nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27601 MiAaI MiAaI 21st Century Americanism [electronic resource] Nationally Representative Survey of the United States Population, 2004 Deborah Schildkraut , Ashley Grosse 2010-05-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The 21st Century Americanism survey was conducted to study (1) the multidimensional nature of American identity ("Americanism"); (2) resentment among Whites toward immigrants, Latinos, and Asians, fueled by perceptions that these groups violate the cherished norms that constitute American identity ("symbolic nativism"); (3) how perceptions of discrimination affect the process of "becoming American" among ethnic minorities ("reactive ethnicity"); and (4) the relationships among these issues and public opinion on policies that address ethnic change. The data collection began in July 2004 and was completed by October 2004. This nationally representative random-digit dial telephone survey has 2,800 respondents and includes oversamples of Blacks, Latinos, and Asians in the United States. It contains questions that allow for the examination of the causes and consequences of two facets of American identity: (1) how people define the normative content of American identity ("identity content"); and (2) the extent to which people think of themselves primarily as American rather than primarily as a member of a pan-ethnic (i.e., Latino or Asian) or national origin group ("identity attachment"). The survey can be used to test hypotheses regarding whether the alleged traditional consensus on what it means to be American is breaking down, or whether people are increasingly rejecting an American identity and instead prioritizing pan-ethnic or national origin identities. It can also be used to examine how these aspects of one's identity affect political attitudes and behaviors, such as trust in government, voting, and one's sense of obligation to the national community. Demographic variables include gender, age, country of origin, United States citizenship status, race, Hispanic origin, and language and educational attainment. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status and household income. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27601.v2 ethnic identity icpsr Hispanic or Latino Americans icpsr immigrants icpsr income icpsr military service icpsr national economy icpsr national identity icpsr national pride icpsr patriotism icpsr political attitudes icpsr political awareness icpsr religion icpsr self concept icpsr African Americans icpsr Arab Americans icpsr Asian Americans icpsr cultural attitudes icpsr discrimination icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United States RCMD IX. Minority Populations Schildkraut, Deborah Grosse, Ashley Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27601.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04326 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04326 MiAaI MiAaI ABC News/Washington Post Monthly Poll, April 2005 [electronic resource] ABC News , The Washington Post 2006-12-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4326 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This poll, conducted April 21-24, 2005, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the current presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were queried on such topics as Social Security benefits, parenthood, young people joining the military, capital punishment, same-sex marriage, stem cell research, and whether abortion should be legal in all cases. Respondents were asked how President George W. Bush was handling his presidency, the economy, the situation in Iraq, and the United States campaign against terrorism. A series of questions also focused on Tom Delay, the majority leader of the United States House of Representatives, and the ethics charges made against him, and whether he should step down as majority leader. A random national sample of 1,082 adults were given this poll, including an oversample of 284 Catholic respondents, who were asked an additional group of questions about Pope Benedict XVI and the Catholic Church. Questions asked included their feelings about the selection of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as pope, whether they approved or disapproved of the selection, if they thought he should maintain the traditional policies of the Church, and what should be his highest priority (e.g., responding to the concerns of women in the Church, encouraging human rights, or addressing the issue of sexual abuse by priests). Other questions included whether the Roman Catholic Church was in touch with the views of Catholics in America, whether the respondent would want their son to become a priest, and whether they would support the Catholic Church denying communion to Catholic politicians who are in favor of legal abortion. Demographic variables include race, gender, age, level of education, income, political party affiliation, political philosophy, and religious affiliation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04326.v1 abortion icpsr Bush, George W. icpsr capital punishment icpsr Catholic Church icpsr Catholic priests icpsr Catholicism icpsr Catholics icpsr Delay, Tom icpsr economic conditions icpsr gasoline prices icpsr Iraq War icpsr judge selection icpsr parenthood icpsr political influence icpsr political influences icpsr Pope Benedict XVI icpsr public opinion icpsr religion icpsr religious attitudes icpsr same-sex marriage icpsr stem cell research icpsr terrorism icpsr United States Senate icpsr ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United States ABC News The Washington Post Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4326 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04326.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31521 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31521 MiAaI MiAaI General Social Survey, 1972-2010 [Cumulative File] [electronic resource] Tom W. Smith , Peter V. Marsden , Michael Hout 2013-02-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 31521 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The General Social Surveys (GSS) were designed as part of a data diffusion project in 1972. The GSS replicated questionnaire items and wording in order to facilitate time-trend studies. The latest survey, GSS 2010, includes a cumulative file that merges all 28 General Social Surveys into a single file containing data from 1972 to 2010. The items appearing in the surveys are one of three types: Permanent questions that occur on each survey, rotating questions that appear on two out of every three surveys (1973, 1974, and 1976, or 1973, 1975, and 1976), and a few occasional questions such as split ballot experiments that occur in a single survey. The 2010 surveys included four topic modules: quality of working life, science, shared capitalism, and CDC high risk behaviors. The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) module included in the 2010 survey was environment. The data also contain several variables describing the demographic characteristics of the respondents. