nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09729 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09729 MiAaI MiAaI Access to Justice in Ontario, 1985-1988 [electronic resource] W.A. Bogart , Neil Vidmar 1999-11-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9729 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection, which was designed to assess experiences with the Ontario, Canada, civil justice system, is a replication and extension of a survey conducted by the Civil Litigation Research Project at the University of Wisconsin. Interviews were conducted with the heads of households. Questions were asked about the nature of the problem, e.g., auto accident, work injury, discrimination, problems with landlord, violations of privacy, or victimization. Questions were also asked about actions taken in response to the problem, such as whether a lawyer was contacted, reasons for not contacting a lawyer, whether non-lawyer assistance was sought, whether a claim was made, and reasons for not making a claim. Finally, questions were asked about the household's experience with the Ontario justice system if a claim was made, including whether there was a trial or a hearing, how much the lawyer charged, evaluation of the result, satisfaction with the result, evaluation of the cost, perceived delay, agreement reached, and compensation awarded. Major demographic variables include age, occupation, number of persons in household, language, ethnic background, religion, education, and family income. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09729.v1 attorneys icpsr civil rights icpsr discrimination icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr justice icpsr lawsuits icpsr privacy icpsr traffic accidents icpsr victim compensation icpsr victimization icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Bogart, W.A. Vidmar, Neil Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9729 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09729.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09223 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09223 MiAaI MiAaI Analyzing Trial Time in California, Colorado, and New Jersey, 1986 [electronic resource] Dale Anne Sipes , Mary Elsner Oram 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9223 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study of nine courts was undertaken to identify procedural factors that can be used to reduce the length of criminal and civil trials without impairing fairness. The data collection provides direct information on the actual amount of time consumed by various trial segments and the perceived length of trial segments as gauged by judges and attorneys. In addition, data are supplied on the legal community's attitudes toward existing trial length, reasons for it, and judicial control over it. The trial case file contains information on types of cases and trials, estimated trial length, type of disposition, type of defense attorney, number of claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims, number of exhibits introduced, number of expert and lay witnesses called by the defense, number of peremptory challenges, and day and time the trial ended. The questionnaire data contain information on professional experiences, number of cases tried per month, opinions about time consumed by each segment of the trial, estimated time used in each segment, and attitudes toward judicial control over the trial length. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09223.v1 attitudes icpsr attorneys icpsr case processing icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judges icpsr time utilization icpsr trial procedures icpsr trials icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sipes, Dale Anne Oram, Mary Elsner Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9223 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09223.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06883 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06883 MiAaI MiAaI Arkansas Juvenile Court Records, 1994 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice and Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6883 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1994 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases) in Arkansas. Inaugurated in 1983, the Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts began to collect data from intake and probation departments on each case disposed during the previous calendar year. The data include a record of each case processed formally with petition and contain an individual record on each family in need of services, delinquency, or dependency/neglect case disposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06883.v1 case processing icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice and Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6883 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06883.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08180 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08180 MiAaI MiAaI Arrests Without Conviction, 1979-1980 [electronic resource] Jacksonville and San Diego Floyd Feeney 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8180 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection includes information on robberies and burglaries in two cities, Jacksonville, Florida, and San Diego, California. The unit of analysis is defendants in felony cases. Information on each defendant includes socioeconomic status, criminal history, weapon usage, relationship to victim, trial procedures, and disposition. Demographic information for each defendant includes sex, race, age, and employment status. There are five files in the dataset. Parts 4 and 5 must be merged to form the complete Jacksonville burglaries dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08180.v1 acquittals icpsr arrests icpsr burglary icpsr conviction rates icpsr court cases icpsr criminal histories icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felony courts icpsr robbery icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trials icpsr weapons icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Feeney, Floyd Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8180 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08180.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07808 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07808 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Local Legal Culture [electronic resource] Practitioner Norms in Four Criminal Courts, 1979 Thomas W. Jr. Church 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7808 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study attempts to operationalize the concept of local legal culture by examining differences in the processing of twelve hypothetical criminal cases in four criminal courts. Questionnaires asking how these hypothetical cases should best be handled were administered to judges, district attorneys, and defense attorneys in four cities: Bronx County (New York City), New York, Detroit, Michigan, Miami, Florida, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In each city, the presiding judge, prosecutor, and head of the public defender's office were informed of the project. Questionnaires were distributed to prosecuting attorneys and public defenders by their supervisors. Judges were contacted in person or given questionnaires with a cover letter from the presiding judge. All questionnaires were completed anonymously and returned separately by respondents. The variables include number of years the respondent had been in the criminal justice system, preferred mode of disposition and of sentencing for each of the twelve cases, and the respondents' predictions of the probability of conviction in each case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07808.v1 attorneys icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judges icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD V. Courts Church, Thomas W. Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7808 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07808.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02730 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02730 MiAaI MiAaI Assessment of a Single-Purpose Substance Abuse Facility for Committed Juvenile Offenders in Virginia, 1995-1997 [electronic resource] Jill A. Gordon 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2730 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of this data collection was to provide a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of treatment offered at the Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center, a substance abuse treatment facility in Virginia for convicted male offenders that began operation in late 1993. The center uses a holistic approach in the treatment of youth to identify the triggers for substance abuse and to investigate the relationship between substance abuse and delinquent behavior. For the facility assessment, various types of data from the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice were gathered. Baseline data on each juvenile were obtained from the department's Reception and Diagnostic Center and consisted of demographic information and I.Q. scores, criminal history, and substance abuse history. Demographic variables include the youth's race, last grade placement, and with whom the youth lived. Youths' scores on standardized tests were also compiled, including SASSI, verbal I.Q., performance I.Q., and full-scale I.Q. scores. Criminal histories covered whether the committing offense was a felony or misdemeanor, the type of committing offense, the total number of committing offenses, whether a prior offense was a felony or a misdemeanor, the type of prior offense, the total number of prior offenses, the age at first criminal adjudication, age at commitment, and degree of delinquency. Alcohol and drug use data focused on the age at which alcohol was first used, number of times alcohol was used in the past year, age at which marijuana was first used, number of times marijuana was used in the past month, and whether the youth ever used cocaine, crack, inhalants, speed, depressants, hallucinogens, or other drugs. Another source of information was the youths' parole officers, who provided data on youths' criminal offending status and substance abuse at three, six, and twelve months after release from the center. Data obtained from parole officers assessing youths' improvement after leaving the center include whether they were rearrested, the type of offense if rearrested, the total number of offenses rearrested for, disposition, most serious offense overall, and youths' overall drug use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 treatment outcomes icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug law offenses icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Gordon, Jill A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2730 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09664 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09664 MiAaI MiAaI Augmented Federal Probation, Sentencing, and Supervision Information System, 1985 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9664 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United States Sentencing Commission, established by the 98th Congress, is an independent agency in the judicial branch of government. The Commission recommends guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. These data were collected to determine whether sentencing disparities existed and whether the guidelines were adequate. Basic information in the collection includes a description of the offense, characterization of the defendant's background and criminal record, method of disposition of the case, and sentence imposed. Felony and misdemeanor cases are included while petty offense cases are excluded. Three types of additional information were used to augment the existing data: (1) more detailed offense and offender characteristics identified by the United States Sentencing Commission but coded by federal probation officers, (2) actual time served in prison from the SENTRY data file of the United States Bureau of Prisons, and (3) information necessary to estimate prospective release dates from the hearing files of the United States Parole Commission. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09664.v2 criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal offenses icpsr felony offenses icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr offenders icpsr probation icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9664 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09664.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02679 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02679 MiAaI MiAaI Bethlehem [Pennsylvania] Police Family Group Conferencing Project, 1993-1997 [electronic resource] Paul McCold , Benjamin Wachtel 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2679 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. ssues include ratings on danger, victims, frustration, external activities, complaints, workload, and driving. In Parts 4 to 9, researchers asked offenders, parents of offenders, and victims about their perceptions of how their cases were handled by the justice system and the fairness of the process, their attitudes and beliefs about the justice system, and their attitudes toward the victim and offender. Variables include whether the respondent was satisfied with the way the justice system handled the case, if the offender was held accountable for the offense, if meeting with the victim was helpful, if the respondent was surprised by anything in the conference, if the respondent told the victim/offender how he/she felt, if there was an opportunity to reach an agreement acceptable to all, if the offender/parents apologized, if the victim/parents had a better opinion of the offender after the conference, what the respondent's attitude toward the conference was, if the respondent would recommend a conference to others, if the offender was pressured to do all the talking, if the offender was treated with respect, if victim participation was insincere, if the respondent had a better understanding of how the victim was affected, if the victim only wanted to be paid back, and if conferences were responsive to needs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02679.v1 assault icpsr case processing icpsr disorderly conduct icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr family counseling icpsr harassment icpsr petty theft icpsr pretrial intervention icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr program evaluation icpsr property crime icpsr restorative justice icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McCold, Paul Wachtel, Benjamin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2679 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02679.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09790 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09790 MiAaI MiAaI Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City [electronic resource] Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice System Processing, 1983-1984, 1986 Jeffrey Fagan , Steven Belenko , Bruce D. Johnson 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9790 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection compares a sample of persons arrested for offenses related to crack cocaine with a sample arrested for offenses related to powdered cocaine. The collection is one of two parts of a study designed to examine the characteristics of crack users and sellers, the impact of large numbers of crack-related offenders on the criminal justice system, and their effects on drug treatment and community programs. Official arrest records and supplementary data bases are used to analyze the official arrest, conviction, and incarceration histories of powdered cocaine and crack defendants. Questions addressed by the collection include: (1) How are defendants charged with crack-related offenses different from defendants charged with offenses related to powdered cocaine? (2) Is there a difference between the ways the criminal justice system handles crack offenders and powdered cocaine offenders in pretrial detention, charges filed, case dispositions, and sentencing? (3) How do the criminal careers of crack offenders compare with the criminal careers of powdered cocaine offenders, especially in terms of total arrest rates, frequencies of nondrug crimes, and frequencies of violent crimes? (4) Is violence more strongly associated with crack dealing than with powdered cocaine dealing? and (5) How does the developmental history of powdered cocaine sales and possession compare with the history of crack sales and possession? Variables include demographic information such as gender, residence, and race, arrest, conviction, and incarceration histories, prior criminal record, community ties, and court outcomes of the arrests. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 imprisonment icpsr arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr crack cocaine icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr criminality icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Fagan, Jeffrey Belenko, Steven Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9790 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06587 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06587 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 1992 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6587 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey is the first broad-based, systematic examination of the nature of civil litigation in state general jurisdiction trial courts. Data collection was carried out by the National Center for State Courts with assistance from the National Association of Criminal Justice Planners and the United States Bureau of the Census. The data collection produced two datasets. Part 1, Tort, Contract, and Real Property Rights Data, is a merged sample of approximately 30,000 tort, contract, and real property rights cases disposed during the 12-month period ending June 30, 1992. Part 2, Civil Jury Cases Data, is a sample of about 6,500 jury trial cases disposed over the same time period. Data collected include information about litigants, case type, disposition type, processing time, case outcome, and award amounts for civil jury cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06587.v5 case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XII. Legal Systems United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6587 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06587.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02883 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02883 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2883 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1996, the Bureau of Justice Statistics awarded a grant to the National Center for State Courts to gather detailed information on tort, contract, and real property rights trial cases in 45 jurisdictions chosen to represent the 75 most populous counties in the nation. The result is this survey, which is a systematic examination of civil trial cases disposed in state general jurisdiction courts. The study expands the 1992 civil jury study, CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 1992 (ICPSR 6587), by specifically sampling bench and jury trial cases. Information gathered includes the type of case, the presence of legal representation, the type of litigation, the amount of compensatory damages awarded, the amount of punitive damages awarded, and case processing time. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02883.v4 disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr court system icpsr case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2883 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02883.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03957 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03957 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3957 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examined general civil cases (torts, contracts, and real property) disposed of by bench or jury trial in the nation's 75 most populous counties in 2001. Information reported includes the type of case, types of plaintiffs and defendants, trial winners, amount of total damages awarded, amount of punitive damages awarded, and case processing time. This is the third in a series of data collections begun in 1992: CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 1992 (ICPSR 6587), and CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 1996 (ICPSR 2883). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03957.v3 case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr state courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3957 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03957.