nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03688 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03688 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3688 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3688 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03815 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03815 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3815 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3815 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04020 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04020 MiAaI MiAaI Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4020 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in 2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) for males, weights. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr drug dependence icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr arrests icpsr crime patterns icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4020 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03541 MiAaI MiAaI Assessing the Texas Christian University Drug Screen Instrument with Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmates, 1999-2000 [electronic resource] Kevin D. Knight , Dwayne Simpson , Janis Rhodes 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The overall purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and credibility of the Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Screen as an instrument to assess drug use severity for treatment referral decisions in correctional settings. TCU Drug Screen data were collected on 18,364 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) inmates (15,816 males and 2,548 females) who completed the screen between January 1 and April 30, 1999. Of the 18,364 subjects, 13,902 were Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) inmates and 4,462 were State Jail Division (TDCJ-SJD) inmates. The TCU Drug Screen was administered by TDCJ staff almost exclusively in a small group setting (12-25 inmates per group) as part of a larger battery of assessments during the intake process at a TDCJ facility. The level and intensity of treatment services needed was then determined and a referral decision was made. As part of this study, the relationship between TCU Drug Screen information and post-release reincarceration was examined. Although one original goal in the study was to assess the comparability, or concurrent validity, of the TCU Drug Screen with the lengthier, more comprehensive Addiction Severity Index (ASI), TDCJ changed the administration protocol for the ASI so that it was given only to a subsample of 3,245 inmates who failed to disclose drug use problems on the TCU Drug Screen. The data include inmate responses to all items of the TCU Drug Screen and the overall drug screen score. There is also demographic information as well as incarceration, release, and reincarceration data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 drug treatment icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmates icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr substance abuse icpsr testing and measurement icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr addiction icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Knight, Kevin D. Simpson, Dwayne Rhodes, Janis Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27541 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-02-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04673 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04674 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04674 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1999 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4674 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1999, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4674 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04670 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2001 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2001, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23480 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23480 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2003 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23480 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2003, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23480 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR24300 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR24300 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 24300 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2006, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 24300 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34401 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34401 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34401 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34401 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34448 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr person offenses icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27543 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27543 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27543 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27543 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27544 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27545 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27545 MiAaI MiAaI Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27545 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug law offenses icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr person offenses icpsr pregnancy icpsr property crimes icpsr status offenses icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27545 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08002 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08002 MiAaI MiAaI Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1972-1975 [United States] [electronic resource] Cities Sample United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8002 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Surveys, of which these Commercial Victimization Surveys are a part, were conducted to obtain current and reliable measures of serious crime in the United States. The Commercial Victimization Surveys are restricted to coverage of burglary and robbery incidents. They include all types of commercial establishments as well as political, cultural, and religious organizations. The survey includes a series of questions about the business, e.g., type and size, form of ownership, insurance, security, and break-in and robbery characteristics. Time and place, weapon, injury, entry evidence, offender characteristics, and stolen property data were collected for each of the incidents. Data on both victimized and nonvictimized establishments in 26 different cities were collected during 1972, 1973, and 1974. In the 1975 survey, data from the 13 cities surveyed during 1972 and 1973 were collected again. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2 armed robbery icpsr burglary icpsr businesses icpsr cities icpsr crime rates icpsr larceny icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr organizations icpsr robbery icpsr security systems icpsr urban crime icpsr victimization icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8002 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08003 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08003 MiAaI MiAaI Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1973-1977 [United States] [electronic resource] National Sample United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8003 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These Commercial Victimization Surveys were collected as part of the National Crime Surveys. They document burglary and robbery incidents for all types of commercial establishments, as well as political, cultural, and religious organizations. Business characteristics gathered include form of ownership and operation, size and type of business, and security measures. Information regarding the reported incidents includes time and place, weapon involvement, offender and entry characteristics, injuries and deaths, and type and value of stolen property. Data were collected by calendar quarter for four quarters in 1973-1976 and for two quarters in 1977, while the actual incidents reported in the files reflect those occurring six months prior to the interview date. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2 armed robbery icpsr security systems icpsr urban crime icpsr victimization icpsr burglary icpsr cities icpsr crime rates icpsr larceny icpsr national crime statistics (USA) icpsr offenders icpsr organizations icpsr robbery icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8003 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02564 MiAaI MiAaI Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin [electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996 K. Jack Riley 2012-08-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was designed to address the practical and policy implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995, the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer (i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends), their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, and living circumstances of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 crack cocaine icpsr crime patterns icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug testing icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr drugs icpsr heroin icpsr substance abuse icpsr trends icpsr urinalysis icpsr ADAM/DUF Program icpsr arrests icpsr cocaine icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Riley, K. Jack Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29202 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29202 MiAaI MiAaI Crime in Boomburb Cities [electronic resource] 1970-2004 [United States] John Hipp 2011-08-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29202 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study focused on the effect of economic resources and racial/ethnic composition on the change in crime rates from 1970-2004 in United States cities in metropolitan areas that experienced a large growth in population after World War II. A total of 352 cities in the following United States metropolitan areas were selected for this study: Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Las Vegas, Miami, Orange County, Orlando, Phoenix, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Silicon Valley (Santa Clara), and Tampa/St. Petersburg. Selection was based on the fact that these areas developed during a similar time period and followed comparable development trajectories. In particular, these 14 areas, known as the "boomburbs" for their dramatic, post-World War II population growth, all faced issues relating to the rapid growth of tract-style housing and the subsequent development of low density, urban sprawls. The study combined place-level data obtained from the United States Census with crime data from the Uniform Crime Reports for five categories of Type I crimes: aggravated assaults, robberies, murders, burglaries, and motor vehicle thefts. The dataset contains a total of 247 variables pertaining to crime, economic resources, and race/ethnic composition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29202.v1 aggravated assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime rates icpsr economic conditions icpsr homicide icpsr income distribution icpsr metropolitan areas icpsr race icpsr racial integration icpsr racial segregation icpsr robbery icpsr trend analysis icpsr urban crime icpsr wealth icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Hipp, John Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29202 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29202.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03078 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03078 MiAaI MiAaI Crime-Induced Business Relocations in the Austin [Texas] Metropolitan Area, 1995-1996 [electronic resource] David L. Huff , James E. Jarrett 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3078 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. There were three key objectives to this study: (1) to determine the relative importance of crime-related as well as business-related factors in business relocation decisions, including business ownership, type of business, and business size, (2) to ascertain how businesses respond to crime and fear of crime, such as by moving, adding more security, requesting police protection, or cooperating with other businesses, and (3) to identify the types of crime prevention measures and assistance that businesses currently need and to assess the roles of business associations and police departments in providing enhanced crime prevention assistance. From November 1995 through February 1996 a mail survey was distributed to a sample of three different groups of businesses in Austin's 14 highest crime ZIP codes. The groups consisted of: (1) businesses that remained within the same ZIP code between 1990 and 1993, (2) new firms that either moved into a high-crime ZIP code area between 1990 and 1993 or were created in a high-crime ZIP code between 1990 and 1993, and (3) businesses that relocated from high-crime ZIP code areas to other locations in Austin's metropolitan area or elsewhere in Texas. Variables include type of business, ownership of business, number of employees, reasons for moving or staying in neighborhood, types of crime that affected business, owner's response to business crime, customer safety, and the role of business associations and the police in preventing crime. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03078.v1 business conditions icpsr businesses icpsr crime control icpsr crime prevention icpsr police protection icpsr relocation icpsr security icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies Huff, David L. Jarrett, James E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3078 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03078.