nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08100 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08100 MiAaI MiAaI ABC News Poll of Public Opinion on Crime, December 1982 [electronic resource] ABC News 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8100 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This special topic poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. In this poll, respondents were questioned regarding their perceptions of crime and the criminal justice system. Questions assessed the respondents' fear of crime, perceptions of the seriousness of crime in the United States, evaluation of the judicial and penal systems, assessment of police performance, and confidence in the ability of the police to prevent crime. The poll also asked for respondents' opinions about President Ronald Reagan's policies, the state of the economy, and government spending. Demographic information was collected, including the respondent's sex, age, education level, race, and income level. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08100.v2 attitudes icpsr correctional system icpsr crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr economic conditions icpsr fear of crime icpsr firearms icpsr government spending icpsr law enforcement icpsr police performance icpsr political attitudes icpsr political issues icpsr presidential performance icpsr public opinion icpsr Reagan, Ronald icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ABC News Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8100 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08100.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09729 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09729 MiAaI MiAaI Access to Justice in Ontario, 1985-1988 [electronic resource] W.A. Bogart , Neil Vidmar 1999-11-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9729 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection, which was designed to assess experiences with the Ontario, Canada, civil justice system, is a replication and extension of a survey conducted by the Civil Litigation Research Project at the University of Wisconsin. Interviews were conducted with the heads of households. Questions were asked about the nature of the problem, e.g., auto accident, work injury, discrimination, problems with landlord, violations of privacy, or victimization. Questions were also asked about actions taken in response to the problem, such as whether a lawyer was contacted, reasons for not contacting a lawyer, whether non-lawyer assistance was sought, whether a claim was made, and reasons for not making a claim. Finally, questions were asked about the household's experience with the Ontario justice system if a claim was made, including whether there was a trial or a hearing, how much the lawyer charged, evaluation of the result, satisfaction with the result, evaluation of the cost, perceived delay, agreement reached, and compensation awarded. Major demographic variables include age, occupation, number of persons in household, language, ethnic background, religion, education, and family income. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09729.v1 attorneys icpsr civil rights icpsr discrimination icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr justice icpsr lawsuits icpsr privacy icpsr traffic accidents icpsr victim compensation icpsr victimization icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Bogart, W.A. Vidmar, Neil Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9729 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09729.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06558 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06558 MiAaI MiAaI Adjusting the National Crime Victimization Survey's Estimates of Rape and Domestic Violence for Gag Factors, 1986-1990 [electronic resource] Ann L. Coker , Elizabeth A. Stasny 1996-10-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6558 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this project was to use statistical modeling techniques to estimate rape and domestic assault rates, adjusting for interviewing conditions under which the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) was administered. Data for women 16 years of age and older interviewed in the NCVS (see NATIONAL CRIME SURVEYS: NATIONAL SAMPLE, 1986-1990 [NEAR-TERM DATA] [ICPSR 8864]) were analyzed. The researchers considered whether the type of interview (personal or telephone) and the presence of another person (particularly a spouse) influenced or "gagged" the reporting of rape and domestic violence in the NCVS. The researchers also investigated correlates, primarily demographic in nature, of reporting rape, domestic violence, other assaults, and breaking and entry. In total, the data file contains reports of 434 rapes, 1,973 incidents of domestic violence, 13,459 other assaults, and 88,950 incidents of breaking and entry. The binary-coded variables provide information on whether the respondent was alone during the interview, others who were present, whether the interview was by telephone, whether the respondent refused a telephone interview, the number of persons who lived in the household, whether the respondent owned her home, whether the land use was urban, whether the household the respondent was living in was the same household from the last interview, whether the respondent had moved more than three times in the last five years, and whether an assault, domestic violence incident, rape, breaking and entry, or no crime was reported. Demographic information includes the respondent's education, income, employment during the last six months, marital status at the time of the interview, and whether the respondent was white (or non-white) or Hispanic (or non-Hispanic). Variables coded the same as the NCVS variables include age, respondent's relationship to the offender, type of crime, year and quarter of interview, NCVS control number, and person weight. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06558.v1 crime costs icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr crime icpsr domestic violence icpsr living arrangements icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr rape icpsr reactions to crime icpsr robbery icpsr sexual offenses icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr women icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization Coker, Ann L. Stasny, Elizabeth A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6558 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06558.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09353 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09353 MiAaI MiAaI Adult Criminal Careers in New York, 1972-1983 [electronic resource] Alfred Blumstein , Jacqueline Cohen 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9353 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to estimate the extent and variation of individual offending by crime type, race, age, and prior criminal record. Included in this collection are the criminal records of individuals aged 16 years or older who were arrested in the state of New York. Two separate data files are supplied. Part 1 contains data on all adults arrested in New York from 1972 to 1976 for rape, murder, robbery, aggravated assault, or burglary. Part 2 includes data on all adults arrested for larceny or auto theft in Albany and Erie counties. Variables include items such as sex, race, age, number of prior arrests, date and place of arrest, arrest charged, number of multiple counts, court disposition of charges, and type and length of sentence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09353.v1 rape icpsr robbery icpsr adult offenders icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr career criminals icpsr criminal histories icpsr larceny icpsr murder icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Blumstein, Alfred Cohen, Jacqueline Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9353 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09353.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08279 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08279 MiAaI MiAaI Adult Criminal Careers, Michigan [electronic resource] 1974-1977 Alfred Blumstein , Jacqueline Cohen 1995-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8279 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, taken from the computerized criminal history files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, were collected to develop estimates of the extent and variation of individual offending. Included are the adult criminal records of individuals 17 years of age and older arrested in Michigan from 1974 to 1977. The primary criterion for inclusion in the sample was at least one arrest in Michigan for murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, or auto theft. Once sampled, the arrest history includes data on all recorded arrests through 1977, regardless of offense type. The full dataset includes records for 41,191 individuals for a total of 200,007 arrests. The dataset is organized by individual and includes demographic characteristics of the individual (birth date, state of birth, sex, and race) followed by information from the individual's arrest record in chronological order. The arrest records include the date of arrest, the offenses charged, the disposition (convicted, dismissed, or acquitted), and the sentence. Because the data are organized by individual, they are suitable for longitudinal analyses of individual offending patterns over time. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08279.v1 arrests icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr crime icpsr defendants icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr murder icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Blumstein, Alfred Cohen, Jacqueline Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8279 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08279.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24610 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24610 MiAaI MiAaI Affect, Reason, and Decision Making [electronic resource] Paul Slovic , Melissa Finucane , Ali Alhakami 2009-09-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 24610 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This study examines the commonly observed inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. The researchers proposed that this relationship occurs because people rely on affect when judging the risk and benefit of specific hazards. The study tested and confirmed the hypothesis that providing information designed to alter the favorability of one's overall affective evaluation of an item (say nuclear power, natural gas, and food preservatives) would systematically change the risk and benefit judgments for that item. The study suggests that people seem prone to using an "affect heuristic" which improves judgmental efficiency by deriving both risk and benefit evaluations from a common source -- affective reactions to the stimulus item. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24610.v1 decision making icpsr judgment icpsr natural gas icpsr nuclear energy icpsr nuclear power icpsr perceptions icpsr risk icpsr risk assessment icpsr risk factors icpsr NACJD I. Attitude Surveys ICPSR II. Community and Urban Studies Slovic, Paul Finucane, Melissa Alhakami, Ali Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24610 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24610.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25201 MiAaI MiAaI African American Experience of Sexual Assault in Maryland, 2003-2006 [electronic resource] Mark D. Weist , Jennifer Pollitt-Hill , Linda Kinney , Yaphet Bryant , Laura Anthony , Jennifer Wilkerson 2009-04-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to better understand the problem of sexual assault among African American women in Maryland, assess their use of available resources in response to sexual assault, and explore their use of alternative sources of care. Researchers interviewed 223 female victims of sexual assault (Part 1 and Part 2) between January 2004 and July 2005 and conducted 21 focus groups (Part 3) with sexual assault resource service providers between 2003 and 2006. Criteria for inclusion in the interview component (Part 1 and Part 2) of the study included: African American or Caucasian female, aged 18 and over, resident of Maryland, and victim of sexual assault. There were four streams of recruitment for the interview portion of the study: Victims receiving services at one of 18 rape crisis centers located throughout the state of Maryland; Community outreach sessions conducted by rape crisis center community educators; Through community service providers, including those working in domestic violence centers, forensic nurse examiners (SAFE programs), probation and parole offices, reproductive health centers, county health departments, community services agencies, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and local colleges; and Through three detention centers housing female inmates. For Part 3 (Focus Group Qualitative Data), rape crisis center representatives and other community service provider representatives received a letter informing them that a focus group was going to be conducted at the end of their study training session and asked them for their participation. Part 1 (Victim Quantitative Data) includes items in the following categories: Personal Demographics, Details of the Sexual Assault, Medical Care, Law Enforcement, Prosecution/Court Process, Sexual Assault Center Services, Other Counseling Services, and Recommendations for Improvement. Part 2 (Victim Qualitative Data) includes responses to selected questions from Part 1. The data are organized by question, not by respondent. Part 3 (Focus Group Qualitative Data) includes questions on the needs of African American women who have been sexually assaulted, whether their needs are different from those of women of other racial/ethnic backgrounds, unique barriers to reporting sexual assault to police for African American women and their treatment by the criminal justice system, unique issues concerning the use of available resources by African American women, such as post-rape medical care and counseling services, and recommendations on how the state of Maryland could improve services for African American women who are the victims of sexual assault. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25201.v1 African Americans icpsr rape icpsr service providers icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual assault icpsr victim services icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Weist, Mark D. Pollitt-Hill, Jennifer Kinney, Linda Bryant, Yaphet Anthony, Laura Wilkerson, Jennifer Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09589 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09589 MiAaI MiAaI Age-by-Race Specific Crime Rates, 1965-1985 [electronic resource] [United States] Jacqueline Cohen , Richard Rosenfeld 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9589 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data examine the effects on total crime rates of changes in the demographic composition of the population and changes in criminality of specific age and race groups. The collection contains estimates from national data of annual age-by-race specific arrest rates and crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary over the 21-year period 1965-1985. The data address the following questions: (1) Are the crime rates reported by the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) data series valid indicators of national crime trends? (2) How much of the change between 1965 and 1985 in total crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary is attributable to changes in the age and race composition of the population, and how much is accounted for by changes in crime rates within age-by-race specific subgroups? (3) What are the effects of age and race on subgroup crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary? (4) What is the effect of time period on subgroup crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary? (5) What is the effect of birth cohort, particularly the effect of the very large (baby-boom) cohorts following World War II, on subgroup crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary? (6) What is the effect of interactions among age, race, time period, and cohort on subgroup crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary? (7) How do patterns of age-by-race specific crime rates for murder, robbery, and burglary compare for different demographic subgroups? The variables in this study fall into four categories. The first category includes variables that define the race-age cohort of the unit of observation. The values of these variables are directly available from UCR and include year of observation (from 1965-1985), age group, and race. The second category of variables were computed using UCR data pertaining to the first category of variables. These are period, birth cohort of age group in each year, and average cohort size for each single age within each single group. The third category includes variables that describe the annual age-by-race specific arrest rates for the different crime types. These variables were estimated for race, age, group, crime type, and year using data directly available from UCR and population estimates from Census publications. The fourth category includes variables similar to the third group. Data for estimating these variables were derived from available UCR data on the total number of offenses known to the police and total arrests in combination with the age-by-race specific arrest rates for the different crime types. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09589.v1 age icpsr arrests icpsr burglary icpsr crime rates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr murder icpsr population characteristics icpsr race icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older Adults Cohen, Jacqueline Rosenfeld, Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9589 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09589.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08261 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08261 MiAaI MiAaI Age Cohort Arrest Rates, 1970-1980 [electronic resource] David F. Greenberg 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8261 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data for this collection were gathered from the 1970 and 1980 Censuses and the Uniform Crime Reports for 1970 through 1980. The unit of analysis in this data collection is cities. Included are population totals by age group and arrest data for selected crimes by age group for Atlanta, Georgia, Chicago, Illinois, Denver, Colorado, Knoxville, Tennessee, San Jose, California, Spokane, Washington, and Tucson, Arizona. Population data by sex and age for all cities are contained in Part 4. The 123 variables provide data by age categories ranging from age 5 to age 69. Part 1, the arrest file for Atlanta and Chicago, provides arrest data for 1970 to 1980 by sex and age, ranging from age 10 and under to age 65 and over. The arrest data for other cities span two data files. Part 2 includes arrest data by sex for ages 15 to 24 for the years 1970 to 1980. Part 3 provides arrest data for ages 25 to 65 and over for the years 1970, 1975, and 1980. Arrest data are collected for the following crimes: murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, other assaults, arson, forgery, fraud, embezzlement, stolen property, vandalism, weapons, prostitution, other sex offenses, opium abuse, marijuana abuse, gambling, family offenses, drunk driving, liquor law violations, drunkenness, disorderly conduct, vagrancy, and all other offenses combined. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08261.v1 arrest rates icpsr arrests icpsr census data icpsr crime icpsr offenses icpsr population size icpsr NACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older Adults NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Greenberg, David F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8261 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08261.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06502 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06502 MiAaI MiAaI AIDS-Related Written Court Decisions in Federal and State Courts, 1984-1989 [electronic resource] [United States] Michael C. Musheno 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6502 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to identify the party characteristics, case attributes, and idea structures of written court decisions related to Auto-Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Written court decisions related to AIDS in state and federal courts were located via the LEXUS and WESTLAW data systems. For a case to be eligible, it had to address an issue involving AIDS or involve a party who was believed to be infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), and a legal decision had to provide sufficient written material to analyze. Coding was completed by three individuals with legal training based on a team-developed codebook. Except in those areas where a preliminary test showed 90-percent reliability, variables were coded based on a consensus rule. Variables include court jurisdiction, whether the case was civil or criminal, case issue area, gender of plaintiff, relationship between parties, demand and primary purpose of the demand by the defendant and the plaintiff, what the court explicitly relied upon for its decision, whether the plaintiff or defendant had AIDS, AIDS-Related Complex (ARC), or was HIV-infected, and whether the plaintiff or defendant was gay, an IV drug user, a prisoner or an accused criminal, a member of a stigmatized group, or a racial or an ethnic minority. The unit of analysis is the written court decision. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06502.v1 court cases icpsr courts icpsr decision making icpsr AIDS icpsr case processing icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD V. Courts Musheno, Michael C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6502 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06502.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07714 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07714 MiAaI MiAaI Alaska Plea Bargaining Study, 1974-1976 [electronic resource] Stevens H. Clarke 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7714 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examines the characteristics of criminal offenders as they affect the primary outcomes of their court cases, particularly plea bargaining decisions. The study was conducted in Anchorage, Juneau, and Fairbanks, Alaska, over a two-year period from August 1974 to August 1976. The data were collected from police booking sheets, public fingerprint files, and court dockets. The unit of observation is the felony case, i.e., a single felony charge against a single defendant. Each unit of data contains information about both the defendant and the charge. The variables include demographic and social characteristics of the offender, criminal history of the offender, nature of the offense, evidence, victim characteristics, and administrative factors related to the disposition of the case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07714.v2 court cases icpsr felons icpsr felony offenses icpsr offenders icpsr plea negotiations icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Clarke, Stevens H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7714 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07714.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28367 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28367 MiAaI MiAaI Alaska Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Data, 1996-2006 [electronic resource] Andre Rosay , Tara Henry 2012-10-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 28367 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. cators of legal resolutions – whether cases were referred for prosecution, whether cases were accepted for prosecution, and whether cases resulted in a conviction. Data on legal resolutions are only available for 1,229 cases examined from 1999 to 2005. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28367.v1 alcohol consumption icpsr convictions (law) icpsr drug use icpsr homelessness icpsr injuries icpsr medical evaluation icpsr medical records icpsr prosecution icpsr rape icpsr rape statistics icpsr sexual assault icpsr sexual behavior icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Rosay, Andre Henry, Tara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28367 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28367.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25763 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25763 MiAaI MiAaI Alcohol Availability, Type of Alcohol Establishment, Distribution Policies, and Their Relationship to Crime and Disorder in the District of Columbia, 2000-2006 [electronic resource] Caterina Gouvis Roman 2009-07-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25763 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between alcohol availability, type of alcohol establishment, distribution policies, and violence and disorder at the block group level in the District of Columbia. This study developed and tested a grounded comprehensive theoretical model of the relationship between alcohol availability and violence and disorder. The study also developed a geographic information system (GIS) containing neighborhood crime and demographic and physical environmental characteristics at the block group level for 431 block groups in the District of Columbia. The principal investigator calculated density measures of alcohol availability and distribution practices and aggregated characteristics of neighborhoods to examine the relationships of those measures to crime and violence. The project used data from various sources to create multiple variables measuring the physical, social, economic, and cultural characteristics of a given area in addition to the density of alcohol-selling establishments by type and incidence of criminal activity. This study examined the influence of alcohol outlets on four outcomes: (1) aggravated assault incidents, (2) calls for service for disorderly conduct, (3) calls for services for social disorder more broadly defined, and (4) calls for service for a domestic incident. The dataset for this study contains a total of 103 variables including crime variables, Census variables, alcohol outlet variables, neighborhood structural constraints variables, motivated offenders variables, and physical environment variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25763.v1 alcohol icpsr violence icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr drinking behavior icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Roman, Caterina Gouvis Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25763 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25763.