nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07310 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07310 MiAaI MiAaI Anti-Semitism in the United States, 1964 [electronic resource] Charles Glock , Gertrude Selznick , Rodney Stark , Stephen Steinberg 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7310 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This nationwide study investigated respondents' opinions on current affairs at both the national and international levels. Issues such as morality in the United States, approval of the United Nations, and the positon of the United States in world affairs were explored, as well as attitudes toward the Constitution and individual rights. Respondents were asked about their feelings toward minority groups such as the John Birch Society, communists, and Blacks, with special emphasis on the Jewish minority. Respondents' beliefs about Jews as a group, their contacts with Jews, and their feelings about political and social rights of Jews in the United States were probed. Past treatment of the Jewish people was also explored, and the respondents were asked to compare Jews with other groups in the United States on the basis of ambition, wealth, intelligence, and power. A number of variables assessed the respondents' leisure activities, their religious beliefs and education, and their outlooks on life. Derived measures include indexes such as anti-Semitic beliefs, Index of Jewish contacts, Fascism Scale, Despair Scale, Tolerance of Cultural Diversity Index, Enlightenment Values Scale, Anomie Scale, Political Anxiety Scale, Self-Image Scale, Libertarian Index, and Monism Scale. Demographic data include sex, race, age, education, income, religion, home ownership, marital status, and number of children. The study was received from the International Data Library and Reference Service, Survey Research Center, University of California at Berkeley. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07310.v1 anti-Semitism icpsr John Birch Society icpsr Judaism icpsr minorities icpsr morality icpsr political attitudes icpsr political issues icpsr prejudice icpsr racial attitudes icpsr religious beliefs icpsr social attitudes icpsr Black White relations icpsr social contact icpsr social distance icpsr social issues icpsr tolerance icpsr worldview icpsr civil rights icpsr communism icpsr cultural perceptions icpsr cultural values icpsr electoral issues icpsr international affairs icpsr Jews icpsr ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United States RCMD II. Discrimination RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity TPDRC I. Terrorism Glock, Charles Selznick, Gertrude Stark, Rodney Steinberg, Stephen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7310 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07310.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09264 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09264 MiAaI MiAaI Charging and Sentencing of Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter Cases in Georgia, 1973-1979 [electronic resource] David C. Baldus , George Woodworth , Charles A. Pulaski 2001-12-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9264 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were collected to assess the levels of racial discrimination and arbitrariness occurring at different levels within Georgia's capital charging and sentencing system. Data cover approximately 1,000 murder and voluntary manslaughter cases. Information was obtained for all known penalty trial cases and for certain cases stratified by case type (voluntary manslaughter conviction, nonpenalty trial life sentence, and penalty trial) and by state judicial circuit. Numerous measures of defendant blameworthiness were developed as a basis for assessing levels of arbitrariness and discrimination in the capital charging and sentencing system. Variables include race, sex, and socioeconomic class, as well as crime codes, jury/bench decisions, final plea, term, and number of counts convicted. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09264.v1 manslaughter icpsr murder icpsr racial discrimination icpsr sentencing icpsr RCMD II. Discrimination NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies RCMD I. Crime Baldus, David C. Woodworth, George Pulaski, Charles A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9264 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09264.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03599 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03599 MiAaI MiAaI Consequences of a Criminal Record for Employment Opportunity in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2002 [electronic resource] Devah Pager 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3599 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined employers' policies and practices for hiring entry-level workers in the Milwaukee metropolitan area. The study consisted of telephone interviews conducted in the spring of 2002 with 177 employers who had advertised entry-level openings in the prior six months. The survey included questions about the company, such as size, industry, employee turnover, and racial composition, questions about hiring procedures, questions about the last worker hired for a position not requiring a college degree, and questions about the employer's attitude toward various kinds of marginalized workers. An emphasis in the survey was placed on assessing employers' attitudes about and experience with applicants with criminal histories. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03599.v1 African Americans icpsr criminal histories icpsr drug related crimes icpsr employment discrimination icpsr ex-offender employment icpsr hiring practices icpsr imprisonment icpsr racial discrimination icpsr White Americans icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency RCMD II. Discrimination ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pager, Devah Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3599 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03599.