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32201 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32201 MiAaI MiAaI Defining Law Enforcement's Role in Protecting American Agriculture From Agroterrorism in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, 2003-2004 [electronic resource] Terry Knowles , James Lane , Gary Bayens , Nevil Speer , Jerry Jaax , David Carter , Andra Bannister 2013-04-03 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 32201 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study was conducted to determine law enforcement's role in protecting American agriculture from terrorism. In particular, the study looked at what effect a widespread introduction of Foot and Mouth disease to America's livestock supply would have on the nation's economy, and law enforcement's ability to contain such an outbreak. The study had two primary components. One component of the study was designed to take an initial look at the preparedness of law enforcement in Kansas to respond to such acts. This was done through a survey completed by 85 sheriffs in Kansas (Part 1). The other component of the study was an assessment of the attitudes of persons who work in the livestock industry with regard to their attitudes about vulnerabilities, prevention strategies, and working relationships with public officials and other livestock industry affiliates. This was done through a survey completed by 133 livestock industry members in Kansas (Parts 2-3, 6-9, 12-13), Oklahoma (Parts 4, 10, 14), and Texas (Parts 5, 11, 15). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32201.v1 agricultural policy icpsr agriculture icpsr bioterrorism icpsr crime prevention icpsr economic crises icpsr emergency preparedness icpsr farms icpsr national security icpsr police response icpsr terrorism icpsr terrorist threat icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System TPDRC I. Terrorism TPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA) Knowles, Terry Lane, James Bayens, Gary Speer, Nevil Jaax, Jerry Carter, David Bannister, Andra Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32201 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32201.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29742 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29742 MiAaI MiAaI Developing Uniform Performance Measures for Policing in the United States [electronic resource] A Pilot Project in Four Agencies, 2008-2009 Robert C. Davis , Chris Ortiz , Gary Cordner , Craig Hartley , Reggie Newell 2013-04-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 29742 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Between 2008 and 2009, the research team gathered survey data from 458 members of the community (Part 1), 312 police officers (Part 2), and 804 individuals who had voluntary contact (Part 3), and 761 individuals who had involuntary contact (Part 4) with police departments in Dallas, Texas, Knoxville, Tennessee, and Kettering, Ohio, and the Broward County, Florida Sheriff's Office. The surveys were designed to look at nine dimensions of police performance: delivering quality services; fear, safety, and order; ethics and values; legitimacy and customer satisfaction; organizational competence and commitment to high standards; reducing crime and victimization; resource use; responding to offenders; and use of authority. The community surveys included questions about police effectiveness, police professionalism, neighborhood problems, and victimization. The officer surveys had three parts: job satisfaction items, procedural knowledge items, and questions about the culture of integrity. The voluntary police contact and involuntary police contact surveys included questions on satisfaction with the way the police officer or deputy sheriff handled the encounter. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29742.v1 decision making icpsr employment practices icpsr law enforcement icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr performance icpsr police icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police performance icpsr professionalism icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Davis, Robert C. Ortiz, Chris Cordner, Gary Hartley, Craig Newell, Reggie Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29742 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29742.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02706 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02706 MiAaI MiAaI Differences in the Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use Across Five Factors in Indianapolis, Fort Lauderdale, Phoenix, and Dallas, 1994 [electronic resource] Andre B. Rosay , University of Maryland at College Park , Denise C. Herz 2000-09-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2706 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study investigated the accuracy of self-reported drug use in three ways. First, the researchers examined differences in the accuracy of self-reported drug use across five factors: gender, race, age, type of drug, and offense seriousness. Second, an attempt was made to determine the specific sources of inaccurate self-reports in terms of differences in underreporting and overreporting. Third, the researchers sought to explain differences in underreporting and overreporting in terms of true differences or differences in opportunity to underreport or overreport. This study used data collected in 1994 as part of the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program [DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 (ICPSR 9477)]. The DUF drug testing and measurement methodology allows the accuracy of self-reported drug use to be checked with a biological criterion, namely urine tests. The sample for this study consisted of 4,752 white and Black adults from Indianapolis, Ft. Lauderdale, Phoenix, and Dallas. The five exogenous measures included in this study were type of drug (marijuana vs. crack/cocaine), age (18 through 30 vs. 31 or over), offense seriousness (misdemeanor vs. felony), race (Black vs. white), and gender (male vs. female). The endogenous measures were accuracy (self-report and drug test both positive or both negative vs. otherwise), underreporting (self-report negative but drug test positive vs. otherwise), and overreporting (self-report positive but drug test negative vs. otherwise). Variables include result of marijuana urine test, result of cocaine/crack urine test, marijuana self-report, cocaine/crack self-report, age group, sex, race, offense category, and ethnic/gender group. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02706.v1 African Americans icpsr age icpsr crack cocaine icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offender profiles icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr gender icpsr marijuana icpsr race icpsr urinalysis icpsr White Americans icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program RCMD I. Crime Rosay, Andre B. University of Maryland at College Park Herz, Denise C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2706 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02706.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04578 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04578 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Incarceration on Criminal Trajectories in the United States, 1994 [electronic resource] Avinash Singh Bhati 2007-02-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4578 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Using data from RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3355), this study developed an analytical approach to utilize detailed dated criminal arrest history information in order to investigate whether, and to what extent, incarceration is able to deter offenders from future offending. This data collection consists of the syntax for a SAS macro used to estimate individual specific offending micro-trajectories, project counterfactual trajectories, and to assess the actual post-release offending patterns against the backdrop of these counterfactuals. The arrest records of individuals were clustered in chronological order and were truncated after the first post-release re-arrest event. The key independent variables used in estimating the pre-release criminal history accumulation process included the arrest number, the age at first arrest, whether or not the individual was confined as a result of the previous arrest event, and a measure of the number of years taken to reach each arrest event cumulated through the last arrest event. The same set of basic variables were used to model first re-arrest after release (recidivism). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1 arrest records icpsr conviction records icpsr criminal histories icpsr recidivism icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional Packages Bhati, Avinash Singh Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4578 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03542 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluating a Collaborative Intervention Between Health Care and Criminal Justice in Harris County, Texas, 2001-2002 [electronic resource] Judith McFarlane , Ann Malecha 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to evaluate the Advocacy-Case Management Intervention designed to increase victim safety and the efficiency of the protection order process. The intervention was performed by registered nurses as part of a collaborative partnership between justice and health care agencies. A two-group experimental design using random assignments to control and experimental groups was used. The study subjects were women who qualified for a civil protection order against a sexual intimate. These women were contacted via telephone for initial interviews, as well as for three-, six-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up interviews. Variables were obtained from several instruments used to measure victim safety-seeking behaviors and levels of violence and harassment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03542.v1 battered women icpsr domestic violence icpsr family violence icpsr intervention icpsr restraining orders icpsr victim safety icpsr violence icpsr assault icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McFarlane, Judith Malecha, Ann Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03542.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02686 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02686 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Children at Risk Program in Austin, Texas, Bridgeport, Connecticut, Memphis, Tennessee, Savannah, Georgia, and Seattle, Washington, 1993-1997 [electronic resource] Adele V. Harrell , Shannon Cavanagh , Sanjeev Sridharan 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2686 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. s about the police, occasions of skipping school and why, if the youth thought he or she would be promoted to the next grade, would graduate from high school, or would go to college, knowledge of children engaging in various problem activities and if the youth was pressured to join them, and experiences with and attitudes toward consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and various drugs. Three sections of the questionnaire were completed by the youths. Section A asked questions about the youth's attitudes toward various statements about self, life, the home environment, rules, and norms. Section B asked questions about the number of times that various crimes had been committed against the youth, his or her sexual activity, number of times the youth ran away from home, number of times he or she had committed various criminal acts, and what weapons he or she had carried. Items in Section C covered the youth's alcohol and drug use, and participation in drug sales. Part 3 provides data from both caretaker interviews (baseline and end-of-program). Questions elicited the caretaker's assessments of the presence of various positive and negative neighborhood characteristics, safety of the child in the neighborhood, attitudes toward and interactions with the police, if the caretaker had been arrested, had been on probation, or in jail, whether various crimes had been committed against the caretaker or others in the household in the past year, activities that the youth currently participated in, curfews set by the caretaker, if the caretaker had visited the school for various reasons, school performance or problems by the youth and the youth's siblings, amount of the caretaker's involvement with activities, clubs, and groups, the caretaker's financial, medical, and personal problems and assistance received in the past year, if he or she was not able to obtain help, why not, and information on the caretaker's education, employment, income level, income sources, and where he or she sought medical treatment for themselves or for the youth. Two sections of the data collection instruments were completed by the caretaker. Section A dealt with the youth's personal problems or problems with others, and the youth's friends. Additional questions focused on the family's interactions, rules, and norms. Section B items asked about the caretaker's alcohol and drug use, and any alcohol and drug use or criminal justice involvement by others in the household older than the youth. Part 4 consists of data from schools, police, and courts. School data include the youth's grades, grade-point average (GPA), absentee rate, reasons for absences, and whether the youth was promoted each school year. Data from police records include police contacts, detentions, violent offenses, drug-related offenses, and arrests prior to recruitment in the CAR program and in Years 1-4 after recruitment, court contacts and charges prior to recruitment and in Years 1-4 after recruitment, and how the charges were disposed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02686.v1 intervention icpsr intervention strategies icpsr case management icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhoods icpsr program evaluation icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr treatment programs icpsr youths at risk icpsr children icpsr cities icpsr crime prevention icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr drug use icpsr family services icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD II. Community Studies Harrell, Adele V. Cavanagh, Shannon Sridharan, Sanjeev Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2686 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02686.