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08355 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08355 MiAaI MiAaI Alternative Probation Strategies in Baltimore, Maryland [electronic resource] James J. Collins 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8355 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of supervised probation, unsupervised probation, and community service. Data were collected from several sources: input-intake forms used by the State of Maryland, probation officers' case record files, Maryland state police rap sheets, FBI sources, and interviews with Maryland probationers. Non-violent, less serious offenders who normally received probation sentences of 12 months or less were offered randomly selected assignments to one of three treatment methods over a five-month period. Baseline data for probationers in each of the three samples were drawn from an intake form that was routinely completed for cases. An interim assessment of recidivism was made at the midpoint of the intervention for each probationer using information drawn from police records. Probationers were interviewed six and twelve months after probation ended. Demographic information on the probationers includes sex, race, age, birthplace, marital status, employment status, and education. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08355.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr community service programs icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmate release plans icpsr offenders icpsr postrelease programs icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Collins, James J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8355 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08355.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09965 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09965 MiAaI MiAaI Alternative Procedures for Reducing Delays in Criminal Appeals [electronic resource] Sacramento, Springfield, and Rhode Island, 1983-1984 Joy A. Chapper , Roger A. Hanson 1994-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9965 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection investigates the effectiveness of alternative approaches to reducing delays in criminal appeals. Interviews were conducted with court representatives from districts employing differing alternatives. These districts and approaches are (1) case management in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fourth District, in Springfield, (2) staff screening for submission without oral argument in the California Court of Appeals, Third District, in Sacramento, and (3) fast-tracking procedures in the Rhode Island Supreme Court. Parallel interviews were conducted in public defenders' offices in three additional locations: Colorado, the District of Columbia, and Minnesota. Questions focused on the backlogs courts were facing, the reasons for the backlogs, and the consequences. Participants were asked about the fairness and possible consequences of procedures employed by their courts and other courts in this study. Case data were acquired from court records of the Springfield, Sacramento, and Rhode Island courts. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09965.v1 appeal procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr case management icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Chapper, Joy A. Hanson, Roger A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9965 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09965.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09875 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09875 MiAaI MiAaI Americans' Use of Time, 1985 [electronic resource] John Robinson 1997-11-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9875 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. For this data collection, respondents were asked to record in single-day time diaries each activity they engaged in over a 24-hour period. The time diary data were gathered through three different data collection methods: mail-back, telephone, and personal interviews. Respondents were instructed to describe in the diaries when the activity began, the time the activity ended, where it occurred, and who was present when the activity took place. Demographic variables include household type, respondent's sex, marital status, age, educational level, occupation, and work hours, number of children in the household under 5 and 18 years of age, and household income. Other variables focus on total work time, total time for meals at work, total minutes at work engaged in nonwork activities, total work break in minutes, and total time traveling to and from work. Data are also provided on total time spent on meal preparation and cleanup, housecleaning, outdoor chores, laundry, ironing, clothes care, home repair, baby care, child care, shopping for food, and traveling to and from food shopping. Respondents also reported total time spent on personal care, medical care, family financial activities, and sleeping, as well as time spent attending school, classes, seminars, special interest group meetings, religious meetings, sports events, and other social activities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09875.v2 housework icpsr leisure icpsr lifestyles icpsr quality of life icpsr recreation icpsr social interaction icpsr social life icpsr time utilization icpsr work icpsr family life icpsr family work relationship icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and Behavior Robinson, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9875 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09875.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07272 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07272 MiAaI MiAaI American Bar Foundation [electronic resource] State Criminal Court Cases, 1962 Lee Silverstein , Stuart S. Nagel 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7272 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study presents data about criminal court cases in the 50 states and District of Columbia in 1962. Variables include state and county of trial, case processing, offense charged, sentence, type of counsel, amount of bail, length of time in jail, and other aspects related to the disposition of the cases. Demographic information on the defendant is provided, such as age group, sex, race, and years of school completed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07272.v1 offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr trial procedures icpsr trials icpsr United States icpsr American Bar Foundation icpsr arrest procedures icpsr arrests icpsr bail icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr criminal courts icpsr defendants icpsr defense counsel icpsr imprisonment icpsr legal representation icpsr legal systems icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Silverstein, Lee Nagel, Stuart S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7272 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07272.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04639 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04639 MiAaI MiAaI American Terrorism Study, 1980-2002 [electronic resource] Brent L. Smith , Kelly R. Damphousse 2007-07-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4639 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted in response to a lack of existing data collections relating specifically to acts of American terrorism. A primary goal of the study was to create an empirical database from which criminological theories and governmental policies could be effectively evaluated. The American Terrorism Study began in 1989 when the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Terrorist Research and Analytical Center released a list of persons indicted as a result of investigation under the FBI's Counterterrorism Program. Since that time, FBI has released additional lists to the principal investigators. After receiving a list of persons indicted in federal criminal court as a result of an official terrorism investigation, the researchers reviewed the cases at either the federal district court where the cases were tried or at the federal regional records center where the cases were archived. The researchers divided the dataset into five distinct datasets. Part 1, Counts Data, provides data on every count for each indictee in each indictment. This is the basic dataset. There were 7,306 counts from 1980 to 2002. Part 2, Indictees Data, provides data on each of the 574 indictees from 1980-2002. Part 3, Persons Data, provides data on the 510 individuals who were indicted by the federal government as a result of a terrorism investigation. Part 4, Cases Data, provides one line of data for each of the 172 criminal terrorism cases that resulted from a federal terrorism investigation. Part 5, Group Data, provides one line of case data for each of the 85 groups that were tried in federal court for terrorism-related activity. Each of the five datasets includes information on approximately 80 variables divided into four major categories: (1) demographic information, (2) information about the terrorist group to which the individual belongs, (3) prosecution and defense data, and (4) count/case outcome and sentencing data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04639.v1 crime prevention icpsr terrorism icpsr terrorists icpsr terrorist attacks icpsr terrorist prosecution icpsr district courts icpsr FBI icpsr federal prisoners icpsr national security icpsr sentencing icpsr TPDRC I. Terrorism ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Smith, Brent L. Damphousse, Kelly R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4639 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04639.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR00049 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR00049 MiAaI MiAaI Analysis of Arrests in Paris, June 1848 [electronic resource] Charles Tilly , Unknown 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 49 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains three files pertaining to the June 1848 insurrection in Paris and to people charged with or arrested for participation in the insurrection. The data files contain social, economic, and demographic information. Information is provided on the results of the judicial proceedings against the individual after arrest, as well as demographic characteristics of the individual, such as occupation, place of birth, sex, age, marital status, number of children, and place of residence (Part 1), the number of inhabitants arrested in connection with the rebellion, the labor force, and social characteristics of the 12 zones (arrondisements) (Part 2), and demographic and arrest information with a focus on the furnished apartments, clubs, and popular societies within the 48 quartiers (districts) existing in Paris in 1848 (Part 3). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00049.v1 arrests icpsr arrondissements icpsr civil disorders icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr labor force icpsr nineteenth century icpsr population density icpsr prosecution icpsr riots icpsr trial procedures icpsr violence icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC I. Conflict Data ICPSR III.A. Conflict, Aggression, Violence, Wars, Conflict and Stability Within Nations Tilly, Charles Unknown Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 49 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00049.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09223 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09223 MiAaI MiAaI Analyzing Trial Time in California, Colorado, and New Jersey, 1986 [electronic resource] Dale Anne Sipes , Mary Elsner Oram 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9223 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study of nine courts was undertaken to identify procedural factors that can be used to reduce the length of criminal and civil trials without impairing fairness. The data collection provides direct information on the actual amount of time consumed by various trial segments and the perceived length of trial segments as gauged by judges and attorneys. In addition, data are supplied on the legal community's attitudes toward existing trial length, reasons for it, and judicial control over it. The trial case file contains information on types of cases and trials, estimated trial length, type of disposition, type of defense attorney, number of claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims, number of exhibits introduced, number of expert and lay witnesses called by the defense, number of peremptory challenges, and day and time the trial ended. The questionnaire data contain information on professional experiences, number of cases tried per month, opinions about time consumed by each segment of the trial, estimated time used in each segment, and attitudes toward judicial control over the trial length. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09223.v1 attitudes icpsr attorneys icpsr case processing icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judges icpsr time utilization icpsr trial procedures icpsr trials icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sipes, Dale Anne Oram, Mary Elsner Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9223 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09223.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29662 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29662 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29662 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1994 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1994, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29662.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29662 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29662.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29663 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29663 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29663 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1995 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1995, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29663.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29663 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29663.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29664 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29664 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29664 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1996 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1996, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29664.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29664 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29664.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29665 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29665 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29665 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1997 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1997, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29665.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29665 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29665.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29666 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29666 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29666 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1998 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1998, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29666.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr causes of death icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29666 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29666.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29667 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29667 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29667 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1999 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1999, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29667.v1 causes of death icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29667 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29667.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31325 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31325 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31325 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2000 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2000, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31325.v1 parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr causes of death icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31325 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31325.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31326 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31326 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31326 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2001 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2001, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31326.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31326 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31326.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31327 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31327 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31327 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2002 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2002, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31327.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31327 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31327.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31328 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31328 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31328 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2003 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2003, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31328.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31328 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31328.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31329 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31329 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31329 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2004 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2004, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31329.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31329 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31329.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31330 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31330 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31330 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2005 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2005, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31330.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31330 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31330.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31331 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31331 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31331 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2006 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2006, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31331.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31331 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31331.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31332 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31332 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31332 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2007 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2007, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31332.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31332 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31332.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34380 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34380 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34380 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2008 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2008, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34380.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34380 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34380.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34381 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34381 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34381 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2009 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2009, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34381.v1 criminal justice system icpsr Hispanic or Latino origins icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34381 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34381.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34382 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2010 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2010, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34382.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34382.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29668 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29668 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-12-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29668 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1994 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1994, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1994. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29668.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29668 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29668.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29669 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29669 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29669 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1995 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1995, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1995. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29669.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29669 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29669.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29670 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1996 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1996, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1996. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29670.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29670.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29671 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29671 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29671 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1997 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1997, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1997. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29671.v2 probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29671 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29671.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29672 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1998 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1998, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1998. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29672.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29672.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29673 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1999 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1999, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1999. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29673.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29673.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28361 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28361 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28361 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2000 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2000, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2000. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28361.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28361 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28361.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28362 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28362 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28362 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2001 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2001, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2001. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28362.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28362 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28362.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28363 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28363 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28363 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2002 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2002, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2002. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28363.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28363 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28363.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28364 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28364 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28364 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2003 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2003, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2003. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28364.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28364 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28364.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28365 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28365 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28365 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2004 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2004, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2004. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28365.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28365 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28365.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28366 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2005 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2005, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2005. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28366.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31323 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31323 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31323 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2006 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2006, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2006. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31323.