<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
	
		
		


 






	

	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR21680</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130619s2008    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR21680</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				
				Multistate Analysis of Time Consumption in Capital Appeals, 1992-2002
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					Latzer, Barry
					
				, 				
			
				
					Cauthen, James N.G.
					
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">2008-03-25</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">2008</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">21680</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			Despite public controversy over the length of death penalty
 appeals, little empirical work has been done on the time allocated to
 the capital appeals process. The purpose of this study was to perform
 a multistate empirical analysis of the time expended in direct appeals
 of capital cases. The researchers included decisions from 14 states
 that they believed to be representative of the 37 states that have
 enforceable death penalty laws. For each of the 14 states included in
 the study, the researchers examined every capital case decided on
 direct appeal by the courts of last resort between the dates January
 1, 1992, and December 31, 2002. The researchers developed a case
 database by examining a variety of sources. For each of the 1,676
 cases in the multistate database, the research team collected time
 consumption data for each of the following five phases of the direct
 appeal process: (1) the postsentence stage, (2) the preparation stage,
 (3) the argument stage, (4) the decision stage, and (5) the supreme
 court stage. Variables include state, case characteristics, court
opinion variables, dates, and time consumption variables. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">appeal procedures</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">appellate courts</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">capital punishment</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">case processing</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">certiorari</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">death row inmates</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">disposition (legal)</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">executions</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">judicial decisions</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">murderers</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">sentence review</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">sentencing</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">Supreme Court decisions</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">state supreme courts</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">United States Supreme Court</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Latzer, Barry</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Cauthen, James N.G.</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">21680</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


    
		
		


 






	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR07611</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130619s1984    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR07611</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				
				Supreme Court Certiorari Study, 1947-1956
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					
					S. Sidney Ulmer
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">1992-02-16</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">1984</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">7611</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			This collection provides data on votes cast in
conference by 15 Supreme Court justices on petitions to the court for
certiorari during the period 1947-1956. The data were collected from
the Harold Burton Papers at the Library of Congress. The file contains
a complete enumeration of the court's decisions on the petitions to
grant or deny plenary review under its certiorari or appellate
jurisdiction for the 1951 term and the 1955 term. A one-third sample
of cases is included for the other eight terms during the period. For
each petition for certiorari, the data file contains (1) the volume,
page, and docket number in the SUPREME COURT REPORTER, (2) the court
action on the petition, (3) the docket type (appellate or
miscellaneous), and (4) the vote made by each of the 15 justices
(e.g., grant or deny the petition, absent from voting, or pass). The
15 justices whose votes were collected are Harold Burton, Wiley
Rutledge, Robert H. Jackson, Frank Murphy, William O. Douglas, Felix
Frankfurter, Stanley Reed, Hugo Black, Fred Vinson, Sherman Minton,
Tom Clark, Earl Warren, John Harlan, William J. Brennan, and Charles
E. Whittaker. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07611.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">United States Supreme Court</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">appeal procedures</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">certiorari</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">judicial review</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">legal history</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">Supreme Court decisions</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">Supreme Court justices</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XII. Legal Systems</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Ulmer, S. Sidney</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">7611</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07611.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


    
</collection>