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23862 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23862 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 23862 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Civil Justice Survey of State Courts (CJSSC), 2005 is a systematic examination of general civil (that is, tort, contract, and real property) cases disposed of by bench or jury trial in a national sample of state courts of general jurisdiction in 2005. This study expands on the 1992, 1996, and 2001 CJSSC by collecting a nationally representative sample of bench and jury trials concluded in 156 urban, suburban, and rural counties. Prior iterations of the CJSSC focused on general civil cases concluded by bench or jury trial in a sample of the nation's 75 most populous counties. The 2005 CJSSC was designed and carried out by the National Center for State Courts. Westat designed the national sampling framework for this survey. The data collection produced two datasets. The first contains information on general civil (tort, contract, and real property) cases disposed of by bench or jury trial in a national sample of counties in 2005. Detailed case level information was obtained on these trials, including types of civil cases litigated at trial, characteristics of litigants involved in trials, who wins in trials, compensatory award amounts, punitive damages, case processing times, and post-trial litigation. The other data file contains aggregate information on the number of general civil trial and nontrial dispositions that occurred in 2005 in CJSCC counties that had the capacity to provide these data. This is the fourth in a series of data collections begun in 1992 [CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 1992 (ICPSR 6587), CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 1996 (ICPSR 2883), and CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 2001 (ICPSR 3957)]. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23862.v2 state courts icpsr case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23862 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23862.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32501 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32501 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Justice Survey of Trials on Appeal, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-01-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32501 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Bureau of Justice Statistics’ (BJS) Civil Justice Survey of Trials on Appeal (CJSTA) was based on 26,950 general civil (i.e., tort, contract, and real property) cases that were disposed by bench or jury trial in 156 counties participating in the 2005 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts (ICPSR 23862). Subsequently, 3,970 of those cases were appealed to 84 appellate courts in 35 states. This data collection examines civil bench and jury trials concluded in state trial courts in 2005 that were appealed to an intermediate appellate court or court of last resort. It is the first report based on data collected in the Bureau of Justice Statistics' (BJS) Civil Justice Survey of Trials on Appeal (CJSTA). The CJSTA included information from court records on civil trials concluded in 2005 and tracked the subsequent appeals from 2005 through March 2010. Information collected included the types of civil cases appealed, appeals dismissed or withdrawn before being decided on the merits, and appeals resulting in the trial court decision being reversed or affirmed. The time from the filing of an appeal to final appellate court disposition was also measured. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32501.v1 case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32501 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32501.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07994 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07994 MiAaI MiAaI Civil Litigation in the United States, 1977-1979 [electronic resource] Herbert M. Kritzer , David M. Trubek , William L.F. Felstiner , Joel B. Grossman , Austin Sarat 1994-02-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7994 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Civil Litigation Research Project, based at the University of Wisconsin Law School, was organized in 1979 to develop a large database on dispute processing and litigation and to collect information on the costs of civil litigation. Data were gathered on topics such as negotiation proceedings, relationship between lawyer and client, and organizations' influence on the outcome of a dispute. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07994.v3 civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal systems icpsr plea negotiations icpsr arrests icpsr attorneys icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Kritzer, Herbert M. Trubek, David M. Felstiner, William L.F. Grossman, Joel B. Sarat, Austin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7994 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07994.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25929 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25929 MiAaI MiAaI Crime Control Effects of Prosecuting Intimate Partner Violence in Hamilton County, Ohio, 1993-1998 [electronic resource] Joel H. Garner , Christopher D. Maxwell 2011-06-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25929 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. hood and proportion of college graduates in the neighborhood, and a social class factor. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25929.v1 arrest records icpsr communities icpsr criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr offenders icpsr recidivism icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Garner, Joel H. Maxwell, Christopher D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25929 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25929.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07750 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07750 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Case Processing in Metropolitan Courts, 1976 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7750 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1977 the National Center for State Courts, in cooperation with the National Conference of Metropolitan Courts, began a research and demonstration project on the delay in processing criminal cases in major metropolitan courts. The objectives were (1) to determine the scope and extent of the delay in such courts, (2) to identify factors associated with the delay, and (3) to suggest and ultimately test techniques that might work to reduce the delay. The variables include geographic location, disposition type, most serious charge against the defendant, and dates of arrest, trial, disposition, and sentencing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07750.v1 case processing icpsr cities icpsr courts icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7750 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07750.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09293 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09293 MiAaI MiAaI Delinquency in a Birth Cohort II [electronic resource] Philadelphia, 1958-1988 Robert M. Figlio , Paul E. Tracy , Marvin E. Wolfgang 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9293 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to follow a birth cohort born in Philadelphia during 1958 with a special focus on delinquent activities as children and as adults. The respondents were first interviewed in DELINQUENCY IN A BIRTH COHORT IN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, 1945-1963 (ICPSR 7729). Part 1 offers basic demographic information, such as sex, race, date of birth, church membership, age, and socioeconomic status, on each cohort member. Two files supply offense data: Part 2 pertains to offenses committed while a juvenile and Part 3 details offenses as an adult. Offense-related variables include most serious offense, police disposition, location of crime, reason for police response, complainant's sex, age, and race, type of victimization, date of offense, number of victims, average age of victims, number of victims killed or hospitalized, property loss, weapon involvement, and final court disposition. Part 4, containing follow-up survey interview data collected in 1988, was designed to investigate differences in the experiences and attitudes of individuals with varying degrees of involvement with the juvenile justice system. Variables include individual histories of delinquency, health, household composition, marriage, parent and respondent employment and education, parental contacts with the legal system, and other social and demographic variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09293.v3 adult offenders icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr police response icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Figlio, Robert M. Tracy, Paul E. Wolfgang, Marvin E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9293 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09293.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09979 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09979 MiAaI MiAaI Drug Abuse as a Predictor of Rearrest or Failure to Appear in Court in New York City, 1984 [electronic resource] Eric D. Wish 2000-04-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9979 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of drug use/drug use trends among booked arrestees in New York City and to analyze the relationship between drug use and crime. The data, which were collected over a six-month period, were generated from volunteer interviews with male arrestees, the analyses of their urine specimens, police and court records of prior criminal behavior and experience with the criminal justice system, and records of each arrestee's current case, including court warrants, rearrests, failures to appear, and court dispositions. Demographic variables include age, education, vocational training, marital status, residence, and employment. Items relating to prior and current drug use and drug dependency are provided, along with results from urinalysis tests for opiates, cocaine, PCP, and methadone. The collection also contains arrest data for index crimes and subsequent court records pertaining to those arrests (number of court warrants issued, number of pretrial rearrests, types of rearrests, failure to appear in court, and court dispositions), and prior criminal records (number of times arrested and convicted for certain offenses). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09979.v1 drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr police records icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr urinalysis icpsr arrest records icpsr court cases icpsr criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug abuse icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Wish, Eric D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9979 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09979.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09348 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09348 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of "United States vs. Leon" on Police Search Warrant Practices, 1984-1985 [electronic resource] Craig D. Uchida , Timothy S. Bynum 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9348 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the impact of the Supreme Court decision in "UNITED STATES VS. LEON" on police search warrant applications in seven jurisdictions. For this collection, which is one of the few data collections currently available for the study of warrant activities, data were gathered from search warrant applications filed during a three-month period before the Leon decision and three months after it. Each warrant application can be tracked through the criminal justice system to its disposition. The file contains variables on the contents of the warrant such as rank of applicant, specific area of search, offense type, material sought, basis of evidence, status of informants, and reference to good faith. Additional variables concern the results of the warrant application and include items such as materials seized, arrest made, cases charged by prosecutor, type of attorney, whether a motion to suppress the warrant was filed, outcomes of motions, appeal status, and number of arrestees. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09348.v1 criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr search warrants icpsr Supreme Court decisions icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Uchida, Craig D. Bynum, Timothy S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9348 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09348.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03319 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03319 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of No-Drop Policies for Domestic Violence Cases in San Diego, California, Omaha, Nebraska, Klamath Falls, Oregon, and Everett, Washington, 1996-2000 [electronic resource] Barbara E. Smith , Robert Davis , Laura B. Nickles , Heather J. Davies 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3319 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. se the victim verbally or physically are also included. Demographic variables on the victim include race, income, and level of education. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03319.v1 defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr judicial process icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr victim safety icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr court cases icpsr criminal histories icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Smith, Barbara E. Davis, Robert Nickles, Laura B. Davies, Heather J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3319 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03319.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07710 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07710 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Pre-Trial Settlement Conference [electronic resource] Dade County, Florida, Criminal Court, 1979 Wayne A. Kerstetter 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7710 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study reports on the implementation in Dade County, Florida, of a proposal to involve, on a voluntary basis, victims, defendants, and police in a judicial plea negotiation conference. The study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department of Justice. Parts 1-3, Defendants, Victims, and Police files, consist of responses to questionnaires given to defendants, victims, and police. The questionnaires were administered during 20-minute interviews, conducted after the case had been completed. The interview instruments were designed to collect data on three major issues: (1) the extent to which respondents reported participation in the processing of their cases, (2) respondents' knowledge of the way their cases were processed, and (3) respondents' attitudes toward the disposition of their cases and toward the criminal justice system. Part 4 is the Conference Data File. During the pretrial settlement conference, an observer wrote down in sequence as much as possible of the verbal behavior. After the session, the observer made some subjective ratings, provided descriptive data about the conclusion of the session, and classified comments into one of the following categories: (1) Facts of the Case, (2) Prior Record, (3) Law and Practices, (4) Maximum Sentence, (5) Prediction of Trial Outcome, (6) Conference Precedent, (7) Personal Background History, and (8) Recommendations. Information in Part 5, the Case Information Data File, was drawn from court records and includes type of case, number of charges, sentence type, sentence severity (stated and perceived), seriousness of offense, date of arrest, date of arraignment, date of conference, prior incarcerations, and defendant background. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07710.v1 courts icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr plea negotiation icpsr police officers icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr victims icpsr case processing icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Kerstetter, Wayne A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7710 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07710.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06557 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06557 MiAaI MiAaI Expanded United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1946-1968 Terms [electronic resource] Harold J. Spaeth 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6557 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is an expanded version of UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL DATABASE, 1953-1996 TERMS (ICPSR 9422), encompassing all aspects of United States Supreme Court decision-making from the beginning of the Vinson Court in 1946 to the end of the Warren Court in 1968. Two major differences distinguish the expanded version of the database from the original collection: the addition of data on the decisions of the Vinson Court, and the inclusion of the conference votes of the Vinson and Warren courts. Whereas the original collection contained only the vote as reported in the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT REPORTS, the expanded database includes all votes cast in conference. Concomitant with the expansion of the database is a shift in its basic unit of analysis. The original collection contained every case in which at least one justice wrote an opinion, and cases without opinions were excluded. This version includes every case in which the Court cast a conference vote, with and without opinions. The justices cast many more votes than they wrote opinions, and hence, the number of Warren Court records in this version increased by more than a factor of two over the original version. As in the original collection, distinct aspects of the Court's decisions are covered by six types of variables: (1) identification variables including case citation, docket number, unit of analysis, and number of records per unit of analysis, (2) background variables offering information on origin of case, source of case, reason for granting cert, parties to the case, direction of the lower court's decision, and manner in which the Court takes jurisdiction, (3) chronological variables covering date of term of court, chief justice, and natural court, (4) substantive variables including multiple legal provisions, authority for decision, issue, issue areas, and direction of decision, (5) outcome variables supplying information on form of decision, disposition of case, winning party, declaration of unconstitutionality, and multiple memorandum decisions, and (6) voting and opinion variables pertaining to the vote in the case and to the direction of the individual justices' votes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06557.v4 legal history icpsr Supreme Court decisions icpsr Supreme Court justices icpsr twentieth century icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judicial decisions icpsr judicial review icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD V. Courts Spaeth, Harold J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6557 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06557.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03010 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03010 MiAaI MiAaI Factors Related to Domestic Violence Court Dispositions in a Large Midwestern Urban Area, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] [United States] Joanne Belknap , Dee L.R. Graham 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3010 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. appeared in court more than once, actions taken when substance abuse was involved, the importance of injuries in making a decision, attitudes toward battered women, the role of victim advocates and the police, views on restraining orders, and opinion on whether arrest is a deterrent. Demographic variables include age, sex, race, marital status, and years of professional experience. Variables in Part 3, Court Transcript Data, include number and type of charges, pleas, reasons for dismissals, types of evidence submitted by prosecutors and defense, substance abuse by victim and defendant, living arrangements and number of children of victim and defendant, specific type of abuse, injuries sustained, witnesses to injuries, police testimony, verdict, and sentence. Demographic variables include age and sex of defendant and victim and relationship of victim and defendant. In Part 4, Victim Survey Data, victims were asked about their relationship and living arrangements with the defendant, concerns about testifying in court, desired outcomes of case and punishment for defendant, emotional issues related to abuse, health problems, substance abuse, support networks, other violent domestic incidents and injuries, and safety concerns. Part 5 variables measured victims' safety at different stages of the criminal justice process and danger experienced due to further violent incidents, presence of weapons, and threats of homicide or suicide. Parts 6-103 contain the qualitative interview data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03010.v1 battered women icpsr case processing icpsr decision making icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr offenders icpsr sentencing icpsr treatment programs icpsr urban areas icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Belknap, Joanne Graham, Dee L.R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3010 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03010.