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31323 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31323.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31324 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31324 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31324 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2007 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2007, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2007. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31324.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31324 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31324.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34319 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34319 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34319 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2008 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2008, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2008. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34319 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34320 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34320 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34320 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2009 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2009, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2009. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34320 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34321 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2010 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2010, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2010. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24641 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24641 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Individual Reporting-Level Data, 2007 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-01-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 24641 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the Nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2007 Annual Survey of Jails is the 20th such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2007. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including Federal and State agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 29, 2007. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24641.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24641 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24641.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02979 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02979 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 1998 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2979 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 69 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on number of inmates, staffing, and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including who operated it, facility age, facility function, rated capacity, authority to house juveniles, number of juveniles held, number of admission and discharges in last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, peak population during June, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 30, number of facility staff by sex and function, facility crowding, renovation and building plans, types of programs available to inmates, and overview of facility and staffing needs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02979.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2979 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02979.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02980 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02980 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 1999 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2980 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 69 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on number of inmates, staffing, and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including who operated it, facility age, facility function, rated capacity, authority to house juveniles, number of juveniles held, number of admission and discharges in last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, the peak population during June, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 30, number of facility staff by sex and function, facility crowding, renovation and building plans, types of programs available to inmates, and overview of facility and staffing needs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02980.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2980 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02980.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03196 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03196 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2000 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003-02-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3196 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 69 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on the number of inmates and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including the rated capacity, number of adult inmates, number of juveniles held, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 30, number of admissions and discharges in the last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, peak population during June, facility crowding, and renovation and building plans. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03196.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3196 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03196.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03472 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03472 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2001 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3472 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is to gather data on all adult and juvenile jail facilities and detention centers in Indian country, which is defined for purposes of this collection as reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey, a complete enumeration of all 68 confinement facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), provides data on number of inmates and facility characteristics and needs. Variables describe each facility, including rated capacity, number of adult inmates, number of juveniles held, number of inmates held by sex and conviction status on June 29, number of admissions and discharges in the last 30 days, number of inmate deaths, the peak population during June, facility crowding, and renovation and building plans. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03472.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3472 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03472.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31981 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 31981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2004, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31981.v1 Alaskan Natives icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31924 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31924 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-11-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31924 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2007, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31924.v1 Alaskan Natives icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31924 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31924.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31923 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31923 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-10-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31923 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2008, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31923.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31923 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31923.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31741 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31741 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31741 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2009, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31741.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31741 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31741.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32841 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32841 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-12-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32841 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2010, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32841.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32841 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32841.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34354 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34354 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails in Indian Country, 2011 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34354 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the Survey of Jails in Indian Country is an enumeration of all known adult and juvenile facilities -- jails, confinement facilities, detention centers, and other correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in the United States Department of the Interior. For the purpose of this collection, Indian country includes reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and other Native American and Alaska Native communities throughout the United States. The survey collects data on the number of adults and juveniles held on the last weekday in June 2011, type of offense, average daily population in June, most crowded day in June, admissions and releases in June, number of inmate deaths and suicide attempts, rated capacity, and jail staffing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34354.v1 correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr Native Americans icpsr population characteristics icpsr correctional facilities icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34354 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34354.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28281 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28281 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2008 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28281 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2008 Annual Survey of Jails is the 21st such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2008. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2008. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28281.v1 jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28281 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28281.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29081 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2009 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-05-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2009 Annual Survey of Jails is the 22nd such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2009. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2009. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29081.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31261 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31261 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2010 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-08-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31261 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2010 Annual Survey of Jails is the 23rd such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to 2010, data is collected on jails’ operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails. To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2010. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2010. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31261.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31261 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31261.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR33722 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR33722 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jail-Level Data, 2011 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-04-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 33722 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2011 Annual Survey of Jails is the 24th such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to the survey, data are collected on jails’ operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails. To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2011. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date for the survey is June 30, 2011. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33722.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 33722 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33722.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08687 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08687 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-level and Jail-level Data, 1985 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8687 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) sponsors the Sample Survey of Jails as part of a series of statistical programs measuring the correctional population. The Sample Survey meets BJS's need to analyze continuously the "spillover" effect on local jails of the growth in federal and state prison populations. The data are used in conjunction with statistics on federal and state prisoners to provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and to measure changes in that system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08687.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8687 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08687.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06511 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06511 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level and Jail-Level Data, 1991 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6511 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity, court orders, conditions of confinement, and alternative programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06511.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6511 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06511.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06395 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06395 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level and Jail-Level Data, 1992 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6395 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Also added in the 1992 survey were variables on citizenship, population movement, and total number of inmate deaths for inmates originally confined to the facility in question who died either at that facility or elsewhere. Also, the 1992 version included a more complete survey of jail programs and a supplemental questionnaire (CJ-5S), which dealt with AIDS-related questions. In addition, information was collected for the first time on drug testing, programs that treated or educated inmates, boot camps, work release, and alternatives to incarceration such as electronic monitoring, house arrest, community service, and weekend or day reporting. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06395.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug testing icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr prerelease programs icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6395 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06395.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09074 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09074 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1987 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9074 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and the changes that occur in that system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09074.v2 correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9074 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09074.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09373 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09373 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1989 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9373 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and the changes that occur in that system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09373.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9373 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09373.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09569 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09569 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1990 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9569 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a complete picture of the adult correctional system and the changes that occur in that system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, adult or juvenile status, reason being held, and cause of death. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity, court orders, conditions of confinement, and alternative programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09569.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9569 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09569.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06538 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06538 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1994 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6538 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06538.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6538 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06538.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06784 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06784 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1995 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6784 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06784.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6784 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06784.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06856 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06856 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1996 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6856 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06856.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6856 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06856.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02313 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02313 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1997 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 2313 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" effect on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data permit an assessment of the demands placed on correctional resources and provide a comprehensive picture of the adult correctional system and changes that occur within the system. Information is available on the number of inmates by sex, race, and adult or juvenile status. Facility characteristics were collected regarding capacity and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02313.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2313 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02313.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02682 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02682 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 1998 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2682 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-U.S. citizens within the jail population. A special addendum to the 1998 survey included data on the prevalence and results of drug testing and treatment in jails. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02682.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug testing icpsr drugs icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2682 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02682.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03882 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03882 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2000 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3882 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03882.v1 correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3882 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03882.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03883 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03883 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2001 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3883 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03883.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3883 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03883.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04428 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04428 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2002 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-04-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4428 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04428.v1 correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr overcrowding effects icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4428 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04428.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04635 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04635 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2003 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4635 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04635.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4635 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04635.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20200 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20200 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2004 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20200 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20200.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20200 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20200.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20368 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20368 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Survey of Jails [electronic resource] Jurisdiction-Level Data, 2006 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-07-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20368 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection provides annual data on jail populations across the nation and examines the "spillover" on local jails resulting from the dramatic growth in federal and state prison populations. These data are used to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the jail population (including sex, race, and adult or juvenile status), supervision status of persons held, prevalence of crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20368.v1 correctional facilities icpsr jail inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr correctional system icpsr jails icpsr population characteristics icpsr probation icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20368 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20368.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06486 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06486 MiAaI MiAaI Anticipating and Combating Community Decay and Crime in Washington, DC, and Cleveland, Ohio, 1980-1990 [electronic resource] Adele Harrell , Caterina Gouvis 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6486 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Urban Institute undertook a comprehensive assessment of communities approaching decay to provide public officials with strategies for identifying communities in the early stages of decay and intervening effectively to prevent continued deterioration and crime. Although community decline is a dynamic spiral downward in which the physical condition of the neighborhood, adherence to laws and conventional behavioral norms, and economic resources worsen, the question of whether decay fosters or signals increasing risk of crime, or crime fosters decay (as investors and residents flee as reactions to crime), or both, is not easily answered. Using specific indicators to identify future trends, predictor models for Washington, DC, and Cleveland were prepared, based on data available for each city. The models were designed to predict whether a census tract should be identified as at risk for very high crime and were tested using logistic regression. The classification of a tract as a "very high crime" tract was based on its crime rate compared to crime rates for other tracts in the same city. To control for differences in population and to facilitate cross-tract comparisons, counts of crime incidents and other events were converted to rates per 1,000 residents. Tracts with less than 100 residents were considered nonresidential or institutional and were deleted from the analysis. Washington, DC, variables include rates for arson and drug sales or possession, percentage of lots zoned for commercial use, percentage of housing occupied by owners, scale of family poverty, presence of public housing units for 1980, 1983, and 1988, and rates for aggravated assaults, auto thefts, burglaries, homicides, rapes, and robberies for 1980, 1983, 1988, and 1990. Cleveland variables include rates for auto thefts, burglaries, homicides, rapes, robberies, drug sales or possession, and delinquency filings in juvenile court, and scale of family poverty for 1980 through 1989. Rates for aggravated assaults are provided for 1986 through 1989 and rates for arson are provided for 1983 through 1988. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06486.v1 communities icpsr crime prediction icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr intervention strategies icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr urban decline icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Harrell, Adele Gouvis, Caterina Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6486 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06486.