nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30321 MiAaI MiAaI Custody Evaluations When There Are Allegations of Domestic Violence [electronic resource] Practices, Beliefs and Recommendations of Professional Evaluators in New York City, 1997-2009 Michael S. Davis , Chris S. O'Sullivan , Kim Susser , Marjory D. Fields 2013-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 30321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the beliefs and investigative practices of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers who had been appointed by a court to evaluate families in disputed custody cases when there were allegations of domestic violence. The research team conducted a Case Review study (Part 1) and administered an Evaluator Survey to corresponding case evaluators (Part 2) between August 2007 and December 2009. The case review study was implemented through four private non-profit legal services agencies in New York City that provide free legal representation to domestic violence victims in civil proceedings including custody and visitation litigation. A total of 69 cases involving custody or visitation issues that were litigated and resolved between 1997 and 2007 were identified for inclusion in the study. The case review study involved the development of a Coding Scale for Custody Evaluations with Domestic Violence (DV) Allegations in order to rate the characteristics of the custody evaluations and the court outcomes. Raters coded each of the 69 cases in the case review sample with the Evaluation Coding Scale. The research team administered the Evaluator Survey (Part 2) to 14 custody evaluators who had completed evaluation reports for the cases in the Part 1 case review study. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 abuse icpsr child custody icpsr child custody hearings icpsr courts icpsr divorce icpsr domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr evaluation icpsr family courts icpsr family relationships icpsr family violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr legal aid icpsr parents icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr social services icpsr social work icpsr spouse abuse icpsr violence icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD V. Courts Davis, Michael S. O'Sullivan, Chris S. Susser, Kim Fields, Marjory D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31521 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31521 MiAaI MiAaI General Social Survey, 1972-2010 [Cumulative File] [electronic resource] Tom W. Smith , Peter V. Marsden , Michael Hout 2013-02-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31521 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The General Social Surveys (GSS) were designed as part of a data diffusion project in 1972. The GSS replicated questionnaire items and wording in order to facilitate time-trend studies. The latest survey, GSS 2010, includes a cumulative file that merges all 28 General Social Surveys into a single file containing data from 1972 to 2010. The items appearing in the surveys are one of three types: Permanent questions that occur on each survey, rotating questions that appear on two out of every three surveys (1973, 1974, and 1976, or 1973, 1975, and 1976), and a few occasional questions such as split ballot experiments that occur in a single survey. The 2010 surveys included four topic modules: quality of working life, science, shared capitalism, and CDC high risk behaviors. The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) module included in the 2010 survey was environment. The data also contain several variables describing the demographic characteristics of the respondents. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1 divorce icpsr dissent icpsr drug use icpsr economic issues icpsr abortion icpsr Affirmative Action icpsr employment icpsr agriculture icpsr AIDS icpsr environment icpsr environmental attitudes icpsr environmental protection icpsr ethnicity icpsr euthanasia icpsr alcohol icpsr altruism icpsr citizenship icpsr prejudice icpsr privacy icpsr race relations icpsr expenditures icpsr families icpsr foreign affairs icpsr freedom icpsr gender icpsr gender issues icpsr racial attitudes icpsr religion icpsr school prayer icpsr science icpsr sexual behavior icpsr sexual preference icpsr smoking icpsr social classes icpsr social inequality icpsr social mobility icpsr social networks icpsr Social Security icpsr sports icpsr suicide icpsr taxes icpsr technology icpsr television icpsr terminal illnesses icpsr terrorism icpsr unemployment icpsr welfare services icpsr work icpsr civil rights icpsr communism icpsr birth control icpsr business icpsr capital punishment icpsr children icpsr community participation icpsr compensation icpsr computer use icpsr corporations icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr democracy icpsr gender roles icpsr government icpsr health icpsr housing icpsr human rights icpsr hunting icpsr immigration icpsr income icpsr industry icpsr Jews icpsr labor unions icpsr marijuana icpsr marriage icpsr media coverage icpsr mental health icpsr military draft icpsr military service icpsr national identity icpsr occupations icpsr parents icpsr physicians icpsr police icpsr politics icpsr patients icpsr poverty icpsr AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States Smith, Tom W. Marsden, Peter V. Hout, Michael Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31521 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30103 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30103 MiAaI MiAaI How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST), Wave I 2009, Wave II 2010, Wave III 2011, United States [electronic resource] Michael J. Rosenfeld , Reuben J. Thomas , Maja Falcon 2013-01-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30103 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) surveyed how Americans met their spouses and romantic partners, and compared traditional to non-traditional couples. This study was conducted in three waves. During the first wave, information was gathered about both the respondent and their partner including age, level of education, parents' level of education, religion, and their political party affiliation. Respondents were queried on their relationship status (married, boyfriend/girlfriend, sexual partner, romantic partner) as well as the gender, ethnicity, and race of their current partner. They were also asked about their living arrangements with their partner such as whether they lived in a house, apartment, etc. Additionally, respondents were asked the country, state, and city the respondent and/or the respondent's partner resided in most from birth to age 16, whether the couple was currently living together or had ever lived together, and whether the couple attended the same high school, college/university, or grew up in the same town. Information was collected on the legal status of the relationship (marriage, domestic partnership, or civil union), the city/state where the partnership was legalized, and how many times the respondent had previously been married. Respondents were also queried about how often they visited with relatives, which gender they were most attracted to, their earned income in 2008, and the length of their current relationship. Finally, respondents were asked to recall how, when, and where they met their partner, how their parents felt about their partner, and to describe the perceived quality of their relationship. The second wave followed-up with respondents one year after wave 1, and information was collected on respondents' changes, if any, in marital status, relationship status, living arrangements, and reasons for separation where applicable. The third wave followed-up with respondents one year after the second wave, and collected information on respondents' relationships reported in the first two waves, again including any changes in the status of the relationship and reasons for separation. This version of the data is being released in two parts, with part one a public use and part two a restricted use. The public use release contains the addition of nine variables including demographic information such as race, household income, whether the respondent was born outside of the United States, whether their zip code was located within a rural area, and where the respondent spent most of his or her time living between birth and 16 years old. The restricted use version contains the previous variables as well as FIPS codes for state of marriage and state of residence, town or city where the respondent was raised, and variables revised by the Principal Investigator (Q24 and Q35), consisting of respondent answers to how they first met their partner and the quality of their relationship in their own words. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30103.v5 civil union icpsr dating (social) icpsr divorce icpsr domestic partnership icpsr gays and lesbians icpsr gender icpsr living arrangements icpsr love icpsr marital status icpsr marriage icpsr religious affiliation icpsr sexual preference icpsr ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States Rosenfeld, Michael J. Thomas, Reuben J. Falcon, Maja Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30103 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30103.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34647 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34647 MiAaI MiAaI Japan 2009 National Survey on Family and Economic Conditions (NSFEC) [electronic resource] Minja Choe , Noriko Tsuya , Ronald Rindfuss , Larry Bumpass 2013-06-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34647 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Japan 2009 National Survey on Family and Economic Conditions (NSFEC) queries a targeted age cohort of Japanese adults on various facets of familial and economic life. The collection, assembled by the Keio University, features two components: (1) a new cross-sectional survey of 3,112 respondents from a nationally representative sample of Japanese men and women aged 20-49 years, and (2) a 2009 follow-up survey of 2,356 out of 4,482 original respondents from the Japan 2000 NSFEC. Respondents were asked questions regarding child rearing, household division of labor, gender roles, and educational background and employment of parents. Respondents were also probed for opinions on marriage, divorce, cohabitation, sexual activity outside of marriage, and children born out of wedlock. Demographic information includes age, sex, education, number of siblings, marital status, household income, home ownership, and number, age, and sex of children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34647.v1 attitudes icpsr child care icpsr child rearing icpsr children icpsr cohabit icpsr commuting (travel) icpsr cooking icpsr dating (social) icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr divorce icpsr educational objectives icpsr employment icpsr extended families icpsr family background icpsr family life icpsr family planning icpsr family relationships icpsr fertility icpsr gender roles icpsr household income icpsr housework icpsr housing icpsr income icpsr marital status icpsr marriage icpsr parents icpsr premarital sex icpsr public opinion icpsr shopping icpsr siblings icpsr spouses icpsr unwed mothers icpsr work icpsr working hours icpsr working mothers icpsr ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender ICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United States Choe, Minja Tsuya, Noriko Rindfuss, Ronald Bumpass, Larry Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34647 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34647.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29582 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29582 MiAaI MiAaI Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newlywed Couples, 1998-2004, Louisiana [electronic resource] Steven L. Nock , Laura A. Sanchez , James D. Wright 2012-06-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29582 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. In 1997, Louisiana enacted a covenant marriage law which gave couples an alternative to a conventional marriage license. By requiring premarital counseling and proof of fault for a subsequent divorce, along with other features, covenant marriages were intended to be more difficult both to enter and to exit. The Marriage Matters panel survey was designed to examine the effects of covenant marriage on rates of marital dissolution, relationship quality, and other outcomes. The data were collected in three waves. Wave 1 was collected approximately 3 to 6 months after marriage. Respondents were asked questions about their recent marriage, the time leading up to their recent marriage, premarital counseling, convenant marriage, previous marriages, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, satisfaction in marriage, household responsibilities, their background, health and happiness, their social and political views, and about the questionnaire itself. Wave 2 was administered approximately 18 months after the first wave. The second wave queried respondents on their marriage today, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. Wave 3 was administered 12 to 24 months after the second wave. Respondents answered questions on their marriage today, views about marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, the celebration of holidays, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. In the divorce questionnaire, the following topics were addressed: how things stand at the moment, feelings about their marriage, arguments during their marriage, social life since the separation or divorce, their health and well-being, moving to a divorce agreement, advice and counseling, the divorce process and convenant marriage, and household income the year before and after the separation. Demographic information collected across all three waves includes: age, gender, religious participation, employment status, education level, number of children birthed or adopted, household composition, and household income. Demographic information collected in Wave 1 only includes: race, religious affiliation, number of previous marriages, and political affiliation. Demographic information collected through the divorce questionnaire includes: gender, marital status, and personal and partner income. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1 adultery icpsr children icpsr conflict resolution icpsr dating (social) icpsr divorce icpsr domestic responsibilities icpsr domestic violence icpsr educational background icpsr employment icpsr family background icpsr family conflict icpsr family relations icpsr health icpsr household composition icpsr income icpsr life satisfaction icpsr marital relations icpsr marital satisfaction icpsr marital status icpsr marriage icpsr marriage ceremonies icpsr marriage counseling icpsr mental health icpsr political attitudes icpsr religious beliefs icpsr remarriage icpsr social attitudes icpsr social issues icpsr social values icpsr spouses icpsr ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender Nock, Steven L. Sanchez, Laura A. Wright, James D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29582 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1