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07245 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07245 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases, 1962-1964 [electronic resource] Stuart S. Nagel 2011-04-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7245 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study collected data from both civil and criminal federal cases tried in the fiscal years 1962-1963 and 1963-1964. Procedural, jurisdictional, and other legal information is provided, including the disposition of each case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07245.v1 case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Nagel, Stuart S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7245 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07245.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22300 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22300 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Database, 2007 Federal Judicial Center 2013-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 22300 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22300.v3 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22300 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22300.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08429 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08429 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 1970-2000 Federal Judicial Center 2012-05-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 8429 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from 94 district and 12 appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. For the appellate and civil data, the unit of analysis is a single case. The unit of analysis for the criminal data is a single defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08429.v7 appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8429 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08429.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03415 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03415 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2001 Federal Judicial Center 2012-06-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3415 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from 94 district and 12 appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. For the appellate and civil data, the unit of analysis is a single case. The unit of analysis for the criminal data is a single defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03415.v3 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3415 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03415.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04059 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04059 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2002 Federal Judicial Center 2012-06-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4059 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04059.v3 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4059 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04059.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04026 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04026 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2003 Federal Judicial Center 2012-06-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4026 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04026.v6 trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4026 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04026.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04348 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04348 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2004 Federal Judicial Center 2013-01-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4348 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04348.v3 civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4348 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04348.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04382 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2005 Federal Judicial Center 2013-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04382.v3 administration icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr appellate courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04382.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04685 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04685 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2006 Federal Judicial Center 2013-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4685 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04685.v3 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4685 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04685.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25002 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25002 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2008 Federal Judicial Center 2012-11-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25002 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25002.v5 pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25002 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25002.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29661 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29661 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2009 Federal Judicial Center 2012-11-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29661 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29661.v3 case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29661 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29661.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30401 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2010 Federal Judicial Center 2012-11-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and termination. The termination data (archived in this data collection) contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data (archived as a separate data collection) contain only filing information on the most recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate and civil terminations data is the case. This collection also contains data on criminal cases in federal courts. However, the unit of analysis for the criminal data is the defendant, and a defendant can be included in several cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30401.v2 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr legal systems icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30401.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33622 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33622 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base, 2011 Federal Judicial Center 2013-01-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33622 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and termination. The termination data (archived in this data collection) contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data (archived as a separate data collection) contain only filing information on the most recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate and civil terminations data is the case. This collection also contains data on criminal cases in federal courts. However, the unit of analysis for the criminal data is the defendant, and a defendant can be included in several cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33622.v2 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33622 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33622.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29281 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Appellate and Civil Pending Data, 2011 Federal Judicial Center 2013-02-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 29281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from district and appellate court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and termination. The termination data (archived as separate data collections each year) contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data (archived as this data collection and updated annually) contain only filing information on the most recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate and civil pending data is the case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29281.v2 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29281.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04303 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04303 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1994 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4303 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending dataset. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04303.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4303 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04303.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04304 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04304 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1995 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4304 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending dataset. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04304.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4304 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04304.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04305 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04305 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1996 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4305 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending dataset. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04305.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr defendants icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4305 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04305.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04306 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04306 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1997 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4306 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending data set. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04306.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4306 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04306.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04086 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04086 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1998 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4086 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data includes all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending data set. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04086.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr defendants icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4086 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04086.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04088 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04088 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1999 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4088 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data includes all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending data set. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04088.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4088 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04088.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04249 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04249 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2000 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4249 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records in this file are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end of the year 2000 included in a separate pending dataset not currently in this collection. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04249.v1 appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4249 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04249.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04250 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04250 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2001 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4250 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1,1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records in this file are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end of the year 2001 included in a separate pending dataset, not currently in this collection. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04250.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4250 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04250.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04251 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04251 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2002 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4251 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records in this file are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end of the year 2002 included in a separate pending dataset, not currently in this collection. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04251.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4251 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04251.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04252 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04252 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2003 Federal Judicial Center 2011-04-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4252 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993, and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending dataset. The records in Part 1, Terminations Data, 2003, include cases that terminated in the year 2003. Part 2, Pending Data, 2003, contains cases still pending in the year 2003. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04252.v1 administration icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4252 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04252.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23080 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23080 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2005 Federal Judicial Center 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 23080 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 2005, that were terminated in the 2005 fiscal year. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23080.v2 legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr administration icpsr judicial decisions icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23080 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23080.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23081 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2006 Federal Judicial Center 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 23081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 2006, that were terminated in the 2006 fiscal year. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23081.v2 administration icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23081.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23082 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23082 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Court Cases [electronic resource] Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2007 Federal Judicial Center 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 23082 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 2006, and any petitions filed before October 1, 2006, that were still pending on that date. The records are organized according to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end included in a separate pending dataset. The records in Part 1, Terminations Data, 2007, include cases that terminated in the year 2007. The records in Part 2, Pending Data, 2007, include cases that were still pending as of October 1, 2007. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23082.v2 disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr administration icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr records icpsr trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr bankruptcy icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23082 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23082.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09296 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09296 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program Data, 1978-1994 [electronic resource] [United States] Abt Associates, Inc. , The Urban Institute 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9296 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. Data in this collection examine the processing of federal offenders. The Cases Terminated files (Parts 1-3 and 25-28) contain information about defendants in criminal cases filed in the United States Federal District Court and terminated in the calendar years indicated. Defendants in criminal cases may either be individuals or corporations, and there is one record for each defendant in each case terminated. Information on court proceedings, date the case was filed, date the case was terminated, most serious charge, and reason for termination is included. The Docket and Reporting System files (Parts 4-7, 31-34, and 42) include information on suspects in investigative matters that took an hour or more of a United States Attorney's time with one of the following outcomes: (1) the United States Attorney declined to prosecute, (2) the case was filed in Federal District Court, or (3) the matter was disposed by a United States magistrate. Codes for each disposition and change of status are also provided. The Pretrial Services data (Parts 8, 22, 43, and 47) present variables on the circuit, district, and office where the defendant was charged, type of action, year of birth and sex of the defendant, major offense charge, and results of initial and detention hearings. The Parole Decisions data (Part 9) contain information from various parole hearings such as court date, appeal action, reopening decision, sentence, severity of sentence, offense, and race and ethnicity of the defendant. The Offenders Under Supervision files (Parts 15-16 and 37-40) focus on convicted offenders sentenced to probation supervision and federal prisoners released to parole supervision. The Federal Prisoner files (Parts 18 and 20) supply data on when an offender entered and was released from confinement, as well as the amount of time served for any given offense. The Administrative Office of the United States Courts data files (Parts 44, 52, and 53) contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in Federal District Court and terminated in the calendar years indicated. There is one record for each defendant in each case. Variables include the date the case was filed, offense level, AO (Administrative Office) codes, and disposition date. The Bureau of Prisons data (both the Master and Detail files, Parts 45, 46, and 54-57 -- formerly known as the Federal Prisoner files) contain records of sentenced prisoners admitted to or released from federal prison during 1992-1994. These files consist of separate records for each prisoner's commitment to federal prison, and for each sentence imposed on a prisoner for a given commitment to federal prison. The Central System (CS) and Central Charge (CC) files of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) include information about suspects in criminal matters and defendants in criminal cases in 1993-1994. Each defendant in a criminal matter has a master Central System record (Parts 50 and 51) and may have one or more Central Charge records (Parts 48 and 49). The Federal Probation/Supervision Data files (Parts 58 and 59) provide information on supervision procedures and the sequence of events and proceedings in 1992-1994 from the time a case was opened for supervision until the case was terminated. These include reports of parole violations, transfers of supervision to other districts, and case removals due to, for example, rearrest or hospitalization. The Sentencing Commission data (Parts 60 and 61) contain information on federal criminal cases sentenced in 1992-1994 under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09296.v7 trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr case processing icpsr case dismissal icpsr court cases icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr federal prisoners icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr offenders icpsr parole icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial settlement icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr records icpsr sentencing icpsr statistical data icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Abt Associates, Inc. The Urban Institute Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9296 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09296.