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09924 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09924 MiAaI MiAaI Anticipating Community Drug Problems in Washington, DC, and Portland, Oregon, 1984-1990 [electronic resource] Adele Harrell , Keiko Powers , Yih-Ing Hser 1994-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9924 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the use of arrestee urinalysis results as a predictor of other community drug problems. A three-stage public health model was developed using drug diffusion and community drug indicators as aggregate measures of individual drug use careers. Monthly data on drug indicators for Washington, DC, and Portland, Oregon, were used to: (1) estimate the correlations of drug problem indicators over time, (2) examine the correlations among indicators at different stages in the spread of new forms of drug abuse, and (3) estimate lagged models in which arrestee urinalysis results were used to predict subsequent community drug problems. Variables included arrestee drug test results, drug-overdose deaths, crimes reported to the local police department, and child maltreatment incidents. Washington variables also included drug-related emergency room episodes. The unit of analysis was months covered by the study. The Washington, DC, data consist of 78 records, one for each month from April 1984 through September 1990. The Portland, Oregon, data contain 33 records, one for each month from January 1988 through September 1990. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09924.v1 arrests icpsr communities icpsr community development icpsr community health icpsr crime rates icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug overdose icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr planning icpsr prediction icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Harrell, Adele Powers, Keiko Hser, Yih-Ing Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9924 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09924.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06808 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06808 MiAaI MiAaI Arkansas Juvenile Court Records, 1991-1993 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice and Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6808 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1983, the Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts began to collect data from intake and probation departments on each case disposed during the previous calendar year. The data include a record of each case processed formally with petition for each delinquency, dependent/neglect, or family in need of services case disposed. Information is provided on county, case type, date of filing, reason for referral to the courts, and the court action. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06808.v1 case processing icpsr court cases icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile crime icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice and Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6808 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06808.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06883 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06883 MiAaI MiAaI Arkansas Juvenile Court Records, 1994 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice and Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6883 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1994 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases) in Arkansas. Inaugurated in 1983, the Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts began to collect data from intake and probation departments on each case disposed during the previous calendar year. The data include a record of each case processed formally with petition and contain an individual record on each family in need of services, delinquency, or dependency/neglect case disposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06883.v1 case processing icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice and Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6883 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06883.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08357 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08357 MiAaI MiAaI Armed Criminals in America [electronic resource] A Survey of Incarcerated Felons, 1983 James Wright , Peter Rossi 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8357 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The data for this study were collected using self-administered questionnaires given to a nonprobability sample of incarcerated felons in ten states. Information in the data include socioeconomic status of the inmate, prior criminal record, drug use, weapon usage, family history, and demographic information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08357.v1 crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug use icpsr families icpsr inmates icpsr justice icpsr socioeconomic indicators icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Wright, James Rossi, Peter Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8357 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08357.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02826 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02826 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 1999-11-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2826 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United States. The ADAM Program is a redesigned version of the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), upgraded methodologically and expanded to include 35 cities. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified ADAM/DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 DUF data and all of the DUF 1996, DUF 1997, and ADAM 1998 data) also collected information about the arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the new interview instrument also included information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs and whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crimes for which they were arrested. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had prior arrests in the last 12 months. Data that continue to be collected with the new version of the ADAM/DUF interview provide information about arrestees' histories of drug/alcohol treatment, including whether they ever received drug/alcohol treatment and whether they needed drug/alcohol treatment. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of the following ten drug types: marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2826 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02994 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02994 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2994 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, the successor to the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in 35 sites across the United States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge at the time of booking. The modified ADAM/DUF interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 data) also collected information about the arrestee's use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day drug use), age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2994 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03270 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03270 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3270 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. thadone, methaqualone, barbiturates, amphetamines, and methamphetamine. The adult data files include several derived variables. The male data also include four sampling weights, and stratum identifications and percents. For the juvenile data, demographic variables include age, race, sex, educational attainment, employment status, and living circumstances. Data also include each juvenile arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs (alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, powder cocaine, crack, heroin, PCP, amphetamines, barbiturates, quaaludes, methadone, crystal methamphetamine, Valium, LSD, and inhalants). For each drug type, arrestees reported whether they had ever used the drug, age of first use, whether they had used the drug in the past 30 days and past 72 hours, number of days they used the drug in past month, whether they tried to cut down or quit using the drug, if they were successful, whether they felt dependent on the drug, whether they were receiving treatment for the drug, whether they had received treatment for the drug in the past, and whether they thought they could use treatment for that drug. Additional variables include whether juvenile respondents had ever injected drugs, whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crime for which they were arrested, whether they had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents, and if so, whether in the past 12 months, and information on arrests and charges in the past 12 months. As with the adult data, urine test results are also provided. Finally, variables covering precinct (precinct of arrest) and law (penal law code associated with the crime for which the juvenile was arrested) are also provided for use by local law enforcement officials at each site. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3270 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03688 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03688 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3688 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3688 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03815 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03815 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3815 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3815 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04020 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04020 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4020 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) for males, weights. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug dependence icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4020 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28141 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28141 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Project in Rural Nebraska, 1998 [electronic resource] Denise C. Herz 2011-01-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28141 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. A pilot outreach project of the National Intstitute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, the rural Nebraska ADAM program examined the prevalence and type of arrestee drug use in four rural Nebraska counties and compared the results to those found in Omaha, Nebraska, an established ADAM site. The data were collected in Madison (n=78), Dawson (n=50), Hall (n=53), and Scotts Bluff (n=149) counties, and Omaha, Nebraska, (n=202) in October and November of 1998. The catchment area for Omaha was the central city. The ADAM interview provided demographic and descriptive data, including race, age, marital status, source of income, screens of substance abuse and dependency, treatment history, arrest and incarceration experiences, and participation in local drug markets. At the conclusion of the interview, respondents were asked to provide a urine specimen. The current study included a supplemental questionnaire about methamphetamine use. The methamphetamine addendum included variables on why the respondent began and continued the use of methamphetamines, how often and how much methamphetamine was used, if and why the respondent had ever sought and completed treatment, source of the methamphetamine, and if the respondent had ever made or sold methamphetamine. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr methamphetamine icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Herz, Denise C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28141 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25821 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25821 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2007 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt 2010-01-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25821 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, the ONDCP and Abt Associates have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. A total of 8,296 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2007. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Hunt, Dana Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25821 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27221 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27221 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2008 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2010-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27221 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc. have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implements two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collects data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Data collection has been conducted across two back-to-back quarters in each of 10 counties from a county-based representative sample of 250 male arrestees per quarter for a total of 500 arrestees annually per site or a total of 5,000 arrestees across sites annually. A total of 7,717 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2008. Collection occurs in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Additional data collection periods were optioned by ONDCP, and subsequent cycles of back-to-back data collection (not yet available) began April 1, 2008. Participation is voluntary and confidential, and the procedures include a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr methamphetamine icpsr urinalysis icpsr addiction icpsr alcoholism icpsr cocaine icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug use icpsr heroin icpsr marijuana icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27221 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30061 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30061 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-02-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30061 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30061 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32321 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010 [electronic resource] Dana Hunt , William Rhodes 2011-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 32321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr susbstance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hunt, Dana Rhodes, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09998 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09998 MiAaI MiAaI Arrests As Communications to Criminals in St. Louis, 1970, 1972-1982 [electronic resource] Carol W. Kohfeld , John Sprague 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9998 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was designed to assess the deterrent effects over time of police sanctioning activity, specifically that of arrests. Arrest and crime report data were collected from the St. Louis Police Department and divided into two categories: all Uniform Crime Reporting Program Part I crime reports, including arrests, and Part I felony arrests. The police department also generated geographical "x" and "y" coordinates corresponding to the longitude and latitude where each crime and arrest took place. Part 1 of this collection contains data on all reports made to police regarding Part I felony crimes from 1970 to 1982 (excluding 1971). Parts 2-13 contain the yearly data that were concatenated into one file for Part 1. Variables in Parts 2-13 include offense code, census tract, police district, police area, city block, date of crime, time crime occurred, value of property taken, and "x" and "y" coordinates of crime and arrest locations. Part 14 contains data on all Part I felony arrests. Included is information on offense charged, the marital status, sex, and race of the person arrested, census tract of arrest, and "x" and "y" coordinates. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09998.v1 crime statistics icpsr deterrence icpsr felony offenses icpsr arrest rates icpsr arrests icpsr crime mapping icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Kohfeld, Carol W. Sprague, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9998 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09998.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08180 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08180 MiAaI MiAaI Arrests Without Conviction, 1979-1980 [electronic resource] Jacksonville and San Diego Floyd Feeney 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8180 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection includes information on robberies and burglaries in two cities, Jacksonville, Florida, and San Diego, California. The unit of analysis is defendants in felony cases. Information on each defendant includes socioeconomic status, criminal history, weapon usage, relationship to victim, trial procedures, and disposition. Demographic information for each defendant includes sex, race, age, and employment status. There are five files in the dataset. Parts 4 and 5 must be merged to form the complete Jacksonville burglaries dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08180.v1 acquittals icpsr arrests icpsr burglary icpsr conviction rates icpsr court cases icpsr criminal histories icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felony courts icpsr robbery icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr trials icpsr weapons icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Feeney, Floyd Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8180 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08180.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09972 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09972 MiAaI MiAaI Arson Measurement, Analysis, and Prevention in Massachusetts, 1983-1985 [electronic resource] James Alan Fox 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9972 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were gathered to test a model of the socioeconomic and demographic determinants of the crime of arson. Datasets for this analysis were developed by the principal investigator from records of the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System and from population and housing data from the 1980 Census of Massachusetts. The three identically-structured data files include variables such as population size, fire incident reports, employment, income, family structure, housing type, housing quality, housing occupancy, housing availability, race, and age. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09972.v2 arson icpsr causes of crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr family size icpsr housing icpsr population size icpsr property crimes icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD VIII. Official Statistics Fox, James Alan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9972 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09972.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22642 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22642 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Consistency and Fairness in Sentencing in Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia, 2001-2002, 2004 [electronic resource] Brian J. Ostrom 2009-11-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 22642 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the integrity of sentencing outcomes under alternative state guideline systems and to investigate how this variation in structure impacted actual sentencing practice. The research team sought to address the question, to what extent do sentencing guidelines contribute to the goals of consistency, proportionality, and a lack of discrimination. The National Center for State Courts conducted an examination of sentencing patterns in three states with substantially different guidelines systems: Minnesota, Michigan, and Virginia. The three states vary along critical dimensions of the presumptive versus voluntary nature of guidelines as well as basic mechanics. There are differences in the formal design, administration, and statutory framework of the Michigan, Minnesota, and Virginia sentencing systems. For the 2004 Michigan Sentencing Outcomes Data (Part 1), the Michigan Department of Corrections Offender Management Network Information System (OMNI) provided sentencing guideline data for 32,754 individual offenders sentenced during calendar year 2004. For the 2002 Minnesota Sentencing Outcomes Data (Part 2), the Minnesota Sentencing Commission provided data for 12,978 individual offenders sentenced in calendar year 2002. The Virginia Sentencing Commission provided the Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Assault Sentencing Outcomes Data (Part 3) and the Fiscal Year 2002 Virginia Burglary Sentencing Outcomes Data (Part 4). The Assault and Burglary/Dwelling crime groups have 1,614 and 1,743 observations, respectively. Variables in the four datasets are classified into the broad categories of conviction offense severity, prior record, offense seriousness, grid cell type, habitual/modifiers, departure, and extra guideline variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22642.v1 correctional classification icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr discrimination icpsr imprisonment icpsr judicial decisions icpsr offenders icpsr offenders sentencing icpsr offense classification icpsr offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Ostrom, Brian J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22642 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22642.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04152 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04152 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Delivery of Community Policing Services in Ada County, Idaho, 2002 [electronic resource] John P. Crank , Andrew L. Giacomazzi 2006-01-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4152 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to explore the ways that enable the Ada County Sheriff's Office (ACSO) to examine its behavior in five areas that embody its adoption of community policing elements: (1) periodic assessments of citizens' perceptions of crime and police services, (2) substation policing, (3) patrol based in problem-oriented identification and resolution, (4) performance evaluation in a community-oriented policing (COP)/problem-oriented policing (POP) environment, and (5) the building of community partnerships. The researchers strived to obtain both transitive and recursive effects. One of the goals of this project was to facilitate the ACSO's efforts toward self-reflection, and by doing so, become a learning organization. In order to do this, data were collected, via survey, from both citizens of Ada County and from deputies employed by the ACSO. The citizen survey was a random, stratified telephone survey, using CATI technology, administered to 761 Ada County residents who received patrol services from the ACSO. The survey was designed to correspond to a similar survey conducted in 1997 (DEVELOPING A PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING MODEL IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 1997-1998 [ICPSR 2654]) in the same area regarding similar issues: citizens' fear of crime, citizens' satisfaction with police services, the extent of public knowledge about and interest in ideas of community policing, citizens' police service needs, sheriff's office service needs and their views of the community policing mandate. The deputy survey was a self-enumerated questionnaire administered to 54 deputies and sergeants of the ACSO during a pre-arranged, regular monthly training. This survey consisted of four sections: the deputies' perception of crime problems, rating of the deputy performance evaluation, ethical issues in policing, and departmental relations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04152.v1 attitudes icpsr community policing icpsr fear of crime icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr perceptions icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police departments icpsr police effectiveness icpsr public safety icpsr organizational change icpsr rural crime icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Crank, John P. Giacomazzi, Andrew L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4152 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04152.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03922 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03922 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Efficacy of Treatment Modalities in the Context of Adult Drug Courts in Four Jurisdictions in the United States, 1997-2002 [electronic resource] Donald F. Anspach , Jeff Bouffard , Andrew S. Ferguson 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3922 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined adult drug treatment courts. Drug treatment courts are intended to reduce the recidivism of drug-involved offenders by changing their drug-use habits. These courts provide a connection between the criminal justice and treatment systems by combining treatment with structured sanctions and rewards. Researchers collected data between February 2001 and May 2002 on drug court participants, treatment services and staff, and organizations involved in drug court operations in four jurisdictions: Bakersfield, California, Jackson County, Missouri, Creek County, Oklahoma, and St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. Part 1, Retrospective Participant Data, contains recidivism and treatment data on 2,357 drug treatment court participants who were enrolled in one of the drug courts between January 1997 and December 2000. Part 2, Treatment Observation Data, contains data collected from observations of treatment sessions at each site from May through July 2001. Part 3, Staff Survey Data, provides data obtained through surveys of 54 treatment service staff members. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03922.v1 courts icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug treatment icpsr recidivism icpsr treatment programs icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Anspach, Donald F. Bouffard, Jeff Ferguson, Andrew S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3922 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03922.