nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04578 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04578 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Incarceration on Criminal Trajectories in the United States, 1994 [electronic resource] Avinash Singh Bhati 2007-02-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4578 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Using data from RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3355), this study developed an analytical approach to utilize detailed dated criminal arrest history information in order to investigate whether, and to what extent, incarceration is able to deter offenders from future offending. This data collection consists of the syntax for a SAS macro used to estimate individual specific offending micro-trajectories, project counterfactual trajectories, and to assess the actual post-release offending patterns against the backdrop of these counterfactuals. The arrest records of individuals were clustered in chronological order and were truncated after the first post-release re-arrest event. The key independent variables used in estimating the pre-release criminal history accumulation process included the arrest number, the age at first arrest, whether or not the individual was confined as a result of the previous arrest event, and a measure of the number of years taken to reach each arrest event cumulated through the last arrest event. The same set of basic variables were used to model first re-arrest after release (recidivism). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1 arrest records icpsr conviction records icpsr criminal histories icpsr recidivism icpsr NACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional Packages ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Bhati, Avinash Singh Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4578 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21901 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21901 MiAaI MiAaI Efficacy of Court-Mandated Counseling for Domestic Violence Offenders in Broward County, Florida, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Lynette Feder , David R. Forde , Laura Dugan 2011-03-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 21901 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. igin and the particular incident bringing the offender to court. The probation reports provided information on the offender's criminal history, behavior in the community for the year while under supervision, and compliance with the batterer program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21901.v1 arrest records icpsr domestic violence icpsr drug use icpsr employment icpsr probation icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Feder, Lynette Forde, David R. Dugan, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21901 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21901.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02974 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02974 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluating the Effects of Fatigue on Police Patrol Officers in Lowell, Massachusetts, Polk County, Florida, Portland, Oregon, and Arlington County, Virginia, 1997-1998 [electronic resource] Dennis Jay Kenney 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2974 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken to assess the connections between administratively controllable sources of fatigue among police patrol officers and problems such as diminished performance, accidents, and illness. The study sought to answer: (1) What is the prevalence of officer fatigue, and what are officers' attitudes toward it? (2) What are the causes or correlates of officer fatigue? (3) How does fatigue affect officer safety, health, and job performance? and (4) Can officer fatigue be measured objectively? The final sample was comprised of all sworn, nonsupervisory police officers assigned full-time to patrol and/or community policing functions on the day that data collection began at each of four selected sites: Lowell, Massachusetts, Polk County, Florida, Portland, Oregon, and Arlington County, Virginia. Part 1, Fatigue Survey Data, includes demographic data and officers' responses from the initial self-report survey. Variables include the extent to which the respondent felt hot or cold, experienced uncomfortable breathing, bad dreams, or pain while sleeping, the time the respondent usually went to bed, number of hours slept each night, quality of sleep, whether medicine was taken as a sleep aid, estimated hours worked in a one-, two-, seven-, and thirty-day period, how overtime affected income, family relationships, and social activities, and reasons for feeling tired. Part 2, Demographic and Fatigue Survey Data, is comprised of data obtained from administrative records and demographic data forms. Several measures from the initial self-report survey are also included in Part 2. Variables focus on respondents' age, sex, race, marital status, global score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale, total years as a police officer assigned to any agency and current agency, and total years worked in current shift. Data for Part 3, FIT and Administrative Data, were obtained from administrative records and from the fitness-for-duty (FIT) workplace screener test. Variables include a pupilometry index score and the dates, time, and particular shift (days, evenings, or midnight) the officer started working when the pupilometry test was administered. Part 3 also includes the number of hours worked by the officer in a regular shift or in association with overtime, the number of sick leave hours taken by the officer, and whether the officer was involved in an on-duty accident, injured on duty, or commended by his/her department during a particular shift. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02974.v1 community policing icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr family work relationship icpsr fatigue icpsr police officers icpsr police patrol icpsr police performance icpsr police safety icpsr sleep disorders icpsr working hours icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Kenney, Dennis Jay Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2974 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02974.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02806 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02806 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluating Recidivism Among Drug Offenders in Florida's Residential and Non-Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs, 1991-1997 [electronic resource] Richard L. Linster , Pamela Lattimore 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 2806 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship, if any, between drug treatment and success or failure of drug-involved offenders on probation/community supervision. Further, the researchers sought to evaluate the outcomes of drug-involved offenders admitted to (1) secure residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) programs, (2) non-secure residential drug treatment programs, (3) non-residential drug treatment programs, and (4) no drug treatment programs. Data were collected from administrative records provided by the Florida Department of Corrections, specifically case history records of offenders admitted to supervision in the community from July 1, 1991, through June 30, 1997. Part 1 is comprised of all cases admitted to community supervision between July 1, 1991, and June 30, 1993 (fiscal years 1991 and 1992) and treated in a secure residential drug treatment program. Part 2 is comprised of all cases admitted to community supervision from July 1, 1991, through June 30, 1995, receiving treatment in a non-secure residential drug treatment program. Part 3 contains data on offenders admitted to non-residential drug treatment programs, whose community supervision admissions were between July 1, 1991, and June 30, 1993. Part 4 contains data on offenders admitted to non-residential drug treatment programs, whose community supervision admissions were between July 1, 1993, and June 30, 1995 (fiscal years 1993 and 1994). Part 5 contains data on cases admitted to community supervision between July 1, 1991, and June 30, 1993, who did not receive drug treatment of any kind. Cases admitted to community supervision between July 1, 1993, and June 20, 1995, receiving no drug treatment are contained in Part 6. Each supervision admission record contains a history of subsequent court actions that were complete through December 31, 1997. Variables for all parts include population estimates, unemployment rates, population by age-specific categories, violent and nonviolent index offenses, per capita personal income, clearance rates, split sentence flag, primary offense disposition, primary offense felony level, current commitment years supervised, supervision type, whether current offense included a drug charge, number of prior supervision terms, number of prior commitments, reasons for failure, treatment facility code, number of drug sale/traffic offenses, outcome of supervision period, and reasons for prison intake. Demographic variables include race and gender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02806.v1 diversion programs icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug offender profiles icpsr drug treatment icpsr intervention icpsr offenders icpsr probation icpsr recidivism icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Linster, Richard L. Lattimore, Pamela Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2806 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02806.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07710 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07710 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Pre-Trial Settlement Conference [electronic resource] Dade County, Florida, Criminal Court, 1979 Wayne A. Kerstetter 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7710 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study reports on the implementation in Dade County, Florida, of a proposal to involve, on a voluntary basis, victims, defendants, and police in a judicial plea negotiation conference. The study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department of Justice. Parts 1-3, Defendants, Victims, and Police files, consist of responses to questionnaires given to defendants, victims, and police. The questionnaires were administered during 20-minute interviews, conducted after the case had been completed. The interview instruments were designed to collect data on three major issues: (1) the extent to which respondents reported participation in the processing of their cases, (2) respondents' knowledge of the way their cases were processed, and (3) respondents' attitudes toward the disposition of their cases and toward the criminal justice system. Part 4 is the Conference Data File. During the pretrial settlement conference, an observer wrote down in sequence as much as possible of the verbal behavior. After the session, the observer made some subjective ratings, provided descriptive data about the conclusion of the session, and classified comments into one of the following categories: (1) Facts of the Case, (2) Prior Record, (3) Law and Practices, (4) Maximum Sentence, (5) Prediction of Trial Outcome, (6) Conference Precedent, (7) Personal Background History, and (8) Recommendations. Information in Part 5, the Case Information Data File, was drawn from court records and includes type of case, number of charges, sentence type, sentence severity (stated and perceived), seriousness of offense, date of arrest, date of arraignment, date of conference, prior incarcerations, and defendant background. