nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34321 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34321 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2010 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34321 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2010 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2010, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2010. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34321 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34321.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28861 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28861 MiAaI MiAaI Reducing Courts' Failure to Appear Rate [electronic resource] A Procedural Justice Approach [Nebraska Statewide, Select Counties, 2009-2010] Brian H. Bornstein , Alan J. Tomkins , Elizabeth M. Neeley 2011-06-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 28861 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of using different kinds of written reminders to reduce misdemeanants' failure to appear (FTA) rates. The study examined the problem of FTA via a two-stage experiment. In Phase 1, 7,865 misdemeanor defendants from 14 Nebraska counties were randomly assigned to one of four reminder conditions: (1) a no-reminder (control) condition; (2) a reminder-only condition; (3) a condition in which the reminder also made them aware of possible sanctions should they fail to appear (reminder-sanctions); or (4) a condition in which the reminder mentioned sanctions but also highlighted aspects of procedural justice (PJ), such as voice, neutrality, respect, and public interest (reminder-combined). Data collection began in March 2009 and continued through May 2010. Files were received daily from the Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts containing information about cases filed in each of the 14 counties included in the study. Upon receipt of this file, researchers screened participants using certain eligibility criteria. Researchers mailed postcard reminders two to five business days prior to the scheduled court appearance. Approximately one week after each scheduled court appearance researchers accessed the courts' administrative database (JUSTICE) to determine whether the defendant actually appeared for the scheduled hearing. Upon accessing this information, researchers recorded this variable, which is the primary dependent variable in the study. At the same time researchers recorded the appearance variable, they selected participants for Phase 2 of the study -- a mail survey administered after their scheduled appearance (or non-appearance) to assess their perceptions of procedural fairness and their level of trust/confidence in the courts. To do so, researchers selected all participants who failed to appear for their court date to receive a survey. Twenty percent of defendants who did appear were also randomly selected to receive a survey. Surveys were sent to a total of 2,360 individuals and were received from a total of 452 defendants. The study contains a total of 197 variables including demographics, court appearance characteristics, experiment characteristics, charge/offense variables, and variables from surveys about experiences with the court system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28861.v1 case processing icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr criminal courts icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr failure to appear icpsr justice icpsr legal proceedings icpsr offense classification icpsr procedural justice icpsr trust in government icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Bornstein, Brian H. Tomkins, Alan J. Neeley, Elizabeth M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28861 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28861.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34320 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34320 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2009 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34320 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2009 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2009, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2009. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34320 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34320.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR34319 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR34319 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2008 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 34319 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2008 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2008, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2008. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 34319 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34319.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25881 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25881 MiAaI MiAaI Systems Change Analysis of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs in One Midwestern County of the United States, 1994-2007 [electronic resource] Rebecca Campbell , Deborah Bybee , J. Kevin Ford , Debra Patterson 2011-07-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 25881 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. (4) victims' experiences with law enforcement, prosecutors, and judicial proceedings, and if/how the forensic nurses and advocates influenced those interactions. Part 6 (Study 6: Forensic Nurse Interview Qualitative Data) examined forensic nurses' perspectives on how the SANE program could affect survivor participation with prosecution indirectly and how the interactions between SANEs and law enforcement could be contributing to increased investigational effort. Between July and August of 2008, six Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) were interviewed. The interviews explored three topics: (1) the nurses' philosophy on victim reporting and participating in prosecution, (2) their perceptions regarding how patient care may or may not affect victim participation in the criminal justice system, and (3) their perception of how the SANE programs influence the work of law enforcement investigational practices.The interviews explored three topics: (1) the nurses' philosophy on victim reporting and participating in prosecution, (2) their perceptions regarding how patient care may or may not affect victim participation in the criminal justice system, and (3) their perception of how the SANE programs influence the work of law enforcement investigational practices. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25881.v1 case processing icpsr court cases icpsr criminal justice system icpsr forensic medicine icpsr judicial decisions icpsr medical evaluation icpsr police icpsr police reports icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sex offenses icpsr sexual assault icpsr victim advocates icpsr victim services icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women Campbell, Rebecca Bybee, Deborah Ford, J. Kevin Patterson, Debra Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25881 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25881.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31324 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31324 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2007 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31324 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2007 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2007, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2007. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31324.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31324 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31324.