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1 divorce icpsr dissent icpsr drug use icpsr economic issues icpsr abortion icpsr Affirmative Action icpsr employment icpsr agriculture icpsr AIDS icpsr environment icpsr environmental attitudes icpsr environmental protection icpsr ethnicity icpsr euthanasia icpsr alcohol icpsr altruism icpsr citizenship icpsr prejudice icpsr privacy icpsr race relations icpsr expenditures icpsr families icpsr foreign affairs icpsr freedom icpsr gender icpsr gender issues icpsr racial attitudes icpsr religion icpsr school prayer icpsr science icpsr sexual behavior icpsr sexual preference icpsr smoking icpsr social classes icpsr social inequality icpsr social mobility icpsr social networks icpsr Social Security icpsr sports icpsr suicide icpsr taxes icpsr technology icpsr television icpsr terminal illnesses icpsr terrorism icpsr unemployment icpsr welfare services icpsr work icpsr civil rights icpsr communism icpsr birth control icpsr business icpsr capital punishment icpsr children icpsr community participation icpsr compensation icpsr computer use icpsr corporations icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr democracy icpsr gender roles icpsr government icpsr health icpsr housing icpsr human rights icpsr hunting icpsr immigration icpsr income icpsr industry icpsr Jews icpsr labor unions icpsr marijuana icpsr marriage icpsr media coverage icpsr mental health icpsr military draft icpsr military service icpsr national identity icpsr occupations icpsr parents icpsr physicians icpsr police icpsr politics icpsr patients icpsr poverty icpsr ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions Smith, Tom W. Marsden, Peter V. Hout, Michael Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31521 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26344 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26344 MiAaI MiAaI Integrated Fertility Survey Series, Release 7, 1955-2002 [United States] [electronic resource] Pamela Smock , Peter Granda , Lynette Hoelter 2013-05-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26344 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Integrated Fertility Survey Series (IFSS) integrates data from ten underlying component studies of family and fertility: the Growth of American Families studies of 1955 and 1960; the National Survey of Fertility of 1965 and 1970; and the National Surveys of Family Growth of 1973, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1995, and 2002. The first release contains harmonized sociodemographic variables for all respondents from all ten component studies, including those related to marital status, race and ethnicity, education, income, migration, religion, and region of origin, among others. The second release adds harmonized husband/partner sociodemographic variables as well as harmonized union history variables. The third release adds harmonized pregnancy, adoption, non-biological children, and menstruation variables. The fourth release adds harmonized fertility variables. The fifth release includes the addition of the pregnancy interval file. This file contains 217,128 pregnancy records with information pertaining to the pregnancies of all respondents. The sixth release adds comparative sample variables to the respondent and pregnancy interval files, and includes the addition of the contraceptive calendar file. This file contains 53,317 records with information pertaining to type and frequency of contraceptive use. The seventh release includes additional variables related to contraceptive knowledge, contraceptive use, birth control and family planning services, sexual history, infertility, and sterilizing operations. It also adds sociodemographic and union history variables. Imputed data through the third release are also included. Additional information about the Integrated Fertility Survey Series can be found on the IFSS Web site. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26344.v7 adopted children icpsr adoption icpsr birth control icpsr children icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr families icpsr family background icpsr family planning icpsr family size icpsr fertility icpsr income icpsr marital status icpsr marriage icpsr pregnancy icpsr religion icpsr sexual behavior icpsr DSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive Health ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender IFSS I. Integrated Fertility Survey Series DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Smock, Pamela Granda, Peter Hoelter, Lynette Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26344 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26344.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04550 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04550 MiAaI MiAaI Jewish School Study, 2001 [United States] [electronic resource] Barbara Schneider 2009-06-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 4550 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Jewish School Study was undertaken to determine the advantages and disadvantages of different forms of Jewish education, how Jewish day schools are formed and organized, how Jewish schools contribute to the maintenance of continuity of a 400-year tradition, how adolescent Jews develop their identity, and what role religious education plays in this development. Questions also asked how Jewish adolescents and their parents participate in Jewish life, express their feelings about being Jewish, the role of spirituality in their lives, how they learn about Jewish life, and their relationship/ties with Israel and the Jewish people. Part 1, the Parent Survey, asked parents of students in Jewish schools about the financial costs of religious education, their religious background, Jewish religious practices of their household, as well as their own religious beliefs and spirituality. The survey also sought answers to questions on the parents' reasons for their choice of Jewish school, how involved and in what ways they were involved in their child's school and education, their involvement in the Jewish community, their