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07710.v1 courts icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr plea negotiation icpsr police officers icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr victims icpsr case processing icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD V. Courts Kerstetter, Wayne A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7710 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07710.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03933 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03933 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of the Transfer of Responsibility for Child Protective Services to Law Enforcement in Manatee, Pasco, and Pinellas Counties, Florida, 1995-2001 [electronic resource] Susan C. Kinnevy 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3933 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1998 Florida law required that the responsibility for child maltreatment investigations be transferred from a statewide child welfare agency to the sheriff's offices in Manatee, Pasco, and Pinellas Counties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes produced by this change. This study used a nonequivalent control group design. Performance in Manatee, Pasco, and Pinellas Counties was compared to performance in selected counties before and after the change in service took place. Data were obtained from the Florida Abuse Hotline Information System (FAHIS), an online data system that contained records of all reported incidents of abuse and neglect in the state of Florida. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03933.v1 child abuse icpsr child neglect icpsr child welfare icpsr counties icpsr law enforcement icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Kinnevy, Susan C. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3933 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03933.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20363 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20363 MiAaI MiAaI Experience of Violence in the Lives of Homeless Persons [electronic resource] The Florida Four City Study, 2003-2004 James D. Wright , Jana L. Jasinski , Elizabeth Mustaine , Jennifer Wesely 2010-11-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 20363 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The primary goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the role of violence in the lives of homeless women and men. The objectives were to determine how many women and men have experienced some form of violence in their lives either as children or adults, the factors associated with experiences of violence, the consequences of violence, and the types of interactions with the justice system. The survey sample was comprised of about 200 face-to-face interviews with homeless women in each of four Florida cities (Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, and Tampa). In all, 737 women were interviewed. In addition, 91 face-to-face interviews with homeless men were also conducted only in Orlando. For Part 1 (Female Interviews), the data include information related to the respondent's living conditions in the past month, as well as experiences with homelessness, childhood violence, adult violence, forced sexual situations, and stalking. Additional variables include basic demographic information, a self-report of criminal history, information related to how the respondent spent her days and evenings, and the physical environment surrounding the respondent during the day and evening. For Part 2 (Male Interviews), the data include much of the same information as was collected in Part 1. Information from Part 1 not included in Part 2 primarily includes questions pertaining to experience with forced sexual situations, and questions related to pregnancy and children. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20363.v1 abuse icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr childhood icpsr criminal histories icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug use icpsr employment icpsr homeless persons icpsr homelessness icpsr living arrangements icpsr living conditions icpsr police reports icpsr rape icpsr restraining orders icpsr self defense icpsr social support icpsr stalking icpsr threats icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization Wright, James D. Jasinski, Jana L. Mustaine, Elizabeth Wesely, Jennifer Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20363 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20363.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02542 MiAaI MiAaI Florida's Criminal Justice Workforce Research Information System, 1985-1996 [electronic resource] Florida Department of Corrections. Bureau of Planning, Research, and Statistics 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This project sought to prove that research files could be created through the extraction of personnel management systems data. There were five goals associated with designing and creating the Florida Criminal Justice Workforce Research Information System: (1) to extract data from two transaction management information systems, which could then be used by researchers to describe and analyze the workforce that administers justice in Florida, (2) to pilot test the concept of developing a new research information source from existing data systems, (3) to forge partnerships with diverse criminal justice agencies having a mutual need to understand their respective workforces, (4) to design research files to enable internal and external researchers to utilize the data for analytical purposes, and (5) to describe the methodology used to create the workforce information system in sufficient detail to enable other states to replicate the process and develop their own criminal justice workforce research databases. The project was jointly conceived, designed, and completed by two state-level criminal justice agencies with diverse missions and responsibilities: the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and the Florida Department of Corrections (FDC). Data were extracted from two personnel management systems: the Automated Transaction Management System (ATMS) operated by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which contains data on all certified law enforcement, correctional, and correctional probation officers in Florida (Part 1), and the Cooperative Personnel Employment System (COPES) operated by the Department of Management Services, which contains data on all state employees (Part 2). Parts 3-5 consist of data extracted from Parts 1 and 2 regarding certification status (Part 3), education (Part 4), and training (Part 5). Two demographic variables, race and sex, are found in all parts. Parts 1 and 2 also contain variables on employment event type, employer type, position type, salary plan, job class, appointment status, and supervisor indicator. Part 3 variables are certification event type and certificate type. Part 4 variables include degree earned and area of degree. Part 5 includes a variable for passing or failing training certification. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02542.v1 correctional officers icpsr criminal justice system icpsr information management icpsr information systems icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr personnel management icpsr personnel records icpsr police officers icpsr probation officers icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Florida Department of Corrections. Bureau of Planning, Research, and Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02542.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25941 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25941 MiAaI MiAaI Florida Elder Abuse Survey in Seven Sites, 2007-2008 [United States] [electronic resource] Laurence G. Branch , Lawrence Schonfeld , Lisa M. Brown 2010-10-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 25941 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this project was to develop and pilot test an interviewer-administered self-report questionnaire that might be used in a subsequent national survey to scientifically establish the prevalence of second-party elder abuse or neglect. The project focused only on those living in the communities who were capable of accurately self-reporting their knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Through focus groups of adult protective services and abuse hot-line staff, questionnaire items were generated and later tested through interviews of clients of aging services in Florida. Aging services case managers screened and recruited 95 clients, aged 65 and older, with 25 clients who had reports of mistreatment within the hotline database, and 70 comparison clients (no reports of mistreatment). Groups were matched by gender and age within 10 years. The interviews were conducted over an 18-month period, of which 3 interviews were conducted in-person and 92 interviews were conducted by telephone. All interviews were conducted by trained interviewers of the research team. Twenty-six interviews were conducted in Spanish. Interviews focused on demographics; activities of daily living; 19 possible types of elder abuse or neglect within the previous year, and, for each positive response, questions about the perpetrators and their relationship to the older adult; a description of when the mistreatment happened, how often, what the respondent did, and whether it was related to the perpetrator's anger, neglect, or carelessness. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25941.v1 abuse icpsr activities of daily living icpsr caregivers icpsr cognitive functioning icpsr elder abuse icpsr family violence icpsr living arrangements icpsr older adults icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Branch, Laurence G. Schonfeld, Lawrence Brown, Lisa M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25941 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25941.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06790 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06790 MiAaI MiAaI Fraud in the Savings and Loan Industry in California, Florida, Texas, and Washington, DC [electronic resource] White-Collar Crime and Government Response, 1986-1993 Henry N. Pontell , Kitty Calavita , Robert Tillman 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 6790 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the factors that contributed to the epidemic of fraud in the savings and loan ("thrift") industry, the role that white-collar crime played, and the government response to this crisis. The researchers sought to describe the magnitude, role, and nature of thrift crime, analyze factors related to the effectiveness of law enforcement control of savings and loan fraud, and develop the broader implications, from both a theoretical and a policy perspective. Data consist of statistics from various government agencies and focus on all types of thrift, i.e., solvent and insolvent, that fell under the jurisdiction of the Office of Thrift Supervision in Florida, Texas, and California and all insolvent thrifts under the control of the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) in Washington, DC. The study focused on Texas, California, and Florida because of the high numbers of savings and loan failures, instances of fraud, and executives being indicted. However, as the study progressed, it became clear that the frauds and failures were nationwide, and while many of the crimes were located in these three states, the individuals involved may have been located elsewhere. Thus, the scope of the study was expanded to provide a national perspective. Parts 1 and 2, Case and Defendant Data, provide information from the Executive Office of United States Attorneys on referrals, investigations, and prosecutions of thrifts, banks, and other financial institutions. Part 1 consists of data about the cases that were prosecuted, the number of institutions victimized, the state in which these occurred, and the seriousness of the offense as indicated by the dollar loss and the number of victims. Part 2 provides information on the defendant's position in the institution (director, officer, employee, borrower, customer, developer, lawyer, or shareholder) and disposition (fines, restitution, prison, probation, or acquittal). The relevant variables associated with the Resolution Trust Corporation (Part 3, Institution Data) describe indictments, convictions, and sentences for all cases in the respective regions, organizational structure and behavior for a single institution, and the estimated loss to the institution. Variables coded are ownership type, charter, home loans, brokered deposits, net worth, number of referrals, number of individuals referred, assets and asset growth, ratio of direct investments to total assets, and total dollar losses due to fraud. For Parts 4 and 5, Texas and California Referral Data, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) provided data for what are called Category I referrals for California and Texas. Part 4 covers Category I referrals for Texas. Variables include the individual's position in the institution, the number of referrals, and the sum of dollar losses from all referrals. Part 5 measures the total dollar losses due to fraud in California, the total number of criminal referrals, and the number of individuals indicted. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06790.v1 financial institutions icpsr fraud icpsr law enforcement icpsr savings and loans associations icpsr white collar crime icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Pontell, Henry N. Calavita, Kitty Tillman, Robert Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6790 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06790.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06527 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06527 MiAaI MiAaI Hair Assays for Drugs of Abuse in a Probation Population [electronic resource] Pilot Study in a Florida Correctional Field Setting, 1993 Tom Mieczkowski , Richard A. Newel , Gale Allison , Shirley Coletti 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6527 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The major objectives of this research project were: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of hair and urine assays in determining drug use among probationers, (2) to examine the concordance patterns of hair and urine specimens, (3) to explore the perceptions and attitudes of probation officers regarding the use of hair assays for drug testing, and (4) to assess the feasibility of implementing hair analysis in a probationary field setting. The 22 correctional officers who participated in this study were recruited from the Florida Department of Corrections Probation Field Services Divisions, and worked within Pinellas and Pasco counties. Each officer was requested to solicit from his or her caseload eight to ten probationers who would be eligible for the project because they would be undergoing at least monthly urinalysis or urine testing. Approximately 150 probationers participated in the project and were subject to hair assays for illicit drug use, along with standard urine testing. Specimens were collected and analyzed on 90 probationers over a six-month period and on 101 probationers for five consecutive months, as well as fewer numbers of samples for the other probationers. The drugs for which the hair and urine specimens were analyzed included cocaine, opiates, cannabinoids such as marijuana, PCP, and methadone. Survey questions asked of the probation officers (Part 1) covered personal information (gender, ethnicity, education level, years of experience in corrections, and satisfaction with job) and attitudes and opinions about their jobs and drug testing (estimated percentage of caseload using drugs, whether all clients should be tested, and whether knowing drug quantities is helpful). Data in Part 2 cover probationers' drug test results and self-reported drug use, personal information (gender, age, weight, ethnicity, and criminal charge), a variety of hair questions (color, texture, style, length, how often shampooed, and if dyed, tinted, bleached, relaxed, or jeried), and use of medications, along with the medication name and amount. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06527.v1 attitudes icpsr drug testing icpsr probation officers icpsr probationers icpsr process evaluation icpsr urinalysis icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mieczkowski, Tom Newel, Richard A. Allison, Gale Coletti, Shirley Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6527 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06527.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26601 MiAaI MiAaI Impact Evaluation of Youth Crime Watch Programs in Three Florida School Districts, 1997-2007 [electronic resource] Tom Rich 2010-01-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to assess both the school-level effects and the participant-level effects of Youth Crime Watch (YCW) programs. Abt Associates conducted a four-year impact evaluation of Youth Crime Watch (YCW) programs in three Florida school districts (Broward, Hillsborough, and Pinellas Counties). School-based YCW programs implement one or more of a variety of crime prevention activities, including youth patrol, in which YCW participants patrol their school campus and report misconduct and crime. The evaluation collected both School-Level Data (Part 1) and Student-Level Data (Part 2). The School-Level Data (Part 1) contain 9 years of data on 172 schools in the Broward, Hillsborough, and Pinellas school districts, beginning in the 1997-1998 school year and continuing through the 2005-2006 school year. A total of 103 middle schools and 69 high schools were included, yielding a total of 1,548 observations. These data provide panel data on reported incidents of crime and violence, major disciplinary actions, and school climate data across schools and over time. The Student-Level Data (Part 2) were collected between 2004 and 2007 and are comprised of two major components: (1) self-reported youth attitude and school activities survey data that were administered to a sample of students in middle schools in the Broward, Hillsborough, and Pinellas School Districts as part of a participant impact analysis, and (2) self-reported youth attitude and school activities survey data that were administered to a sample of YCW continuing middle school students and YCW high school students in the same three school districts as part of a process analysis. For Part 2, a total of 3,386 completed surveys were collected by the project staff including 1,319 "new YCW" student surveys, 1,581 "non-YCW" student surveys, and 486 "Pro" or "Process" student surveys. The 138 variables in the School-Level Data (Part 1) include Youth Crime Watch (YCW) program data, measures of crime and the level of school safety in a school, and other school characteristics. The 99 variables in the Student-Level Data (Part 2) include two groups of questions for assessing participant impact: (1) how the respondents felt about themselves, and (2) whether the respondent would report certain types of problems or crimes that they observed at the school. Part 2 also includes administrative variables and demographic/background information. Other variables in Part 2 pertain to the respondent's involvement in school-based extracurricular activities, involvement in community activities, attitudes toward school, attitudes about home environment, future education plans, attitudes toward the YCW advisor, attitudes about effects of YCW, participation in YCW, reasons for joining YCW, and reasons for remaining in YCW. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26601.v1 crime icpsr middle schools icpsr program evaluation icpsr school violence icpsr secondary education icpsr violence icpsr youthful offenders icpsr crime in schools icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime reporting icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr educational environment icpsr high schools icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Rich, Tom Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26601.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03872 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03872 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Immigration on Ethnic-Specific Violence in Miami, Florida, 1997 [electronic resource] Ramiro Jr. Martinez 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3872 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Does the rate of violent victimization differ across race and ethnic groups? In an effort to answer this question, this study sought to examine the violent victimization rate and the factors influencing ethnic-specific rates of violence in the city of Miami. Administrative data were obtained from the United States Bureau of the Census and the Miami Police Department Research Unit. For the groups of people identified as Afro Americans, Latinos, and Haitians, the numbers who were victims of aggravated assault and robbery in 1997 are included along with the assault and robbery rates for each group. The remaining variables are the percent of female-headed households, percent below poverty line, percent of young males out of the labor force and unemployed, residential instability, vacant and household instability, and the percent of 1980-1990 immigrants. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03872.v1 aggravated assault icpsr census tract level icpsr crime rates icpsr ethnicity icpsr immigration icpsr race icpsr robbery icpsr victimization icpsr violent crime icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity Martinez, Ramiro Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3872 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03872.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25621 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25621 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Legal Advocacy on Intimate Partner Homicide in the United States, 1976-1997 [electronic resource] Laura Dugan 2009-07-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25621 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined the impacts of jurisdictions’ domestic violence policies on violent behavior of family members and intimate partners, on the likelihood that the police discovered an incident, and on the likelihood that the police made an arrest. The research combined two datasets. Part 1 contains information on police, prosecution policies, and local victim services. Informants within the local agencies of the 50 largest cities in the United States were contacted and asked to complete a survey inventorying policies and activities by type and year of implementation. Data from completed surveys covered 48 cities from 1976 to 1996. Part 2 contains data on domestic violence laws. Data on state statutes from 1976 to 1997 that related to protection orders were collected by a legal expert for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 arrests icpsr crime reporting icpsr domestic violence icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr police reports icpsr policy analysis icpsr state legislatures icpsr victim services icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Dugan, Laura Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25621 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27542 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 pregnancy icpsr census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27546 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27546 