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR27062 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR27062 MiAaI MiAaI Crime During the Transition to Adulthood [electronic resource] How Youth Fare As They Leave Out-of-Home Care in Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin, 2002-2007 Mark E. Courtney , Gretchen Ruth Cusick 2010-12-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 27062 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to examine criminal behavior and criminal justice system involvement among youth making the transition from out-of-home care to independent adulthood. The study collected data from two sources: (1) survey data from the Midwest Study of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth (Midwest Study), and (2) official arrest data. The Midwest Study was a longitudinal panel study that was part of a collaborative effort of the state public child welfare agencies in Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, and the University of Washington. The participating states funded and/or operated the full range of services supported by the Chafee Foster Care Independence Program. The Midwest Study survey data were collected directly from the youth in the sample every two years over three waves, between May 2002 and January 2007. A total of 732 respondents participated in at least one of the in-person interviews over the three waves. This data collection includes some variables that were directly measured from the original Midwest Study survey instrument and other variables that were computed or derived from variables in the original data for purposes of the current study. To supplement the survey data, the research team accessed official arrest data from each state for this study. Researchers obtained data on all criminal arrests that occurred between the respondents' Wave 1 interview and August 31, 2007, a date by which all of the study participants were at least 21 years old. The study contains a total of 85 variables including indicator variables, demographic and background variables, delinquency and crime variables, out-of-home care experiences variables, and social bonds variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27062.v1 arrest records icpsr child welfare icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr criminality prediction icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr independent living icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr risk factors icpsr social support icpsr youthful offenders icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Courtney, Mark E. Cusick, Gretchen Ruth Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 27062 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27062.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31323 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31323 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31323 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2006 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2006, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2006. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31323.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31323 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31323.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31331 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31331 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2006 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31331 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2006 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2006, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31331.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31331 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31331.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20346 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2007 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20346 MiAaI MiAaI Court Responses to Batterer Program Noncompliance in the United States, 2005-2006 [electronic resource] Melissa Labriola , Michael Rempel , Chris S. O'Sullivan , Phyllis B. Frank , Jim McDowell , Rachel Finkelstein 2007-11-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2007 ICPSR 20346 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to explore to what extent criminal courts nationwide are advancing the goal of accountability by imposing consequences on offenders who are noncompliant with a batterer program mandate. The study also sought to understand the goals that courts, batterer programs, and victim assistance agencies currently ascribe to batterer programs. In March 2005, a preliminary survey was sent to 2,445 batterer programs nationwide found through multiple sources. Preliminary survey results were analyzed, and a final sample of 260 communities or triads (courts, batterer programs, and victim assistance agencies) was selected. Respondents were asked to complete a Web-based survey in May 2006. Alternatively, respondents could request a hard-copy version of the survey. The variables in this study encompass community demographic information, the functions that court mandates to batterer programs serve, and the primary focus of the curriculum of batterer programs. Variables specific to batterer programs capture whether the program accepts court-mandated referrals only or volunteers as well, the length and duration of the program, possible reasons for noncompliance, and an approximate program completion rate. Variables related to the interaction between courts and batterer programs capture whether the court receives progress reports from the batterer program, and if so, when, and who receives them. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20346.v1 criminal justice system icpsr family violence icpsr recidivism icpsr recidivists icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Labriola, Melissa Rempel, Michael O'Sullivan, Chris S. Frank, Phyllis B. McDowell, Jim Finkelstein, Rachel Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20346 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20346.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR26462 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2010 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR26462 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems Series, Waves 1-10, 1970-2006 [electronic resource] United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2010-07-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010 ICPSR 26462 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The major goal of the United Nations Surveys on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems was to collect data on the incidence of reported crime and the operations of criminal justice systems with a view to improving the analysis and dissemination of that information globally. Surveys were distributed to officials in every member country of the United Nations. Designated officials completed the surveys to the best of their abilities given the country's available data. The survey questionnaire consisted of a series of questions which asked for data, primarily statistical, on the main components of the country's criminal justice system, for the given time period of the wave of data collection. To date, there have been ten waves of data collection. Crime variables include counts of recorded crime for homicide, assault, rape, robbery, theft, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, drug trafficking, drug possession, bribery, and corruption. There are also counts of suspects, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, and prison admissions by crime, gender, and adult or juvenile status. Other variables include the population of the country and largest city, budgets and salaries for police, courts, and prisons, and types of sanctions, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, deprivation of liberty, control of freedom, warning, fine, and community sentence. The countries participating in the survey and the variables available vary across the ten waves. There are two versions of the Wave 2 data (Part 2: Wave 2a , 1975-1980; Part 3: Wave 2b, 1975-1980) because, for various reasons, the variables from Wave 1 and some variables from Wave 2 were combined into one dataset. Similarly, some variables from Wave 2 were combined into one dataset with the variables from Wave 3. For this study, the combined Wave 1 and Wave 2 dataset was separated into Parts 1 and 2 (Wave 1, 1970-1975, and Wave 2a, 1976-1980, respectively) and the combined Wave 2 and Wave 3 dataset was separated into Parts 3 and 4 (Wave 2b, 1975-1980, and Wave 3, 1980-1986, respectively). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26462.v1 acquittals icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr assault icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr burglary icpsr sentencing icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 26462 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26462.