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20622 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20622 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Identity Theft Offenders' Strategies and Perceptions of Risk in the United States, 2006-2007 [electronic resource] Heith Copes , Lynne Vieraitis 2009-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 20622 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine the crime of identity theft from the offenders' perspectives. The study employed a purposive sampling strategy. Researchers identified potential interview subjects by examining newspapers (using Lexis-Nexis), legal documents (using Lexis-Nexis and Westlaw), and United States Attorneys' Web sites for individuals charged with, indicted, and/or sentenced to prison for identity theft. Once this list was generated, researchers used the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Inmate Locator to determine if the individuals were currently housed in federal facilities. Researchers visited the facilities that housed the largest number of inmates on the list in each of the six regions in the United States as defined by the BOP (Western, North Central, South Central, North Eastern, Mid-Atlantic, and South Eastern) and solicited the inmates housed in these prisons. A total of 14 correctional facilities were visited and 65 individuals incarcerated for identity theft or identity theft related crimes were interviewed between March 2006 and February 2007. Researchers used semi-structured interviews to explore the offenders' decision-making processes. When possible, interviews were audio recorded and then transcribed verbatim. Part 1 (Quantitative Data) includes the demographic variables age, race, gender, number of children, highest level of education, and socioeconomic class while growing up. Other variables include prior arrests or convictions and offense type, prior drug use and if drug use contributed to identity theft, if employment facilitated identity theft, if they went to trial or plead to charges, and sentence length. Part 2 (Qualitative Data), includes demographic questions such as family situation while growing up, highest level of education, marital status, number of children, and employment status while committing identity theft crimes. Subjects were asked about prior criminal activity and drug use. Questions specific to identity theft include the age at which the person became involved in identity theft, how many identities he or she had stolen, if they had worked with other people to steal identities, why they had become involved in identity theft, the skills necessary to steal identities, and the perceived risks involved in identity theft. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20622.v1 white collar crime icpsr adult offenders icpsr federal prisoners icpsr felony offenses icpsr fraud icpsr identity theft icpsr inmate attitudes icpsr personal finances icpsr property crimes icpsr access to information icpsr stolen property icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Copes, Heith Vieraitis, Lynne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20622 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20622.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07808 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07808 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Local Legal Culture [electronic resource] Practitioner Norms in Four Criminal Courts, 1979 Thomas W. Jr. Church 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7808 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study attempts to operationalize the concept of local legal culture by examining differences in the processing of twelve hypothetical criminal cases in four criminal courts. Questionnaires asking how these hypothetical cases should best be handled were administered to judges, district attorneys, and defense attorneys in four cities: Bronx County (New York City), New York, Detroit, Michigan, Miami, Florida, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In each city, the presiding judge, prosecutor, and head of the public defender's office were informed of the project. Questionnaires were distributed to prosecuting attorneys and public defenders by their supervisors. Judges were contacted in person or given questionnaires with a cover letter from the presiding judge. All questionnaires were completed anonymously and returned separately by respondents. The variables include number of years the respondent had been in the criminal justice system, preferred mode of disposition and of sentencing for each of the twelve cases, and the respondents' predictions of the probability of conviction in each case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07808.v1 attorneys icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr judges icpsr legal systems icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems Church, Thomas W. Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7808 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07808.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04337 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04337 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Mental Health Problems Among Serious Delinquents Committed to the California Youth Authority, 1997-1999 [electronic resource] Rudy Haapanen , Hans Steiner 2006-01-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4337 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to explore the usefulness of the instruments used in the California Youth Authority's (CYA) Treatment Needs Assessment (TNA) battery. A total of 836 wards who completed screening questionnaires were followed to determine whether they were subsequently placed in mental health programs, were prescribed medications used to treat serious mental health problems, and/or were identified by staff as requiring these services. Data for this study were collected from hard-copy files maintained in CYA ward institutions and the CYA central office. Specific variables include the scale scores of the four instruments used in the TNA, demographic variables of the ward, treatment received by the ward, and ward behavior. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04337.v1 correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile inmates icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr mental health icpsr mental health services icpsr treatment programs icpsr youthful offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Haapanen, Rudy Steiner, Hans Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4337 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04337.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04340 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04340 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Police Officers' Decision Making and Discretion in Making Traffic Stops in Savannah, Georgia, 2002 [electronic resource] Geoffrey P. Alpert , Roger G. Dunham , Meghan Stroshine , Katherine Bennett , John MacDonald 2006-01-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4340 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study aimed to fill a void in the research regarding police behavior by focusing on the formation and creation of cognitive suspicion by officers. The study also examined formal actions (stops) taken by the police pursuant to that suspicion. The study was conducted using observational research methods and collected quantitative and qualitative data on officer suspicion. Data were collected by observers who rode along with patrol officers from April 2002 to November 2002. Field observers used three major data collection instruments in order to gather as much relevant information as possible from a variety of sources and in diverse situations. The Officer Form was an overall evaluation of the officer's decision-making characteristics, Suspicion Forms captured information each time an incident occurred, and a Suspect Form was a compilation of data from the citizen who had the encounter with the officer. Additional documents included informed consent forms, a card detailing the language to be used for the initial contact with citizens, and hourly activity forms. Anytime a suspicion was formed or a formal action was taken after a suspicion was formed, the observer debriefed the officer as to his or her thoughts and elicited the officer's overall rating of the encounter. Data in this collection include general demographic characteristics of the officer and the suspect, as well as the area in which the suspicion was formed. Data was also gathered regarding what led the officer to form a suspicion, and why a person was or was not stopped. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04340.v1 cognitive processes icpsr decision making icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police officers icpsr police patrol icpsr suspect identification icpsr traffic offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Alpert, Geoffrey P. Dunham, Roger G. Stroshine, Meghan Bennett, Katherine MacDonald, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4340 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04340.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26401 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Practical and Monetary Efficacy of New Jersey's Megan's Law, 1972-2007 [electronic resource] Kristen Zgoba , Philip Witt , Melissa Dalessandro , Bonita Veysey 2013-04-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 26401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study investigated New Jersey's Megan's Law and its specific deterrence effect on re-offending, including the level of general and sexual offense recidivism, the nature of sexual re-offenses, and time to first re-arrest for sexual and non-sexual re-offenses (i.e., community tenure). Data were collected on 550 sexual offenders released during the years 1990 to 2000. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26401.v1 outcome evaluation icpsr rape icpsr recidivism rates icpsr sex offender profiles icpsr sex offender registration icpsr sex offenders icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual assault icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Zgoba, Kristen Witt, Philip Dalessandro, Melissa Veysey, Bonita Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22180 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22180 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Punitive and Cooperative Strategies of Corporate Crime Control for Select Companies Operating in 1995 Through 2000 [United States] [electronic resource] Sally S. Simpson , Joel Garner , Carole Gibbs 2011-01-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 22180 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. ry data to measure compliance and managerial decision-making. Concerning the Vignette Data (Part 17), a factorial survey was developed and administered to company managers tapping into perceptions of the costs and benefits of pro-social and anti-social conduct for themselves and their companies. A total of 114 respondents from 2 of the sampled corporations read and responded to a total of 384 vignettes representing 4 scenario types: technical noncompliance, significant noncompliance, over-compliance, and response to counter-terrorism. Part 1 contains 19 economic and size variables. Part 2 contains a total of eight variables relating to ownership. Part 3 contains 67 variables with regard to facility characteristics. Part 4 contains 31 variables relating to discharge points and pipe layout information. Part 5 contains 13 inspections characteristics variables. Part 6 contains 13 compliance schedule event characteristics variables. Part 7 contains 11 compliance schedule violation characteristics variables. Part 8 contains 10 single event violation characteristics variables. Part 9 contains 79 variables including variables for matching limits and discharge monitoring reports, actual limits (permitted levels) variables, standardized limits variables, statistical base codes variables, reported units on limits variables, units for standardized limits variables, sampling information variables, additional limits information, actual DMR reports for each limit, effluent violations, and variables relating to technical aspects of reporting. Part 10 contains 26 enforcement actions variables. Part 11 contains 24 Occupational Safety and Health Administration inspection variables. Part 12 contains 39 administrative and judicial court case characteristics variables. Part 13 contains 21 court case settlement characteristics variables. Part 14 contains 9 criminal case characteristics variables. Part 15 contains 95 variables created for final report analyses by year. Part 16 contains 46 variables created for final report analyses by quarter. Part 17 contains 157 variables including pro-social variables with security/over-compliance intentions, noncompliance variables with technical/significant noncompliance intentions, vignette characteristics variables, other variables derived from survey questions, environmental norms variables, and demographic characteristics variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22180.v1 companies icpsr corporate crime icpsr corporations icpsr environmental attitudes icpsr environmental laws icpsr environmental monitoring icpsr environmental policy icpsr environmental regulations icpsr government regulation icpsr regulation icpsr regulatory processes icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Simpson, Sally S. Garner, Joel Gibbs, Carole Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22180 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22180.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03541 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Texas Christian University Drug Screen Instrument with Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmates, 1999-2000 [electronic resource] Kevin D. Knight , Dwayne Simpson , Janis Rhodes 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The overall purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and credibility of the Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Screen as an instrument to assess drug use severity for treatment referral decisions in correctional settings. TCU Drug Screen data were collected on 18,364 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) inmates (15,816 males and 2,548 females) who completed the screen between January 1 and April 30, 1999. Of the 18,364 subjects, 13,902 were Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) inmates and 4,462 were State Jail Division (TDCJ-SJD) inmates. The TCU Drug Screen was administered by TDCJ staff almost exclusively in a small group setting (12-25 inmates per group) as part of a larger battery of assessments during the intake process at a TDCJ facility. The level and intensity of treatment services needed was then determined and a referral decision was made. As part of this study, the relationship between TCU Drug Screen information and post-release reincarceration was examined. Although one original goal in the study was to assess the comparability, or concurrent validity, of the TCU Drug Screen with the lengthier, more comprehensive Addiction Severity Index (ASI), TDCJ changed the administration protocol for the ASI so that it was given only to a subsample of 3,245 inmates who failed to disclose drug use problems on the TCU Drug Screen. The data include inmate responses to all items of the TCU Drug Screen and the overall drug screen score. There is also demographic information as well as incarceration, release, and reincarceration data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 drug treatment icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmates icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr substance abuse icpsr testing and measurement icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr addiction icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Knight, Kevin D. Simpson, Dwayne Rhodes, Janis Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04278 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04278 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing Trends and Best Practices of Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Programs in the United States, 2003 [electronic resource] Patrick Curtin , David Thomas , Daniel Felker , Eric Weingart 2007-09-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4278 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This trends and best practices evaluation geared toward motor vehicle theft prevention with a particular focus on the Watch Your Car (WYC) program was conducted between October 2002 and March 2004. On-site and telephone interviews were conducted with administrators from 11 of 13 WYC member states. Surveys were mailed to the administrators of auto theft prevention programs in 36 non-WYC states and the 10 cities with the highest motor vehicle theft rates. Completed surveys were returned from 16 non-WYC states and five of the high auto theft rate cities. Part 1, the survey for Watch Your Car (WYC) program members, includes questions about how respondents learned about the WYC program, their WYC related program activities, the outcomes of their program, ways in which they might have done things differently if given the opportunity, and summary questions that asked WYC program administrators for their opinions about various aspects of the overall WYC program. The survey for the nonmember states, Part 2, and cities, Part 3, collected information about motor vehicle theft prevention within the respondent's state or city and asked questions about the respondent's knowledge of, and opinions about, the Watch Your Car program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1 stolen property icpsr stolen vehicles icpsr auto theft icpsr crime control programs icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime reduction icpsr property crimes icpsr NACJD I. Attitude Surveys ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Curtin, Patrick Thomas, David Felker, Daniel Weingart, Eric Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4278 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20625 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20625 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Validity of Voice Stress Analysis (VSA) Tools in a Jail Setting in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 2006 [electronic resource] Kelly R. Damphousse , Laura Pointon , Deidra Upchurch , Rebecca K. Moore 2008-06-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20625 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the project was to assess the validity of two Voice Stress Analysis (VSA) tools currently on the market: the Layered Voice Analysis (LVA) and the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA). The methodology and sampling protocols for this study were derived from the pre-existing methodology and sampling techniques employed in the National Institute of Justice-funded Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program that operated in Oklahoma County from 1998 to 2004. The researchers interviewed arrestees in the Oklahoma County jail about their recent illicit drug use during the months of February and March 2006. The VSA data collected using each of the software systems in this study were sent to certified examiners from CVSA and LVA for their analysis. After the completion of the interview, the subjects were asked to complete the data collection process by supplying urine specimens. Answers from the 319 respondents were compared to the results of a urinalysis test to determine the extent to which they were being deceptive. Then, their "actual deceptiveness" was compared to the extent to which deception was indicated by the VSA programs. The dataset contains (1) demographic information obtained from the official booking records, (2) responses to survey questions about recent drug use, (3) the results of a urinalysis test on five drugs, (4) variables recording "deception" or "no deception" on each of the drugs, and (5) decisions by novice and expert analysts regarding the indication of deception. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20625.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr voice stress analysis icpsr drug testing icpsr drugs icpsr evaluation icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr stress icpsr urinalysis icpsr voice communications icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Damphousse, Kelly R. Pointon, Laura Upchurch, Deidra Moore, Rebecca K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20625 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20625.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02022 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02022 MiAaI MiAaI Assessment of a Multiagency Approach to Drug-Involved Gang Members in San Diego County, California, 1988-1992 [electronic resource] Susan Pennell , Roni Melton , Darlanne Hoctor 2002-03-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2022 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1988, with funds from the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) via the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1987, a multiagency task force, Jurisdictions Unified for Drug Gang Enforcement (JUDGE), was created. Spearheaded by the San Diego County District Attorney's Office and representing a unique blend of police officers, probation officers, and deputy district attorneys working together, the JUDGE program targeted documented gang members also involved in drug use and sales. The task force incorporated an intensive supervision approach that enforced conditions of probation and drug laws and provided vertical prosecution for probation violations and new offenses involving targeted offenders. This research project sought to address the following research objectives: (1) to determine if the JUDGE program objectives were met during the grant period, (2) to assess the results of program activities, such as surveillance, special enforcement, and vertical prosecution, in terms of probation violations, arrests, pretrial custody, probation revocations, convictions, and sentences, (3) to evaluate the impact of the program on offenders as measured by recidivism and the need for probation intervention, (4) to assess the cost of JUDGE probation compared to regular probation caseloads, and (5) to provide recommendations regarding the implementation of similar programs in other jurisdictions. This research project consisted of a process evaluation and an impact assessment that focused on the first two years of the JUDGE program, when youthful offenders were the targets (1988 and 1989). The research effort focused only on new targets for whom adequate records were maintained, yielding a study size of 279. The tracking period for targets ended in 1992. For the impact assessment, the research was structured as a within-subjects design, with the comparison focusing on target youths two years before the implementation of JUDGE and the same group two years after being targeted by JUDGE. Data were compiled on the juveniles' age at target, race, sex, gang affiliation, type of target (gang member, drug history, and/or ward), status when targeted, and referrals to other agencies. Variables providing data on criminal histories include age at first contact/arrest, instant offense and disposition, highest charges for each subsequent arrest that resulted in probation supervision, drug charges, highest conviction charges, probation conditions before selection date and after JUDGE target, number of contacts by probation and JUDGE staff, number of violations for each probation condition and action taken, and new offenses during probation. For the process evaluation, case outcome data were compared to project objectives to measure compliance in terms of program implementation and results. Variables include number of violations for each probation condition and action taken, and number of failed drug tests. The consequences of increased probation supervision, including revocation, sentences, custody time, and use of vertical prosecution, were addressed by comparing the processing of cases prior to the implementation of JUDGE to case processing after JUDGE targeting. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02022.v1 case processing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug use icpsr gang members icpsr gangs icpsr government agencies icpsr law enforcement icpsr program evaluation icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pennell, Susan Melton, Roni Hoctor, Darlanne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2022 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02022.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02730 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02730 MiAaI MiAaI Assessment of a Single-Purpose Substance Abuse Facility for Committed Juvenile Offenders in Virginia, 1995-1997 [electronic resource] Jill A. Gordon 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2730 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The objective of this data collection was to provide a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of treatment offered at the Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center, a substance abuse treatment facility in Virginia for convicted male offenders that began operation in late 1993. The center uses a holistic approach in the treatment of youth to identify the triggers for substance abuse and to investigate the relationship between substance abuse and delinquent behavior. For the facility assessment, various types of data from the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice were gathered. Baseline data on each juvenile were obtained from the department's Reception and Diagnostic Center and consisted of demographic information and I.Q. scores, criminal history, and substance abuse history. Demographic variables include the youth's race, last grade placement, and with whom the youth lived. Youths' scores on standardized tests were also compiled, including SASSI, verbal I.Q., performance I.Q., and full-scale I.Q. scores. Criminal histories covered whether the committing offense was a felony or misdemeanor, the type of committing offense, the total number of committing offenses, whether a prior offense was a felony or a misdemeanor, the type of prior offense, the total number of prior offenses, the age at first criminal adjudication, age at commitment, and degree of delinquency. Alcohol and drug use data focused on the age at which alcohol was first used, number of times alcohol was used in the past year, age at which marijuana was first used, number of times marijuana was used in the past month, and whether the youth ever used cocaine, crack, inhalants, speed, depressants, hallucinogens, or other drugs. Another source of information was the youths' parole officers, who provided data on youths' criminal offending status and substance abuse at three, six, and twelve months after release from the center. Data obtained from parole officers assessing youths' improvement after leaving the center include whether they were rearrested, the type of offense if rearrested, the total number of offenses rearrested for, disposition, most serious offense overall, and youths' overall drug use. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 treatment outcomes icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal histories icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug law offenses icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Gordon, Jill A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2730 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09087 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09087 MiAaI MiAaI Attitudes and Perceptions of Police Officers in Boston, Chicago, and Washington, DC, 1966 [electronic resource] Albert J. Jr. Reiss 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9087 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey was designed to explore perceptions and attitudes of police officers in three metropolitan areas toward their work and the organizations and publics with which they interact. Issues of interest include (1) the nature of police careers and police work, and officers' satisfaction with their jobs, (2) officers' orientations toward policing tasks and their relationships with the public, and (3) officers' perceptions of organizations and systems that influence or change police work. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09087.v1 career choice icpsr career expectations icpsr job satisfaction icpsr perceptions icpsr police community relations icpsr police officers icpsr work attitudes icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Reiss, Albert J. Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9087 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09087.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03016 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03016 MiAaI MiAaI Attitudes Toward Crime and Punishment in Vermont [electronic resource] Public Opinion About an Experiment With Restorative Justice, 1999 John Doble , Judith Greene 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3016 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. By the summer of 1998, the Vermont Department of Corrections (DOC) had completed three years of operational experience with "restorative justice," a concept that involves compensating victims and establishing community-based reparative boards that determine how offenders can make amends for their crimes. The purpose of this project was to update the benchmark findings from an earlier survey of Vermont residents in 1994, to assess public attitudes about the reforms and changes that had been instituted by the Vermont DOC, and to explore the possibility of expansion of responsibilities of the reparative community boards. This project involved a telephone survey of a new sample of 601 adult residents of Vermont. The interviewing was conducted on March 15-21, 1999. Respondents were asked a series of trend questions to update the 1994 findings. Respondents were also asked questions about two other programs: the diversion program, in which selected first offenders who fulfilled the terms of a community-based sanction could have their records expunged, and the furlough program, in which offenders making the transition from prison to the community were supervised for an interim period. The survey also explored whether Vermonters would like to see the responsibilities of the reparative boards expanded to include community notification and other types of cases. Residents assessed whether crime in general, violent crime, and illegal drug use had increased compared to five years prior, whether more prisons should be built, whether Vermont's jails and prisons were overcrowded, and whether violent offenders were being released before completing their sentences because of overcrowding. They commented on how often offenders in four scenarios should go to prison and how often they believed that these offenders in fact did go to prison. Respondents rated the performance of various segments of the Vermont criminal justice system and, given 15 offense scenarios, were asked whether the offender should spend time in jail or in community service and rehabilitation. In addition, respondents were asked whether anyone in their household had been a victim of a crime within the last three years and, if so, whether it was a violent crime. Demographic data include sex, employment, education, race/ethnicity, and age category of the respondent, and the county and region where the resident lived. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03016.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr communities icpsr violent offenders icpsr community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr corrections management icpsr criminal histories icpsr diversion programs icpsr program evaluation icpsr public opinion icpsr restitution programs icpsr restorative justice icpsr victim compensation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD I. Attitude Surveys Doble, John Greene, Judith Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3016 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03016.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09664 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09664 MiAaI MiAaI Augmented Federal Probation, Sentencing, and Supervision Information System, 1985 [electronic resource] United States Sentencing Commission 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9664 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United States Sentencing Commission, established by the 98th Congress, is an independent agency in the judicial branch of government. The Commission recommends guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. These data were collected to determine whether sentencing disparities existed and whether the guidelines were adequate. Basic information in the collection includes a description of the offense, characterization of the defendant's background and criminal record, method of disposition of the case, and sentence imposed. Felony and misdemeanor cases are included while petty offense cases are excluded. Three types of additional information were used to augment the existing data: (1) more detailed offense and offender characteristics identified by the United States Sentencing Commission but coded by federal probation officers, (2) actual time served in prison from the SENTRY data file of the United States Bureau of Prisons, and (3) information necessary to estimate prospective release dates from the hearing files of the United States Parole Commission. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09664.v2 criminal histories icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal offenses icpsr felony offenses icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr offenders icpsr probation icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Sentencing Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9664 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09664.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08950 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08950 MiAaI MiAaI Autobiographical Accounts of Property Offenses by Youths at UCLA, 1983-1984 [electronic resource] Jack Katz 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 8950 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data examine the attraction of shoplifting and vandalism to nonprofessional offenders. The data consists of actual autobiographical accounts of offenses committed by undergraduates enrolled in three sections of undergraduate criminology classes at the University of California, Los Angeles. Verbatim answers of the respondents are presented. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08950.v1 property crimes icpsr shoplifting icpsr students icpsr universities icpsr vandalism icpsr youths icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Katz, Jack Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8950 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08950.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09969 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09969 MiAaI MiAaI Automated Reporting System Pilot Project in Los Angeles, 1990 [electronic resource] David Doan , Bronston T. Mayes 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9969 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this pilot project was to determine if preliminary investigation report (PIR) data filed by patrol officers could be collected via laptop computers to allow the direct input of the data into the Los Angeles Police Department Crime and Arrest Database without adversely affecting the personnel taking or using the reports. This data collection addresses the following questions: (1) Did officers and supervisors prefer the automated reporting system (ARS) or the handwritten version of the PIR? (2) Did the ARS affect the job satisfaction or morale of officers and supervisors? (3) Did the ARS reduce the amount of time that patrol officers, supervisors, and clerks spent on paperwork? (4) Did the ARS affect the accuracy of information contained in the PIRs? (5) Did detectives and prosecuting attorneys find the ARS a more reliable source than handwritten PIRs? Officers and supervisors in two divisions of the Los Angeles Police Department, Wilshire and Hollywood, participated as control and experimental groups. The control group continued using handwritten ("existing") PIRs while the experimental group used the automated PIRs (ARS). The General Information Questionnaire collected information on each officer's rank, assignment, watch, gender, age, years with the Los Angeles Police Department, education, job morale, job demands, self-esteem, computer anxiety, and relationship with supervisor and other officers. The Job Performance Rating Form gathered data on work efforts, depth of job knowledge, work quality, oral and written skills, and capacity to learn. The Time Study Sheets collected data on investigation time, writing and editing time, travel time, approval and correction time, review time, errors by type, and data input time for both the handwritten and automated forms. The Evaluation of the Existing Form and the Evaluation of the Automated Form both queried respondents on ease of use, system satisfaction, and productivity loss. The ARS Use Questionnaire asked about ease of use, typing skills, computer skills, comfort with the system, satisfaction with training, and preference for the system. The Hollywood Detective Division ARS Use Questionnaire surveyed detectives on the system's ease of use, task improvement, support for continued use, and preference for the system. The PIR Content Evaluation Form collected data on quality of officers' observations, organization and writing skills, physical evidence, statements of victims, witnesses, and suspects, and offense classification. The Caplan Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity subscales were used in the design of the questionnaires. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09969.v1 computer programs icpsr crime reporting icpsr databases icpsr job performance icpsr job satisfaction icpsr morale icpsr police officers icpsr program evaluation icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Doan, David Mayes, Bronston T. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9969 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09969.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06788 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06788 MiAaI MiAaI Availability and Use of Intermediate Sanctions by Judges and Corrections Professionals in the United States, 1994 [electronic resource] Helen G. Corrothers 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6788 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey is part of a larger project designed to explore ways to increase the availability and use of intermediate sanctions (IS) on a national level without jeopardizing public safety. A model for an Intermediate Punishment System is suggested. The survey was undertaken to ascertain attitudes and practices concerning IS for three groups: state and federal judges (Part 3), correctional system administrators responsible for community corrections in their state or jurisdiction (Part 1), and program directors who actually operated community programs (Part 2). The units of analysis were intermediate sanctions/programs operating in jurisdictions across the United States. Data were collected on the availability and frequency of use of IS, as well as costs, client/staffing ratios, use of rehabilitative programming, respondents' opinions concerning the field's needs, and program eligibility criteria. Information was also gathered on how decisions were made to place offenders into the various programs, program outcome and whether the program was viewed as being successful (and how this was measured), and types of new programs needed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06788.v2 community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr judges icpsr offenders icpsr program evaluation icpsr public safety icpsr sanctions icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Corrothers, Helen G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6788 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06788.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04081 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04081 MiAaI MiAaI Battering, Work, and Welfare in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, 2001-2002 [electronic resource] Lisa D. Brush , Lorraine Higgins 2012-04-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4081 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. d questions about interference, sabotage, and violence in relationships. The Part 6 (First Follow-Up Interview Data), Part 7 (Second Follow-Up Interview Data), and Part 8 (Final Follow-Up Interview Data) data files include follow-up information to that collected in Parts 1-5. The Part 9 (Date and Spell Data) data file provides data on the start and end dates of each period of education, each job, each period on welfare, and each relationship, and the Part 10 (Summary Longitudinal Data) data file summarizes some elements of the longitudinal data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04081.v1 domestic violence icpsr educational background icpsr employment icpsr marital status icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr welfare services icpsr abuse icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Brush, Lisa D. Higgins, Lorraine Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4081 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04081.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02557 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02557 MiAaI MiAaI Benefits and Limitations of Civil Protection Orders for Victims of Domestic Violence in Wilmington, Delaware, Denver, Colorado, and the District of Columbia, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Susan Keilitz , Paula L. Hannaford , Hillery S. Efkeman 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2557 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was designed to explore whether civil protection orders were effective in providing safer environments for victims of domestic violence and enhancing their opportunities for escaping violent relationships. The researchers looked at the factors that might influence civil protection orders, such as accessibility to the court process, linkages to public and private services and sources of support, and the criminal record of the victim's abuser, and then examined how courts in three jurisdictions processed civil protection orders. Wilmington, Delaware, Denver, Colorado, and the District of Columbia were chosen as sites because of structural differences among them that were believed to be linked to the effectiveness of civil protection orders. Since these jurisdictions each had different court processes and service models, the researchers expected that these models would produce various results and that these variations might hold implications for improving practices in other jurisdictions. Data were collected through initial and follow-up interviews with women who had filed civil protection orders. The effectiveness of the civil protection orders was measured by the amount of improvement in the quality of the women's lives after the order was in place, versus the extent of problems created by the protection orders. Variables from the survey of women include police involvement at the incident leading to the protection order, the relationship of the petitioner and respondent to the petition prior to the order, history of abuse, the provisions asked for and granted in the order, if a permanent order was not filed for by the petitioner, the reasons why, the court experience, protective measures the petitioner undertook after the order, and how the petitioner's life changed after the order. Case file data were gathered on when the order was filed and issued, contempt motions and hearings, stipulations of the order, and social service referrals. Data on the arrest and conviction history of the petition respondent were also collected. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02557.v1 battered women icpsr domestic violence icpsr process evaluation icpsr restraining orders icpsr victim safety icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD V. Courts Keilitz, Susan Hannaford, Paula L. Efkeman, Hillery S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2557 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02557.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02679 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02679 MiAaI MiAaI Bethlehem [Pennsylvania] Police Family Group Conferencing Project, 1993-1997 [electronic resource] Paul McCold , Benjamin Wachtel 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2679 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. ssues include ratings on danger, victims, frustration, external activities, complaints, workload, and driving. In Parts 4 to 9, researchers asked offenders, parents of offenders, and victims about their perceptions of how their cases were handled by the justice system and the fairness of the process, their attitudes and beliefs about the justice system, and their attitudes toward the victim and offender. Variables include whether the respondent was satisfied with the way the justice system handled the case, if the offender was held accountable for the offense, if meeting with the victim was helpful, if the respondent was surprised by anything in the conference, if the respondent told the victim/offender how he/she felt, if there was an opportunity to reach an agreement acceptable to all, if the offender/parents apologized, if the victim/parents had a better opinion of the offender after the conference, what the respondent's attitude toward the conference was, if the respondent would recommend a conference to others, if the offender was pressured to do all the talking, if the offender was treated with respect, if victim participation was insincere, if the respondent had a better understanding of how the victim was affected, if the victim only wanted to be paid back, and if conferences were responsive to needs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02679.v1 assault icpsr case processing icpsr disorderly conduct icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr family counseling icpsr harassment icpsr petty theft icpsr pretrial intervention icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr program evaluation icpsr property crime icpsr restorative justice icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies McCold, Paul Wachtel, Benjamin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2679 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02679.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06483 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06483 MiAaI MiAaI Boston Police Department Domestic Violence Research Project, 1993-1994 [electronic resource] Boston Police Department 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6483 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Domestic Violence Research Project was a pilot study designed to examine the dynamics of domestic violence within two of the ten police districts that comprise the city of Boston. The objectives were to collect data on domestic violence in greater detail than previously possible, conduct various analyses on this information, and determine how the findings could best be used to improve the police, prosecutorial, and social service responses to domestic violence. Data for 1993 are a stratified random sample of reported domestic violence incidents occurring throughout the year. The sample represents approximately 27 percent of the domestic violence incidents reported in 1993 for the two districts studied, B3 and D4. The 1994 data include all reported incidents occurring in the two districts during the period May to July. After the incident selection process was completed, data were collected from police incident reports, follow-up investigation reports, criminal history reports, and court dockets. Variables include arrest offenses, time of incident, location of incident, witnesses (including children), nature and extent of injuries, drug and alcohol use, history of similar incidents, whether there were restraining orders in effect, and basic demographic information on victims and offenders. Criminal history information was coded into five distinct categories: (1) violent offenses, (2) nonviolent offenses, (3) domestic violence offenses, (4) drug/alcohol offenses, and (5) firearms offenses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06483.v1 arrest records icpsr criminal histories icpsr domestic violence icpsr police departments icpsr police response icpsr NACJD IX. Police NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Boston Police Department Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6483 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06483.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03928 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03928 MiAaI MiAaI Breaking the Cycle of Drugs and Crime in Birmingham, Alabama, Jacksonville, Florida, and Tacoma, Washington, 1997-2001 [electronic resource] Adele V. Harrell , Douglas Marlowe , Jeffrey Merrill 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3928 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an evaluation of the Breaking the Cycle (BTC) demonstration projects conducted in Birmingham, Alabama, Jacksonville, Florida, and Tacoma, Washington, between 1997 and 2001. The BTC demonstrations tested the feasibility and impact of systemwide interventions to reduce drug use among offenders by identifying and intervening with drug-involved felony defendants. This study contains data collected as part of the impact evaluation of BTC, which was designed to test the hypotheses that BTC reduced criminal involvement, substance abuse, and problems related to the health, mental health, employment, and families of felony drug defendants in the demonstration sites. The evaluation examined the relationship between changes in these areas and characteristics of the participants, the kinds and levels of services and supervision they received, and perceptions of defendants about the justice system's handling of their cases. It also assessed how BTC affected case handling and the length of time required to reach a disposition, the number of hearings, and the kinds of sentences imposed. The impact evaluation was based on a quasi-experimental comparison of defendants in BTC with samples of similar defendants arrested in the year before BTC implementation. Interviews were conducted with sample members and additional data were gathered from administrative records sources, such as the BTC programs, arrest records, and court records. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03928.v1 courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr evaluation icpsr felony offenses icpsr intervention icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Harrell, Adele V. Marlowe, Douglas Merrill, Jeffrey Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3928 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03928.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08672 MiAaI MiAaI British Crime Survey, 1982 [electronic resource] Home Office Research and Planning Unit 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The primary purpose of the British Crime Survey was to estimate how many of the public in England and Wales are victims of selected types of crime over a year, describing the circumstances under which people become victims, and the consequences of crime for victims. Other aims included providing background information on fear of crime among the public and on public contact with the police. Respondents were asked a series of screening questions to establish whether or not they or their households had been victims of relevant crimes during the one-year reference period. They were then asked a series of very detailed questions about the incidents they reported. Basic descriptive background information on respondents and their households was collected to allow analysis of the sorts of people who do and do not become victims. Information was also collected on other areas which were of intrinsic interest and which could usefully be related to experience as a victim, namely, fear of crime, contact with the police, lifestyle, and self-reported offending. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08672.v1 crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime reporting icpsr fear of crime icpsr lifestyles icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police response icpsr reactions to crime icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data NACJD X. Victimization IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Home Office Research and Planning Unit Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08672.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09850 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09850 MiAaI MiAaI British Crime Survey, 1988 [electronic resource] Great Britain Home Office Research and Planning Unit 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9850 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This 1988 survey, the third in a series of surveys instituted by the Home Office in 1982, examines levels of victimization in Great Britain and offers attitudinal data on issues relating to crime. The 1988 survey was intended to replicate the 1982 and 1984 surveys (ICPSR 8672 and 8685) as much as possible. However, in 1988 an additional sample of ethnic minority respondents was included. Respondents were asked a series of screening questions to establish whether they had been the victims of crime during the reference period, and another series of detailed questions about the incidents they reported. Basic descriptive background information, such as sex, age, employment, education, and number of children, was also collected on the respondents and their households. Other information was collected on fear of crime, contact with the police, lifestyle, and self-reported offending. Part 1 consists of data captured on the Demographic Questionnaire. Parts 2 and 3 represent data collected via Follow-Up Questionnaire A and Follow-Up Questionnaire B, respectively. Each respondent completed one of the two Follow-Up Questionnaires, with all respondents in the ethnic minority sample completing Follow-Up Questionnaire B. Part 4 consists of data from the Main Questionnaire. Each respondent completed a Main Questionnaire that included a large number of screening questions to identify crime victims, and some attitudinal questions. Data in Part 5 were collected from the Victim Form. Only respondents reporting incidents of victimization on the Main Questionnaire have Victim Forms, with up to four Victim Forms per respondent. The unit of analysis for this collection is the individual. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09850.v1 crime reporting icpsr fear of crime icpsr lifestyles icpsr police citizen icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police response icpsr reactions to crime icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime patterns icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Great Britain Home Office Research and Planning Unit Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9850 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09850.