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 27546 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27546 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04672 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 4672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2000, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 census data icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23520 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23520 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 23520 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2002, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23520 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25282 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25282 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2004 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25282 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2004, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the physical health and educational services provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr pregnancy icpsr vaccines icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25282 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25981 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25981 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2006 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-02-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25981 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2006, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr pregnancy icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr vaccines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25981 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34402 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34402 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34402 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 census data icpsr correctional facilities icpsr correctional facilities (juveniles) icpsr group homes icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34402 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34449 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 2012-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 census data icpsr correctional education icpsr correctional facilities icpsr educational needs icpsr group homes icpsr health care services icpsr juvenile detention icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr juveniles icpsr mental health services icpsr substance abuse treatment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20423 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20423 MiAaI MiAaI Law Enforcement Response to Human Trafficking and the Implications for Victims in the United States, 2005 [electronic resource] Heather J. Clawson , Nicole Dutch , Megan Cummings 2011-06-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 20423 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to explore how local law enforcement were responding to the crime of human trafficking after the passage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) in 2000. The first phase of the study (Part 1, Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data) involved conducting telephone surveys with 121 federal, state, and local law enforcement officials in key cities across the country between August and November of 2005. Different versions of the telephone survey were created for the key categories of law enforcement targeted by this study (state/local investigators, police offices, victim witness coordinators, and federal agents). The telephone surveys were supplemented with interviews from law enforcement supervisors/managers, representatives from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Human Trafficking/Smuggling Office, the United States Attorney's Office, the Trafficking in Persons Office, and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. Respondents were asked about their history of working human trafficking cases, knowledge of human trafficking, and familiarity with the TVPA. Other variables include the type of trafficking victims encountered, how human trafficking cases were identified, and the law enforcement agency's capability to address the issue of trafficking. The respondents were also asked about the challenges and barriers to investigating human trafficking cases and to providing services to the victims. In the second phase of the study (Part 2, Case File Review Qualitative Data) researchers collected comprehensive case information from sources such as case reports, sanitized court reports, legal newspapers, magazines, and newsletters, as well as law review articles. This case review examined nine prosecuted cases of human trafficking since the passage of the TVPA. The research team conducted an assessment of each case focusing on four core components: identifying the facts, defining the problem, identifying the rule to the facts (e.g., in light of the rule, how law enforcement approached the situation), and conclusion. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20423.v1 exploitation icpsr human rights icpsr human trafficking icpsr indentured servants icpsr law enforcement icpsr sex trafficking icpsr slavery icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Clawson, Heather J. Dutch, Nicole Cummings, Megan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20423 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20423.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03874 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03874 MiAaI MiAaI Mortality Detail and Multiple Cause of Death, 1981 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-07-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3874 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of deaths occurring during 1981. Part 1, the Mortality Detail file, describes every death or fetal death registered in the United States for 1981. Part 2, Multiple Cause of Death, provides information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1981. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03874.v2 gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions DSDR II. Mortality NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics RCMD V. Health and Well-Being ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3874 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03874.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25781 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25781 MiAaI MiAaI Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes [electronic resource] Cities, Counties, and National, 1998-2007 [United States] Geoffrey P. Alpert , Michael R. Smith , Lorie Fridell 2011-04-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25781 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Part 7) include 6,596 force incidents aggregated over 60 months- a 5 year period from 2002 through 2006. Part 6 and Part 7 are comprised of seven variables documenting whether a Taser was implemented, the number of suspects and officers injured in a month, the number of force incidents per month, and the number of CEDs uses per month. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25781.v1 police icpsr police equipment icpsr police response icpsr police use of force icpsr police weapons icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Alpert, Geoffrey P. Smith, Michael R. Fridell, Lorie Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25781 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25781.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03905 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03905 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1968-1973 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3905 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1968 through 1973. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of the week of the death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, EIGHTH REVISION (ICD-8), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03905.v2 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD V. Health and Well-Being NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3905 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03905.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03906 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03906 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1974-1978 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3906 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1974 through 1978. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of the week of the death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, EIGHTH REVISION (ICD-8), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03906.v2 death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr age icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults RCMD V. Health and Well-Being NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3906 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03906.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03895 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03895 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1979 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3895 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1979. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03895.v2 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VIII. Official Statistics AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD V. Health and Well-Being NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3895 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03895.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03897 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03897 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1980 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-05-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3897 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of deaths occurring during 1980. Included is information about the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1981. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was performed, and the month and day of the death. In addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03897.v2 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr NACJD VIII. Official Statistics NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD V. Health and Well-Being ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3897 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03897.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09880 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09880 MiAaI MiAaI Multiple Cause of Death, 1982 [electronic resource] United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics 2007-06-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9880 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection presents information about the causes of deaths occurring in the United States during 1982. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, place of death, whether there were multiple conditions that caused the death, and what those conditions were. In addition, data are provided on date of death, and on sex, race, age, marital status, and origin or descent of the deceased. Also included is information on residence of the deceased (state, county, city, region, and whether the county was a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area). Data on whether an autopsy was performed and the site of accidents are also provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09880.v1 age icpsr causes of death icpsr death icpsr death records icpsr ethnicity icpsr fatalities icpsr gender icpsr marital status icpsr mortality rates icpsr race icpsr ICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults RCMD V. Health and Well-Being AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9880 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09880.