nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06741 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06741 MiAaI MiAaI Dutch Parliamentary Election Panel Study, 1989-1994 [electronic resource] H. Anker , E.V. Oppenhuis 1998-02-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6741 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Dutch Parliamentary Election Panel Study, 1989-1994, was conducted within the framework of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies. The survey was administered in three waves, one before and one after the election in 1989, and the third following the election in 1994. In the first wave, respondents provided information on their interest in politics, what they considered the most important national problem, how they intended to vote in the upcoming election, political party membership and affiliation, attitudes toward government policies and officials, opinions on political and social issues such as abortion, nuclear energy, income differences, and environmental pollution, and a variety of personal and demographic characteristics. Many first-wave items were repeated in the second and third waves. For these waves, respondents also reported the name of the party they had voted for in the election and their reasons for doing so. Other variables recorded voter perceptions of the stance of various political parties on issues such as euthanasia, nuclear weapons, and economic concerns, voter knowledge of national politicians, rating of political parties based on a 10-point left-right scale, attitudes toward politics and the effectiveness of government, union membership, and opinions on European unification. Respondents were also asked to describe how they would participate in the governing process if they thought that the Second Chamber of Parliament was about to consider a bill that the voter thought unjust and, in addition, to state which national goals should receive the highest priority. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06741.v2 abortion icpsr domestic policy icpsr Dutch Parliament icpsr economic conditions icpsr European unification icpsr foreign policy icpsr government performance icpsr income icpsr nuclear energy icpsr nuclear weapons icpsr parliamentary elections icpsr political affiliation icpsr political attitudes icpsr political change icpsr political issues icpsr political leaders icpsr political participation icpsr pollution icpsr public approval icpsr public opinion icpsr trust in government icpsr union membership icpsr voting behavior icpsr IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior ICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United States IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data Anker, H. Oppenhuis, E.V. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6741 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06741.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09950 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09950 MiAaI MiAaI Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1989 [electronic resource] H. Anker , E.V. Oppenhuis 1994-10-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 9950 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This survey, the eighth in a series of election studies from the Netherlands, focuses on the September 6, 1989, elections for the Second Chamber of Parliament. These elections were called early due to the fall of the Lubbers-II cabinet on May 2. The survey was administered in two waves, one conducted before the election and one following the vote. In the first wave, respondents provided information on their interest in politics, what they considered the most important national problem, how they intended to vote in the upcoming election, political party membership and affiliation, attitudes toward government policies and officials, opinions on political and social issues such as abortion, nuclear energy, income differences, and environmental pollution, and on a variety of personal and demographic characteristics. During the second wave, respondents reported the name of the party they had voted for in the election and their reasons for doing so. Other variables recorded voter perceptions of the stance of various political parties on issues such as euthanasia, nuclear weapons, economic concerns, voter knowledge of national politicians, rating of political parties based on a 10-point left-right scale, attitudes toward politics and the effectiveness of government, union membership, and future vote intentions. Respondents were also asked to describe how they would participate in the governing process if they thought that the Second Chamber of Parliament was about to consider a bill that the voter thought unjust, and, in addition, to state which national goals should receive the highest priority. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09950.v1 euthanasia icpsr foreign policy icpsr government performance icpsr income icpsr nuclear energy icpsr nuclear weapons icpsr parliamentary elections icpsr political affiliation icpsr political attitudes icpsr political change icpsr political issues icpsr political leaders icpsr political participation icpsr pollution icpsr public approval icpsr public opinion icpsr trust in government icpsr union membership icpsr voting behavior icpsr abortion icpsr domestic policy icpsr Dutch Parliament icpsr economic conditions icpsr IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior ICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United States Anker, H. Oppenhuis, E.V. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9950 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09950.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06740 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06740 MiAaI MiAaI Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1994 [electronic resource] H. Anker , E.V. Oppenhuis 1997-11-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6740 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This survey, the ninth in a series of election studies from the Netherlands, focuses on the May 3, 1994, elections for the Second Chamber of Parliament. This election occurred after the Lubbers-III Cabinet formed by the political parties CDA and Pvda had reached the end of its term. The survey was administered in two waves, one conducted before the election and one following the vote. In the first wave, respondents provided information on their interest in politics, what they considered the most important national problem, how they intended to vote in the upcoming election, political party membership and affiliation, attitudes toward government policies and officials, opinions on political and social issues such as crime, minorities, nuclear energy, and income differences, and a variety of personal and demographic characteristics. Many first-wave items were repeated in the second wave. During the second wave, respondents also reported the name of the party they had voted for in the election and their reasons for doing so. Other variables recorded voter perceptions of the stance of various political parties on issues such as crime, unemployment, pollution, and economic concerns, voter knowledge of national politicians, rating of political parties based on a 10-point left-right scale, attitudes toward politics and the effectiveness of government, union membership, and opinions on European unification. Respondents were also asked to describe how they would participate in the governing process if they thought that the Second Chamber of Parliament was about to consider a bill that the voter thought unjust, and, in addition, to state which national goals should receive the highest priority. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06740.v2 political affiliation icpsr political attitudes icpsr political change icpsr political issues icpsr political leaders icpsr political participation icpsr pollution icpsr public approval icpsr public opinion icpsr trust in government icpsr union membership icpsr voting behavior icpsr crime icpsr domestic policy icpsr Dutch Parliament icpsr economic conditions icpsr European unification icpsr foreign policy icpsr government performance icpsr income icpsr minorities icpsr nuclear energy icpsr parliamentary elections icpsr IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior ICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United States Anker, H. Oppenhuis, E.V. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6740 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06740.v2