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03400 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03400 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Law Enforcement Training for Domestic Violence Cases in a Southwestern City in Texas, 1997-1999 [electronic resource] Martha Smithey , Susanne E. Green , Andrew L. Giacomazzi 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3400 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an outcome evaluation of the effects of the Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project Training Model for Law Enforcement Response on police officer attitudes toward domestic violence. Data on the effectiveness of the training were collected by means of an attitude survey of law enforcement officers (Part 1). Additionally, two experimental designs (Part 2) were implemented to test the effects of the Duluth model training on (1) time spent by police officers at the scene of a domestic violence incident, and (2) the number of convictions. Variables for Part 1 include the assigned research group and respondents' level of agreement with various statements, such as: alcohol is the primary cause of family violence, men are more likely than women to be aggressive, only mentally ill people batter their families, mandatory arrest of offenders is the best way to reduce repeat episodes of violence, family violence is a private matter, law enforcement policies are ineffective for preventing family violence, children of single-parent, female-headed families are abused more than children of dual-parent households, and prosecution of an offender is unlikely regardless of how well a victim cooperates. Index scores calculated from groupings of various variables are included as well as whether the respondent found training interesting, relevant, well-organized, and useful. Demographic variables for each respondent include race, gender, age, and assignment and position in the police department. Variables for Part 2 include whether the domestic violence case occurred before or after training, to which test group the case belongs, the amount of time in minutes spent on the domestic violence scene, and whether the case resulted in a conviction. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03400.v1 arrest procedures icpsr domestic violence icpsr family violence icpsr intervention icpsr law enforcement icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr police officers icpsr police training icpsr policies and procedures icpsr program evaluation icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Smithey, Martha Green, Susanne E. Giacomazzi, Andrew L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3400 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03400.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28044 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28044 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Target Corporation's Safe City Initiative in Chula Vista, California, and Cincinnati, Ohio, 2004-2008 [electronic resource] Nancy LaVigne 2010-09-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 28044 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. he specified type of crime in the displacement area, the cost of the specified type of crime in a matched comparison area, the city, and the crime type. The Safe City Business Survey Data (Part 3) contain 132 variables relating to perceptions of safety, contact with local police, experience and reporting of crime, impact of crime, crime prevention, community connections, and business/employee information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28044.v1 crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime reporting icpsr community involvement icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr crime control icpsr crime control programs icpsr crime costs icpsr crime impact icpsr evaluation icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr program evaluation icpsr reactions to crime icpsr retail industry icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies LaVigne, Nancy Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28044 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28044.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03141 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03141 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Texas Youth Commission's Chemical Dependency Treatment Program, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] William R. Kelly 2003-03-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3141 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study consists of data from both the process evaluation and the outcome evaluation of the Texas Youth Commission's (TYC) Chemical Dependency Treatment Program (CDTP). The research goal of the first part of the study was to provide a systematic and empirical process evaluation of appropriate program placement and whether and to what extent selected individual-level factors were related to key measures of program progress, as well as to variations in process outcomes across each of five treatment sites. The research goal of the second part of the study was to provide a systematic and empirical outcome evaluation of the impact of the TYC Chemical Dependency Treatment Program, including determination of the extent to which certain risk, need, amenability, program performance and delivery, and aftercare factors affected treatment impact. Data were obtained from the Texas Youth Commission, the state corrections agency responsible for serving violent and serious delinquent youth committed to the custody of the state. TYC collects a range of information on the risk, needs, and treatment amenability of its youths. Also, program performance is measured through the use of an exit assessment conducted by program staff, which essentially provides a report card summarizing each youth's involvement and progress in treatment. Data in this evaluation cover all juveniles who entered the CDTP from January through October 1998, and who were discharged by April 1, 1999. The treatment group consists of youths who invariably had a high need for chemical dependency treatment. The control group consists of youths who were eligible for treatment in the CDTP during this same time period but who did not receive it due to limited CDTP bed space. To obtain measures of drug use/abuse relapse, aftercare participation, and parole performance, a parolee data worksheet was created. TYC was able to provide information on who received chemical dependency treatment while on parole. Five core variables of the process evaluation data are program completion, program expulsion, days to completion, days to expulsion, and number of behavior infractions. The process evaluation includes the following variables from individual exit assessments: the youth's overall participation, whether the youth understood the curriculum, understood addiction, sought help, acknowledged addiction, and acknowledged impact, the youth's performance grade, whether the youth committed to be drug-free, family involvement, special circumstances, and performance index. Demographic variables are race, age, parents' marital status, and gender. Variables addressing risk factors include classifying offense, offender class, risk level, number of felony referrals, number of felony adjudications, number of previous TYC commitments, and number of parole revocations. Other variables in the process evaluation address the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI), the Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) chemical dependency treatment need, TYC treatment amenability score, and the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Variables available in the outcome evaluation data address issues of rearrest, higher custody level, aftercare sessions, drug tests, and parole compliance. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03141.v1 addiction icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr process evaluation icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment compliance icpsr treatment facilities icpsr treatment outcome icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Kelly, William R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3141 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03141.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20403 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20403 MiAaI MiAaI Examination of Actuarial Offender-Based Prediction Assessments in Texas, 1993-1996 [electronic resource] Michele M. Connolly 2008-06-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20403 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of prediction and classification of offenders under community supervision. A felony cohort data collection instrument was developed to test the validity of the Wisconsin Risk and Need Instrument in use in Texas, as well as to develop "better" predictor variables for a variety of dependent variables. Using the felony cohort data instrument, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Community Justice Assistance Division (TDCJ-CJAD) collected detailed statewide information on 3,405 felony offenders placed on probation in Texas during October 1993. Specifically, the form was completed by a probation officer on all felony probation intakes at the time the initial case classification risk/needs assessment was conducted. Additionally, follow-up forms were developed and administered to track the offenders' progress at one year, two years, and three years. Variables include probationer information, current offense, criminal history, social history, substance abuse, probation sanctions, case classification risk items, and case classification need items. Additional variables include felony cohort one-year follow-up data form questions, felony cohort second-year follow-up data form questions, and felony cohort third-year follow-up data form questions. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20403.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr parole icpsr parole boards icpsr parole services icpsr parolees icpsr probation icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr recidivism icpsr risk assessment icpsr risk factors icpsr correctional classification icpsr crime prediction icpsr criminality prediction icpsr evaluation icpsr inmate release plans icpsr offender classification icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Connolly, Michele M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20403 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20403.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03399 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03399 MiAaI MiAaI Examination of Homicides in Houston, Texas, 1985-1994 [electronic resource] Victoria Titterington , Kelly R. Damphousse 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3399 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. As a contribution to nationwide efforts to more thoroughly understand urban violence, this study was conducted to assess the impact of cultural dynamics on homicide rates in Houston, Texas, and to profile homicides in the city from 1985 to 1994. This data collection provides the results of quantitative analysis of data collected from all Houston homicide cases recorded in the police murder logs for 1985-1994. Variables describe the homicide circumstances, the victim-offender relationship, the type of weapon used, and any drug- or gang-related activity involved. Other variables include the year and month in which the homicide occurred, whether the homicide occurred on a weekday or over the weekend, the motive of the homicide, whether the homicide was drug-related, whether the case was cleared by police at time of data entry, weapon type and means of killing, the relationship between the victim and the offender, whether a firearm was the homicide method, whether it was a multiple victim incident or multiple offender incident, whether the victim or the offender was younger than age 15, and the inter-racial relationship between the victim and the offender. Demographic variables include age, sex, and race of the victim as well as the offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03399.v1 murder icpsr offenders icpsr police records icpsr urban crime icpsr victims icpsr arrest records icpsr crime rates icpsr homicide icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime Titterington, Victoria Damphousse, Kelly R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3399 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03399.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02890 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02890 MiAaI MiAaI Experiment to Enhance the Reporting of Drug Use by Arrestees in Cleveland, Detroit, and Houston, 1997 [electronic resource] Eric D., Wish , Thomas Gray , Jonathan Sushinsky 2001-04-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2890 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This project involved an experiment conducted in three Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) [DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 (ICPSR 9477)] program sites to determine whether using a more detailed informed consent procedure and/or altering the sequence of the interview and urine specimen collection could enhance the validity of arrestees' self-reports of drug use without adversely affecting study response rates. A 2x2 factorial design was used to assess the effects of the two manipulations. The first two experimental conditions involved administering either the standard DUF informed consent or an enhanced consent that told the arrestees more about the confidential nature of the research and the capabilities of urinalysis. The second two conditions involved collecting the urine specimen either before or after the interview was administered. The experiment included 2,015 adult arrestees from Cleveland, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Houston, Texas, who were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental conditions. The experiment was designed so that the only variability across the interviews was the manipulation of informed consent and the sequencing of the urine specimen request. All other procedures of a standard DUF collection were followed. Data were collected in Cleveland between July 8 and August 22, 1997, in Detroit from August 4 to September 27, 1997, and in Houston from October 17 to November 1, 1997. Variables specific to this project include the experimental condition to which the respondent was assigned, follow-up questions asking whether the arrestee would have responded differently if assigned to the other conditions, and several dummy variables on length and type of drug use. Data from the DUF interview provided detailed information about each arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type, arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Urine tests screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Demographic data include the age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment status, and living circumstances of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02890.v1 drug abuse icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr offenders icpsr treatment programs icpsr urinalysis icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Wish, Eric D., Gray, Thomas Sushinsky, Jonathan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2890 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02890.