nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06788 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06788 MiAaI MiAaI Availability and Use of Intermediate Sanctions by Judges and Corrections Professionals in the United States, 1994 [electronic resource] Helen G. Corrothers 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6788 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey is part of a larger project designed to explore ways to increase the availability and use of intermediate sanctions (IS) on a national level without jeopardizing public safety. A model for an Intermediate Punishment System is suggested. The survey was undertaken to ascertain attitudes and practices concerning IS for three groups: state and federal judges (Part 3), correctional system administrators responsible for community corrections in their state or jurisdiction (Part 1), and program directors who actually operated community programs (Part 2). The units of analysis were intermediate sanctions/programs operating in jurisdictions across the United States. Data were collected on the availability and frequency of use of IS, as well as costs, client/staffing ratios, use of rehabilitative programming, respondents' opinions concerning the field's needs, and program eligibility criteria. Information was also gathered on how decisions were made to place offenders into the various programs, program outcome and whether the program was viewed as being successful (and how this was measured), and types of new programs needed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06788.v2 community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr judges icpsr offenders icpsr program evaluation icpsr public safety icpsr sanctions icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Corrothers, Helen G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6788 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06788.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02025 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02025 MiAaI MiAaI Experimental Evaluation of Drug Testing and Treatment Interventions for Probationers in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1992-1994 [electronic resource] Elizabeth Piper Deschenes , Susan Turner , Peter W. Greenwood 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2025 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection represents a combined experimental evaluation of a drug court program, implemented in 1992 in cooperation with the Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, in comparison to standard probation with different levels of drug testing. The experiment's objective was to compare the drug use and criminal behavior of probationers assigned to four alternative regimes or tracks: (1) standard probation, but no drug testing, (2) standard probation with random monthly drug tests, (3) standard probation with testing scheduled twice a week, and (4) drug court, an integrated program of drug testing, treatment, and sanctions that utilized a carefully structured set of rewards and punishments. The experiment was limited to first-time felony offenders convicted of drug possession or use (not sales) and sentenced to a term of three years' probation. A total of 630 probationers from Maricopa County were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental regimes and tracked for a 12-month period. Data collection efforts included: (1) background information on each participant, (2) process information on the characteristics of supervision and services provided under each experimental condition, and (3) follow-up data on subsequent drug use, crime, and pro-social activities for 12 full months. Background Data (Part 1) include demographic variables such as race, sex, education, marital status, living arrangements, and employment history. In addition, there are variables on prior drug use and abuse, drug treatment, criminal histories as both a juvenile and an adult, and risk and need assessment scores. Other variables include the results of drug testing and any sanctions taken for a positive result (Part 2), new arrests while on probation and corresponding disposition and conviction (Part 3), and technical violations and any actions taken for these violations (Part 4). For probationers assigned to drug court (Part 5) there are variables measuring probationers' status, probation recommendations, and judges' decisions at 11 different progress assessments. The follow-up information (Parts 6-8) includes monthly data on the status of the probationer, the number of face-to-face office contacts, phone contacts, work/school contacts, and community contacts, collateral checks, employment/school verification, counseling sessions, alcohol tests, drug tests, substance abuse treatment, the number of hours the probationer spent job hunting, in educational training, in vocational training, and in community service, the number of days employed full- and part-time, and the amount of earnings, fines paid, restitution paid, and fees paid. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02025.v2 criminal histories icpsr drug testing icpsr drug treatment icpsr felony offenses icpsr intervention icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr treatment programs icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Deschenes, Elizabeth Piper Turner, Susan Greenwood, Peter W. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2025 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02025.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06358 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06358 MiAaI MiAaI Intensive Supervision for High-Risk Offenders in 14 Sites in the United States, 1987-1990 [electronic resource] Joan Petersilia , Susan Turner , RAND Corporation 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 6358 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. sed, and various items relating to risk of recidivism and need for treatment. For the two Texas sites, information on each arrest and/or technical violation, its disposition, and sentence or sanction was recorded in separate recidivism files (Parts 10 and 17). Dates were converted by RAND to time-lapse variables for the public release files that comprise this data collection. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06358.v2 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr communities icpsr community service programs icpsr diversion programs icpsr drug testing icpsr drug use icpsr offenders icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Petersilia, Joan Turner, Susan RAND Corporation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6358 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06358.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34564 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34564 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Domestic and Family Violence Court Evaluation in Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and San Francisco Counties, California, 1999-2005 [electronic resource] Brenda Uekert , Inger Sagatun-Edwards , Ann Crowe , Tracy Peters , Fred Cheesman , Dina Kameda 2013-05-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34564 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study tested the effectiveness of two court-based intervention programs in California (Santa Clara County, San Francisco County) that addressed juvenile domestic and family violence. The court-based intervention programs included an intake assessment process for domestic and family violence, specialized prosecution and defense, a dedicated docket, intensive supervision, offender programs, and victim services. Probation and court records of juvenile domestic/family violence offenders provided the source of data to compare the intervention programs with a third county that did not have a specialized response (Contra Costa County). The final study group included 303 closed cases (201 cases from Santa Clara County, 40 cases from San Francisco County, and 62 cases from Contra Costa County). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34564.v1 arrest records icpsr domestic violence icpsr family violence icpsr intervention icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivism rates icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Uekert, Brenda Sagatun-Edwards, Inger Crowe, Ann Peters, Tracy Cheesman, Fred Kameda, Dina Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34564 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34564.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09586 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09586 MiAaI MiAaI Variations in Criminal Patterns Among Narcotic Addicts in Baltimore and New York City, 1983-1984 [electronic resource] David N. Nurco , Thomas E. Hanlon , Timothy W. Kinlock , Evelyn Slaght 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9586 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection was undertaken to develop a typology of narcotic addicts according to the kind, frequency, and seriousness of their crimes and to identify the most serious criminal offenders, thereby determining which individuals were best suited to rehabilitation. The following questions are addressed by the data: (1) What "types" of narcotic addicts can be distinguished in terms of their criminal behavior? Which of these types are amenable to rehabilitation? (2) At what time during their addiction careers do addicts commit the most crime? Do narcotic addicts "mature" out of addiction? (3) What is the relationship between individuals' involvement in crime prior to addiction and their criminal activity and drug use over their addiction career? (4) Which demographic, personality, or other factors are associated with serious crime committed during periods of narcotic addiction? (5) What are the contributions of situational and dispositional factors to the relationship between addiction and crime? Part 1 of the collection details the subjects' addiction careers, the age they first used various drugs, the age they first became addicted to narcotics, the amount of time they were addicted/not addicted to narcotics, and the total length of their addiction careers. Part 2 contains variables generated by cluster analysis, including cluster assignment or "type." Part 3 includes the educational, occupational, and arrest histories of the subjects, as well as the drug use and arrest histories of their families. The Part 4 file consists of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and Raven Progressive Matrix scores. The frequency and types of crime that subjects committed during the preaddiction period comprise Part 5, while the frequency and nature of drug use during the preaddiction period comprise Part 6. Parts 7 and 8 contain crime variables and drug use variables, respectively, across all nonaddiction periods. Finally, Part 9 contains data characterizing crime across all addiction periods, and Part 10 contains variables regarding drug use across total addiction periods. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09586.v2 addiction icpsr controlled drugs icpsr crime patterns icpsr criminality prediction icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug dependence icpsr drug treatment icpsr personality icpsr rehabilitation icpsr NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Nurco, David N. Hanlon, Thomas E. Kinlock, Timothy W. Slaght, Evelyn Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9586 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09586.v2