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08186 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08186 MiAaI MiAaI Forensic Evidence and the Police, 1976-1980 [electronic resource] Joseph L. Peterson , Steve Mihajlovic , Michael Gilliland 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8186 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection focuses on adult cases of serious crime such as homicide (and related death investigations), rape, robbery, aggravated assault/battery, burglary, and arson. Data are included for Peoria, Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, Kansas City, Missouri, and Oakland, California. The data consist of police, court, and laboratory records from reports submitted by police personnel during investigations of suspected criminal offenses. The primary source of information was police case files. Prosecutor and court files were reviewed for information regarding the disposition of suspects who were arrested and formally charged. Crime laboratory reports include information concerning the evidence submitted and the examiner's worksheets, notes, and final results. There are eight files in this dataset. Each of the four cities has one file for cases with physical evidence and one file for cases in which physical evidence was not collected or examined. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08186.v1 arrests icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr crime icpsr crime laboratories icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal investigations icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr evidence icpsr forensic sciences icpsr murder icpsr police records icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD IX. Police Peterson, Joseph L. Mihajlovic, Steve Gilliland, Michael Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8186 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08186.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03252 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03252 MiAaI MiAaI Impact Evaluation of Stop Violence Against Women Grants in Dane County, Wisconsin, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, Jackson County, Missouri, and Stark County, Ohio, 1996-2000 [electronic resource] Brenda K. Uekert , Neal Miller , Cheron Dupree 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3252 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. n on whether there was an existing protective order, whether the victim was interviewed separately, severity of injuries, seizure of weapons, witnesses present, involvement of children, and demeanor of suspect and victim. In Part 7 (Hillsborough County Victim Interview Data) variables focus on whether victims had prior experience with the court, type of physical abuse experienced, injuries from abuse, support from relatives, friends, neighbors, doctor, religious community, or police, assistance from police, satisfaction with police response, expectations about case outcome, why the victim dropped the charges, contact with the prosecutor, criminal justice advocate, and judge, and the outcome of the case. Demographic variables include age, race, number of children, and occupation. Variables in Part 9 (Jackson County Victim Interview Data) relate to when victims were sexually assaulted, if they knew the perpetrator, who was contacted to help, victims' opinions about police and detectives who responded to the case, contact with the prosecutor and victim's advocate, and aspects of the medical examination. Demographic variables include age, race, and marital status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03252.v1 battered women icpsr case processing icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr police response icpsr program evaluation icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Uekert, Brenda K. Miller, Neal Dupree, Cheron Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3252 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03252.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04178 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04178 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of the No Early Release Act (NERA) on Prosecution and Sentencing in New Jersey, 1996-2000 [electronic resource] Candace McCoy , Patrick, Jr. McManimon 2005-02-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4178 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined New Jersey's No Early Release Act (NERA), which became effective in 1997. NERA required that offenders convicted of violent crimes serve at least 85 percent of their sentences before becoming eligible for parole. This study's primary goal was to determine whether prosecutors changed their charging and plea bargaining practices in order to obtain sentences under NERA that were roughly equivalent to those imposed before NERA. Data were obtained from the New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts for 1996 to May 2000. These data included every case in which a crime covered by the No Early Release Act was charged and, for comparison, every case involving a burglary charge, a charge not covered by NERA. These data cover defendants' progress through the New Jersey court system, including the initial charge, indictment, and sentencing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04178.v1 disposition (legal) icpsr mandatory sentences icpsr plea bargains icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing reforms icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McCoy, Candace McManimon, Patrick, Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4178 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04178.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06923 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06923 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Rape Reform Legislation in Six Major Urban Jurisdictions in the United States, 1970-1985 [electronic resource] Julie Horney , Cassia Spohn 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6923 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Despite the fact that most states enacted rape reform legislation by the mid-1980s, empirical research on the effect of these laws was conducted in only four states and for a limited time span following the reform. The purpose of this study was to provide both increased breadth and depth of information about the effect of the rape law changes and the legal issues that surround them. Statistical data on all rape cases between 1970 and 1985 in Atlanta, Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC, were collected from court records. Monthly time-series analyses were used to assess the impact of the reforms on rape reporting, indictments, convictions, incarcerations, and sentences. The study also sought to determine if particular changes, or particular combinations of changes, affected the case processing and disposition of sexual assault cases and whether the effect of the reforms varied with the comprehensiveness of the changes. In each jurisdiction, data were collected on all forcible rape cases for which an indictment or information was filed. In addition to forcible rape, other felony sexual assaults that did not involve children were included. The names and definitions of these crimes varied from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. To compare the pattern of rape reports with general crime trends, reports of robbery and felony assaults during the same general time period were also obtained from the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) from the Federal Bureau of Investigation when available. For the adjudicated case data (Parts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11), variables include month and year of offense, indictment, disposition, four most serious offenses charged, total number of charges indicted, four most serious conviction charges, total number of conviction charges, type of disposition, type of sentence, and maximum jail or prison sentence. The time series data (Parts 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12) provide year and month of indictment, total indictments for rape only and for all sex offenses, total convictions and incarcerations for all rape cases in the month, for those on the original rape charge, for all sex offenses in the month, and for those on the original sex offense charge, percents for each indictment, conviction, and incarceration category, the average maximum sentence for each incarceration category, and total police reports of forcible rape in the month. Interviews were also conducted in each site with judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys, and this information is presented in Part 13. These interviewees were asked to rate the importance of various types of evidence in sexual assault cases and to respond to a series of six hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual history was at issue. Respondents were also presented with a hypothetical case for which some factors were varied to create 12 different scenarios, and they were asked to make a set of judgments about each. Interview data also include respondent's title, sex, race, age, number of years in office, and whether the respondent was in office before and/or after the reform. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06923.v1 disposition (legal) icpsr law reform icpsr rape icpsr rape statistics icpsr sentencing icpsr sexual assault icpsr case processing icpsr convictions (law) icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Horney, Julie Spohn, Cassia Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6923 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06923.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03750 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03750 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Defendants in Criminal Courts (JDCC) [electronic resource] Survey of 40 Counties in the United States, 1998 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3750 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This is an independent sample of juvenile defendants drawn from the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) for 1998 (see ICPSR 2038). SCPS 1998 tracked felony cases filed in May 1998 until final disposition or until one year had elapsed from the date of filing. SCPS 1998 presents data on felony cases filed in approximately 40 of the nation's 75 most populous counties in 1998. These 75 counties account for more than a third of the United States population and approximately half of all reported crimes. The cases from these 40 jurisdictions were weighted to represent all felony filings during the month of May in the 75 most populous counties. Data were collected on arrest charges, demographic characteristics, criminal history, pretrial release and detention, adjudication, and sentencing. Within each sampled site, data were gathered on each juvenile felony case. Cases were tracked through adjudication or for up to one year. The source used to identify the upper age for juveniles and the filing mechanism appropriate to each state was the OJJDP publication, Trying Juveniles as Adults in Criminal Court: An Analysis of State Transfer Provisions (December 1998). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03750.v1 case processing icpsr criminal histories icpsr court cases icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felony courts icpsr felons icpsr juveniles icpsr pretrial detention icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3750 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03750.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09420 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09420 MiAaI MiAaI Mandatory Drug offender Processing Data, 1986 [electronic resource] Alaska, California, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9420 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Consortium for Assessing Drug Control Initiatives, funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and coordinated by the Criminal Justice Statistics Association, collected drug offender processing data from eight states: Alaska, California, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia. The purpose of the project was to track adult drug offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final court disposition, regardless of whether the offender was released without trial, acquitted, or convicted. These data allow researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes drug offenders, to measure the changing volume of drug offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the drug offender population. For purposes of this project, a drug offender was defined as any person who had been charged with a felony drug offense. The data are structured into six segments pertaining to (1) record identification, (2) the offender (date of birth, sex, race, ethnic origin), (3) arrest information (date of arrest, age at arrest, arrest charge code), (4) prosecution information (filed offense code and level, prosecution disposition and date), (5) court disposition information (disposition offense and level, court disposition, final disposition date, final pleading, type of trial), and (6) sentencing information (sentence and sentence date, sentence minimum and maximum). Also included are elapsed time variables. The unit of analysis is the felony drug offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09420.v1 acquittals icpsr arrest procedures icpsr convictions (law) icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug law enforcement icpsr drug offenders icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9420 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09420.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09565 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09565 MiAaI MiAaI Mandatory Drug Offender Processing Data, 1987 [electronic resource] New York Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association 1997-08-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9565 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Consortium for Assessing Drug Control Initiatives, funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and coordinated by the Criminal Justice Statistics Association, collected drug offender processing data from the state of New York. The purpose of the project was to track adult drug offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final court disposition, regardless of whether the offender was released without trial, acquitted, or convicted. These data allow researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes drug offenders, to measure the changing volume of drug offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the drug offender population. For purposes of this project, a drug offender was defined as any person who had been charged with a felony drug offense. The data are structured into six segments pertaining to (1) record identification, (2) the offender (date of birth, sex, race, and ethnic origin), (3) arrest information (date of arrest, age at arrest, arrest charge code), (4) prosecution information (filed offense code and level, prosecution disposition and date), (5) court disposition information (disposition offense and level, court disposition, final disposition date, final pleading, type of trial), and (6) sentencing information (sentence and sentence date, sentence minimum and maximum). Also included are elapsed time variables. The unit of analysis is the felony drug offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09565.v1 adults icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug offenders icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9565 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09565.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07909 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07909 MiAaI MiAaI Massachusetts Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1979 [electronic resource] Sentencing Data Richard F. Sparks 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7909 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report on the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7910) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1980: INMATE SURVEY DATA (ICPSR 7911). The Massachusetts Sentencing Data contains information on a random sample of 1,440 convicted defendants sentenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court between November 1977 and October 1978. The sample represents approximately one-third of the actual number of defendants sentenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court during a one-year period. The cases were selected and coded by the Massachusetts Sentencing Guidelines project during 1979. Variables include information about each defendant's juvenile and adult criminal history, characteristics of the current offense, and the elements of the disposition of the current offense. Demographic data include defendant's age, sex, race, marital status, employment status, occupation, income, number of children, educational attainment, and drug and alcohol use history. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07909.v1 crime icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr evaluation icpsr inmates icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr state courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Sparks, Richard F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7909 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07909.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07776 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07776 MiAaI MiAaI Massachusetts Superior Court Files, 1859-1959 [electronic resource] Michael S. Hindus , Theodore M. Hammett , Barbara M. Hobson 2010-05-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7776 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This dataset contains data about case records created between 1859-1959 in the Massachusetts Superior Court (and its predecessors) for two Massachusetts counties. Part 1 contains data for 1,952 criminal cases with 52 descriptive variables, including: type of crime, year crime was committed, pleas, sentences, appeals, size of file, and demographic characteristics of victim and defendant (e.g., gender, status, residence, and occupation). Eighteen variables describe and rate each case's historical interest. Part 2 contains data on 1,968 civil (law, equity, and divorce) cases, with 82 descriptive variables, such as: relationship between parties, type of complaint, relief sought, disposition, relief granted, number of claims, damages awarded, size of file, and demographic characteristics of plaintiff and defendant (e.g., gender, status, residence, and occupation). Ten variables describe and rate each case's historical interest. In both data files, criteria for historical interest coding include: (1) inherent interest, such as offenses that are not routine (e.g., white-collar crimes, sexual crimes, and serious felonies), parties who are inherently interesting (e.g., famous persons, institutional defendants, and law enforcement personnel), and legal proceedings that are inherently interesting (e.g., alleged violations of prosecutorial or judicial discretion), (2) contexts that are inherently interesting, and (3) extraordinary documentation, such as those that shed light on the legal system (e.g., pardons or letters from citizens' committees), shed light on social history (e.g., the testimony of a woman who moved to the city and inadvertently ended up in a brothel), provide legal/procedural information (e.g., the details of search or a technical challenge to an indictment), and describe public or political history (e.g., milk inspection or zoning laws). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07776.v2 legal systems icpsr nineteenth century icpsr political history icpsr social history icpsr trials icpsr twentieth century icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr civil law icpsr convictions (law) icpsr court cases icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr criminal law icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hindus, Michael S. Hammett, Theodore M. Hobson, Barbara M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7776 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07776.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09447 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09447 MiAaI MiAaI Minnesota Juvenile Court Records, 1984-1987 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice , Minnesota State Court Administration 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9447 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides information on the disposition of juvenile court cases (delinquency, status and dependency) in the state of Minnesota. Data are included on all cases petitioned before the juvenile courts and supply information on sex, race, and birth date of juveniles, court referral date, major allegation, number of law violations, number of prior referrals, detention status, court action, and placement status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09447.v1 court cases icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Minnesota State Court Administration Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9447 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09447.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09448 MiAaI MiAaI Missouri Juvenile Court Records, 1984-1987 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice , Missouri Division of Youth Services 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collections provides information on each juvenile case disposed in the state of Missouri during calendar years 1984-1987. The state of Missouri began collecting and disseminating juvenile court data in 1975 as the result of legislation by the Division of Youth Services within the Department of Social Services. Despite this legislation no binding laws required the courts to submit data to the Division of Youth Services. In 1980, such a law was passed, and data were first collected in 1982 and 1983. The system was automated in 1984, and these data are now available for public use. The data files provide information on juveniles' progress through the juvenile justice system from the time of referral to juvenile court to final disposition. Variables include sex, race, and birth date of the juveniles, court referral date, major allegation, number of law violations, number of prior referrals, detention status, jail status, court orders, placement status, and final court action. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09448.v1 court cases icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Missouri Division of Youth Services Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06884 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06884 MiAaI MiAaI Missouri Juvenile Court Records, 1994 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice and Missouri Division of Youth Services 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6884 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1994 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases) in Missouri. Inaugurated in 1975 and mandated in 1980, the Missouri Division of Youth Services collects and disseminates delinquency statistics about each case disposed during the previous calendar year. The data include a record of each case processed formally with petition and informally without petition, and contain an individual record on each delinquency, status offense, dependency, and special proceeding case disposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06884.v1 delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr case processing icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice and Missouri Division of Youth Services Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6884 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06884.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21680 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21680 MiAaI MiAaI Multistate Analysis of Time Consumption in Capital Appeals, 1992-2002 [electronic resource] Latzer, Barry , Cauthen, James N.G. 2008-03-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 21680 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Despite public controversy over the length of death penalty appeals, little empirical work has been done on the time allocated to the capital appeals process. The purpose of this study was to perform a multistate empirical analysis of the time expended in direct appeals of capital cases. The researchers included decisions from 14 states that they believed to be representative of the 37 states that have enforceable death penalty laws. For each of the 14 states included in the study, the researchers examined every capital case decided on direct appeal by the courts of last resort between the dates January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2002. The researchers developed a case database by examining a variety of sources. For each of the 1,676 cases in the multistate database, the research team collected time consumption data for each of the following five phases of the direct appeal process: (1) the postsentence stage, (2) the preparation stage, (3) the argument stage, (4) the decision stage, and (5) the supreme court stage. Variables include state, case characteristics, court opinion variables, dates, and time consumption variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1 appeal procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr capital punishment icpsr case processing icpsr certiorari icpsr death row inmates icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr executions icpsr judicial decisions icpsr murderers icpsr sentence review icpsr sentencing icpsr Supreme Court decisions icpsr state supreme courts icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Latzer, Barry Cauthen, James N.G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21680 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03795 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03795 MiAaI MiAaI National Evaluation of the Arrest Policies Program Under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), 1996-2000 [electronic resource] Cassandra Archer , Cheron DuPree 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3795 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the Arrest Policies Program, funded by the Violence Against Women Office (VAWO), on criminal justice system changes and offender accountability, and victim safety and well-being. Through convenience sampling, six project sites were chosen to participate in the study. Part 1, Case Tracking Data, contains quantitative data collected from criminal justice agencies on arrests, prosecution filings, criminal case disposition, convictions, and sentences imposed for intimate partner violence cases involving a male offender and female offender. Data for Part 2, Victim Interview Data, were collected from in-depth personal interviews with domestic violence victims/survivors (1) to learn more about victim experiences with and perceptions of the criminal justice response, and (2) to obtain victim perceptions about how the arrest and/or prosecution of their batterers affected their safety and well-being. The survey instrument covered a wide range of topics including severity and history of domestic violence, social support networks, perceptions of police response, satisfaction with the criminal justice process and the sentence, experiences in court, and satisfaction with prosecutors, victim services provider advocates, and probation officers. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03795.v1 prosecution icpsr process evaluation icpsr social support icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr victim safety icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr offenders icpsr police response icpsr probation officers icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Archer, Cassandra DuPree, Cheron Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3795 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03795.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03677 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03677 MiAaI MiAaI National Evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program, 1998-2002 [electronic resource] Mary Ann Dutton , Aileen Worrell , Darci Terrell , Sharon Denaro , Robin Thompson 2012-06-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 3677 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program (National Rural Evaluation) was a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program (Rural Program). The program provided funding to states, local and tribal governments, and private or public entities in rural states to create or enhance collaborations among criminal justice agencies, service providers, and community organizations to enhance services and the response to victims of domestic violence. The National Rural Evaluation consisted of two phases: a process evaluation and an outcome evaluation. The process evaluation (Phase 1: Parts 1-8) was conducted prior to the outcome evaluation to describe the 89 grantees funded in fiscal years 1996 to 1998 and the context and nature of grant activity. The outcome evaluation (Phase 2: Parts 9-35) conducted an in-depth quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Rural program by identifying and assessing outcomes for nine grantees. In total, this study contains 35 data files. Users should review the Collection Notes to see a breakdown of the number of cases and variables in each data file. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03677.v1 crime rates icpsr crime statistics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr offenses icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Dutton, Mary Ann Worrell, Aileen Terrell, Darci Denaro, Sharon Thompson, Robin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3677 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03677.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09508 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09508 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9508 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. Offenses were recoded into 14 broad categories that conform to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior record, relationship to criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09508.v2 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9508 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09508.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06136 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06136 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1990-1991 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2011-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 6136 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. Offenses were recoded into 14 broad categories that conform to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior record, relationship to criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06136.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6136 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06136.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06489 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06489 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1992-1993 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2011-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6489 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. The 1992-1993 National Pretrial Reporting Program database includes cases filed in May 1992 that were tracked through April 1993. Offenses were recoded into 15 broad categories that conformed to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior criminal record, relationship to the criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06489.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6489 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06489.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06885 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06885 MiAaI MiAaI Nebraska Juvenile Court Records, 1994 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice , Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice 1997-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6885 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1994 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases) in Nebraska. The Juvenile Court Reporting System was inaugurated in 1971 by the Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice to collect data from juvenile justice agencies on each case disposed during the previous calendar year and reported to the Commission. The data are used by the Commission in juvenile justice planning, and by county and juvenile courts, juvenile probation offices, private and public agencies, and industry interested in juvenile involvement in the state's juvenile courts. Cases involving individuals under age 18 that were filed directly in district courts or juvenile traffic offenses or citations were not included. The data include a record of each case processed with or without filing a petition and include a county code, youth's date of birth, age at referral, sex, date of referral, date of disposition, and case disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06885.v1 case processing icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6885 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06885.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07910 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07910 MiAaI MiAaI New Jersey Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1979 [electronic resource] Richard F. Sparks 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7910 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: MASSACHUSETTS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979: SENTENCTING DATA (ICPSR 7909) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1980: INMATE SURVEY DATA (ICPSR 7911). The data in this study is contained in two files. It consists of interviews to determine the opinions of inmates about the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of punishments, appropriateness of penalties for various kinds of crimes, and the use of sentencing guidelines to structure judicial sentencing decisions. Part 1, Inmate Background Data, contains socioeconomic, residential, and current and prior criminal history information in a random sample of 226 Rahway, New Jersey, State Prison inmates. Background information was collected for all of the inmates selected to participate in the 1979 New Jersey inmate survey. However, not all of those inmates selected agreed to be interviewed when the actual survey was conducted. Therefore, Part 1 includes information on survey respondents and nonrespondents. Part 2, Inmate Survey Data, contains information on 146 inmates. Frequency distributions and the survey instrument are included in the documentation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07910.v1 attitudes icpsr crime icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr inmates icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr place of residence icpsr punishment icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sparks, Richard F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7910 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07910.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07911 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07911 MiAaI MiAaI New Jersey Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1980 [electronic resource] Inmate Survey Data Richard F. Sparks 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7911 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: MASSACHUSETTS STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7909) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7910). The data in this study consist of interviews to determine the opinions of inmates about the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of punishments, appropriateness of penalties for various kinds of crimes, and the use of sentencing guidelines to structure judicial sentencing decisions. Frequency distributions and the survey instrument are included in the documentation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07911.v1 attitudes icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr inmates icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr punishment icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sparks, Richard F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7911 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07911.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07832 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07832 MiAaI MiAaI New York City Court Employment Project Evaluation Study, 1976-1979 [electronic resource] Vera Institute of Justice 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7832 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study served as a controlled research evaluation of the New York City Court Employment Project (CEP) as it stood in 1976-1979. At the time of the study, CEP was an independent corporation under contract to New York City's Human Resources Administration. The ultimate aim of CEP was to change the income-generating behavior of its participants to reduce their subsequent criminal activity. CEP did this by diverting accused offenders from routine court procedures (criminal prosecution, sentencing, and possible incarceration) and instead placing them into jobs, training, or vocationally-oriented counseling services. Eligible defendants agreed to attend mandatory counseling sessions, to devise and execute individual plans for securing training and employment, and to avoid arrest and conviction during their participation. Charges were dismissed by the court if, at the end of six months, CEP counselors determined that the defendant had participated successfully. Research goals for this study were to accumulate data in order to: (1) assess the impact of diversion on recidivism and personal stability, (2) ascertain the outcome of court cases without diversion, and (3) assess the relationship of these outcomes to the social services aspect of diversion programs. The study compared a control group of non-CEP offenders with an experimental group of CEP participants to assess the program's effectiveness in helping offenders find and maintain employment or training and avoid criminal activity. Data were collected on 666 subjects, 410 in the experimental group and 256 in the control group. Three interviews were conducted at six-month intervals with each subject, initially to record self-reports about education, training, employment history, reliance on public assistance, criminal history, illegal activities, lifestyle, and utilization of social services, and then to maintain current information about their school, employment, income, and court processing status. In addition to the three personal interviews, official records data were obtained from a variety of agencies to gather information including criminal history, disposition of the case on which the defendant entered the research, information related to subsequent arrests, and (for members of the experimental group) information about participation in CEP. Other variables include attendance at counseling sessions, type of employment found, job attendance, self-evaluation of important life events and life satisfaction, social services programs utilized, and drug and alcohol use, as well as defendant's and defendant's parents' age, sex, and race. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07832.v1 conviction records icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr diversion programs icpsr education icpsr employment services icpsr intervention icpsr job history icpsr job placement icpsr job satisfaction icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr alternatives to institutionalization icpsr arrest records icpsr career guidance icpsr life events icpsr living arrangements icpsr occupational mobility icpsr personal adjustment icpsr probation icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism rates icpsr rehabilitation programs icpsr sentencing reforms icpsr social adjustment icpsr social services icpsr training icpsr NACJD V. Courts NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Vera Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7832 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07832.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08042 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08042 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1979 [electronic resource] Hawaii United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8042 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1979: Hawaii was to compile, collate, analyze, publish, and disseminate statistical information concerning the operation of the criminal justice system at the federal, state, and local levels. This collection includes facts on an arrested offender showing actions by the police, prosecutor, and court. The individual offender is the unit of analysis, and felony arrests and other related dispositions are included. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08042.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8042 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08042.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08248 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08248 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1980 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania, and Utah United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8248 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08248.v6 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8248 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08248.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08277 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08277 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1981 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8277 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08277.v5 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8277 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08277.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08408 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08408 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1982 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, Virgin Islands, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8408 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08408.v6 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8408 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08408.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08449 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1983 [electronic resource] California, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virgin Islands, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08449.v7 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08449.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08675 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08675 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1984 [electronic resource] Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8675 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08675.v4 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8675 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08675.