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09367 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09367 MiAaI MiAaI Federal District Court Civil Decisions, 1981-1987 [electronic resource] Detroit, Houston, and Kansas City C.K. Rowland 1992-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9367 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data describe unpublished civil cases filed and terminated in the three federal district courts of Detroit, Michigan, Houston, Texas, and Kansas City, Missouri, between 1981 and 1987. The data were collected to enable researchers to measure the relative influence of local legal environments and politicized judicial appointments on unpublished substantive and procedural outcomes. Variables in the collection specify the date a case was filed and terminated, type of case filed, specific judgment and nature of the decision, whether a monetary award was granted and, if so, the amount involved. Information also is included on whether a government litigant was involved, if a jury trial was requested and by whom, type of attorney for plaintiff and defendant, type and number of motions filed (and by whom), and outcome of appeal, if applicable. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09367.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr district courts icpsr federal courts icpsr judicial decisions icpsr judicial process icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Rowland, C.K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9367 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09367.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06790 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06790 MiAaI MiAaI Fraud in the Savings and Loan Industry in California, Florida, Texas, and Washington, DC [electronic resource] White-Collar Crime and Government Response, 1986-1993 Henry N. Pontell , Kitty Calavita , Robert Tillman 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 6790 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the factors that contributed to the epidemic of fraud in the savings and loan ("thrift") industry, the role that white-collar crime played, and the government response to this crisis. The researchers sought to describe the magnitude, role, and nature of thrift crime, analyze factors related to the effectiveness of law enforcement control of savings and loan fraud, and develop the broader implications, from both a theoretical and a policy perspective. Data consist of statistics from various government agencies and focus on all types of thrift, i.e., solvent and insolvent, that fell under the jurisdiction of the Office of Thrift Supervision in Florida, Texas, and California and all insolvent thrifts under the control of the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) in Washington, DC. The study focused on Texas, California, and Florida because of the high numbers of savings and loan failures, instances of fraud, and executives being indicted. However, as the study progressed, it became clear that the frauds and failures were nationwide, and while many of the crimes were located in these three states, the individuals involved may have been located elsewhere. Thus, the scope of the study was expanded to provide a national perspective. Parts 1 and 2, Case and Defendant Data, provide information from the Executive Office of United States Attorneys on referrals, investigations, and prosecutions of thrifts, banks, and other financial institutions. Part 1 consists of data about the cases that were prosecuted, the number of institutions victimized, the state in which these occurred, and the seriousness of the offense as indicated by the dollar loss and the number of victims. Part 2 provides information on the defendant's position in the institution (director, officer, employee, borrower, customer, developer, lawyer, or shareholder) and disposition (fines, restitution, prison, probation, or acquittal). The relevant variables associated with the Resolution Trust Corporation (Part 3, Institution Data) describe indictments, convictions, and sentences for all cases in the respective regions, organizational structure and behavior for a single institution, and the estimated loss to the institution. Variables coded are ownership type, charter, home loans, brokered deposits, net worth, number of referrals, number of individuals referred, assets and asset growth, ratio of direct investments to total assets, and total dollar losses due to fraud. For Parts 4 and 5, Texas and California Referral Data, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) provided data for what are called Category I referrals for California and Texas. Part 4 covers Category I referrals for Texas. Variables include the individual's position in the institution, the number of referrals, and the sum of dollar losses from all referrals. Part 5 measures the total dollar losses due to fraud in California, the total number of criminal referrals, and the number of individuals indicted. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06790.v1 financial institutions icpsr fraud icpsr law enforcement icpsr savings and loans associations icpsr white collar crime icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pontell, Henry N. Calavita, Kitty Tillman, Robert Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6790 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06790.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03145 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03145 MiAaI MiAaI Gun Density, Gun Type, and the Dallas Homicide Rate, 1980-1992 [electronic resource] Christopher S. Koper 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3145 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the relationships among trends in deadly gun violence, overall gun availability, and the availability of more lethal types of guns. Using firearms confiscated by the Dallas, Texas, police department from 1980 to 1992 as indicators of the types of guns circulating among criminal/high-risk groups, the project examined changes over time in Dallas' street gun arsenal and assessed the impact these changes had upon gun violence mortality in Dallas. The focus of the project was on the characteristics of the guns rather than their numbers. All confiscated firearms were analyzed and characterized according to basic weapon type and caliber groupings. Dates of confiscation were missing from the majority of the pre-1988 records, but by aggregating the gun data into bimonthly (Part 1) and quarterly (Part 2) time series databases, it was possible to estimate the bimonthly and quarterly periods of confiscation for most of the 1980-1992 records. Records that could not be assigned to bimonthly or quarterly periods were dropped. Confiscated firearms were grouped into basic categories based on stopping power (i.e., wounding potential), rate of fire, and ammunition capacity. The following measures were created for each bimonthly and quarterly period: (1) weapons with high stopping power (large guns), (2) semiautomatic weaponry (semis), (3) weapons combining high stopping power and a semiautomatic firing mechanism (large semis), (4) handguns with high stopping power (large handguns), (5) semiautomatic handguns (semi handguns), and (6) handguns combining high stopping power and semiautomatic firing (large semi handguns). Several violence measures were obtained from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reports Supplemental Homicide Reports and Return A (or Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest) data files (see UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA [UNITED STATES]: 1975-1997 [ICPSR 9028]). These measures were also aggregated at bimonthly and quarterly levels. Data from the Dallas Police Department master gun property file include total handguns, total semiautomatic handguns, total large-caliber handguns, total large-caliber semiautomatic handguns, total shotguns, total semiautomatic shotguns, total rifles, total semiautomatic rifles, and total counts and total semiautomatic counts for various calibers of handguns, shotguns, and rifles. Data that were aggregated using the FBI data include total homicides, gun homicides, total robberies, gun robberies, and gun aggravated assaults. The data file also includes the year and the bimonthly or quarterly period counter. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03145.v1 assault weapons icpsr crime reporting icpsr firearms icpsr gun ownership icpsr gun use icpsr handguns icpsr mortality rates icpsr police records icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Koper, Christopher S. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3145 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03145.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03263 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03263 MiAaI MiAaI Homicide, Bereavement, and the Criminal Justice System in Texas, 2000 [electronic resource] Sarah Dugan Goodrum 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3263 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the influence of the criminal justice system on the bereavement process of individuals who have lost loved ones to homicide. The primary question motivating this research was: Can the criminal justice system help to heal the harm of the bereaved's loss? The three main goals of this study were to examine: (1) bereaveds' perceptions of and experiences with the criminal justice system and its professionals, (2) the ways criminal justice professionals perceive and manage the bereaved, and (3) the nature of the association between the criminal justice system and bereaveds' psychological well-being. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews conducted in June through December 2000 with two different groups of people. The first group represented individuals who had lost loved ones to murder between 1994 and 1998 in one county in Texas (Parts 1-33). The second group (Parts 34-55) was comprised county criminal justice professionals (murder detectives, prosecutors, criminal court judges, victim's service counselors, and victim's rights advocates). For Parts 1-33, interviewees were asked a series of open-ended questions about the criminal justice system, including how they learned about the death and the current disposition of the murder case. They also were asked what they would change about the criminal justice system's treatment of them. The bereaved were further asked about their sex, age, race, education, marital status, employment status, income, and number of children. Additional questions were asked regarding the deceased's age at the time of the murder, race, relationship to interviewee, and the deceased's relationship to the murderer, if known. For Parts 34-55, respondents were asked about their job titles, years in those positions, number of murder cases handled in the past year, number of murder cases handled over the course of their career, and whether they thought the criminal justice system could help to heal the harm of people who had lost loved ones to murder. All interviews (Parts 1-55) were tape-recorded and later transcribed by the interviewer, who replaced actual names of individuals, neighborhoods, cities, counties, or any other identifiable names with pseudonyms. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03263.v1 criminal justice system icpsr death counseling icpsr grief icpsr homicide icpsr judges icpsr loss adjustment icpsr murder icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr victim services icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Goodrum, Sarah Dugan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3263 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03263.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09330 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09330 MiAaI MiAaI Illegal Immigration and Crime in San Diego and El Paso Counties, 1985-1986 [electronic resource] Susan Pennell , Christine Curtis , Jeff Tayman 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9330 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to examine whether a rising crime rate in El Paso, Texas and San Diego, California in 1986 could be attributed to, among other factors, the influx of undocumented aliens. Variables include level of involvement of undocumented aliens in serious felony arrests in San Diego and El Paso Counties, the outcome of serious felony arrest cases involving undocumented persons compared to others arrested for similar offenses, the impact of arrests of undocumented aliens on the criminal justice system in terms of workload and cost, the extent that criminal justice agencies coordinate their efforts to apprehend and process undocumented aliens who have committed serious crimes in San Diego and El Paso counties, and how differences in agency objectives impede or enhance coordination. Data are also provided on how many undocumented persons were arrested/convicted for repeat offense in these counties and which type of policies or procedures could be implemented in criminal justice agencies to address the issue of crimes committed by undocumented aliens. Data were collected in the two cities with focus on serious felony offenses. The collection includes sociodemographic characteristics, citizenship status, current arrest, case disposition, and prior criminal history with additional data from San Diego to compute the costs involving undocumented aliens. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09330.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr criminal justice system icpsr felony offenses icpsr illegal immigrants icpsr immigration icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity RCMD I. Crime Pennell, Susan Curtis, Christine Tayman, Jeff Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9330 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09330.