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30983 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30983 MiAaI MiAaI Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE), 2003-2009 [electronic resource] Shelli B. Rossman , John K. Roman , Janine M. Zweig , Michael Rempel , Christine H. Lindquist 2012-11-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 30983 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE) study included 23 drug courts and 6 comparison sites selected from 8 states across the country. The purpose of the study was to: (1) Test whether drug courts reduce drug use, crime, and multiple other problems associated with drug abuse, in comparision with similar offenders not exposed to drug courts, (2) address how drug courts work and for whom by isolating key individual and program factors that make drug courts more or less effective in achieving their desired outcomes, (3) explain how offender attitudes and behaviors change when they are exposed to drug courts and how these changes help explain the effectiveness of drug court programs, and (4) examine whether drug courts generate cost savings. Offenders in all 29 sites were surveyed in 3 waves, at baseline, 6 months later, and 18 months after enrollment. The research comprises three major components: process evaluation, impact evaluation, and a cost-benefit analysis. The process evaluation describes how the 23 drug court sites vary in program eligibility, supervision, treatment, team collaboration, and other key policies and practices. The impact evaluation examines whether drug courts produce better outcomes than comparison sites and tests which court policies and offender attitudes might explain those effects. The cost-benefit analysis evaluates drug court costs and benefits. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 cost effectiveness icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr crime control icpsr crime control policies icpsr crime control programs icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug courts icpsr drug law enforcement icpsr drug law offenses icpsr drug offenders icpsr drug related crimes icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr process evaluation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Rossman, Shelli B. Roman, John K. Zweig, Janine M. Rempel, Michael Lindquist, Christine H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30983 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06986 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06986 MiAaI MiAaI Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration [electronic resource] [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992 Doris Layton MacKenzie 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6986 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp) programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1) changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and military experience. The community supervision data contain information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and contacts with community supervision officers, along with demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey were different from those who were surveyed in the community supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1 alcohol abuse icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug abuse icpsr offenders icpsr parole icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr program evaluation icpsr shock incarceration programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections MacKenzie, Doris Layton Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6986 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21680 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21680 MiAaI MiAaI Multistate Analysis of Time Consumption in Capital Appeals, 1992-2002 [electronic resource] Latzer, Barry , Cauthen, James N.G. 2008-03-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 21680 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Despite public controversy over the length of death penalty appeals, little empirical work has been done on the time allocated to the capital appeals process. The purpose of this study was to perform a multistate empirical analysis of the time expended in direct appeals of capital cases. The researchers included decisions from 14 states that they believed to be representative of the 37 states that have enforceable death penalty laws. For each of the 14 states included in the study, the researchers examined every capital case decided on direct appeal by the courts of last resort between the dates January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2002. The researchers developed a case database by examining a variety of sources. For each of the 1,676 cases in the multistate database, the research team collected time consumption data for each of the following five phases of the direct appeal process: (1) the postsentence stage, (2) the preparation stage, (3) the argument stage, (4) the decision stage, and (5) the supreme court stage. Variables include state, case characteristics, court opinion variables, dates, and time consumption variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1 appeal procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr capital punishment icpsr case processing icpsr certiorari icpsr death row inmates icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr executions icpsr judicial decisions icpsr murderers icpsr sentence review icpsr sentencing icpsr Supreme Court decisions icpsr state supreme courts icpsr United States Supreme Court icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Latzer, Barry Cauthen, James N.G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21680 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07658 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07658 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Cities, 1972-1975 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7658 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This sample of the National Crime Survey contains information about victimization in 26 central cities in the United States. The data are designed to achieve three primary objectives: 1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, 2) to estimate the numbers and types of crimes not reported to police, and 3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes and permit reliable comparisons over time and between areas of the country. Information about each household or personal victimization was recorded. The data include type of crime (attempts are covered as well), description of offender, severity of crime, injuries or losses, time and place of occurrence, age, race and sex of offender(s), relationship of offenders to victims, education, migration, labor force status, occupation, and income of persons involved. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 census data icpsr cities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr households icpsr victimization icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7658 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03677 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03677 MiAaI MiAaI National Evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program, 1998-2002 [electronic resource] Mary Ann Dutton , Aileen Worrell , Darci Terrell , Sharon Denaro , Robin Thompson 2012-06-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 3677 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program (National Rural Evaluation) was a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program (Rural Program). The program provided funding to states, local and tribal governments, and private or public entities in rural states to create or enhance collaborations among criminal justice agencies, service providers, and community organizations to enhance services and the response to victims of domestic violence. The National Rural Evaluation consisted of two phases: a process evaluation and an outcome evaluation. The process evaluation (Phase 1: Parts 1-8) was conducted prior to the outcome evaluation to describe the 89 grantees funded in fiscal years 1996 to 1998 and the context and nature of grant activity. The outcome evaluation (Phase 2: Parts 9-35) conducted an in-depth quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Rural program by identifying and assessing outcomes for nine grantees. In total, this study contains 35 data files. Users should review the Collection Notes to see a breakdown of the number of cases and variables in each data file. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03677.v1 crime rates icpsr crime statistics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr offenses icpsr violence icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Dutton, Mary Ann Worrell, Aileen Terrell, Darci Denaro, Sharon Thompson, Robin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3677 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03677.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04454 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04454 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Characteristics, Offense Mix, and Escalation in Domestic Violence in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Miami-Dade, Florida, Omaha, Nebraska, Charlotte, North Carolina, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1987-1989 [electronic resource] Alex R. Piquero , Robert Brame , Jeffrey Fagan , Terrie E. Moffitt 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 4454 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Using data from five Spouse Assault Replication Program (SARP) sites, this study examined the extent to which domestic violence offenders exhibit a specialized proclivity toward violence and the extent to which attack severity escalates, de-escalates, or stays about the same over time. The specialization question was examined using official arrest records from the Charlotte, North Carolina, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Omaha, Nebraska sites. Escalation was examined using victim interview data from the Charlotte, Milwaukee, Omaha, and Miami-Dada, Florida sites. This collection consists of 18 SAS setup files used to recode the variables from the original datasets, organized in five groups, by city of each data collection site. This collection does not contain the original data files, themselves. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04454.v1 battered women icpsr criminal histories icpsr deterrence icpsr domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr intervention strategies icpsr offenders icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenses icpsr police records icpsr police response icpsr recidivism icpsr spouse abuse icpsr victims icpsr arrests icpsr NACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional Packages NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Piquero, Alex R. Brame, Robert Fagan, Jeffrey Moffitt, Terrie E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4454 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04454.