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08911 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08911 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1985 [electronic resource] Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8911 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08911.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8911 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08911.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09130 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09130 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1986 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9130 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09130.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9130 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09130.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09287 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09287 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1987 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9287 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09287.v3 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9287 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09287.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09523 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09523 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1988 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9523 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09523.v5 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9523 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09523.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06190 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06190 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1989 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6190 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06190.v2 policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6190 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06190.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06191 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06191 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1990 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-09-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6191 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06191.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6191 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06191.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09038 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09038 MiAaI MiAaI Operation Hardcore [Crime] Evaluation [electronic resource] Los Angeles, 1976-1980 Los Angeles District Attorney's Office 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 9038 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This evaluation was developed and implemented by the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office to examine the effectiveness of specialized prosecutorial activities in dealing with the local problem of rising gang violence, in particular the special gang prosecution unit Operation Hardcore. One part of the evaluation was a system performance analysis. The purposes of this system performance analysis were (1) to describe the problems of gang violence in Los Angeles and the ways that incidents of gang violence were handled by the Los Angeles criminal justice system, and (2) to document the activities of Operation Hardcore and its effect on the criminal justice system's handling of the cases prosecuted by that unit. Computer-generated listings from the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office of all individuals referred for prosecution by local police agencies were used to identify those individuals who were subsequently prosecuted by the District Attorney. Data from working files on all cases prosecuted, including copies of police, court, and criminal history records as well as information on case prosecution, were used to describe criminal justice handling. Information from several supplementary sources was also included, such as the automated Prosecutors Management Information System (PROMIS) maintained by the District Attorney's Office, and court records from the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles County, the local felony court. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09038.v2 arrests icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr district attorneys icpsr driving under the influence icpsr drug possession icpsr felony offenses icpsr gang violence icpsr gangs icpsr hearings icpsr jails icpsr kidnapping icpsr murder icpsr plea negotiations icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sentencing icpsr theft icpsr victimization icpsr weapons icpsr witnesses icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Los Angeles District Attorney's Office Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9038 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09038.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09513 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09513 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 1987-1998 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-11-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9513 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. complete guideline application information was not received. The database does not include organizational defendants sentenced pursuant to pre-guideline procedures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09513.v3 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9513 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09513.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03104 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03104 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-04-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3104 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 1999. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status of the defendant organization, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational Defendants Data, 1999, covers fiscal year October 1, 1998, through September 30, 1999. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03104.v1 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3104 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03104.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03495 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03495 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-04-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3495 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2000. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status of the defendant organization, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational Defendants Data, 2000, covers fiscal year October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2000. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03495.v1 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3495 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03495.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03498 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03498 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-04-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3498 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2001. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status of the defendant organization, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational Defendants Data, 2001, covers fiscal year October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2001. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03498.v1 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3498 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03498.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04109 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04109 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-04-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4109 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2002. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational Defendants Data, 2002, covers fiscal year October 1, 2001, through September 30, 2002. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04109.v1 corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr convictions (law) icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4109 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04109.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04631 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04631 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4631 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2003. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2003, covers fiscal year October 1, 2002, through September 30, 2003. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04631.v2 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4631 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04631.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04628 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04628 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4628 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2004. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2004, covers fiscal year October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04628.v2 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4628 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04628.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04609 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04609 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4609 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2005. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2005, covers fiscal year October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04609.v2 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4609 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04609.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20102 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20102 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20102 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2006. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2006, covers fiscal year October 1, 2005, through September 30, 2006. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the first occurrence of each iterating variable. Over 99 percent of the valid data is captured in this variable for most sets of iterations. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20102.v2 convictions (law) icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20102 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20102.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22625 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22625 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 22625 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2007. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2007, covers fiscal year October 1, 2006, through September 30, 2007. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22625.v3 convictions (law) icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22625 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22625.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25426 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25426 MiAaI MiAaI Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2011-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25426 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2008. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2008, covers fiscal year October 1, 2007, through September 30, 2008. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25426.v2 convictions (law) icpsr organizations icpsr restitution programs icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporate sentencing icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr fines icpsr organizational structure icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25426 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25426.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20401 MiAaI MiAaI Performance Measures in Prosecution and Their Application to Community Prosecution at Two Sites in the United States, 2005-2006 [electronic resource] M. Elaine Nugent-Borakove , Lisa M. Budzilowicz , Gerard Rainville 2008-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to explore empirical evidence to support the performance measurement framework identified by the American Prosecutors Research Institute's (APRI) Prosecution Study for the 21st Century. The framework included promoting the fair, impartial, and expeditious pursuit of justice and ensuring public safety. Two prosecutors' offices participated in the study. One was a traditional office, and the other was a more community-oriented office. Each site submitted monthly data on the identified performance measures for analysis. APRI also designed and administered a public safety survey to assess a number of factors related to the performance of prosecutors' offices, but for which data could not be provided by the offices. The public safety surveys were administered by phone using random digit dialing (RDD). Part 1, Site 1 Administrative Data, contains 15 months of data, and Part 2, Site 2 Administrative Data, contain 6 months of data on the identified performance measures for analysis from each site. Part 3, Public Safety Survey Data, contains variables that provide some basic demographic data about the respondents and several variables in response to Likert-style questions measuring attitudes and opinions on six factors. These include the seriousness of local crime, safety of the environment, organizational behavior of the prosecutor's office, participation in the community, community education, and task performance. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20401.v1 arrests icpsr pleas icpsr prosecution icpsr public safety icpsr sentencing icpsr case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr convictions (law) icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr fear of crime icpsr justice icpsr performance icpsr plea negotiations icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Nugent-Borakove, M. Elaine Budzilowicz, Lisa M. Rainville, Gerard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04409 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04409 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecuting Domestic Violence Cases with Reluctant Victims in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Robert C. Davis , Barbara E. Smith , Laura Nickles 2006-06-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4409 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, introduced two experiments designed to provide answers to questions of how to deal with victim reluctance in domestic violence cases. Two projects funded by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) evaluated these Milwaukee domestic violence experiments. The first project examined the effectiveness of a specialized domestic violence court that opened in September 1994. The primary intent of the specialized domestic violence court was to speed up the disposition of cases. The second project examined the impact of a change in the district attorney's (DA's) screening policy that admitted more cases into the special court, which became effective January 1, 1995. The liberalized prosecutorial policy was intended to determine whether arrests that the DA normally rejected for prosecution because victims failed to attend the prosecutor's charging conference could be prosecuted successfully none the less. The researchers collected data from three time periods: (1) prior to September 1994, (2) between September 1994 and January 1995, and (3) post-Janurary 1995. For the first experiment, several samples were selected from court and DA records to assess the impact of the introduction of the special domestic violence court and its impact after the change in the DA's charging policy. These samples of domestic violence cases (court samples) filed by the prosecutor included: (1) 237 cases from Summer 1994, (2) 190 cases from Fall 1994, and (3) 242 cases from Spring 1995. For the second experiment, three additional samples (complaint room samples) were collected of domestic cases declined by the prosecutor to determine how victim attendance at the charging conference and other factors affected the decision to prosecute: (1) 152 cases from Summer 1994, (2) 155 cases from Fall 1994, and (3) 152 cases from Spring 1995. Variables in this dataset include if the case was filed, type of charges, number of prior misdemeanors, number of prior felonies, number of misdemeanors after, number of felonies after, number of felony convictions, number of misdemeanor convictions, number of subpoenas, number of judicial body attachment orders, whether the victim was cooperative, if the victim testified, method of disposition, type of disposition, time to disposition, time to sentencing, sentencing conditions, if the defendant received jail or prison time, if the defendant received probation time, number of months incarcerated, number of months on probation, and several date variables. Additional variables provide the sex of the defendant, the relationship between the defendant and the victim, if the victim was injured, if the victim was intoxicated, and use of a weapon. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04409.v1 case processing icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr trial procedures icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Davis, Robert C. Smith, Barbara E. Nickles, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4409 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04409.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09094 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09094 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1986 [electronic resource] Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland, St. Louis, and Washington, DC Barbara Boland 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9094 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection represents the sixth in a series of statistical reports sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The purpose of the series is to provide statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts dispose of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes. With this purpose in mind, information was collected on items such as an individual's arrest date, sentencing date, court charge, and case disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09094.v3 arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felony offenses icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime Boland, Barbara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9094 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09094.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09844 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09844 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in Federal Criminal Courts in the United States, 1983-1990 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2000-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9844 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The primary purpose of this data collection was to study whether prosecutorial behavior was affected by the implementation of federal criminal sentencing guidelines in 1987. Monthly time series data were constructed on a number of prosecutorial outcomes, representing either discrete decision steps in the processing of criminal cases or the characteristics of cases that passed through the system. Variables include disposition year and month, number of matters initiated, number of cases filed, declined, and dismissed, number of convictions by trial, by jury, and by bench trial, number of guilty pleas, ratio of guilty pleas to cases resolved, and ratio of trials to cases resolved. The collection also provides a series of dichotomous variables to assess the impact of various events on prosecutorial outcomes over time. These events include the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (effective November 1986), implementation of the sentencing guidelines (November 1987), Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (November 1988), United States Supreme Court's decision in the Minstretta case affirming the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines (January 1989), and Attorney General Thornburgh's memo outlining Justice Department policy on charging and prosecution (March 1989). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09844.v1 case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr guilty pleas icpsr plea negotiations icpsr pleas icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9844 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09844.