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25621 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25621 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Legal Advocacy on Intimate Partner Homicide in the United States, 1976-1997 [electronic resource] Laura Dugan 2009-07-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25621 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the impacts of jurisdictions’ domestic violence policies on violent behavior of family members and intimate partners, on the likelihood that the police discovered an incident, and on the likelihood that the police made an arrest. The research combined two datasets. Part 1 contains information on police, prosecution policies, and local victim services. Informants within the local agencies of the 50 largest cities in the United States were contacted and asked to complete a survey inventorying policies and activities by type and year of implementation. Data from completed surveys covered 48 cities from 1976 to 1996. Part 2 contains data on domestic violence laws. Data on state statutes from 1976 to 1997 that related to protection orders were collected by a legal expert for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 arrests icpsr crime reporting icpsr domestic violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr police reports icpsr policy analysis icpsr state legislatures icpsr victim services icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Dugan, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25621 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27542 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 pregnancy icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27546 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27546 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27546 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27546 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04672 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2000, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 census data icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23520 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23520 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23520 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2002, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23520 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25282 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25282 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2004 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25282 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2004, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the physical health and educational services provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr pregnancy icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25282 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25981 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2006, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20423 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20423 MiAaI MiAaI Law Enforcement Response to Human Trafficking and the Implications for Victims in the United States, 2005 [electronic resource] Heather J. Clawson , Nicole Dutch , Megan Cummings 2011-06-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 20423 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to explore how local law enforcement were responding to the crime of human trafficking after the passage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) in 2000. The first phase of the study (Part 1, Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data) involved conducting telephone surveys with 121 federal, state, and local law enforcement officials in key cities across the country between August and November of 2005. Different versions of the telephone survey were created for the key categories of law enforcement targeted by this study (state/local investigators, police offices, victim witness coordinators, and federal agents). The telephone surveys were supplemented with interviews from law enforcement supervisors/managers, representatives from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Human Trafficking/Smuggling Office, the United States Attorney's Office, the Trafficking in Persons Office, and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. Respondents were asked about their history of working human trafficking cases, knowledge of human trafficking, and familiarity with the TVPA. Other variables include the type of trafficking victims encountered, how human trafficking cases were identified, and the law enforcement agency's capability to address the issue of trafficking. The respondents were also asked about the challenges and barriers to investigating human trafficking cases and to providing services to the victims. In the second phase of the study (Part 2, Case File Review Qualitative Data) researchers collected comprehensive case information from sources such as case reports, sanitized court reports, legal newspapers, magazines, and newsletters, as well as law review articles. This case review examined nine prosecuted cases of human trafficking since the passage of the TVPA. The research team conducted an assessment of each case focusing on four core components: identifying the facts, defining the problem, identifying the rule to the facts (e.g., in light of the rule, how law enforcement approached the situation), and conclusion. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20423.v1 exploitation icpsr human rights icpsr human trafficking icpsr indentured servants icpsr law enforcement icpsr sex trafficking icpsr slavery icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Clawson, Heather J. Dutch, Nicole Cummings, Megan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20423 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20423.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03874 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03874 MiAaI MiAaI Mortality Detail and Multiple Cause of Death, 1981 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-07-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3874 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of deaths occurring during 1981. Part 1, the Mortality Detail file, describes every death or fetal death registered in the United States for 1981. Part 2, Multiple Cause of Death, provides information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1981. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03874.v2 gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD V. Health and Well-Being AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACJD VIII. Official Statistics DSDR II. Mortality ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3874 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03874.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25781 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25781 MiAaI MiAaI Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes [electronic resource] Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] Geoffrey P. Alpert , Michael R. Smith , Lorie Fridell 2011-04-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25781 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Part 7) include 6,596 force incidents aggregated over 60 months- a 5 year period from 2002 through 2006. Part 6 and Part 7 are comprised of seven variables documenting whether a Taser was implemented, the number of suspects and officers injured in a month, the number of force incidents per month, and the number of CEDs uses per month. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25781.v1 police icpsr police equipment icpsr police response icpsr police use of force icpsr police weapons icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Alpert, Geoffrey P. Smith, Michael R. Fridell, Lorie Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25781 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25781.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03905 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03905 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1968-1973 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3905 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1968 through 1973. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of the week of the death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, EIGHTH REVISION (ICD-8), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03905.v2 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr RCMD V. Health and Well-Being NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3905 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03905.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03906 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03906 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1974-1978 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3906 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1974 through 1978. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of the week of the death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, EIGHTH REVISION (ICD-8), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03906.v2 death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr age icpsr NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics RCMD V. Health and Well-Being United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3906 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03906.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03895 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03895 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1979 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3895 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1979. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03895.v2 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics RCMD V. Health and Well-Being AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3895 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03895.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03897 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03897 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1980 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3897 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of deaths occurring during 1980. Included is information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1981. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of the death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03897.v2 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults RCMD V. Health and Well-Being AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3897 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03897.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09880 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09880 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1982 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-06-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9880 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of deaths occurring in the United States during 1982. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, place of death, whether there were multiple conditions that caused the death, and what those conditions were. In addition, data are provided on date of death, and on sex, race, age, marital status, and origin or descent of the deceased. Also included is information on residence of the deceased (state, county, city, region, and whether the county was a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area). Data on whether an autopsy was performed and the site of accidents are also provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09880.v1 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults RCMD V. Health and Well-Being ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9880 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09880.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06986 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06986 MiAaI MiAaI Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration [electronic resource] [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992 Doris Layton MacKenzie 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6986 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp) programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1) changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and military experience. The community supervision data contain information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and contacts with community supervision officers, along with demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey were different from those who were surveyed in the community supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr offenders icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr program evaluation icpsr shock incarceration programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections MacKenzie, Doris Layton Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6986 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21680 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21680 MiAaI MiAaI Multistate Analysis of Time Consumption in Capital Appeals, 1992-2002 [electronic resource] Latzer, Barry , Cauthen, James N.G. 2008-03-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 21680 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Despite public controversy over the length of death penalty appeals, little empirical work has been done on the time allocated to the capital appeals process. The purpose of this study was to perform a multistate empirical analysis of the time expended in direct appeals of capital cases. The researchers included decisions from 14 states that they believed to be representative of the 37 states that have enforceable death penalty laws. For each of the 14 states included in the study, the researchers examined every capital case decided on direct appeal by the courts of last resort between the dates January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2002. The researchers developed a case database by examining a variety of sources. For each of the 1,676 cases in the multistate database, the research team collected time consumption data for each of the following five phases of the direct appeal process: (1) the postsentence stage, (2) the preparation stage, (3) the argument stage, (4) the decision stage, and (5) the supreme court stage. Variables include state, case characteristics, court opinion variables, dates, and time consumption variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1 appeal procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr capital punishment icpsr case processing icpsr certiorari icpsr death row inmates icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr executions icpsr judicial decisions icpsr murderers icpsr sentence review icpsr sentencing icpsr Supreme Court decisions icpsr state supreme courts icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Latzer, Barry Cauthen, James N.G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21680 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07658 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07658 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Cities, 1972-1975 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7658 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This sample of the National Crime Survey contains information about victimization in 26 central cities in the United States. The data are designed to achieve three primary objectives: 1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, 2) to estimate the numbers and types of crimes not reported to police, and 3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes and permit reliable comparisons over time and between areas of the country. Information about each household or personal victimization was recorded. The data include type of crime (attempts are covered as well), description of offender, severity of crime, injuries or losses, time and place of occurrence, age, race and sex of offender(s), relationship of offenders to victims, education, migration, labor force status, occupation, and income of persons involved. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 census data icpsr cities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr households icpsr victimization icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7658 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06720 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06720 MiAaI MiAaI National Opinion Survey of Crime and Justice, 1995 [electronic resource] Timothy J. Flanagan , Dennis R. Longmire 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6720 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this survey was to provide legislators, public officials, and Texas residents with a reliable source of information about citizens' opinions and attitudes concerning crime and criminal justice related-topics. The data collection consists of two distinctly different files, National Data (Part 2) and Texas Data (Part 1), which can be linked or used separately for analysis. The survey questions concern neighborhood atmosphere and presentation of crime in the media, worries regarding possible attacks--both robbery and physical attacks, confidence in and opinions of police and their effectiveness, problems dealing with courts, and attitudes regarding prisoners and prisons, drug laws and drug problems, and juvenile gangs. Other questions focused on attitudes concerning the death penalty, guns, and the availability of firearms. The National Data file contains additional information expanding on the respondent's sources of crime news and gang-related questions. Demographic information on respondents includes sex, age, race, income, education, and religion. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06720.v1 attitudes icpsr capital punishment icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug law offenses icpsr fear of crime icpsr firearms icpsr gangs icpsr handguns icpsr media coverage icpsr neighborhoods icpsr police effectiveness icpsr prison inmates icpsr prisons icpsr public opinion icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD I. Attitude Surveys Flanagan, Timothy J. Longmire, Dennis R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6720 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06720.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08936 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08936 MiAaI MiAaI Nature and Patterns of Homicide in Eight American Cities, 1978 [electronic resource] Margaret A. Zahn , Marc Riedel 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8936 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This dataset contains detailed information on homicides in eight United States cities: Philadelphia, Newark, Chicago, St. Louis, Memphis, Dallas, Oakland, and "Ashton" (a representative large western city). Detailed characteristics for each homicide victim include time and date of homicide, age, gender, race, place of birth, marital status, living arrangement, occupation, socioeconomic status (SES), employment status, method of assault, location where homicide occurred, relationship of victim to offender, circumstances surrounding death, precipitation or resistance of victim, physical evidence collected, victim's drug history, victim's prior criminal record, and number of offenders identified. Data on up to two offenders and three witnesses are also available and include the criminal history, justice system disposition, and age, sex, and race of each offender. Information on the age, sex, and race of each witness also was collected, as were data on witness type (police informant, child, eyewitness, etc.). Finally, information from the medical examiner's records including results of narcotics and blood alcohol tests of the victim are provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08936.v1 demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr evidence icpsr homicide icpsr offenders icpsr substance abuse icpsr victims icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Zahn, Margaret A. Riedel, Marc Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8936 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08936.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03716 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03716 MiAaI MiAaI Outcome Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-2000 [electronic resource] Kevin, D. Knight , Dwayne Simpson , Matthew L. Hiller 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3716 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an outcome evaluation of the Dallas County Judicial Treatment Center (DCJTC), a six-month residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) facility in Dallas County, Texas. The primary goal of this evaluation was to assess offender recidivism following treatment in this six-month community-based modified therapeutic community for probationers. Secondary goals were to examine change in social functioning over time among probationers mandated to this program, to determine which characteristics at intake and which during-treatment social functioning indicators were predictive of dropping out of treatment early, and to identify which indicators predicted being arrested one to two years after treatment. These goals were accomplished by a comparison of outcomes between treated probationers and an untreated comparison group and by an assessment of the relationships among treatment, social functioning, and recidivism. For both treatment and comparison groups, a criminal records search was performed on the Institutional Division database of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for all of the study participants for the two years following discharge for treatment or following commitment to probation. In addition to these records, treatment participants were asked to complete a set of data collection forms over their course of treatment. These forms collected information about mental status, background and psychosocial functioning, substance abuse, psychological status, offenders' perceptions of the program and their experiences in treatment, evaluations of counselors, self-evaluations, and counselors' evaluations of clients. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03716.v1 correctional facilities icpsr inmate programs icpsr mental health icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr residential programs icpsr self evaluation icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcome icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Knight, Kevin, D. Simpson, Dwayne Hiller, Matthew L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3716 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03716.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25521 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25521 MiAaI MiAaI Pretrial Release of Latino Defendants in the United States, 1990-2004 [electronic resource] David Levin 2009-07-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25521 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. that is Latino over the last six years and change in the percentage of the county population that is African American over the last six years. Cross-level interaction variables include percentage minority (Latino/African American) population zero percent to 15 percent, percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 16 percent to 30 percent, and percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 31 percent or higher. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25521.v1 bail icpsr Hispanic or Latino Americans icpsr immigration icpsr population growth icpsr pretrial release icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System DSDR VI. Population Characteristics NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Levin, David Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25521 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25521.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20400 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20400 MiAaI MiAaI Prevalence, Context, and Consequences of Dual Arrest in Intimate Partner Cases in 19 States in the United States, 2000 [electronic resource] David Hirschel , Eve Buzawa , April Pattavina , Don Faggiani , Melissa Reuland 2009-04-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 20400 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. whether any cases were prosecuted, the number of charges filed and against whom, and the sentences for prosecuted cases that resulted in conviction. The data in Part 3 (Police Department Policy Data) contain 282 cases and include variables regarding whether the department had a domestic violence policy, what the department's arrest policy was, whether a police report needed to be made, whether the policy addressed mutual violence, whether the policy instructed how to determine the primary aggressor, and what factors were taken into account in making a decision to arrest. There is also information related to the proportion of arrests involving intimate partners, the proportion of arrests involving other domestics, the proportion of arrests involving acquaintances, and the proportion of arrests involving strangers. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20400.v1 arrest procedures icpsr police departments icpsr police records icpsr policies and procedures icpsr victims icpsr violence against women icpsr arrest records icpsr arrests icpsr assault icpsr domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization Hirschel, David Buzawa, Eve Pattavina, April Faggiani, Don Reuland, Melissa Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20400 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20400.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02765 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02765 MiAaI MiAaI Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Kyle, Texas, 1993-1995 [electronic resource] Kevin Knight , Matthew Hiller , D. Dwayne Simpson 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 2765 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. drug use, and arrests within the last six months, whether the counselor was easy to talk to, helped in motivating or building confidence, or assisted in making a treatment plan, whether the respondent felt a sense of family or closeness, if his family got along, enjoyed being together, got drunk together, used drugs together, or had arguments or fights, if the respondent had a job in the last six months to a year and if he enjoyed working, whether he was on time for his job, whether he had new friends or associated with old friends, and which specific drugs he had used in the last six months (e.g., hallucinogens, heroin, methadone, or other opiates). Part 10 (Treatment Background Data, Comparison Group): Treatment condition of the comparison group. Part 11 (Educational Demographic Data, Comparison Group): Whether respondents completed a GED and their highest grade completed. Parts 12 and 13 (Six-Month Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group, and One-Year Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group): How important church was to the respondent, whether the respondent had any educational or vocational training, if he had friends that had used drugs, got drunk, dealt drugs, or had been arrested, if within the last six months to a year the respondent had been arrested for drug use, drug sales, forgery, fencing, gambling, burglary, robbery, sexual offense, arson, or vandalism, whether drugs or alcohol affected the respondent's health, relations, attitude, attention, or ability to work, whether the respondent experienced symptoms of withdrawal, the number of drug treatment programs and AA or CA meetings the respondent attended, whether the respondent received help from parents, siblings, or other relatives, if treatment was considered helpful, and risky behavior engaged in (e.g., sharing needles, using dirty needles, and unprotected sex). Parts 14 and 16 (Probation Officer Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Probation Officer Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Date of departure from prison, supervision level, number of treatment team meetings, whether there was evidence of job hunting, problems with transportation, child care, or finding work, number of drug tests in the last six months, times tested positive for marijuana, cocaine, heroin, opiates, crack, or other drugs, and number of arrests, charges, convictions, and technicals. Parts 15 and 17 (Hair Specimen Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Hair Specimen Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Hair collection and its source at the six-month follow-up (Part 15) and one-year follow-up (Part 17) and whether parolee was positive or negative for cocaine or opiates. Part 18 (Texas Department of Public Safety Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Dates of first, second, and third offenses, if parolee was arrested, and first, second, and third offenses from the National Crime Information Center. Part 19 (Texas Department of Criminal Justice Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Treatment condition, date of release, race, and a Texas Department of Criminal Justice Salient Factor Risk Score. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 recidivism icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr process evaluation icpsr addiction icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr correctional facilities icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug use icpsr inmate programs icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Knight, Kevin Hiller, Matthew Simpson, D. Dwayne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2765 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03492 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03492 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of the Comprehensive Communities Program in Selected Cities in the United States, 1994-1996 [electronic resource] George L. Kelling , Mona R. Hochberg , Sandra Lee Kaminska , Ann Marie Rocheleau , Dennis P. Rosenbaum , Jeffrey A. Roth , Wesley G. Skogan 2009-06-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 3492 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was a process evaluation of the Comprehensive Communities Program (CCP) intended to develop insights into how community approaches to crime and drug abuse prevention and control evolved, to track how each site implemented its comprehensive strategy, to determine the influence of preexisting ecological, social, economic, and political factors on implementation, and to monitor the evolution of strategies and projects over time. Intensive evaluations were done at six CCP sites: Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; Columbia, South Carolina; Fort Worth, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Seattle, Washington. Less intensive evaluations were done at six other CCP sites: Gary, Indiana; Hartford, Connecticut; Wichita, Kansas; the Denver, Colorado, metropolitan area; the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area; and the East Bay area of northern California. At all 12 sites, 2 waves of a Coalition Survey (Parts 1 and 2) were sent to everyone who participated in CCP. Likewise, 2 waves of the Community Policing Survey (Parts 3 and 4) were sent to the police chiefs of all 12 sites. Finally, all 12 sites were visited by researchers at least once (Parts 5 to 13). Variables found in this data collection include problems facing the communities, the implementation of CCP programs, the use of community policing, and the effectiveness of the CCP programs and community policing efforts. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03492.v1 community decision making icpsr community development icpsr community involvement icpsr community leaders icpsr community organizations icpsr community participation icpsr community policing icpsr crime control icpsr crime reduction icpsr neighborhood change icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police effectiveness icpsr process evaluation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD II. Community Studies Kelling, George L. Hochberg, Mona R. Kaminska, Sandra Lee Rocheleau, Ann Marie Rosenbaum, Dennis P. Roth, Jeffrey A. Skogan, Wesley G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3492 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03492.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03077 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03077 MiAaI MiAaI Process Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-1999 [electronic resource] Matthew L. Hiller , Kevin Knight , Sandhya Rao , Dwayne Simpson 2003-06-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3077 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the Dallas County Judicial Treatment Center (DCJTC) in Texas. The DCJTC is a residential substance abuse treatment center for drug-involved felony offenders. It provides a treatment program of approximately six months in three major phases: orientation, main treatment, and re-entry. Data were collected from 429 offenders admitted to the DCJTC between January and December 1998. During their first week of treatment, residents completed a comprehensive intake battery that included (1) the Texas Christian University (TCU) initial assessment, (2) the TCU self-rating form (SRF), and (3) the TCU intake interview. The initial assessment gauged mental status, background and psychosocial functioning, alcohol and other drug use, and psychological status. The SRF assessed psychological functioning, social functioning, and motivation for treatment. The intake interview included detailed questions on the resident's social background, family and peer relations, health and psychological status, criminal history, drug use problems, and behavioral risks for HIV/AIDS. Progress made during treatment was measured by the TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) and the TCU Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) forms. The REST included all questions on the SRF, plus questions on offenders' perceptions of the structure of the program and their experiences while in treatment, an evaluation of the counselor, an evaluation of their own personality, and ratings of group and individual treatment sessions. The CRC forms rated residents on a set of attributes related to residents' ability to benefit from treatment and indicated the extent to which counseling activities with each client had focused on certain activities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 AIDS icpsr alcohol abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr counseling icpsr felons icpsr HIV icpsr inmate classification icpsr mental health icpsr offenders icpsr process evaluation icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr residential programs icpsr substance abuse icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hiller, Matthew L. Knight, Kevin Rao, Sandhya Simpson, Dwayne Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3077 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08673 MiAaI MiAaI Recidivism Among Young Parolees [electronic resource] a Study of Inmates Released from Prison in 22 States, 1978 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1997-05-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examines the criminal activities of a group of young offenders after their release from prison to parole supervision. Previous studies have examined recidivism using arrests as the principal measure, whereas this study examines a variety of factors, including length of incarceration, age, sex, race, prior arrest record, prosecutions, length of time between parole and rearrest, parolees not prosecuted for new offenses but having their parole revoked, rearrests in states other than the paroling states, and the nature and location of rearrest charges. Parolees in the 22 states covered in this study account for 50 percent of all state prisoners paroled in the United States in 1978. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08673.v2 arrests icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr parole systems icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08673.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03355 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03355 MiAaI MiAaI Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3355 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994 is a database containing information on each of 38,624 sampled prisoners released from prisons in 15 states in 1994 and tracked for three years following their release. The majority of the database consists of information on each released prisoner's entire officially recorded criminal history (before and after the 1994 release). Sources for criminal history information are state and FBI automated RAP ("Records of Arrests and Prosecutions") sheets, which contain records of arrests, adjudications, and sentences. The study is the second major recidivism study conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The first study, RECIDIVISM AMONG RELEASED PRISONERS, 1983: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 8875), tracked over 16,000 prisoners released in 11 states in 1983 for three years. These two studies are the closest approximation to "national" recidivism studies in the United States. They are distinguished by their large sample size (over 16,000 released prisoners in the first study, 38,624 in the second), geographic breadth of coverage (11 states in the first study, 15 in the second), length of prospective tracking (three years from date of release in both studies), ability to track the movement of released prisoners across state boundaries (both studies), and multiple measures of recidivism (both studies). Demographic data include race, ethnicity, sex, and date of birth. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8 arrest records icpsr conviction records icpsr criminal histories icpsr offenses icpsr recidivism icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3355 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20360 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20360 MiAaI MiAaI Sexual Assault Among Intimates in Houston, Texas, 2003 [electronic resource] Judith McFarlane , Ann Malecha 2009-01-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 20360 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency and consequences of sexual assault within abusive intimate relationships, specific to ethnicity and immigrant status, and compare the findings to a similar group of physically abused women who had not experienced intimate partner sexual assault. Research objectives included a description of the type, extent, and temporal sequencing of sexual assault, consequences of sexual assault on women's health and their children's functioning, and treatments used by women to end the sexual assault. This study follows an earlier study on the effectiveness of protection orders that began in January 2001 at a special family violence unit of the Harris County District Attorney's office in Houston, Texas. That study was called EVALUATING A COLLABORATIVE INTERVENTION BETWEEN HEALTH CARE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, 2001-2002 (ICPSR 3542). Among the initial cohort of 150 women, 148 women were alive in January 2003 and signed informed consent for the second study. Data from the first study on effectiveness of protection orders were re-stratified to measure differences between sexually abused and not-sexually abused women. Instruments used in the re-stratified analysis included instruments from the earlier study: a Demographic Data Form, Severity of Violence against Women Scales (SAVAWS), the Stalking Victimization Survey, the Danger Assessment Scale, a Worksite Harassment survey, and the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey, as well the addition of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and Global Severity Index, the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale (PTSD), the Family Hardiness Index (FHI), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey, and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL.). The data include responses from 35 children to the CBCL. The variables in this study also include the frequency of use and the effectiveness of social agencies used in 2002. Additional questions asked about type and frequency of decision-making and actions regarding sexual relations, condom use, and birth control. Women physically but not sexually assaulted were asked a series of questions regarding whether they had ever worried about sexual assault. A series of questions was asked regarding children being witness to physical abuse. A detailed history of perpetrator behavior at the time of the first and additional sexual assaults was obtained, as well as victim helpseeking and health problems following the sexual assault(s). There was also a series of questions regarding the health effects of forced sex on the victim. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20360.v1 abuse icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr reproductive history icpsr sexual assault icpsr social interaction icpsr social networks icpsr social services icpsr social support icpsr worry icpsr adolescents icpsr anxiety icpsr behavior problems icpsr communicable diseases icpsr depression (psychology) icpsr drug use icpsr family life icpsr post-traumatic stress disorder icpsr NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McFarlane, Judith Malecha, Ann Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20360 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20360.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04458 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04458 MiAaI MiAaI Stress Training for Probation Officers and Their Families in Harris County, Texas, 2001 [electronic resource] Bob Glazier , Bennett Chapman 2007-11-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4458 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was a quasi-experimental design that utilized a multidimensional approach toward the design of an education-based stress intervention program for probation officers and a significant other. The study participants were recruited using a convenience sample from the Harris County Community Supervision and Corrections Department based in Houston, Texas in June of 2001. Officers and their significant others were exposed to a series of interventions related to various aspects of stress including: stress education, organizational sources of stress, individual response to stress, and how to communicate about stress in the home. The program consisted of four course modules and three assessments, including: a pretest, a post-test (administered one month after intervention), and a six-month follow-up. The assessments consisted of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the knowledge of stress inventory, which were completed by 31 officers. Demographic variables include age, gender, and ethnicity, years of experience, position within the organization, responses to the burnout inventory, and responses and scores for the knowledge of stress inventory. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04458.v1 job stress icpsr mental health icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr work attitudes icpsr coping icpsr job performance icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Glazier, Bob Chapman, Bennett Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4458 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04458.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07899 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07899 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of American Prisons and Jails, 1979 [electronic resource] Abt Associates, Inc. 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7899 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains information gathered in a two-part survey that was designed to assess institutional conditions in state and federal prisons and in halfway houses. It was one of a series of data-gathering efforts undertaken during the 1970s to assist policymakers in assessing and overcoming deficiencies in the nation's correctional institutions. This particular survey was conducted in response to a mandate set forth in the Crime Control Act of 1976. Data were gathered via self-enumerated questionnaires that were mailed to the administrators of all 558 federal and state prisons and all 405 community-based prerelease facilities in existence in the United States in 1979. Part 1 contains the results of the survey of state and federal adult correctional systems, and Part 2 contains the results of the survey of community-based prerelease facilities. The two files contain similar variables designed to tap certain key aspects of confinement: (1) inmate (or resident) counts by sex and by security class, (2) age of facility and rated capacity, (3) spatial density, occupancy, and hours confined for each inmate's (or resident's) confinement quarters, (4) composition of inmate (or resident) population according to race, age, and offense type, (5) inmate (or resident) labor and earnings, (6) race, age, and sex characteristics of prison (or half-way house) staff, and (7) court orders by type of order and pending litigation. Other data (contained in both files) include case ID number, state ID number, name of facility, and operator of facility (e.g., federal, state, local, or private). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07899.