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR23820 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR23820 MiAaI MiAaI Detroit Area Study, 2004 [electronic resource] Reynolds Farley , Maria Krysan , Mick P. Couper 2009-04-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 23820 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The 2004 Detroit Area Study (DAS) is a face-to-face survey of adults in the Detroit, Michigan tri-county area. Topics in this survey addressed racial issues, residence and housing, neighborhood evaluations, racial attitudes, labor market issues, and racial segregation in the Detroit area. Respondents were asked for their opinions of local communities, their experiences searching for housing, feelings about possible relocation, and opinions on the redevelopment of neighborhoods in the city of Detroit. Other questions addressed the household's financial situation, home ownership, amount of household debts and assets, and history of receiving public assistance. Information was also collected on the types of schools children in the household attended, whether respondents and their parents were born in the United States, and languages spoken at home. Interviewer observations about the condition of the respondent's neighborhood were also included. Demographic variables include respondent's sex, age, marital/cohabitation status, United States citizenship status, political philosophy, household income, number of children in the household, and the race, ethnicity, education level, and employment status of respondents and their spouses or partners. More information about the Detroit Area Studies Project is available on this Web site. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23820.v1 attitudes icpsr housing needs icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr public assistance programs icpsr racial attitudes icpsr real estate icpsr residential segregation icpsr cities icpsr communities icpsr economic behavior icpsr families icpsr family life icpsr housing icpsr housing conditions icpsr housing costs icpsr RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity RCMD II. Discrimination RCMD IX.A. African American RCMD VII. Housing RCMD IX. Minority Populations ICPSR II.B. Community and Urban Studies, Detroit Area Studies Farley, Reynolds Krysan, Maria Couper, Mick P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 23820 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23820.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02535 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02535 MiAaI MiAaI Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality, 1992-1994 [electronic resource] [Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, and Los Angeles] Lawrence Bobo , James Johnson , Melvin Oliver , Reynolds Farley , Barry Bluestone , Irene Browne , Sheldon Danziger , Gary Green , Harry Holzer , Maria Krysan , Michael Massagli , Camille Zubrinsky Charles , Joleen Kirschenman , Philip Moss , Chris Tilly 2008-04-23 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 2535 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality was designed to broaden the understanding of how changing labor market dynamics, racial attitudes and stereotypes, and racial residential segregation act singly and in concert to foster contemporary urban inequality. This data collection comprises data for two surveys: a survey of households and a survey of employers. Multistage area probability sampling of adult residents took place in four metropolitan areas: Atlanta (April 1992-September 1992), Boston (May 1993-November 1994), Detroit (April-September 1992), and Los Angeles (September 1993-August 1994). The combined four-city data file in Part 1 contains data on survey questions that were asked in households in at least two of the four survey cities. Questions on labor market dynamics included industry, hours worked per week, length of time on job, earnings before taxes, size of employer, benefits provided, instances of harassment and discrimination, and searching for work within particular areas of the metropolis in which the respondent resided. Questions covering racial attitudes and attitudes about inequality centered on the attitudes and beliefs that whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians hold about one another, including amount of discrimination, perceptions about wealth and intelligence, ability to be self-supporting, ability to speak English, involvement with drugs and gangs, the fairness of job training and educational assistance policies, and the fairness of hiring and promotion preferences. Residential segregation issues were studied through measures of neighborhood quality and satisfaction, and preferences regarding the racial/ethnic mix of neighborhoods. Other topics included residence and housing, neighborhood characteristics, family income structure, networks and social functioning, and interviewer observations. Demographic information on household respondents was also elicited, including length of residence, education, housing status, monthly rent or mortgage payment, marital status, gender, age, race, household composition, citizenship status, language spoken in the home, ability to read and speak English, political affiliation, and religion. The data in Part 2 represent a telephone survey of current business establishments in Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, and Los Angeles carried out between spring 1992 and spring 1995 to learn about hiring and vacancies, particularly for jobs requiring just a high school education. An employer size-weighted, stratified, probability sample (approximately two-thirds of the cases) was drawn from regional employment directories, and a probability sample (the other third of the cases) was drawn from the current or most recent employer reported by respondents to the household survey in Part 1. Employers were queried about characteristics of their firms, including composition of the firm's labor force, vacant positions, the person most recently hired and his or her salary, hours worked per week, educational qualifications, promotions, the firm's recruiting and hiring methods, and demographic information for the respondent, job applicants, the firm's customers, and the firm's labor force, including age, education, race, and gender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02535.v3 demographic characteristics icpsr racial discrimination icpsr racial segregation icpsr residential segregation icpsr urban areas icpsr discrimination icpsr employers icpsr household income icpsr households icpsr labor markets icpsr neighborhoods icpsr race relations icpsr racial attitudes icpsr RCMD II. Discrimination ICPSR II. Community and Urban Studies ICPSR XVII.A. Social Institutions and Behavior, Minorities and Race Relations Bobo, Lawrence Johnson, James Oliver, Melvin Farley, Reynolds Bluestone, Barry Browne, Irene Danziger, Sheldon Green, Gary Holzer, Harry Krysan, Maria Massagli, Michael Charles, Camille Zubrinsky Kirschenman, Joleen Moss, Philip Tilly, Chris Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2535 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02535.