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07791 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07791 MiAaI MiAaI Police Referral Practices and Social Service Agency Practices in Three Metropolitan Areas, 1977 [electronic resource] Elinor Ostrom , Roger B. Parks , Gordon P. Whitaker 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7791 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The dataset contains two related studies conducted in the metropolitan areas of St. Louis, Missouri, Tampa - St. Petersburg, Florida, and Rochester, New York. The study of police referral practices provies information on the types of calls made to police departments, the referrals made to social service agencies from these calls, and the pattern of citizen demands. Data for this study were collected from 26,465 calls for police service at 21 police departments. The 36 variables include the nature of the call, characteristics of the caller, and the type of agency receiving the referral. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07791.v1 police intervention icpsr police referral icpsr police social services icpsr social services icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Ostrom, Elinor Parks, Roger B. Whitaker, Gordon P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7791 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07791.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03152 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03152 MiAaI MiAaI Police Use of Force in Metro-Dade, Florida, and Eugene and Springfield, Oregon, 1993-1995 [electronic resource] Geoffrey P. Alpert , Roger G. Dunham 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3152 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study gathered data on police use of force in Metro-Dade, Florida, and Eugene and Springfield, Oregon. The study differed from previous research in that it addressed the level of force used by the police relative to the suspect's level of resistance. The data for Metro-Dade (Part 1) were collected from official Metro-Dade Police Department Control of Persons Reports from the last quarter of 1993 and all of 1994 and 1995. The Eugene and Springfield dataset (Part 2) was created from items in the Police Officers' Essential Physical Work Report Form, which was completed by members of the Eugene and Springfield, Oregon, Police Departments during April 1995. The dataset includes all police-citizen contacts, rather than being limited to the use-of-force situations captured by the Metro-Dade data. In Part 1 (Metro-Dade Data), information on the subject includes impairment (i.e., alcohol and drugs), behavior (i.e., calm, visibly upset, erratic, or highly agitated), level of resistance used by the subject, types of injuries to the subject, and types of force used by the subject. Information on the officer includes level of force used, medical treatment, and injuries. Other variables include ethnic match between officer and the subject and relative measures of force. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, and ethnicity of both the subject and the officer. In Part 2 (Oregon Data), information is provided on whether the officer was alone, how work was initiated, elapsed time until arrival, reasons for performance, perceived mental state and physical abilities of the suspect, amount and type of resistance by the suspect, if another officer assisted, perceived extent of effort used by the suspect, type of resistance used by the suspect, if the officer was knocked or wrestled to the ground, if the officer received an injury, level of effort used to control the suspect, types of control tactics used on the suspect, whether the officer was wearing tactical gear, how restraint devices were applied to inmate, time taken to get to, control, resolve, and remove the problem, how stressful the lead-up time or the period following the incident was, if the officer worked with a partner, types of firearm used, and if force was used. Demographic variables include age, gender, weight, and height of both the suspect and officer, and the officer's duty position. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03152.v1 arrest procedures icpsr arrests icpsr assaults on police icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police officers icpsr police use of force icpsr police performance icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Alpert, Geoffrey P. Dunham, Roger G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3152 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03152.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25521 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25521 MiAaI MiAaI Pretrial Release of Latino Defendants in the United States, 1990-2004 [electronic resource] David Levin 2009-07-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 25521 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. that is Latino over the last six years and change in the percentage of the county population that is African American over the last six years. Cross-level interaction variables include percentage minority (Latino/African American) population zero percent to 15 percent, percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 16 percent to 30 percent, and percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 31 percent or higher. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25521.v1 bail icpsr Hispanic or Latino Americans icpsr immigration icpsr population growth icpsr pretrial release icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System DSDR VI. Population Characteristics Levin, David Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25521 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25521.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR21860 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR21860 MiAaI MiAaI Processes of Resistance in Domestic Violence Offenders in Seven Sites in the United States and Canada, 2004-2005 [electronic resource] Deborah Levesque 2010-04-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 21860 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to examine the processes of resistance in domestic violence offenders. Study One (Part 1, Study One Quantitative Data) was developed to refine and offer preliminary validation of the draft processes of resistance measure. In the summer of 2004, group facilitators collected data from 346 domestic violence offenders recruited from domestic violence agencies in Florida, California, Georgia, and Rhode Island. The 88 item draft processes of resistance measure was administered as part of a 280 item paper-and-pencil survey that took approximately 60 minutes to complete. Resistance items were placed in random order in the measure and in 50 percent of the surveys, resistance items were placed in reverse order within the measure. Study Two (Part 2, Study Two Quantitative Data), administered the processes of resistance measure to a separate sample of domestic violence offenders at batterer program intake and again two months later. Participants included 358 domestic violence offenders recruited from domestic violence agencies in Florida, Virginia, Rhode Island, Michigan, and Calgary, Canada, between January and December 2005. In Study Three (Part 3, Study Three Expert Interview Qualitative Data), 16 of the 18 domestic violence experts who were interviewed in Study One during the drafting of the resistance measure were invited by telephone or email to participate in a 1- hour interview on best practices for dealing with resistance. Thirteen experts who agreed to be interviewed were mailed a list of processes of resistance measure items and asked to give recommendations on how domestic violence counselors can respond to a client engaging in those behaviors in treatment. Interviews were conducted by telephone in November 2005, with an interviewer and note taker, and audiotaped. Part 1 (Study One Quantitative Data) and Part 2 (Study Two Quantitative Data) include demographic variables such as age, race, level of education, employment and income level, relationship to the domestic assault victim, months in batterer treatment, and criminal history. Both Parts also include variables to measure stage of change, decisional balance, processes of change, self-efficacy, physical and psychological aggression, social desirability, at risk drinking, and physical and mental health. Additionally, Part 2 includes variables on program attendance and completion. Part 3 (Study Three Expert Interviews Qualitative Data) includes domestic violence experts recommendations for managing eight types of resistance in batterer treatment including system blaming, problems with partner, problems with alliance, social justification, hopelessness, isolation, psychological reactance, and passive reactance. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21860.v1 domestic assault icpsr domestic violence icpsr emotional abuse icpsr intimate partner violence icpsr offender profiles icpsr treatment compliance icpsr treatment outcome icpsr treatment programs icpsr violence against women icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Levesque, Deborah Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 21860 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21860.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03160 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03160 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Policing Neighborhoods in Indianapolis, Indiana, and St. Petersburg, Florida, 1996-1997 [electronic resource] Stephen D. Mastrofski , Roger B. Parks , Robert E. Worden , Albert J. Jr. Reiss 2007-06-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3160 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. variables (Part 19) include ride and encounter numbers, site beat (site, district, and beat or community policing areas [CPA]), and sector. Staffing variables (Part 20) include district, shift, and staffing levels for various shifts. Census data (Part 21) include neighborhood, index of socioeconomic distress, total population, and total white population. District population variables (Part 22) include district and population of district. The aggregated citizen data (Part 23) provide the ride and encounter numbers, number of citizens in the encounter, counts of citizens by their various roles, and by sex, age, race, wealth, if known by the police, under the influence of alcohol or drugs, physically injured, had a weapon, or assaulted the police, counts by type of encounter, and counts of police and citizen actions during the encounter. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03160.v2 citizen attitudes icpsr communities icpsr community policing icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr perception of crime icpsr police icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police effectiveness icpsr police patrol icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime Mastrofski, Stephen D. Parks, Roger B. Worden, Robert E. Reiss, Albert J. Jr. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3160 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03160.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08673 MiAaI MiAaI Recidivism Among Young Parolees [electronic resource] a Study of Inmates Released from Prison in 22 States, 1978 United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1997-05-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examines the criminal activities of a group of young offenders after their release from prison to parole supervision. Previous studies have examined recidivism using arrests as the principal measure, whereas this study examines a variety of factors, including length of incarceration, age, sex, race, prior arrest record, prosecutions, length of time between parole and rearrest, parolees not prosecuted for new offenses but having their parole revoked, rearrests in states other than the paroling states, and the nature and location of rearrest charges. Parolees in the 22 states covered in this study account for 50 percent of all state prisoners paroled in the United States in 1978. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08673.v2 arrests icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr parole systems icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08673.