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr court orders icpsr crime statistics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr halfway houses icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jails icpsr lawsuits icpsr offenses icpsr prerelease programs icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr sentencing icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Abt Associates, Inc. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7899 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07899.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08169 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08169 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Jail and Prison Inmates, 1978 [electronic resource] California, Michigan, Texas Rand Corporation 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8169 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey was was conducted as part of the Rand Corporation's research program on career criminals. Rand's Second Inmate Survey was administered in late 1978 and early 1979 to convicted male inmates at 12 prisons and 14 county jails in California, Michigan, and Texas. The purpose of the survey was to provide detailed information about the criminal behavior of offenders and their associated characteristics. Emphasis was also placed on investigating other major areas of interest such as the quality of prisoner self-reports, varieties of criminal behavior, selective incapacitation, and prison treatment programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08169.v2 social attitudes and behavior icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Rand Corporation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8169 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08169.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31704 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31704 MiAaI MiAaI Systematic Review of the Effects of Parental Imprisonment on Child Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health, 1960-2008 [electronic resource] Joseph Murray , David P. Farrington , Ivana Sekol , Rikke F. Olsen 2012-05-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 31704 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The two main aims for the review were to assess evidence on whether parental imprisonment is a risk factor for undesirable child outcomes and to assess evidence on whether parental imprisonment is a causal risk factor. A third aim of the review was to investigate whether associations between parental imprisonment and child outcomes differ according to child, parent, and environmental characteristics. Between June and September 2008, researchers searched for studies that met the eligibility criteria. Several strategies were used to conduct an exhaustive search for eligible studies. Researchers started with an existing set of documents collected by Joseph Murray during his previous research on the effects of parental imprisonment on children and then used three methods to search for additional studies. First, researchers searched 23 electronic databases for the years 1960-2008. The same keywords were used to search each database. Second, researchers examined bibliographies of previous reviews of studies on the effects of parental imprisonment on children. Third, researchers contacted experts in the field. Two groups of researchers and practitioners were emailed and asked to inform researchers of any studies they thought might be eligible for the review. The 16 studies included in the review were coded for the following key features: reference information, sample characteristics, details about the measure of parental imprisonment, details of subsamples, and multiple comparisons made in the study, details of the comparison group(s) used to derive effect sizes, types of outcome measured, and measurement details, methods used to control for confounding variables to estimate causal effects, methodological quality of the study for drawing conclusions about risk factors and causal risk factors, and statistical information used to derive an effect size. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31704.v1 behavior problems icpsr child rearing icpsr child welfare icpsr children icpsr imprisonment icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental health icpsr parenting skills icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Murray, Joseph Farrington, David P. Sekol, Ivana Olsen, Rikke F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31704 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31704.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08392 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08392 MiAaI MiAaI Systems and Training Requirements for Criminal Justice Participants (PROJECT STAR), 1971-1974 [electronic resource] California, Michigan, New Jersey, Texas American Justice Institute 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8392 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Project STAR was designed to collect information about the various roles of operational criminal justice personnel in order to assist in the design of educational and training programs for these personnel. Data were collected from a two-part questionnaire administered to criminal justice personnel in four states: California, Michigan, New Jersey, and Texas. The first part of the questionnaire contained personal, attitudinal, and opinion items as well as questions concerning the goals of the criminal justice system. The second part presented 97 situations that the respondent was asked to rank using a five-part scale. The situations dealt with the roles of police officers, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, judges, probation officers, correctional officers, and parole officers. Demographic information about the respondents includes age, sex, race, educational attainment, occupation and employing agency, and income. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08392.v1 criminal justice system icpsr defense counsel icpsr judges icpsr parole officers icpsr police officers icpsr probation officers icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr training icpsr attorneys icpsr crime prevention icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System American Justice Institute Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8392 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08392.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07874 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07874 MiAaI MiAaI Transitional Aid Research Project (TARP), 1976-1977 [electronic resource] Peter Rossi , Richard A. Berk , Kenneth J. Lenihan 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7874 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Transitional Aid Research Project (TARP) was a randomized field experiment conducted in Texas and Georgia in 1976-1977 that was designed to reduce recidivism among ex-prisoners by lowering incentives for re-engaging in property crime through provision of minimal levels of income support and extension of some unemployment insurance coverage to released prisoners. This study evolved out of an earlier LIFE (Living Insurance for Ex-Prisoners) study conducted in Baltimore, Maryland in the early 1970s. In the LIFE study, 500 prisoners with a high probability of re-arrest were randomly assigned at release from prison to experimental and control groups which varied by the amount of money received (contingent upon employment or unemployment and job placement services provided). The results showed that ex-prisoners receiving payments were less likely to be re-arrested for property theft-related crimes than those who received only job placement or no services or payments of any kind. The United States Department of Labor commissioned the TARP experiment, designed to replicate the LIFE experiment while providing a larger and more representative sample of prisoners, greater variation in treatment conditions, and administration of payments and job placement services through existing agencies rather than by a special purpose project staff. Texas and Georgia were the states chosen for the experiment, and stratified random samples of inmates were assigned, at the time of release from prison, to experimental and control groups. The groups varied in the amount of money and job placement services they received upon their release. Originally, the data were recorded in nine files for each state corresponding to each of the nine different sources of information for each TARP case. The ICPSR data collection combines these into one file for each state: Part 1 for Texas, and Part 2 for Georgia. Each file contains over 1,500 variables, clustered in nine topic areas for each inmate: (1) prison history (e.g., background information, psychological and aptitude test data, and prior criminal and present incarceration activity), (2-5) data from four personal interviews (conducted at the prerelease, three-month, six-month, and 12-month stages and that include living arrangements, employment history, and financial status), (6) state arrest data, (7) records of TARP payments received, (8) social security wages, and (9) parole records. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07874.v1 crime control programs icpsr parolees icpsr postrelease programs icpsr prison inmates icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism prediction icpsr social adjustment icpsr social reintegration icpsr unemployment insurance icpsr employment services icpsr ex-offender employment icpsr ex-offenders icpsr inmate release plans icpsr job history icpsr job placement icpsr occupational mobility icpsr parole services icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions Rossi, Peter Berk, Richard A. Lenihan, Kenneth J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7874 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07874.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03172 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03172 MiAaI MiAaI Understanding the Use of Force By and Against the Police in Six Jurisdictions in the United States, 1996-1997 [electronic resource] Joel H. Garner , Christopher D. Maxwell 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3172 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. weapons (e.g., knife, chemical agent, dog, blunt object, handgun, motor vehicle). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03172.v1 arrest procedures icpsr arrest records icpsr assaults on police icpsr law enforcement icpsr police officers icpsr police use of force icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Garner, Joel H. Maxwell, Christopher D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3172 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03172.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06787 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130526s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06787 MiAaI MiAaI Victims' Ratings of Police Services in New York and Texas, 1994-1995 Survey [electronic resource] Lisa Newmark , Adele Harrell , Bill Adams 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6787 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-26. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 (FVPSA) provided funding, through the Office of Victims of Crime in the United States Department of Justice, for 23 law enforcement training projects across the nation from 1986 to 1992. FVPSA was enacted to assist states in (1) developing and maintaining programs for the prevention of family violence and for the provision of shelter to victims and their dependents and (2) providing training and technical assistance for personnel who provide services for victims of family violence. The National Institute of Justice awarded a grant to the Urban Institute in late 1992 to evaluate the police training projects. One of the program evaluation methods the Urban Institute used was to conduct surveys of victims in New York and Texas. The primary objectives of the survey were to find out, from victims who had contact with law enforcement officers in the pre-training period and/or in the post-training period, what their experiences and evaluations of law enforcement services were, how police interventions had changed over time, and how the quality of services and changes related to the police training funded under the FVPSA. Following the conclusion of training, victims of domestic assault in New York and Texas were surveyed through victim service programs across each state. Similar, but not identical, instruments were used at the two sites. Service providers were asked to distribute the questionnaires to victims of physical or sexual abuse who had contact with law enforcement officers. The survey instruments were developed to obtain information and victim perceptions of the following key subject areas: history of abuse, characteristics of the victim-abuser relationship, demographic characteristics of the abuser and the victim, history of law enforcement contacts, services received from law enforcement officers, and victims' evaluations of these services. Variables on history of abuse include types of abuse experienced, first and last time physically or sexually abused, and frequency of abuse. Characteristics of the victim-abuser relationship include length of involvement with the abuser, living arrangement and relationship status at time of last abuse, number of children the victim had, and number of children at home at the time of last abuse. Demographic variables provide age, race/ethnicity, employment status, and education level of the abuser and the victim. Variables on the history of law enforcement contacts and services received include number of times law enforcement officers were called because of assaults on the victim, number of times law enforcement officers actually came to the scene, first and last time officers came to the scene, number of times officers were involved because of assaults on the victim, number of times officers were involved in the last 12 months, and type of law enforcement agencies the officers were from. Data are also included on city size by population, city median household income, county population density, county crime rate, and region of state of the responding law enforcement agencies. Over 30 variables record the victims' evaluations of the officers' responsiveness, helpfulness, and attitudes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06787.v1 crime prevention icpsr domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr family violence icpsr intervention icpsr police response icpsr police training icpsr program evaluation icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD IX. Police Newmark, Lisa Harrell, Adele Adams, Bill Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6787 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06787.v1