nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25423 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25423 MiAaI MiAaI Court Workforce Racial Diversity and Racial Justice in Criminal Case Outcomes in the United States, 2000-2005 [electronic resource] Geoff Ward , Amy Farrell , Danielle Rousseau 2009-06-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25423 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to determine whether workgroup racial composition is related to sentence outcomes generally, and racial differences in sentencing in particular, across federal districts. This collection contains information on federal court district characteristics. Data include information about the social context, court context, and diversity of the courtroom workgroup for 90 federal judicial districts provided by 50 judicial district context variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25423.v1 case processing icpsr labor force icpsr race icpsr race relations icpsr sentencing icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr courts icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr justice icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing RCMD I. Crime Ward, Geoff Farrell, Amy Rousseau, Danielle Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25423 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25423.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03382 MiAaI MiAaI Impact Evaluation of the Felony Domestic Violence Court in Kings County [Brooklyn], New York, 1994-2000 [electronic resource] Lisa Newmark , Mike Rempel , Kelly Diffily , Kamala Mallik Kane 2006-07-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. the defendant, whether the victim attempted to drop charges, whether the victim testified at trial, whether a victim advocate was assigned, total violations during pending case, predisposition violations, and number of probation violations. Demographic variables in Part 1 include defendant and victims' gender, race, victim age at defendant's arrest, defendant's income, employment status, and education. Variables in Part 2, Top Charge Data, relating to the defendant include number and types of prior arrests and convictions, top charge at arrest, severity of top charge at arrest, top charge at grand jury indictment, severity of top charge indictment, disposition details, Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) arrest indicators, child victim conviction indicator, drug conviction indicator, weapon conviction indicator, types of probation, sentence, disposition, and offenses. Demographic variables in Part 2 include sex and race of the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03382.v2 arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr domestic violence icpsr family courts icpsr felony offenses icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr restraining orders icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Newmark, Lisa Rempel, Mike Diffily, Kelly Kane, Kamala Mallik Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03382.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06481 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment Program Survey of Criminal Justice Agencies in the United States, 1992-1994 [electronic resource] J. Thomas McEwen 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Assessment Program (NAP) Survey was conducted to determine the needs and problems of state and local criminal justice agencies. At the local level in each sampled county, survey questionnaires were distributed to police chiefs of the largest city, sheriffs, jail administrators, prosecutors, public defenders, chief trial court judges, trial court administrators (where applicable), and probation and parole agency heads. Data were collected at the state level through surveys sent to attorneys general, commissioners of corrections, prison wardens, state court administrators, and directors of probation and parole. For the 1992-1994 survey, 13 separate questionnaires were used. Police chiefs and sheriffs received the same survey instruments, with a screening procedure employed to identify sheriffs who handled law enforcement responsibilities. Of the 411 counties selected, 264 counties also employed trial court administrators. Judges and trial court administrators received identical survey instruments. A total of 546 surveys were mailed to probation and parole agencies, with the same questions asked of state and local officers. Counties that had separate agencies for probation and parole were sent two surveys. All survey instruments were divided into sections on workload (except that the wardens, jail administrators, and corrections commissioners were sent a section on jail use and crowding instead), staffing, operations and procedures, and background. The staffing section of each survey queried respondents on recruitment, retention, training, and number of staff. The other sections varied from instrument to instrument, with questions tailored to the responsibilities of the particular agency. Most of the questionnaires asked about use of automated information systems, programs, policies, or aspects of the facility or security needing improvement, agency responsibilities and jurisdictions, factors contributing to workload increases, budget, number of fulltime employees and other staff, and contracted services. Questions specific to police chiefs and sheriffs included activities aimed at drug problems and whether they anticipated increases in authorized strength in officers. Jail administrators, corrections commissioners, and wardens were asked about factors contributing to jail crowding, alternatives to jail, medical services offered, drug testing and drug-related admissions, and inmate classification. Topics covered by the surveys for prosecutors, public defenders, judges, and state and trial court administrators included types of cases handled, case timeliness, diversion and sentencing alternatives, and court and jury management. State and local probation and parole agency directors were asked about diagnostic tools, contracted services, and drug testing. Attorneys general were queried about operational issues, statutory authority, and legal services and support provided to state and local criminal justice agencies. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06481.v1 case processing icpsr corrections management icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr information systems icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr needs assessment icpsr police recruits icpsr police training icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prisons icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McEwen, J. Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06481.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09508 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09508 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9508 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. Offenses were recoded into 14 broad categories that conform to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior record, relationship to criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09508.v2 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9508 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09508.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06136 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06136 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1990-1991 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2011-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 6136 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. Offenses were recoded into 14 broad categories that conform to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior record, relationship to criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06136.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6136 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06136.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06489 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06489 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1992-1993 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2011-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6489 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. The 1992-1993 National Pretrial Reporting Program database includes cases filed in May 1992 that were tracked through April 1993. Offenses were recoded into 15 broad categories that conformed to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior criminal record, relationship to the criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06489.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6489 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06489.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09094 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09094 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1986 [electronic resource] Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland, St. Louis, and Washington, DC Barbara Boland 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9094 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection represents the sixth in a series of statistical reports sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The purpose of the series is to provide statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts dispose of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes. With this purpose in mind, information was collected on items such as an individual's arrest date, sentencing date, court charge, and case disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09094.v3 arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felony offenses icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Boland, Barbara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9094 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09094.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09844 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09844 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in Federal Criminal Courts in the United States, 1983-1990 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2000-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9844 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The primary purpose of this data collection was to study whether prosecutorial behavior was affected by the implementation of federal criminal sentencing guidelines in 1987. Monthly time series data were constructed on a number of prosecutorial outcomes, representing either discrete decision steps in the processing of criminal cases or the characteristics of cases that passed through the system. Variables include disposition year and month, number of matters initiated, number of cases filed, declined, and dismissed, number of convictions by trial, by jury, and by bench trial, number of guilty pleas, ratio of guilty pleas to cases resolved, and ratio of trials to cases resolved. The collection also provides a series of dichotomous variables to assess the impact of various events on prosecutorial outcomes over time. These events include the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (effective November 1986), implementation of the sentencing guidelines (November 1987), Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (November 1988), United States Supreme Court's decision in the Minstretta case affirming the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines (January 1989), and Attorney General Thornburgh's memo outlining Justice Department policy on charging and prosecution (March 1989). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09844.v1 case dismissal icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr guilty pleas icpsr plea negotiations icpsr pleas icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9844 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09844.v1