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03355 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03355 MiAaI MiAaI Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3355 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994 is a database containing information on each of 38,624 sampled prisoners released from prisons in 15 states in 1994 and tracked for three years following their release. The majority of the database consists of information on each released prisoner's entire officially recorded criminal history (before and after the 1994 release). Sources for criminal history information are state and FBI automated RAP ("Records of Arrests and Prosecutions") sheets, which contain records of arrests, adjudications, and sentences. The study is the second major recidivism study conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The first study, RECIDIVISM AMONG RELEASED PRISONERS, 1983: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 8875), tracked over 16,000 prisoners released in 11 states in 1983 for three years. These two studies are the closest approximation to "national" recidivism studies in the United States. They are distinguished by their large sample size (over 16,000 released prisoners in the first study, 38,624 in the second), geographic breadth of coverage (11 states in the first study, 15 in the second), length of prospective tracking (three years from date of release in both studies), ability to track the movement of released prisoners across state boundaries (both studies), and multiple measures of recidivism (both studies). Demographic data include race, ethnicity, sex, and date of birth. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8 arrest records icpsr conviction records icpsr criminal histories icpsr offenses icpsr recidivism icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3355 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27101 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27101 MiAaI MiAaI Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) Multi-site Impact Evaluation, 2004-2007 [United States] [electronic resource] Pamela K. Lattimore , Christy A. Visher 2011-05-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 27101 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) funded agencies to develop programs to improve criminal justice, employment, education, health, and housing outcomes for released prisoners. SVORI was an outcome or goal-oriented initiative that specified outcomes, or goals, that should be achieved by programs that were developed locally. The SVORI multi-site evaluation included an impact evaluation to determine the effectiveness of programming. Specifically, the purpose of the impact evaluation was to determine whether individuals who participated in enhanced reentry programming, as measured by their enrollment in SVORI programs, had improved post-release outcomes than comparable individuals who did not participate in SVORI programming. Impact evaluation data collection for both SVORI and non-SVORI participants consisted of four waves of in-person, computer-assisted interviews, oral swab drug tests conducted in conjunction with two of the follow-up interviews, arrest data obtained from the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and administrative records data obtained from state correctional and juvenile justice agencies. The research team collected data on a total of 2,391 individuals including 1,697 adult males (Part 1), 357 adult females (Part 2), and 337 juvenile males (Part 3). As part of the impact evaluation, experienced RTI field interviewers conducted pre-release interviews with offenders approximately 30 days before release from prison and a series of follow-up interviews at 3, 9, and 15 months post-release. The interview and drug test data were supplemented with arrest data obtained from the NCIC and with administrative records obtained from state correctional and juvenile justice agencies. These data provided information on criminal history and recidivism occurring by December 31, 2007. The research team collected data on a total of 35,469 arrests (Part 4) from the NCIC, including prior arrests and re-arrests for offenders in the adult male, adult female, and juvenile male samples. Re-arrest indicators data based on the NCIC Arrest Records Data (Part 4) are also included in Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3. The Adult Males Data (Part 1), Adult Females Data (Part 2), and the Juvenile Males Data (Part 3) each contain the same 5,698 variables including 5,635 variables from the 4 waves of offender interviews, 10 drug test lab results variables, 36 re-arrest indicator variables based on NCIC arrest records, 14 administrative re-incarceration variables, and 3 weight variables. (Note: Some interview questions were only asked of adults, and other questions were only asked of juveniles.) Offender interview variables include demographics, housing, employment, education, military experience, family background, peer relationships, program operations and services, physical and mental health, substance abuse, crime and delinquency, and attitudes. Part 4, the NCIC Arrest Records Data, contains a total of 8 variables including release date, arrest date, charge, higher code, conviction offense, and a time variable created by ICPSR that represents the number of days between arrest date and release date. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27101.v1 evaluation icpsr inmate release plans icpsr offenders icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr postrelease programs icpsr prisoner reentry icpsr program evaluation icpsr programs icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivists icpsr violence icpsr violent crime icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Lattimore, Pamela K. Visher, Christy A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27101 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27101.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06008 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06008 MiAaI MiAaI Spouse Abuse Replication Project in Metro-Dade County, Florida, 1987-1989 [electronic resource] Antony Pate , Edwin E. Hamilton , Sampson Annan 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6008 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Metro-Dade project replicated an earlier study of domestic violence, the Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment (SPECIFIC DETERRENT EFFECTS OF ARREST FOR DOMESTIC ASSAULT: MINNEAPOLIS, 1981-1982 [ICPSR 8250]), which was conducted by the Police Foundation with a grant from the National Institute of Justice. The Metro-Dade study employed a research design that tested the relative effectiveness of various combinations of treatments that were randomly assigned in two stages. Initially, eligible spouse battery cases were assigned to either an arrest or a nonarrest condition. Later, cases were assigned either to receive or not to receive a follow-up investigation and victim counseling from a detective working with the Safe Streets Unit (SSU), a unit that deals specifically with domestic violence. Given the various treatment conditions employed, three types of dependent variables were examined: (1) prevalence--the proportion of suspects who engaged in repeat incidents, (2) incidence--the frequency with which repeat incidents occurred, and (3) "time to failure"--the interval between the presenting incident and subsequent incidents. Initial interviews were conducted with victims soon after the presenting incident, and follow-up interviews were attempted six months later. The interviews were conducted in either English or Spanish. The interview questions requested detailed background information about the suspect, victim, and any family members living with the victim at the time of the interview, including age, gender, and marital and employment status. Parallel sets of employment and education questions were asked about the victim and the suspect. Additionally, the interview questionnaire was designed to collect information on (1) the history of the victim's relationship with the suspect, (2) the nature of the presenting incident, including physical violence, property damage, and threats, (3) causes of the presenting incident, including the use of alcohol and drugs by both the victim and the offender, (4) actions taken by the police when they arrived on the scene, (5) the victim's evaluation of the services rendered by the police on the scene, (6) the nature of the follow-up contact by a detective from the Safe Street Unit and an evaluation of the services provided, (7) the victim's history of abuse by the offender, and (8) the nature of subsequent abuse since the presenting incident. Data for Parts 1 and 2 are self-reported data, obtained from interviews with victims. Part 4 consists of data recorded on Domestic Violence Continuation Report forms, indicating subsequent assaults or domestic disputes, and Part 5 contains criminal history data on suspects from arrest reports, indicating a subsequent arrest. The police report of the incident and information on the type of randomized treatment assigned to each case is given in Part 6. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06008.v1 domestic violence icpsr police response icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivists icpsr spouse abuse icpsr treatment outcomes icpsr treatment programs icpsr victims services icpsr victims icpsr battered women icpsr counseling icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Pate, Antony Hamilton, Edwin E. Annan, Sampson Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6008 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06008.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08919 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08919 MiAaI MiAaI Supervised Pretrial Release Programs, 1979-1982 [electronic resource] Miami, Milwaukee, and Portland James Austin , Barry Krisberg 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8919 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was designed to assess the effects of different types of supervised pretrial release (SPR). Four major types of effects were examined: (1) defendants' behaviors while awaiting trial (failure to appear and arrests for new offenses), (2) the costs of SPR to victims and the criminal justice system, (3) pretrial release practices, and (4) jail populations. This study provides detailed information for a selected group of defendants awaiting trial on criminal histories and arrests while awaiting trial. Data are also available on services provided between arrest and disposition. The study produced four different data sets. The first, Supervised Release Information System (SRIS), contains intake information on current arrest, criminal record, socio-economic status, ties with the community, contact with mental health and substance abuse facilities, and pretrial release decisions. The release section of this data base contains information on services provided, intensity of supervision, termination from program, personal characteristics at termination, criminal charges at disposition, and new charges resulting from arrests while under pretrial status. The Arrest Data Set includes variables on type and number of crimes committed by SPR defendants, property costs to victims, personal injury costs, and court disposition for each offense. The Retrospective Data Set supplies variables on charges filed and method of release, personal characteristics, length of pretrial incarceration, bail, whether the defendant was rebooked during the pretrial period, charge at disposition, sentence, total court appearances, and total failures to appear in court (FTAs). The Jail Population Data Set contains monthly counts of jail population and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08919.v1 arrests icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drugs icpsr mental health icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Austin, James Krisberg, Barry Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8919 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08919.