<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
	
		
		


 






	

	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR09401</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130523s1990    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR09401</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				
				Community Policing in Baltimore, 1986-1987
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					
					Antony M. Pate
				, 				
			
				
					
					Sampson O. Annan
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">2006-03-30</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">1990</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">9401</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			This data collection was designed to investigate the
effects of foot patrol and ombudsman policing on perceptions of the
incidence of crime and community policing practices in Baltimore,
Maryland. Data collected at Wave 1 measured perceptions of crime and
community policing practices before the two new policing programs were
introduced. Follow-up data for Wave 2 were collected approximately one
year later and were designed to measure the effects of the new
policing practices. Included in the data collection instrument were
questions on the perceived incidence of various crimes, police
effectiveness and presence, disorder, property and personal crime and
the likelihood of crime in general, feelings of safety, crime
avoidance behaviors and the use of crime prevention devices, cohesion
and satisfaction with neighborhoods, and awareness of victimization
and victimization history. The instrument also included demographic
questions on employment, education, race, and income. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09401.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">community policing</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">fear of crime</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">foot patrol</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police community relations</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">police effectiveness</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">NACJD IX. Police</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Pate, Antony M.</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Annan, Sampson O.</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">9401</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09401.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


    
		
		


 






	

	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR09962</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130523s1994    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR09962</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				Modern Policing and the Control of Illegal Drugs
				
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="b">Testing New Strategies in Oakland, California, and Birmingham, Alabama, 1987-1989</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					
					Craig D. Uchida
				, 				
			
				
					
					Brian Forst
				, 				
			
				
					
					Sampson O. Annan
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">2005-11-04</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">1994</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">9962</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			These data were collected in Oakland, California, and
 Birmingham, Alabama, to examine the effectiveness of alternative drug
 enforcement strategies. A further objective was to compare the
 relative effectiveness of strategies drawn from professional- versus
 community-oriented models of policing. The professional model
 emphasizes police responsibility for crime control, whereas the
 community model stresses the importance of a police-citizen
 partnership in crime control. At each site, experimental treatments
 were applied to selected police beats. The Oakland Police Department
 implemented a high-visibility enforcement effort consisting of
 undercover buy-bust operations, aggressive patrols, and motor vehicle
 stops, while the Birmingham Police Department engaged in somewhat less
 visible buy-busts and sting operations. Both departments attempted a
 community-oriented approach involving door-to-door contacts with
 residents. In Oakland, four beats were studied: one beat used a
 special drug enforcement unit, another used a door-to-door community
 policing strategy, a third used a combination of these approaches, and
 the fourth beat served as a control group. In Birmingham, three beats
 were chosen: Drug enforcement was conducted by the narcotics unit in
 one beat, door-to-door policing, as in Oakland, was used in another
 beat, and a police substation was established in the third beat. To
 evaluate the effectiveness of these alternative strategies, data were
 collected from three sources. First, a panel survey was administered
 in two waves on a pre-test/post-test basis. The panel survey data
 addressed the ways in which citizens' perceptions of drug activity,
 crime problems, neighborhood safety, and police service were affected
 by the various policing strategies. Second, structured observations of
 police and citizen encounters were made in Oakland during the periods
 the treatments were in effect. Observers trained by the researchers
 recorded information regarding the roles and behaviors of police and
 citizens as well as police compliance with the experiment's
 procedures. And third, to assess the impact of the alternative
 strategies on crime rates, reported crime data were collected for time
 periods before and during the experimental treatment periods, both in
the targeted beats and city-wide. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09962.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">crime control</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">drug law enforcement</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">drug law offenses</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">drug related crimes</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">drug traffic</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">neighborhoods</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">program evaluation</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">citizen attitudes</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">community involvement</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">community policing</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">NACJD IX. Police</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Uchida, Craig D.</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Forst, Brian</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Annan, Sampson O.</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">9962</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09962.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


    
		
		


 






	

	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR06485</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130523s1995    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR06485</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				
				National Survey of Community Policing Strategies, 1992-1993   
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					
					Sampson O. Annan
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">2006-01-12</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">1995</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">6485</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-23.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			The primary objective of this national study was to gather
 reliable information on the extent to which the concept of community
 policing had been adopted by law enforcement agencies across the
 country. As a program evaluation, the survey also sought to provide
 information on what was happening and what needed to happen within the
 law enforcement community with respect to the development and
 implementation of community policing. Following a pretest of the
 questionnaire, a survey package was mailed to the chief executive of
 each selected agency in May 1993. To minimize the number of unresolved
 cases and reduce the potential nonresponse bias, four follow-up
 contacts were made with agencies that had not responded by various
 stages of the data collection process. Part 1 examines the chief
 executive's views about community policing. Part 2 contains data on
 the agency's current situation, resources used, and types of police
 training needed in the implementation of community policing. Agencies
 that had implemented or planned to implement community policing
 identified various written policies or legislation that had been
 developed. Agencies that had been implementing community policing for
 more than one year assessed the effects of community policing. All
 respondents indicated programs and organizational arrangements that
 their agencies had in place or planned to develop, identified who in
 their agencies performed various community policing activities, and
 examined their agencies' current or planned community involvement with
 various activities and programs. Demographic data include the agency's
 sworn and civilian personnel size, number assigned to patrol and
 investigative divisions, size of jurisdiction served, and whether the
 agency provided 24-hour patrol service. The unit of analysis for the
 chief executive data is the individual chief executive of the
agency. The unit of analysis for the agency data is the agency. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06485.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">community policing</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">law enforcement agencies</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">program evaluation</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">NACJD IX. Police</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Annan, Sampson O.</subfield>
					<subfield code="u"></subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">6485</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06485.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


    
</collection>