level of knowledge on various subjects related to Judaism, and their opinions on their own parenting. Other information collected included marital status, income, family status, family origins, education, and employment. Part 2, the Student Survey, asked students about their religious background, the religious practices and experiences in their household, and their own Jewish practices. Students were then asked about how they spent their free time on Saturdays and weekdays, how they and their parents felt about being Jewish, and what types of rules their parents had for them. Additionally, students were queried about their values, friends, and future plans; knowledge of various subjects relating to Judaism; and their opinions of their school, teachers, and their own academic performance. Background information collected included gender, grade in school, name and types of schools attended, household composition, language spoken in the home, and parents' education and employment. Part 3, the Teacher Survey, asked teachers about the settings they worked in and the salary and benefits of those positions. Respondents also were asked about the classes they taught, the use of various teaching methods and media, and their roles and responsibilities. The survey also asked the teachers about their training and professional development, their perceptions and attitudes about their school, parental involvement, resources and facilities, and school goals. Additionally, teachers were asked about their religious background, Jewish religious practices of their own households, and their personal religious beliefs and spirituality. Background information collected included type of postsecondary education, gender, age, place of birth, marital status, income, and future career plans. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04550.v1 education icpsr parents icpsr religion icpsr religious beliefs icpsr religious congregations icpsr religious education icpsr religious organizations icpsr religious schools icpsr schools icpsr student attitudes icpsr student behavior icpsr educational administration icpsr student values icpsr students icpsr teachers icpsr values icpsr educational environment icpsr educational objectives icpsr educational programs icpsr educators icpsr Judaism icpsr parent-child relationship icpsr parental attitudes icpsr RCMD III. Education DATAPASS I. NDIIPP ICPSR V.A. Education, United States Schneider, Barbara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4550 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04550.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR22100 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR22100 MiAaI MiAaI Longitudinal Study of Generations, 1971, 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000 [California] [electronic resource] Vern L. Bengtson 2009-05-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 22100 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Longitudinal Study of Generations (LSOG), initiated in 1971, began as a survey of intergenerational relations among 300 three-generation California families with grandparents (then in their sixties), middle-aged parents (then in their early forties), and grandchildren (then aged 15 to 26). The study broadened in 1991 and now includes a fourth generation, the great-grandchildren of these same families. The LSOG, with a fully elaborated generation-sequential design, allows comparisons of sets of aging parents and children at the same stage of life but during different historical periods. These comparisons make possible the investigation of the effects of social change on inter-generational solidarity or conflict across 35 years and four generations, as well as the effects of social change on the ability of families to buffer stressful life transitions (e.g., aging, divorce and remarriage, higher female labor force participation, changes in work and the economy, and possible weakening of family norms of obligation), and the effects of social change on the transmission of values, resources, and behaviors across generations. The study also examines how intergenerational relationships influence individuals' well-being as they transition across the life course from early, to middle, to late adulthood. The LSOG contains information on family structure, household composition, affectual solidarity and conflict, values, attitudes, behaviors, role importance, marital relationships, health and fitness, mental health and well-being, caregiving, leisure activities, and life events and concerns. Demographic variables include age, sex, income, employment status, marital status, socioeconomic history, education, religion, ethnicity, and military service. With the addition of Wave 7, in 2000, this collection supercedes LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF GENERATIONS, 1971, 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994, 1997: [CALIFORNIA] (ICPSR 4076). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22100.v2 activities of daily living icpsr aging icpsr caregivers icpsr children icpsr death icpsr drug use icpsr education icpsr employment icpsr ethnicity icpsr family history icpsr generations icpsr grandchildren icpsr grandparents icpsr household composition icpsr institutional care icpsr intergenerational relations icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr life satisfaction icpsr marital status icpsr mental health icpsr military service icpsr parents icpsr physical condition icpsr political affiliation icpsr race icpsr religion icpsr self concept icpsr siblings icpsr NACDA I. Demographic Characteristics of Older Adults AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions NACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older Adults NACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older Adults ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults DSDR IX. NIA Supported Studies ICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life Cycle Bengtson, Vern L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 22100 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22100.