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07899 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07899 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of American Prisons and Jails, 1979 [electronic resource] Abt Associates, Inc. 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7899 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection contains information gathered in a two-part survey that was designed to assess institutional conditions in state and federal prisons and in halfway houses. It was one of a series of data-gathering efforts undertaken during the 1970s to assist policymakers in assessing and overcoming deficiencies in the nation's correctional institutions. This particular survey was conducted in response to a mandate set forth in the Crime Control Act of 1976. Data were gathered via self-enumerated questionnaires that were mailed to the administrators of all 558 federal and state prisons and all 405 community-based prerelease facilities in existence in the United States in 1979. Part 1 contains the results of the survey of state and federal adult correctional systems, and Part 2 contains the results of the survey of community-based prerelease facilities. The two files contain similar variables designed to tap certain key aspects of confinement: (1) inmate (or resident) counts by sex and by security class, (2) age of facility and rated capacity, (3) spatial density, occupancy, and hours confined for each inmate's (or resident's) confinement quarters, (4) composition of inmate (or resident) population according to race, age, and offense type, (5) inmate (or resident) labor and earnings, (6) race, age, and sex characteristics of prison (or half-way house) staff, and (7) court orders by type of order and pending litigation. Other data (contained in both files) include case ID number, state ID number, name of facility, and operator of facility (e.g., federal, state, local, or private). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07899.v2 correctional facilities icpsr correctional guards icpsr court orders icpsr crime statistics icpsr federal correctional facilities icpsr halfway houses icpsr inmate classification icpsr inmate programs icpsr inmates icpsr jails icpsr lawsuits icpsr offenses icpsr prerelease programs icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr sentencing icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Abt Associates, Inc. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7899 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07899.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03491 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03491 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Citizens' Attitudes Toward Community-Oriented Law Enforcement in Alachua County, Florida, 1996 [electronic resource] Michael J. Scicchitano 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3491 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to identify the impact of the communication training program given to deputies in Alachua County, Florida, on the community's attitudes toward community law enforcement activities, particularly crime prevention and neighborhood patrols. To determine the success of the communication training for the Alachua deputies, researchers administered a survey to residents in the target neighborhood before the communication program was implemented (Part 1: Pretest Data) and again after the program had been established (Part 2: Post-Test Data). The survey instrument developed for use in this study was designed to assess neighborhood respondents' attitudes regarding (1) community law enforcement, defined as the assignment of deputies to neighborhoods on a longer term (not just patrol) basis with the goal of developing and implementing crime prevention programs, (2) the communication skills of deputies assigned to the community, and (3) the perceived importance of community law enforcement activities. For both parts, residents were asked how important it was to (1) have the same deputies assigned to their neighborhoods, (2) personally know the names of their deputies, and (3) work with the deputies on crime watch programs. Residents were asked if they agreed that the sheriff's office dealt with the neighborhood residents effectively, were good listeners, were easy to talk to, understood and were interested in what the residents had to say, were flexible, were trustworthy, were safe to deal with, and were straightforward, respectful, considerate, honest, reliable, friendly, polite, informed, smart, and helpful. Demographic variables include the gender, race, age, income, employment status, and educational level of each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03491.v1 communication icpsr community policing icpsr law enforcement icpsr perception of crime icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police community relations icpsr police performance icpsr police relations programs icpsr social interaction icpsr citizen attitudes icpsr crime control programs icpsr crime prevention icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Scicchitano, Michael J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3491 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03491.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09988 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09988 MiAaI MiAaI Techniques for Assessing the Accuracy of Recidivism Prediction Scales, 1960-1980 [electronic resource] [Miami, Albuquerque, New York City, Alameda and Los Angeles Counties, and the State of California] Jacqueline Cohen , Sherwood Zimmerman , Stephen King 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9988 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to measure the validity or accuracy of four recidivism prediction instruments: the INSLAW, RAND, SFS81, and CGR scales. These scales estimate the probability that criminals will commit subsequent crimes quickly, that individuals will commit crime frequently, that inmates who are eligible for release on parole will commit subsequent crimes, and that defendants awaiting trial will commit crimes while on pretrial arrest or detention. The investigators used longitudinal data from five existing independent studies to assess the validity of the four predictive measures in question. The first data file was originally collected by the Vera Institute of Justice in New York City and was derived from an experimental evaluation of a jobs training program called the Alternative Youth Employment Strategies Project implemented in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Miami, Florida, and New York City, New York. The second file contains data from a RAND Corporation study, EFFECTS OF PRISON VERSUS PROBATION IN CALIFORNIA, 1980-1982 (ICPSR 8700), from offenders in Alameda and Los Angeles counties, California. Parts 3 through 5 pertain to serious juvenile offenders who were incarcerated during the 1960s and 1970s in three institutions of the California Youth Authority. A portion of the original data for these parts was taken from EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF THE CHRONIC OFFENDER, [1978-1980: CALIFORNIA] (ICPSR 8226). All files present demographic and socioeconomic variables such as birth information, race and ethnicity, education background, work and military experience, and criminal history, including involvement in criminal activities, drug addiction, and incarceration episodes. From the variables in each data file, standard variables across all data files were constructed. Constructed variables included those on background (such as drug use, arrest, conviction, employment, and education history), which were used to construct the four predictive scales, and follow-up variables concerning arrest and incarceration history. Scores on the four predictive scales were estimated. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09988.v1 recidivism prediction icpsr recidivists icpsr criminality prediction icpsr criminal histories icpsr imprisonment icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr probation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Cohen, Jacqueline Zimmerman, Sherwood King, Stephen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9988 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09988.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20366 MiAaI MiAaI Understanding Court Culture and Improving Court Performance in 12 Courts in California, Florida, and Minnesota, 2002 [electronic resource] Brian J. Ostrom , Charles W. Ostrom , Roger A. Hanson , Matthew Kleiman 2008-08-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine the organizational culture in 12 felony criminal trial courts selected in 3 states and to gauge prosecuting and public defender attorneys' views on how well the courts in which they practice achieve the goals of access, fairness, and managerial effectiveness. Data on organizational culture in each of the 12 courts (Part 1) were obtained by administering the Court Culture Assessment Instrument (CCAI) to all judges with a felony criminal court docket and to all senior court administrators. A total of 224 respondents completed the questionnaire. Additionally, surveys were conducted of prosecuting attorneys (Part 2) and public defender attorneys (Part 3) to gauge their views on how well the courts in which they practice achieve the goals of access, fairness, and managerial effectiveness. A total of 334 prosecuting attorneys and 260 public defense attorneys completed the 46-item trial court process survey. Part 1 contains 40 variables pertaining to 5 dimensions of current and preferred court culture. Variables in Part 2 and Part 3 each include seven items from a jurisdictional practice scale, eight items from a procedural fairness scale, seven items from a resource scale, nine items from a management scale, nine items from a practitioner competence scale, and six items from a court access scale. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20366.v1 administration icpsr felony courts icpsr judges icpsr management styles icpsr organizational behavior icpsr organizational culture icpsr organizational structure icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr public defenders icpsr trial courts icpsr administrators icpsr attorneys icpsr case management icpsr case processing icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr criminal courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Ostrom, Brian J. Ostrom, Charles W. Hanson, Roger A. Kleiman, Matthew Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03172 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130523s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03172 MiAaI MiAaI Understanding the Use of Force By and Against the Police in Six Jurisdictions in the United States, 1996-1997 [electronic resource] Joel H. Garner , Christopher D. Maxwell 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3172 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. weapons (e.g., knife, chemical agent, dog, blunt object, handgun, motor vehicle). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03172.v1 arrest procedures icpsr arrest records icpsr assaults on police icpsr law enforcement icpsr police officers icpsr police use of force icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Garner, Joel H. Maxwell, Christopher D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3172 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03172.v1