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04078 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04078 MiAaI MiAaI North Carolina Highway Traffic Study, 2000-2001 [electronic resource] Matthew Zingraff , William Smith , Donald Tomaskovic-Devey 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4078 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study investigated whether the North Carolina State Highway Patrol (NCSHP) practiced racial profiling. The NCSHP provided data on all vehicular stops (Parts 1 and 2), written warnings (Part 3), and citations (Part 4) its officers issued in 2000. This included data on what the stops or tickets were for, the race, sex, and age of the driver, and the make, model, and year of the car being driven. Data on accidents in 2000 (Part 5), also obtained from the NCSHP, were used to examine whether there were racial disparities in unsafe driving practices. These data included information about what caused the accident and the race, sex, and age of the driver. The NCSHP also supplied data on all officers who worked for the NCSHP in 2000 (Part 6), including their race, age, and rank. The data in Part 6 can be linked to the data in Parts 3 and 4. In addition, two surveys of North Carolina drivers were conducted to gather information on reported typical driving behaviors that may influence the probability of being stopped, and to gather information about stops conducted by law enforcement agencies across the state. One was conducted using a sample of North Carolina drivers who had recently renewed their licenses (Part 7), and the other used a sample of North Carolina drivers who were ticketed for speeding between June 1, 1999, and June 1, 2000 (Part 8). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04078.v1 driving habits icpsr highways icpsr police icpsr racial discrimination icpsr traffic accidents icpsr traffic offenses icpsr RCMD II. Discrimination ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Zingraff, Matthew Smith, William Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4078 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04078.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR13692 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR13692 MiAaI MiAaI Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) [electronic resource] Discrimination, Wave 3, 2000-2002 Felton J. Earls , Jeanne Brooks-Gunn , Stephen W. Raudenbush , Robert J. Sampson 2007-02-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 13692 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Discrimination survey. It was administered to subjects' primary caregivers in Cohorts 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12. It was drawn from the Puerto Rican Adolescent Survey and addressed both actual instances of discrimination and fear of this occurring in specific settings. These questions also appear in the Personal Identity instrument used with older subjects and young adults (PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): IDENTITY-PERSONAL, WAVE 3, 2000-2002 [ICPSR 13717]). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13692.v1 caregivers icpsr discrimination icpsr ethnic discrimination icpsr neighborhoods icpsr racial discrimination icpsr social behavior icpsr DSDR VI. Population Characteristics DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies PHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort Study DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity RCMD II. Discrimination ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Earls, Felton J. Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne Raudenbush, Stephen W. Sampson, Robert J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 13692 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13692.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03009 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130524s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03009 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Prosecutorial Response to Bias-Motivated Crime in the United States, 1994-1995 [electronic resource] Jane Nady Sigmon , Donald Rebovich 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 3009 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-24. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This national survey of prosecutors was undertaken to systematically gather information about the handling of bias or hate crime prosecutions in the United States. The goal was to use this information to identify needs and to enhance the ability of prosecutors to respond effectively to hate crimes by promoting effective practices. The survey aimed to address the following research questions: (1) What was the present level of bias crime prosecution in the United States? (2) What training had been provided to prosecutors to assist them in prosecuting hate- and bias-motivated crimes and what additional training would be beneficial? (3) What types of bias offenses were prosecuted in 1994-1995? (4) How were bias crime cases assigned and to what extent were bias crime cases given priority? and (5) What factors or issues inhibited a prosecutor's ability to prosecute bias crimes? In 1995, a national mail survey was sent to a stratified sample of prosecutor offices in three phases to solicit information about prosecutors' experiences with hate crimes. Questions were asked about size of jurisdiction, number of full-time staff, number of prosecutors and investigators assigned to bias crimes, and number of bias cases prosecuted. Additional questions measured training for bias-motivated crimes, such as whether staff received specialized training, whether there existed a written policy on bias crimes, how well prosecutors knew the bias statute, and whether there was a handbook on bias crime. Information elicited on case processing included the frequency with which certain criminal acts were charged and sentenced as bias crimes, the existence of a special bias unit, case tracking systems, preparation of witnesses, jury selection, and case disposition. Other topics specifically covered bias related to racial or ethnic differences, religious differences, sexual orientation, and violence against women. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03009.v1 case processing icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr hate crimes icpsr judicial process icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr prosecution icpsr training icpsr RCMD II. Discrimination TPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA) NACJD V. Courts RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sigmon, Jane Nady Rebovich, Donald Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3009 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03009.v1