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06717 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06717 MiAaI MiAaI British Crime Survey, 1992 [electronic resource] Great Britain Home Office Research and Planning Unit 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6717 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The fourth in a series of surveys instituted by the Home Office in 1982, this survey examines levels of victimization in Great Britain and offers attitudinal data on issues relating to crime. The 1992 survey was intended to replicate the 1982, 1984, and 1988 surveys (ICPSR 8672, 8685, and 9850) in methodology and content as much as possible. In 1992, a "core" sample of 10,059 adults along with booster samples of 1,650 ethnic minority adults and 1,350 young people aged 12-15 resident in the same households as adult respondents were interviewed. The 1988 survey had also included an ethnic minority booster sample employing the same sampling method. Respondents were asked a series of screening questions to establish whether they had been the victims of crime during the reference period, and another series of detailed questions about the incidents they reported. Basic descriptive background information, such as sex, age, employment, education, and number of children, was also collected on the respondents and their households. Other information was elicited on fear of crime, contact with the police, lifestyle, and self-reported offending. Part 1, Demographic File, consists of data captured on the Demographic Questionnaire. Parts 2 and 3 represent data collected via Follow-Up Questionnaire A and Follow-Up Questionnaire B, respectively. Each respondent completed one of the two Follow-Up Questionnaires, with all respondents in the ethnic minority booster sample completing Follow-Up Questionnaire A. Part 4, Main File, consists of data from the Main Questionnaire. Each respondent completed a Main Questionnaire that included some attitudinal questions and a large number of screening questions to identify crime victims. Data in Part 5, Victim File, were collected from the Victim Form. Only respondents reporting incidents of victimization on the Main Questionnaire have Victim Forms, with up to four Victim Forms per respondent. The unit of analysis for this collection is the individual. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06717.v1 crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime reporting icpsr fear of crime icpsr lifestyles icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police response icpsr reactions to crime icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data Great Britain Home Office Research and Planning Unit Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6717 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06717.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06834 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06834 MiAaI MiAaI British Crime Survey, 1992 [electronic resource] Teenage Booster Sample Great Britain Home Office Research and Planning Unit 1997-02-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6834 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This survey was conducted in parallel with the BRITISH CRIME SURVEY, 1992 (ICPSR 6717) in the same households among the age group 12-15. The survey covers victimization out of the home, contacts with the police, and self-reported offending. The questions replicate the adult version as much as possible. Respondents were asked a series of screening questions to establish whether they had been victims of crime during the reference period, and another series of detailed questions about the incidents they reported. Basic descriptive background information was also collected on the respondent. Other information was elicited on fear of crime, contact with the police, lifestyle, and self-reported offending. The unit of analysis for this collection is the individual. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06834.v1 adolescents icpsr crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime reporting icpsr fear of crime icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police response icpsr reactions to crime icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations Great Britain Home Office Research and Planning Unit Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6834 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06834.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08685 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08685 MiAaI MiAaI British Crime Surveys, 1984 [electronic resource] Home Office (United Kingdom). Research and Planning Unit 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8685 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. In 1982 the Home Office conducted the first British Crime Survey, a major study with the aim of discovering levels of victimization in Britain, and of producing attitudinal data on issues relating to crime. The survey was repeated in 1984 and was restricted to England and Wales, whereas the previous study had included Scotland. The survey set out to replicate the previous one as far as possible. Other than questions having to do with victimization and basic demographic details, the topics covered in the questionnaire were: general opinion of the local area, fear of crime and precautions taken, likelihood of crime occurring, extent of "incivilities" in the area, seriousness of various crimes, attitudes towards punishment and prison reform, victim support schemes, neighborhood watch schemes, and self-reported offending. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08685.v1 crime icpsr crime costs icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime reporting icpsr fear of crime icpsr lifestyles icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police response icpsr reactions to crime icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data Home Office (United Kingdom). Research and Planning Unit Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8685 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08685.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28144 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28144 MiAaI MiAaI Bruising as a Forensic Marker of Physical Elder Abuse in Orange County, California, 2006-2008 [electronic resource] Laura Mosqueda 2012-12-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 28144 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to describe bruising as a marker of physical elder abuse. Consenting older adults were examined to document location and size of bruises and assess whether they were inflicted during physical abuse. An expert panel confirmed physical abuse. A research nurse conducted study assessments on 67 adults aged 65 and older reported to Adult Protective Services for suspected physical elder abuse in Orange County, California between July 2006 and May 2008. The study contains a total of 142 variables including age, sex, ethnicity, functional status, medical conditions, cognitive status, history of falls, bruise size, bruise location and color, recall of cause, and responses to the Revised Conflicts Tactics Scales (CTS2) and to the Elder Abuse Inventory (EAI). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28144.v1 abuse icpsr accidents icpsr adult care services icpsr assault icpsr cognitive processes icpsr conflict icpsr elder abuse icpsr eldercare icpsr evaluation icpsr injuries icpsr medical evaluation icpsr medical history icpsr medications icpsr nonfatal injuries icpsr older adults icpsr prescription drugs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Mosqueda, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28144 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28144.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03482 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03482 MiAaI MiAaI California Vital Statistics and Homicide Data, 1990-1999 [electronic resource] Jason Van Court 2006-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3482 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection resulted from the project "Linked Homicide File for 1990-1999," which was conducted by the California Department of Health Services (CDHS), Epidemiology and Prevention for Injury Control Branch, for the purpose of studying homicide and providing evidence for the development of strategies to reduce homicide in California. The researchers combined the strengths of law enforcement reporting and medical reporting in one dataset. The homicide data contain information on victims and circumstances of the 34,542 homicides investigated by law enforcement agencies in California for the period 1990 to 1999. The data are Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), which are received monthly by the Department of Justice from all local California law enforcement agencies as part of the national Uniform Crime Reporting program (UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS [UNITED STATES]: SUPPLEMENTARY HOMICIDE REPORTS, 1976-1999 [ICPSR 3180]). The researchers linked the SHRs to the CDHS vital statistics mortality data, which contain the death records provided by the medical examiner or coroner of each county after investigation of the death. Variables include total number of offenders involved, weapon used in the homicide, county of the victim's residence, location and date of the incident, date of death, cause of death, date of arrest for the suspect, and whether supplemental homicide report matched the death record. Demographic data include age, sex, and race of the victim and the suspect, relationships between the suspect and the victim, and the victim's marital status. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03482.v2 causes of death icpsr homicide icpsr offenders icpsr victims icpsr vital statistics icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics Van Court, Jason Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3482 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03482.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08185 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08185 MiAaI MiAaI Calling the Police [electronic resource] Citizen Reporting of Serious Crime, 1979 William Spelman , Dale K. Brown 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8185 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This dataset replicates the citizen reporting component of POLICE RESPONSE TIME ANALYSIS, 1975 (ICPSR 7760). Information is included on 4,095 reported incidents of aggravated assault, auto theft, burglary, larceny/theft offenses, forcible rape, and robbery. The data cover citizen calls to police between April 21 and December 7, 1979. There are four files in this collection, one each for Jacksonville, Florida, Peoria, Illinois, Rochester, New York, and San Diego, California. The data are taken from police dispatch records and police interviews of citizens who requested police assistance. Variables taken from the dispatch records include the dispatch time, call priority, police travel time, age, sex, and race of the caller, response code, number of suspects, and area of the city in which the call originated. Variables taken from the citizen interviews include respondent's role in the incident (victim, caller, victim-caller, witness-caller), incident location, relationship of caller to victim, number of victims, identification of suspect, and interaction with police. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1 assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr citizen crime reporting icpsr larceny icpsr offenses icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police protection icpsr police reports icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Spelman, William Brown, Dale K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8185 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09669 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09669 MiAaI MiAaI Calls for Service to Police as a Means of Evaluating Crime Trends in Oklahoma City, 1986-1988 [electronic resource] Robert J. Jr. Bursik , Harold G. Grasmick , Mitchell B. Chamlin 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9669 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In an effort to measure the effectiveness of crime deterrents and to estimate crime rates, calls for assistance placed to police in Oklahoma City over a two-year period were enumerated. This type of call was studied in order to circumvent problems such as "interviewer's effect" and sampling errors that occur with other methods. The telephone calls were stratified by police district, allowing for analysis on the neighborhood level to determine whether deterrence operates ecologically--that is, by neighbors informing one another about arrests which took place as a result of their calls to the police. In measuring deterrence, only the calls that concerned robbery were used. To estimate crime rates, calls were tallied on a monthly basis for 18 types of offenses: aggravated assault, robbery, rape, burglary, grand larceny, motor vehicle theft, simple assault, fraud, child molestation, other sex offenses, domestic disturbance, disorderly conduct, public drunkenness, vice and drugs, petty larceny, shoplifting, kidnapping/hostage taking, and suspicious activity. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09669.v1 arrests icpsr assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr child abuse icpsr civil disorders icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr deterrence icpsr kidnapping icpsr larceny icpsr neighborhoods icpsr petty theft icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sex offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Bursik, Robert J. Jr. Grasmick, Harold G. Chamlin, Mitchell B. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9669 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09669.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08488 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08488 MiAaI MiAaI Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development [Great Britain], 1961-1981 [electronic resource] David P. Farrington 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8488 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort, initiated by Dr. Donald J. West and continued by Dr. David Farrington, was undertaken to test several hypotheses about delinquency. The investigators examined socioeconomic conditions, schooling, friendship, parent-child relationships, extracurricular activities, school records, and criminal records. They also performed psychological tests to determine the causes of crime and delinquency. Information in the survey includes reports from peers, family size, child-rearing behavior, job histories, leisure habits, truancy, popularity, physical attributes, tendencies toward violence, sexual activity, and self-reported delinquency. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08488.v2 aggression icpsr arrests icpsr children icpsr crime icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr education icpsr families icpsr friendships icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr job history icpsr leisure icpsr quality of life icpsr recreation icpsr sexual attitudes icpsr social attitudes icpsr youths icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Farrington, David P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8488 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08488.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09210 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09210 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1987 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9210 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on prisoners whose sentences were commuted or vacated. The data furnish basic sociodemographic classifications including age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state and region of incarceration. Criminal history information includes prior felony convictions, prior convictions for criminal homicide, and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is provided on those inmates removed from death row by yearend 1986, inmates receiving a second capital punishment sentence in 1987, and inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09210.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9210 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09210.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09337 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09337 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1988 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9337 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on those whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated. Information is available on basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is provided on those inmates removed from death row by yearend 1988 and those inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09337.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr NACJD III. Corrections RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9337 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09337.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09507 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09507 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1989 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9507 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on those whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1989. Information is supplied on basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for those inmates removed from death row by yearend 1989 and for those inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09507.v2 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9507 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09507.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09819 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09819 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1990 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9819 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on those whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1990. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for those inmates removed from death row by yearend 1990 and for those inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09819.v1 states (USA) icpsr capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD III. Corrections RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9819 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09819.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06514 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06514 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1991 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6514 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on those whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1991. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1991 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06514.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6514 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06514.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06513 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06513 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1992 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6513 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on those whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1992. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1992 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06513.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr NACJD III. Corrections RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6513 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06513.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06512 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06512 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1993 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6512 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and on those whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1993. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at the time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1993 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06512.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6512 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06512.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06691 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06691 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6691 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1994. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at the time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1994 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06691.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6691 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06691.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06956 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06956 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6956 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1995. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at the time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1995 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06956.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6956 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06956.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02736 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02736 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2736 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1996. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at the time of imprisonment, level of education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1996 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02736.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2736 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02736.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02737 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02737 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2737 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1997. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1997 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02737.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2737 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02737.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02977 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02977 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2977 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1998. Information is supplied on basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1998 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02977.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2977 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02977.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03201 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-1999. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 1999 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03201.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03667 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03667 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3667 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2000. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by yearend 2000 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03667.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3667 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03667.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03947 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03947 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3947 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2001. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2001 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03947.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3947 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03947.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03958 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03958 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3958 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2002. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2002 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03958.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3958 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03958.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04404 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04404 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4404 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2003. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2003 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04404.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4404 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04404.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04430 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04430 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-10-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4430 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2004. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2004 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04430.v1 prison inmates icpsr criminal histories icpsr capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4430 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04430.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20580 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20580 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-10-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20580 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2005. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2005 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20580.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr felony offenses icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20580 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20580.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23360 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23360 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2008-10-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 23360 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2005. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2006 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23360.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23360 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23360.