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34392 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34392 MiAaI MiAaI New Family Structures Study [electronic resource] Mark Regnerus 2012-11-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 34392 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The New Family Structure Study (NFSS) is a comparative, social-science data-collection project, which focused on American young adults (ages 18-39) who were raised in different types of family arrangements with varying household experiences. The sample included respondents that had lived in biologically-intact households, lived with cohabiting parents, adoptive, step, or single parents, with parents who had same-sex relationships, or with parents who remarried after divorce. Respondents were asked about a range of topics, including social behaviors: such as educational attainment and performance, work history, risk-taking, and religiosity; health behaviors: such as substance abuse, sexually transmitted infections, and emotional states (depression, anger, and stress), and relationships: including the quality and stability of romantic relationships, marital history, fertility, sexual orientation, and family connectedness. Additional questions asked whether respondents voted in the 2008 presidential election, how much time they spent on various activities; watching TV, gaming, and on social networking sites, and how many Facebook "friends" they had. Demographic information includes age, education level, race, gender, income, marital status, employment status, and household size. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34392.v1 religion icpsr religious behavior icpsr same-sex marriage icpsr sexual abuse icpsr sexual behavior icpsr social interaction icpsr voting behavior icpsr adopted children icpsr adoptive parents icpsr alcohol consumption icpsr bullying icpsr drug use icpsr emotional states icpsr family background icpsr family life icpsr family structure icpsr gays and lesbians icpsr health icpsr health insurance icpsr homosexual relationships icpsr households icpsr lifestyles icpsr marital relations icpsr marital status icpsr Medicaid icpsr parent child relationship icpsr personal finances icpsr physical condition icpsr public assistance programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program Regnerus, Mark Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34392 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34392.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03255 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03255 MiAaI MiAaI Religion, Aging, and Health Survey, 2001, 2004 [United States] [electronic resource] Neal Krause 2006-04-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 3255 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection looks at religion, self-rated health, depression, and psychological well-being in a sample of older Blacks and older Whites (aged 65 and over) within the United States. Questions were asked regarding religious status, activities, and beliefs among those who currently practice the Christian faith, those who used to be Christian but are not now, and those who have never been associated with any religion during their lifetimes. Demographic variables include age, race, sex, education, and income. Wave II was collected in 2004 and reinterviewed 1,024 respondents. There were 75 respondents who refused to participate, 112 who could not be located, 70 that were too ill for participation, 11 who had moved to nursing homes and 208 were deceased. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03255.v2 religious behavior icpsr Christianity icpsr church membership icpsr depression (psychology) icpsr health attitudes icpsr health problems icpsr older adults icpsr prayer icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr religion icpsr religious beliefs icpsr religious denominations icpsr worship icpsr DSDR IX. NIA Supported Studies DSDR III. Health and Mortality NACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older Adults ICPSR XVII.B. Social Institutions and Behavior, Religion Krause, Neal Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3255 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03255.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32881 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Collateral Measures, 2000-2004 Edward P. Mulvey 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 32881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700) from 2000 through 2010. This study looks at interviews conducted with the collateral informants who participated in the study. The collateral informants were nominated by the main study participant and represented individuals who "knew the study participant well". At the interview baseline the collateral informant was usually a biological parent. During the three follow-up interviews the majority of collaterals were a friend. Collateral informants could also be a sibling, significant other, or relative. Collaterals were asked questions in regards to the main study participant's life, allowing for comparison between responses provided by two sources. A baseline interview was conducted with the collateral after the baseline interview took place with the main participant. Additional waves of follow-up with collaterals took place at 12, 24, and 36 months. A collateral report is not present for all of the main study participant interviews across waves (see response rate below). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32881.v1 interpersonal relations icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr personal adjustment icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr psychosocial assessment icpsr religion icpsr social behavior icpsr substance abuse icpsr income icpsr academic achievement icpsr community involvement icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr family life icpsr friendships icpsr gangs icpsr household composition icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32881.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29961 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29961 MiAaI MiAaI Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA] [electronic resource] Subject Measures, 2000-2010 Edward P. Mulvey 2013-01-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29961 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700). Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview. The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses). The baseline interview was conducted within 75 days of the youth's adjudication hearing. For youths in the adult system, the baseline interview was conducted within 90 days of either (a) the decertification hearing in Philadelphia, a hearing at which it is determined if the case will remain in adult court or if it will be sent back to juvenile court; or (b) the adult arraignment hearing in Phoenix, the point in the Arizona adult system at which charges have been formally presented. The aims of the investigation were to identify initial patterns of how serious adolescent offenders stop antisocial activity, to describe the role of social context and developmental changes in promoting these positive changes, and to compare the effects of sanctions and interventions in promoting these changes. The larger goals of the Pathways to Desistance study were to improve decision-making by court and social service personnel and to clarify policy debates about alternatives for serious adolescent offenders. The study relied primarily on self-report information from study participants. Each wave of data collection covered six domains: (1) background characteristics (e.g., demographics, academic achievement, psychiatric diagnoses, offense history, neurological functioning, psychopathy, personality), (2) indicators of individual functioning (e.g., work and school status and performance, substance abuse, mental disorder, antisocial behavior), (3) psychosocial development and attitudes (e.g., impulse control, susceptibility to peer influence, perceptions of opportunity, perceptions of procedural justice, moral disengagement), (4) family context (e.g., household composition, quality of family relationships), (5) personal relationships (e.g., quality of romantic relationships and friendships, peer delinquency, contacts with caring adults), and (6) community context (e.g., neighborhood conditions, personal capital, and community involvement). Information about the measures used to capture this information can be found on the Pathways to Desistance website. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2 family life icpsr friendships icpsr gangs icpsr household composition icpsr income icpsr interpersonal relations icpsr juvenile crime icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr personal adjustment icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr psychosocial assessment icpsr religion icpsr social behavior icpsr substance abuse icpsr academic achievement icpsr community involvement icpsr crime icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Mulvey, Edward P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29961 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04297 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04297 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Texas Adults, 2004 [electronic resource] Marc A. Musick 2005-09-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4297 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This dataset is the first in a series of several data collection efforts aimed at learning more about the lives of adults who live in Texas. Data collected in 2004 contains information on seven major aspects of Texas life: (1) A series of questions on civic engagement and attitudes, such as voting behavior, jury service, and attitudes towards the institution of the jury. (2) A large module of questions related to volunteering. Inquiry was made on how and how much respondents volunteer, their reasons for volunteering, and the ways they go about finding opportunities to do so. This module also asks about organizational memberships and giving behaviors. (3) Personality dispositions and attitudes related to violence and other issues. (4) Physical and mental health status. (5) Information regarding health behaviors, such as diet and exercise, and the frequency in which respondents regularly engage in various activities. (6) Questions related to religious activities and beliefs held by respondents. (7) General demographic information, including age, sex, race, type of Hispanic descent, education, employment and citizenship. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04297.v1 memberships icpsr mental health icpsr personality icpsr physical condition icpsr physical fitness icpsr religion icpsr volunteers icpsr charitable donations icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr health behavior icpsr health status icpsr NACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older Adults ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United States Musick, Marc A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4297 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04297.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR30764 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130619s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR30764 MiAaI MiAaI Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [electronic resource] Hate Crime Data, 2009 [Record-Type Files] United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011-09-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 30764 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-06-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In response to a growing concern about hate crimes, the United States Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990. The Act requires the attorney general to establish guidelines and collect, as part of the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, data "about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation, arson, and destruction, damage or vandalism of property." Hate crime data collection was required by the Act to begin in calendar year 1990 and to continue for four successive years. In September 1994, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act amended the Hate Crime Statistics Act to add disabilities, both physical and mental, as factors that could be considered a basis for hate crimes. Although the Act originally mandated data collection for five years, the Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 amended the collection duration "for each calendar year," making hate crime statistics a permanent addition to the UCR program. As with the other UCR data, law enforcement agencies contribute reports either directly or through their state reporting programs. Information contained in the data includes number of victims and offenders involved in each hate crime incident, type of victims, bias motivation, offense type, and location type. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30764.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr disabilities icpsr discrimination icpsr ethnicity icpsr hate crimes icpsr homophobia icpsr law enforcement icpsr offenses icpsr prejudice icpsr racial tensions icpsr religion icpsr Uniform Crime Reports icpsr violence icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System TPDRC I. Terrorism FENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual Populations NACJD VIII. Official Statistics United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 30764 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30764.v1