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08219 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08219 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutor's Management and Information System (PROMIS), New Orleans, 1979 [electronic resource] Institute for Law and Social Research 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8219 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Prosecutor's Management and Information System (PROMIS) is a computer-based management information system for public prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially developed with funds from the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) to cope with the problems of a large, urban prosecution agency where mass production operations had superseded the traditional practice of a single attorney preparing and prosecuting a given case from inception to final disposition. The combination of massive volumes of cases and the assembly-line fragmentation of responsibility and control had created a situation in which one case was indistinguishable from another and the effects of problems at various stages in the assembly line on ultimate case disposition went undetected and uncorrected. One unique feature of PROMIS that addresses these problems is the automated evaluation of cases. Through the application of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS assigns two numerical ratings to each case: one signifying the gravity of the crime through a measurement of the amount of harm done to society, and the other signifying the gravity of the prior criminal record of the accused. These ratings make it possible to select the more important cases for intensive, pre-trial preparation and to assure even-handed treatment of cases of like gravity. A complementary feature of PROMIS is the automation of reasons for decisions made or actions taken along the assembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases prior to trial on their merits can be related to earlier cycles of postponements for various reasons and to the reasoning behind intake and screening decisions. The PROMIS data include information about the defendant, case characteristics and processes, charge, sentencing and continuance processes, and the witnesses/victims involved with a case. PROMIS was first used in 1971 in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer the PROMIS concepts and software to other communities, LEAA awarded a grant to the Institute for Law and Social Research (INSLAW) in Washington, DC. The New Orleans PROMIS data collection is a product of this grant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08219.v1 case management icpsr case processing icpsr computer programs icpsr court cases icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr databases icpsr decision making icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr information systems icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Institute for Law and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8219 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08219.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08288 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08288 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS), Rhode Island, 1979 [electronic resource] Institute for Law and Social Research 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8288 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS) is a computer-based information system for public prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially developed with funds from the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) to cope with problems of a large, urban prosecution agency where mass production operations had superseded the traditional practice of a single attorney preparing and prosecuting a given case from inception to final disposition. The combination of massive volumes of cases and assembly-line fragmentation of responsibility and control had created a situation in which one case was indistinguishable from another and the effects of problems at various stages in the assembly line on ultimate case disposition went undetected and uncorrected. One unique feature of PROMIS that addresses these problems is the automated evaluation of cases. Through the application of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS assigns two numerical ratings to each case: one signifying the gravity of the crimes through the measurement of the amount of harm done to society, and the other signifying the gravity of the prior record of the accused. These ratings make it possible to select the more important cases for intensive, pre-trial preparation and to assure even-handed treatment of cases with similar degrees of gravity. A complementary feature of PROMIS is the automation of reasons for decisions made or actions taken along the assembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases prior to trial on their merits can be related to earlier cycles of postponement for various reasons and the reasoning behind intake and screening decisions. The PROMIS data include information about the defendant, case characteristics and processes, charge, sentencing and continuance processes, and the witnesses/victims involved in the case. PROMIS was first used in 1971 in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer the concepts and software to other communities, LEAA awarded a grant to the Institute for Law xand Social Research (INSLAW) in Washington, DC. The Rhode Island PROMIS data collection is a product of this grant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08288.v1 case management icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr information systems icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr case processing icpsr computer programs icpsr court cases icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr databases icpsr decision making icpsr defendants icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Institute for Law and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8288 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08288.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08225 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08225 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS), St. Louis, 1979 [electronic resource] Institute for Law and Social Research 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8225 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS) is a computer-based information system for public prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially developed with funds from the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) to cope with problems of a large, urban prosecution agency where mass production operations had superceded the traditional practice of a single attorney preparing and prosecuting a given case from inception to final disposition. The combination of massive volumes of cases and assembly-line fragmentation of responsibility and control had created a situation in which one case was indistinguishable from another and the effects of problems at various stages in the assembly line on ultimate case disposition went undetected and uncorrected. One unique feature of PROMIS that addresses these problems is the automated evaluation of cases. Through the application of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS assigns two numerical ratings to each case: one signifying the gravity of the crimes through the measurement of the amount of harm done to society, and the other signifying the gravity of the prior record of the accused. These ratings make it possible to select the more important cases for intensive, pre-trial preparation and to assure even-handed treatment of cases with similar degrees of gravity. A complementary feature of PROMIS is the automation of reasons for decisions made or actions taken along the assembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases prior to trial on their merits can be related to earlier cycles of postponement for various reasons and the reasoning behind intake and screening decisions. The PROMIS data include information about the defendant, case characteristics and processes, charge, sentencing and continuance processes, and the witness/victims involved in the case. PROMIS was first used in 1971 in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer the concepts and software to other communities, LEAA awarded a grant to the Institute for Law and Social Research (INSLAW) in Washington, DC. The St. Louis PROMIS data collection is a product of this grant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08225.v1 case processing icpsr computer programs icpsr case management icpsr crime icpsr court cases icpsr criminal justice system icpsr databases icpsr decision making icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr information systems icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Institute for Law and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8225 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08225.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03013 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03013 MiAaI MiAaI Reconsidering Domestic Violence Recidivism [electronic resource] Individual and Contextual Effects of Court Dispositions and Stake in Conformity in Hamilton County, Ohio, 1993-1998 John Wooldredge 2000-10-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 3013 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined empirical relationships between various court dispositions and the prevalence, incidence, and delay of domestic violence recidivism. It built on past research by examining the possible effects of formal and informal social controls at the individual level, as well as the contextual effects of community characteristics on individual behavior. The researchers collected information on 3,662 suspects arrested for misdemeanor domestic violence (specifically, assault against an intimate) in Hamilton County, Ohio, during August 1, 1993, to October 31, 1993, and January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996. All arrestees in the sample were tracked until June 1998. The dataset includes information pertaining to demographic and background characteristics of suspects (e.g., race, age, means of support, education, employment, marital status, residential stability, number of children the suspect had, and if the suspect lived with a spouse and/or children at arrest), their criminal histories (prior convictions for misdemeanors and felonies, prior incarceration, alcohol/drug addiction, and pending charges), how their cases were disposed (e.g., no charges filed, charges dropped, acquitted at trial, sentenced to an offender program, probation, or jail), rearrests for domestic violence that occurred between the initial arrest and May 31, 1998, and the number of months that elapsed between case disposition and rearrest. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03013.v1 arrest records icpsr communities icpsr criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr offenders icpsr recidivism icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Wooldredge, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3013 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03013.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09668 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09668 MiAaI MiAaI Registry of Randomized Criminal Justice Experiments in Sanctions, 1951-1983 [electronic resource] David Weisburd , Lawrence Sherman , Anthony Petrosino 1997-08-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9668 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This registry categorizes, summarizes, and analyzes datasets containing information on randomized criminal justice experiments in sanctions. These datasets vary in methodology, geographic region, and other aspects. Among the topics covered in this registry are the nature of offense being sanctioned, type of sanction, racial and sexual composition of the sample, and procedures and outcomes of each collection. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09668.v2 criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr gender icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr race icpsr sanctions icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Weisburd, David Sherman, Lawrence Petrosino, Anthony Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9668 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09668.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09310 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09310 MiAaI MiAaI Robbery of Financial Institutions in Indiana, 1982-1984 [electronic resource] Terry Baumer , Michael D. Carrington 2010-02-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9310 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goals of this data collection were to provide information on robbery-related security measures employed by financial institutions, to identify factors that contribute to robbery, and to study the correlates of case disposition and sentence length of convicted robbers. The collection compares banking institutions that have been robbed with those bank offices that have not been robbed to provide information on factors that contribute to these robberies. The office-based file includes variables designed to measure general office characteristics, staff preparation and training, security measures, characteristics of the area in which the banking institution is located, and the robbery history of each institution. The incident-based file includes variables such as the robber's method of operation and behavior, the employee's reaction, the characteristics of the office at the time of the robbery, and the apprehension of the offender. Also included is information on the status of the investigation, reasons involved in solving the robbery, status of prosecution, ultimate prosecution, and sentence in length. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09310.v2 banks icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr financial institutions icpsr offenders icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr security icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Baumer, Terry Carrington, Michael D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9310 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09310.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08254 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08254 MiAaI MiAaI Search Warrant Procedures in Seven Cities, 1984 [electronic resource] [United States] Richard L. Van Duizend , Paul Sutton , Charlotte A. Carter 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8254 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were collected in seven unnamed cities by the National Center of State Courts. Court cases were identified in one of three ways: (1) observation during real-time interviews, (2) court records of real-time interviews, or (3) court records of historical cases. The variables in this dataset include the rank of the law enforcement officer applying for the warrant, the type of agency applying for the warrant, general object of the search requested, specific area to be searched, type of crime being investigated, central offense named in the warrant, evidence upon which the warrant application is based, and disposition of the warrant application. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08254.v1 arrests icpsr criminal investigations icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr police response icpsr search warrants icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Van Duizend, Richard L. Sutton, Paul Carter, Charlotte A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8254 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08254.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02038 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02038 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Processing Statistics, 1990-2006 [electronic resource] Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 2038 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Originally known as the National Pretrial Reporting Program, the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) program tracks felony cases filed in May of a given year until final disposition or until one year has elapsed from the date of filing. This collection presents data on felony cases filed in approximately 40 of the nation's 75 most populous counties in even numbered years from 1990-2006. These 75 counties account for more than a third of the United States population and approximately half of all reported crimes. The cases from these 40 jurisdictions are weighted to represent all felony filings during the month of May in the 75 most populous counties. Data were collected on arrest charges, demographic characteristics, criminal history, pretrial release and detention, adjudication, and sentencing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02038.v5 case processing icpsr court cases icpsr criminal histories icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr pretrial detention icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2038 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02038.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09266 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09266 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 1985-2001 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for State Courts 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9266 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, juvenile cases, and administrative agency appeals. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09266.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9266 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09266.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03990 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03990 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2002 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for State Courts 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3990 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, juvenile cases, and administrative agency appeals. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03990.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3990 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03990.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20280 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20280 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2003 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for State Courts 2007-11-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20280 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, juvenile cases, and administrative agency appeals. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20280.v1 appellate courts icpsr caseloads icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20280 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20280.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20281 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2004 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for State Courts 2007-11-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, juvenile cases, and administrative agency appeals. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20281.v1 trial courts icpsr appellate courts icpsr caseloads icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20281.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30522 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30522 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2005 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-05-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30522 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, domestic relations cases, juvenile cases, traffic violations cases, and administrative agency appeals. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30522.v1 trial courts icpsr appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30522 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30522.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30523 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30523 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2006 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-05-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30523 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment cases, other criminal cases, domestic relations cases, juvenile cases, traffic violations cases, and administrative agency appeals. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30523.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30523 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30523.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30524 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30524 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2007 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-05-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30524 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases. The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30524.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30524 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30524.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30481 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2008 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-05-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases. The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30481.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30481.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34081 MiAaI MiAaI State Court Statistics, 2009 [electronic resource] National Center for State Courts 2012-11-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides comparable measures of state appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload. Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases. The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34081.v1 appellate courts icpsr case processing icpsr caseloads icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr legal appeals icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for State Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04539 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04539 MiAaI MiAaI Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4539 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals is a follow-up to the CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 2001 (ICPSR 3957) which examined 8,311 general civil cases (e.g., tort, contract, and real property) concluded by bench or jury trial in a sample of 46 of the nation's 75 most populous counties in 2001. These cases were then weighted to represent the 11,908 general civil trials concluded in the nation's 75 most populous counties. Data from the 2001 Civil Trial Survey were used to produce several Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) reports describing the characteristics of civil litigation in state courts. The 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals tracks every general civil case concluded by bench or jury trial in 2001 in the 46 surveyed counties that were subsequently appealed to an intermediate appellate court or court of last resort. In the 2001 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts information was collected for every general civil trial concluded in 43 of the 46 selected counties. In these counties, the 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals collected information on all general trials that produced an appeal. In the three remaining counties, (Cook County, Philadelphia County, and Bergen County), the appeals survey obtained information for both those general civil trials concluded in 2001 that were subsequently appealed and, in addition, collected information for those general civil appeals that were not captured at the trial court level. The 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals tracks data on general civil appeals that originated from 46 of the nation's 75 most populous counties. Unlike the 2001 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, cases were not weighted to represent appeals in the nation's 75 most populous counties. The appeals were followed until they were withdrawn, dismissed, or decided on the merits in the appellate courts. All appeals were tracked until April 30, 2005. Appeals not disposed on that date are identified as pending. Overall four appellate datasets were produced from this survey. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04539.v2 case processing icpsr civil courts icpsr civil law icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr lawsuits icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4539 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04539.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03009 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03009 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Prosecutorial Response to Bias-Motivated Crime in the United States, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Jane Nady Sigmon , Donald Rebovich 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 3009 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This national survey of prosecutors was undertaken to systematically gather information about the handling of bias or hate crime prosecutions in the United States. The goal was to use this information to identify needs and to enhance the ability of prosecutors to respond effectively to hate crimes by promoting effective practices. The survey aimed to address the following research questions: (1) What was the present level of bias crime prosecution in the United States? (2) What training had been provided to prosecutors to assist them in prosecuting hate- and bias-motivated crimes and what additional training would be beneficial? (3) What types of bias offenses were prosecuted in 1994-1995? (4) How were bias crime cases assigned and to what extent were bias crime cases given priority? and (5) What factors or issues inhibited a prosecutor's ability to prosecute bias crimes? In 1995, a national mail survey was sent to a stratified sample of prosecutor offices in three phases to solicit information about prosecutors' experiences with hate crimes. Questions were asked about size of jurisdiction, number of full-time staff, number of prosecutors and investigators assigned to bias crimes, and number of bias cases prosecuted. Additional questions measured training for bias-motivated crimes, such as whether staff received specialized training, whether there existed a written policy on bias crimes, how well prosecutors knew the bias statute, and whether there was a handbook on bias crime. Information elicited on case processing included the frequency with which certain criminal acts were charged and sentenced as bias crimes, the existence of a special bias unit, case tracking systems, preparation of witnesses, jury selection, and case disposition. Other topics specifically covered bias related to racial or ethnic differences, religious differences, sexual orientation, and violence against women. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03009.v1 case processing icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr hate crimes icpsr judicial process icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr prosecution icpsr training icpsr NACJD V. Courts TPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA) ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime RCMD II. Discrimination Sigmon, Jane Nady Rebovich, Donald Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3009 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03009.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07743 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07743 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reports, 1966-1976 [electronic resource] Data Aggregated by Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7743 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains a revised SMSA (Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area) aggregate version of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) statistics gathered from 1966-1976, in which original UCR agency records are combined to produce several types of crime rates, by SMSA, for eight crimes. The data were prepared by the Hoover Institution for Economic Studies of the Criminal Justice System, at Stanford University. The data in the file are an aggregation of all relevant law enforcement reporting agencies into 291 SMSAs, and corresponding approximate aggregations of crime rates and dispositions. Each record contains crime rates for one SMSA in one specific year, with data including annual statistics of eight index crimes, i.e., murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft. Calculations include offense-based clearance rates (the number of clearances of juvenile clearances per reported offense), clearance-based rates (the number of persons charged per offense cleared by arrest), and charge-based rates (the number of persons whose cases were disposed in a particular manner per person charged). A related study is UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS, 1966-1976 (ICPSR 7676). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07743.v1 arrests icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr clearance rates icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile crime icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr manslaughter icpsr murder icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7743 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07743.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08214 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08214 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reports [electronic resource] National Time-Series Community-Level Database, 1967-1980 Glenn L. Pierce , William J. Bowers , James Baird , Joseph Heck 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8214 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Uniform Crime Reports National Time-Series Data, 1967-1980, include detailed criminal offense and clearance information submitted monthly by over 3,000 consistently reporting law enforcement agencies in the United States. These data, provided in annually pooled cross-sections, were processed at the Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts to produce easily accessible and highly reliable time-series data on officially reported crime. Originally provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), these data exclude Uniform Crime Report (UCR) data from infrequently reporting law enforcement agencies. In general, only those agencies that submitted ten or more monthly reports in every year during 1967 through 1980 are included in this collection. The data include detailed breakdowns of offenses and clearances taken from disaggregated UCR Return A tapes. Of particular interest are weapon-specific robbery and assault variables, types of rape, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft, and clearances by arrest (or other exceptional means) of adults and juveniles for each offense sub-type. Both monthly and annual counts of these are available. Finally, as an aid to the user, each agency is identified by its FBI "ORI Code" as well as a sequential case number produced and documented by ICPSR in the codebook's appendix. Cases also may be identified by geographic region, state, SMSA, county, population size and group, and frequency of reporting. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08214.v1 arrests icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr clearance rates icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile crime icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr manslaughter icpsr murder icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr weapons offenses icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pierce, Glenn L. Bowers, William J. Baird, James Heck, Joseph Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8214 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08214.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09422 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09422 MiAaI MiAaI United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953-1997 Terms [electronic resource] Harold J. Spaeth 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9422 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection encompasses all aspects of United States Supreme Court decision-making from the beginning of the Warren Court in 1953 to the completion of the most recent term of the Rehnquist Court. In this collection, distinct aspects of the Court's decisions are covered by six types of variables: (1) identification variables including citations and docket numbers, (2) background variables offering information on how the Court took jurisdiction, origin and source of case, and the reason the Court granted cert, (3) chronological variables covering date of decision, Court term, and natural court, (4) substantive variables including legal provisions, issues, and direction of decision, (5) outcome variables supplying information on disposition of case, winning party, formal alteration of precedent, and declaration of unconstitutionality, and (6) voting and opinion variables pertaining to how individual justices voted, their opinions and interagreements, and the direction of their votes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09422.v9 Supreme Court decisions icpsr Supreme Court justices icpsr twentieth century icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judicial decisions icpsr judicial review icpsr legal history icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD V. Courts Spaeth, Harold J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9422 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09422.v9 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06987 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06987 MiAaI MiAaI United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, Phase II [electronic resource] 1953-1993 James L. Gibson 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6987 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to record information about the cases, litigants, amicus participants, and the opinions decided by the Supreme Court under the tenure of Chief Justices Earl Warren (1953-1969) and Warren Burger (1969-1986) and others through 1993. The approach of this study was to proceed deductively, rather than seek to infer values of a particular group of justices. This method allows the investigation of value conflicts that are not litigated, as well as the value conflicts represented in Supreme Court opinions. Opinions are coded on the basis of their literal content, and the data are organized around the opinions. There are eight types of opinions. Within each type, up to six topics are coded, and within each topic, up to two values are coded. There are three integrated parts to this study, each of which can be linked to the other files by specific variables. Part 1, Supreme Court Database, contains basic case attributes from UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL DATABASE, 1953-1993 TERMS (ICPSR 9422) and the opinions given in the cases. Part 2, Briefs, gives information on the filers and co-filers for cases in which amicus curie briefs were filed. Part 3, Groups, lists the litigants' names. The distinct aspects of the Court's decisions are covered by six types of variables in Part 1: (1) identification variables including case citation, docket number, unit of analysis, and number of records per unit of analysis, (2) background variables offering information on origin of case, source of case, reason for granting cert, parties to the case, direction of the lower court's decision, and manner in which the Court takes jurisdiction, (3) chronological variables covering date of term of court, chief justice, and natural court, (4) substantive variables including multiple legal provisions, authority for decision, issue, issue areas, and direction of decision, (5) outcome variables supplying information on form of decision, disposition of case, winning party, declaration of unconstitutionality, and multiple memorandum decisions, and (6) voting and opinion variables pertaining to the vote in the case and to the direction of the individual justices' votes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06987.v1 Supreme Court decisions icpsr Supreme Court justices icpsr twentieth century icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judicial decisions icpsr judicial review icpsr legal history icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Gibson, James L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6987 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06987.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08979 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08979 MiAaI MiAaI Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986 [electronic resource] [United States] Alexander Aikman , Elsner Oram, Mary , Frederick Miller 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 8979 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This multi-site data collection evaluates the impact of judicial adjunct attorneys and referees on the court system at the county and state levels in six jurisdictions: (1) Pima County, Arizona, (2) Multnomah County, Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4) Hennepin County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix, Arizona, and (6) the state of Connecticut. There are three different units of observation in this study: (1) civil trial cases, (2) trial judges, including regular judges and adjunct attorneys, and (3) litigating attorneys. The court case data include information on type of case, date of trial, type of judge, type of disposition, and date of disposition. For the questionnaire data obtained on judges, adjuncts, and litigating attorneys, information includes experience with the program, satisfaction, and ideas for changes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08979.v1 judges icpsr judicial process icpsr attorneys icpsr court cases icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Aikman, Alexander Elsner Oram, Mary Miller, Frederick Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8979 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08979.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06540 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130520s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06540 MiAaI MiAaI White-Collar Criminal Careers, 1976-1978 [electronic resource] Federal Judicial Districts David Weisburd , Elin Waring , Ellen Chayet 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 6540 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-20. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the criminal careers of 1,331 offenders convicted of white-collar crimes in the United States District Courts to assess the relative effectiveness of court-imposed prison sanctions in preventing or modifying future criminal behavior. The white-collar crime event that was the central focus of this study, the "criterion" offense, provided the standard point of entry for sample members. Researchers for this study supplemented the data collected by Wheeler et al. in their 1988 study (NATURE AND SANCTIONING OF WHITE COLLAR CRIME, 1976-1978: FEDERAL JUDICIAL DISTRICTS [ICPSR 8989]) with criminal history data subsequent to the criterion offense through to 1990. As in the 1988 study, white-collar crime was considered to include economic offenses committed through the use of some combination of fraud, deception, or collusion. Eight federal offenses were examined: antitrust, securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, false claims and statements, credit fraud, bank embezzlement, income tax fraud, and bribery. Arrests were chosen as the major measure of criminal conduct. The data contain information coded from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal history records ("rap sheets") for a set of offenders convicted of white-collar crimes in federal courts in fiscal years 1976 to 1978. The seven federal judicial districts from which the sample was drawn were central California, northern Georgia, northern Illinois, Maryland, southern New York, northern Texas, and western Washington. To correct for a bias that can be introduced when desistance from criminality is confused with the death of the offender, the researchers examined the National Death Index (NDI) data to identify offenders who had died between the date of sentencing for the criterion offense and when data collection began for this study in 1990. This data collection contains three types of records. The first record type (Part 1, Summary Data) contains summary and descriptive information about the offender's rap sheet as a whole. Variables include dates of first entry and last entry on the rap sheet, number of separate crimes on the rap sheet, whether the criterion crime was listed on the rap sheet, whether the rap sheet listed crimes prior to or subsequent to the criterion crime, and date of death of offender. The second and third record types are provided in one data file (Part 2, Event and Event Interim Data). The second record type contains information about each crime event on the rap sheet. Variables include custody status of offender at arrest, type of arresting agency, state of arrest, date of arrest, number of charges for each arrest, number of charges resulting in no formal charges filed, number of charges dismissed, number of charges for white-collar crimes, type of sanction, length of definite sentence, probation sentence, and suspended probation sentence, amount of fines, amount of court costs, and restitution ordered, first, second, and third offense charged, arrest and court disposition for each charge, and date of disposition. The third record type contains information about the interim period between events or between the final event and the end of the follow-up period. Variables include date of first, second, and third incarceration, date discharged or transferred from each incarceration, custody/supervision status at each incarceration, total number of prisons, jails, or other institutions resided in during the interval, final custody/supervision status and date discharged from incarceration for the interval, dates parole and probation started and expired, if parole or probation terms were changed or completed, amount of fines, court costs, and restitution paid, whether the conviction was overturned during the interval, and date the conviction was overturned. A single offender has as many of record types two and three as were needed to code the entire rap sheet. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06540.v1 arrest records icpsr career criminals icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr imprisonment icpsr offenders icpsr prisons icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr white collar crime icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Weisburd, David Waring, Elin Chayet, Ellen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6540 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06540.v1