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24961 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24961 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2009-03-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 24961 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2007. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2007 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24961.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System DSDR VI. Population Characteristics RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24961 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24961.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27982 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27982 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-09-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27982 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2008. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2008 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27982.v1 capital punishment icpsr states (USA) icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27982 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27982.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31443 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31443 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-12-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31443 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted or vacated during the period 1973-2009. Information is supplied for basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed from death row by year-end 2009 and for inmates who were executed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31443.v2 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31443 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31443.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34366 MiAaI MiAaI Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-11-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 1973-2010 provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death, as well as those who had their sentences commuted or vacated and prisoners who were executed. This study examines basic sociodemographic classifications including age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and State and region of incarceration. Criminal history information includes prior felony convictions and prior convictions for criminal homicide and the legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is provided on those inmates removed from death row by yearend 2010. The dataset consists of one part which contains 9,058 cases. The file provides information on inmates whose death sentences were removed in addition to information on those inmates who were executed. The file also gives information about inmates who received a second death sentence by yearend 2010 as well as inmates who were already on death row. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34366.v1 capital punishment icpsr commuted sentences icpsr criminal histories icpsr death row inmates icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr executions icpsr felony offenses icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr states (USA) icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03965 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03965 MiAaI MiAaI Case Classification for Juvenile Corrections [electronic resource] Evaluation of the Youth Level of Service Inventory in Ohio, 1998-2001 Lawrence Travis , Edward Latessa , Anthony Flores 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3965 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the effectiveness of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI or Y-LSI). The Y-LSI is an instrument for classifying juvenile offender risk of recidivism and for identifying areas of treatment need that, if addressed, will result in a reduced risk of recidivism. Three juvenile correction agencies in Ohio that used the Y-LSI for case classification were the settings for this study. Data in Part 1 were collected on 1,679 youths received in the three correctional settings between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 1999. Youths' files were reviewed to complete the data collection instruments. These files contained demographic and background information, Y-LSI assessments, and information relating to treatment and service referrals, completion of programming, and supervision outcome. One year after the initial Y-LSI assessments, reassessment data were collected on youths. Reassessments were completed on youth at the time of program completion or one year after the initial assessment. Supervision outcome data were collected two years after the initial data collection. Data in Part 2 were collected in 2001 through a survey of 196 agency staff members on their reactions to the use of the Y-LSI as a classification instrument. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03965.v1 case management icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile recidivists icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr risk assessment icpsr treatment icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Travis, Lawrence Latessa, Edward Flores, Anthony Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3965 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03965.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09918 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09918 MiAaI MiAaI Caseflow Management and Delay Reduction in Urban Trial Courts of the United States, 1979, 1983-1985 [electronic resource] Barry Mahoney 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 9918 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine caseflow management in order to reduce delays in urban trial courts. The data contain information from court records that reached disposition in a cross-section of urban general-jurisdiction trial courts during 1979, 1983, 1984, and 1985. The 1979 data files contain the baseline data for this survey. Data were gathered on civil and criminal case processing times across a broad range of courts, and changes in case processing times over a period of years were analyzed for 18 different jurisdictions: Newark, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Miami, Wayne County, Minneapolis, the Bronx, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, Dayton, Boston, Cleveland, Providence, Wichita, Detroit, Oakland, and Jersey City. The data are supplemented by information supplied by trial court administrators and presiding judges in the courts participating in the study. Data include information on the nature of the case, the dates of first and last trials, and the total number of trials and their manner of disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09918.v1 case processing icpsr cities icpsr court cases icpsr courts icpsr trial courts icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mahoney, Barry Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9918 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09918.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27721 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27721 MiAaI MiAaI Case Outcomes Following Investigative Interviews of Suspected Victims of Child Sexual Abuse in Salt Lake City and County, Utah, 1994-2000 [electronic resource] Margaret-Ellen Pipe 2010-08-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27721 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Investigative Interview Protocol impacted child sexual abuse case outcomes within the justice system. The researchers coded information from child protection and police reports, Children's Justice Center (CJC) intake forms, and the CJC electronic database to create a dataset on 1,280 alleged child sexual abuse cases involving children interviewed in Salt Lake County, Utah, between 1994 and 2000. Specifically, the research team gathered case characteristics and case outcomes data on 551 alleged child sexual abuse cases in which investigative interviews were conducted from 1994 to mid-September 1997 before the NICHD protocol was implemented, and 729 alleged child sexual abuse cases in which investigative interviews were conducted from mid-September 1997 to 2000 after the implementation of the NICHD protocol, so that pre-NICHD protocol and NICHD protocol interview case outcomes could be compared. The same police detectives conducted both the pre-NICHD protocol interviews and the NICHD protocol interviews. The dataset contains a total of 116 variables pertaining to cases of suspected child abuse. The major categories of variables include demographic data on the suspected child victim and on the suspected perpetrator, on case characteristics, on case outcomes, and on time delays. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27721.v1 abuse icpsr female offenders icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juvenile victims icpsr juveniles icpsr male offenders icpsr offenders icpsr probable cause icpsr prosecution icpsr sex offenders icpsr sexual abuse icpsr abused children icpsr arrest procedures icpsr arrest rates icpsr arrests icpsr child abuse icpsr child neglect icpsr conviction rates icpsr family violence icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pipe, Margaret-Ellen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27721 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27721.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02929 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02929 MiAaI MiAaI Case Tracking and Mapping System Developed for the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Colin Reilly , Victor Goldsmith 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2929 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection grew out of a prototype case tracking and crime mapping application that was developed for the United States Attorney's Office (USAO), Southern District of New York (SDNY). The purpose of creating the application was to move from the traditionally episodic way of handling cases to a comprehensive and strategic method of collecting case information and linking it to specific geographic locations, and collecting information either not handled at all or not handled with sufficient enough detail by SDNY's existing case management system. The result was an end-user application designed to be run largely by SDNY's nontechnical staff. It consisted of two components, a database to capture case tracking information and a mapping component to link case and geographic data. The case tracking data were contained in a Microsoft Access database and the client application contained all of the forms, queries, reports, macros, table links, and code necessary to enter, navigate through, and query the data. The mapping application was developed using Environmental Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcView 3.0a GIS. This collection shows how the user-interface of the database and the mapping component were customized to allow the staff to perform spatial queries without having to be geographic information systems (GIS) experts. Part 1 of this collection contains the Visual Basic script used to customize the user-interface of the Microsoft Access database. Part 2 contains the Avenue script used to customize ArcView to link the data maintained in the server databases, to automate the office's most common queries, and to run simple analyses. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02929.v1 case management icpsr case processing icpsr crime mapping icpsr databases icpsr geographic information systems icpsr ICPSR X.B. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Computer Programs NACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional Packages Reilly, Colin Goldsmith, Victor Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2929 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02929.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26602 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26602 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Jail Facilities, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2010-01-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26602 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. To reduce respondent burden and improve data quality and timeliness, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) split the jail census into two parts: The Census of Jail Inmates was conducted with a reference date of June 30, 2005. The following spring it was followed by this enumeration, the Census of Jail Facilities, which collected data as of March 31, 2006. Previous jail enumerations were conducted in 1970 (ICPSR 7641), 1972 (ICPSR 7638), 1978 (ICPSR 7737), 1983 (ICPSR 8203), 1988 (ICPSR 9256), 1993 (ICPSR 6648), and 1999 (ICPSR 3318). The United States Census Bureau collected the data for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The 2006 Census of Jail Facilities gathered data from all jail detention facilities holding inmates beyond arraignment, a period normally exceeding 72 hours. Jail facilities were operated by cities and counties, by private entities under contract to correctional authorities, and by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). Excluded from the census were physically separate temporary holding facilities such as drunk tanks and police lockups that do not hold persons after being formally charged in court. Also excluded were state-operated facilities in Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Alaska, which have combined jail-prison systems. Fifteen independently operated jails in Alaska were included in the Census. The census collected jurisdictional level information on the number of confined inmates; average daily population; number of separate jail facilities; renovation and building plans; court orders and consent decrees; staff by occupational category and race/ethnicity; jail programs; and costs of operation. The census also collected individual jail facility information on the purpose for which the jail held offenders; gender of the inmates authorized to house; functions, such as general adult population confinement, work release, and medical treatment; whether a separate temporary holding area or lockup was operated; rated capacity; number of confined inmates by gender and adult or juvenile status; year of original construction; and whether the facility ever had a major renovation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26602.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional officers icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr census data icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr personnel icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr NACJD III. Corrections DSDR VI. Population Characteristics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26602 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26602.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20367 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20367 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Jail Inmates [electronic resource] Individual-Level Data, 2005 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-07-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20367 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Jail Inmates is the eighth in a series of data collection efforts aimed at studying the nation's locally-administered jails. Beginning in 2005, the National Jail Census was broken out into two collections. The 2005 Census of Jail Inmates (CJI) collects data on the facilities' supervised populations, inmate counts and movements, and persons supervised in the community. The forthcoming 2006 Census of Jail Facilities collects information on staffing levels, programming, and facility policies. Previous censuses were conducted in 1970, 1972, 1978, 1983, 1988, 1993, and 1999. The 2005 CJI enumerated 2,960 locally administered confinement facilities that held inmates beyond arraignment and were staffed by municipal or county employees. Among these were 42 privately-operated jails under contract to local governments and 65 regional jails that were operated for two or more jail authorities. In addition, the census identified 12 facilities maintained by the Federal Bureau of Prisons that functioned as jails. These 12 facilities, together with the 2,960 nonfederal facilities, brought the number of jails in operation on June 30, 2005, to a nationwide total of 2,972. The CJI supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, crowding issues, growth in the population supervised in the community, and changes in methods of community supervision. The CJI also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-United States citizens in custody. The data are intended for a variety of users, including federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20367.v1 census data icpsr correctional system icpsr corrections management icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmate populations icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jail inmates icpsr jails icpsr correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20367 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20367.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27541 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04673 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04674 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04674 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1999 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4674 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1999, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4674 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04670 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2001 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2001, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23480 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23480 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2003 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23480 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2003, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23480 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24300 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24300 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 24300 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2006, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24300 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34401 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34448 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27543 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27544 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27545 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27545 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27545 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27545 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25482 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25482 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Law Enforcement Aviation Units, 2007 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2009-12-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25482 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2007 Census of Law Enforcement Aviation Units is the first systematic, national-level data collection providing information about law enforcement aviation assets and functions. In general, these units provide valuable airborne support for traditional ground-based police operations. An additional role following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks is the provision of essential homeland security functions, such as providing critical facility checks of buildings, ports and harbors, public utilities, inland waterways, oil refineries, bridges and spans, water storage/reservoirs, National and/or State monuments, water treatment plants, irrigation facilities, airports, and natural resources. Aviation units are thought to be able to perform critical facility checks and routine patrol and support operations with greater efficiency than ground-based personnel. However, little is presently known about the equipment, personnel, operations, expenditures, and safety requirements of these units on a national level. This information is critical to law enforcement policy development, planning, and budgeting at all levels of government. The data will supply law enforcement agencies with a benchmark for comparative analysis with other similarly situated agencies, and increase understanding of the support that aviation units provide to ground-based police operations. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25482.v1 aircraft icpsr law enforcement icpsr national security icpsr police equipment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25482 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25482.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29503 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29503 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Law Enforcement Gang Units, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-03-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29503 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2007 Census of Law Enforcement Gang Units (CLEGU) collected data from all state and local law enforcement agencies with 100 or more sworn officers and at least one officer dedicated solely to addressing gangs and gang activities. Law enforcement agencies are often the first line of response to the gang problems experienced across the country and are a critical component of most anti-gang initiatives. One way for law enforcement agencies to address gang-related problems is to form specialized gang units. The consolidation of an agency's gang enforcement activities and resources into a single unit can allow gang unit officers to develop specific expertise and technical skills related to local gang characteristics and behaviors and gang prevention and suppression. No prior studies have collected data regarding the organization and operations of law enforcement gang units nationwide, the types of gang prevention tactics employed, or the characteristics and training of gang unit officers. This CLEGU collected data on the operations, workload, policies, and procedures of gang units in large state and local law enforcement agencies in order to expand knowledge of gang prevention and enforcement tactics. The CLEGU also collected summary measures of gang activity in the agencies' jurisdictions to allow for comparison across jurisdictions with similar gang problems. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29503.v1 gangs icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr personnel icpsr police departments icpsr policies and procedures icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29503 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29503.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04255 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04255 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Law Enforcement Training Academies, 2002 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-06-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4255 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2002 Census of Law Enforcement Training Academies (CLETA02) was the first effort by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to collect information from law enforcement training academies across the United States. The CLETA02 included all currently operating academies that provided basic law enforcement training. Academies that provided only in-service training, corrections/detention training, or other special types of training were excluded. Data were collected on personnel, expenditures, facilities, equipment, trainees, training curricula, and a variety of special topic areas. As of year-end 2002, a total of 626 law enforcement academies operating in the United States offered basic law enforcement training to individuals recruited or seeking to become law enforcement officers. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04255.v1 census data icpsr law enforcement icpsr police officers icpsr police departments icpsr police training icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4255 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04255.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20342 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20342 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Medical Examiners' and Coroners' Offices, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-04-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20342 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Medical Examiners' and Coroners' Offices (MECO) is a compilation of data on the practices of these offices, which are responsible for medical-legal death investigations. The data cover information such as the prevalence of unidentified human remains on record in medical examiners' and coroners' offices across the country, record-keeping practices, and final disposition practices such as burial, cremation, or other means. In addition, data were gathered on FTE employees, contractors, and annual budgets. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20342.v3 autopsy icpsr coroners icpsr death records icpsr forensic medicine icpsr victim identification icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20342 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20342.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08341 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08341 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States] [electronic resource] Group Quarters Population by Age, Sex, Race and Spanish Origin United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8341 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains a complete or 100-percent count of all persons in group quarters by sex and single years of age up to 74 years old with a category for all persons 75 years old and older, as well as a total. The distribution is repeated for 18 racial/ethnic groups. The group quarters population includes persons in institutional group quarters such as homes, schools, hospitals, or wards for the physically and mentally handicapped, hospitals or wards for mental, tubercular, or chronically ill patients, homes for unwed mothers, nursing, convalescent, and rest homes for the aged and dependent, orphanages, and correctional facilities. Noninstitutional group quarters cover rooming and boarding houses, general hospitals, including nurses' and interns' dormitories, college student dormitories, religious group quarters, and similar housing. Data are available for all counties and independent cities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08341.v1 census data icpsr cities icpsr counties icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr gender icpsr Hispanic origins icpsr ethnicity icpsr group homes icpsr housing icpsr race icpsr ICPSR I.A.1.c. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1980 Census NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older Adults United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8341 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08341.v1 nmm