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28366 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2005 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2005, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2005. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28366.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31330 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31330 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2005 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31330 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2005 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2005, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31330.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31330 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31330.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20357 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2009 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20357 MiAaI MiAaI Reducing Violent Crime and Firearms Violence in Indianapolis, Indiana, 2003-2005 [electronic resource] Steven Chermak 2009-01-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2009 ICPSR 20357 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The lever-pulling model was first developed as part of a broad-based, problem-solving effort implemented in Boston in the mid-1990s. The lever-pulling strategy was a foundational element of many collaborative partnerships across the country and it was a central element of the strategic plans of many Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) jurisdictions. This effort attempted to deter the future violent behavior of chronic offenders by first communicating directly to them about the impact that violence had on the community and the implementation of new efforts to respond to it, and then giving credibility to this communication effort by using all available legal sanctions (i.e., levers) against these offenders when violence occurred. The purpose of the study was to perform an experimental evaluation of a lever-pulling strategy implemented in Indianapolis, Indiana. Probationers were randomly assigned to the law enforcement focused lever-pulling group, the community leader lever-pulling group, or a regular probation control group during six months between June 2003 and March 2004. There were a total of 540 probationers in the study--180 probationers in each group. Probationers in the law enforcement focused lever-pulling group had face-to-face meetings with federal and local law enforcement officials and primarily received a deterrence-based message, but community officials also discussed various types of job and treatment opportunities. In contrast, probationers in the community leader lever-pulling group attended meetings with community leaders and service providers who exclusively focused on the impact of violence on the community and available services. Three types of data were collected to assess perceptions about the meeting: offending behavior, program participation behavior, and the levers pulled. First, data were collected using a self-report survey instrument (Part 1). Second, the complete criminal history for probationers (Part 2) was collected one-year after their meeting date. Third, all available probation data (Part 3) were collected 365 days after the meeting date. Part 1, Self-Report Survey Data, includes a total of 316 variables related to the following three types of data: Section I: meeting evaluation and perception of risk, Section II: Self-reported offense and gun use behavior, and Section III: Demographics. Part 2, Criminal History Data, includes a total of 94 variables collected about the probationer's complete offending history as well as their criminal activities after the treatment for one year. Part 3, Probation Data, includes a total of 249 variables related to probation history and other outcome data. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20357.v1 arrest records icpsr gangs icpsr gun use icpsr law enforcement icpsr nonviolent crime icpsr probationers icpsr punishment icpsr recidivists icpsr victimization icpsr violence icpsr violent crime icpsr community leaders icpsr weapons icpsr weapons offenses icpsr conviction records icpsr crime control programs icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug traffic icpsr federal offenses icpsr firearms icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Chermak, Steven Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20357 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20357.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR25961 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR25961 MiAaI MiAaI Statewide Study of Stalking and Its Criminal Justice Response in Rhode Island, 2001-2005 [electronic resource] Andrew Klein , Amy Salomon , Nick Huntington , Janice Dubois , Denise Lang 2012-09-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 25961 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The research team collected data from statewide datasets on 268 stalking cases including a population of 108 police identified stalking cases across Rhode Island between 2001 and 2005 with a sample of 160 researcher identified stalking incidents (incidents that met statutory criteria for stalking but were cited by police for other domestic violence offenses) during the same period. The secondary data used for this study came from the Rhode Island Supreme Court Domestic Violence Training and Monitoring Unit's (DVU) statewide database of domestic violence incidents reported to Rhode Island law enforcement. Prior criminal history data were obtained from records of all court cases entered into the automated Rhode Island court file, CourtConnect. The data contain a total of 121 variables including suspect characteristics, victim characteristics, incident characteristics, police response characteristics, and prosecutor response characteristics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25961.v1 abuse icpsr arrest records icpsr criminal justice system icpsr domestic violence icpsr offenders icpsr police response icpsr prosecution icpsr recidivism rates icpsr stalkers icpsr stalking icpsr victims icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD X. Victimization NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Klein, Andrew Salomon, Amy Huntington, Nick Dubois, Janice Lang, Denise Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 25961 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25961.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR32541 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR32541 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Defense Counsel on Homicide Case Outcomes in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1995-2004 [United States] [electronic resource] James Anderson , Paul Heaton 2012-09-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 32541 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study measured the difference that defense counsel made to the outcome of homicide and death penalty cases. One in five indigent murder defendants in Philadelphia were randomly assigned representation by the Defender Association of Philadelphia while the remainder received court-appointed private attorneys. This study's research design utilized this random assignment to measure how defense counsel affected murder case outcomes. The research team collected data on 3,157 defendants charged with murder in Philadelphia Municipal Court between 1995-2004, using records provided by the Philadelphia Courts (First Judicial District of Pennsylvania). Data were also obtained from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System web portal, the National Corrections Reporting Program, and the 2000 Census. This study contains a total of 47 variables including public defender representation, defendant demographics, ZIP code characteristics, prior criminal history, case characteristics, case outcomes, and case handling procedures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32541.v1 attorneys icpsr capital punishment icpsr convictions (law) icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr courts icpsr criminal courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr criminal law icpsr defendants icpsr defense counsel icpsr homicide icpsr legal representation icpsr legal systems icpsr murder icpsr offenders icpsr outcome evaluation icpsr plea negotiations icpsr poverty icpsr public defenders icpsr punishment icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Anderson, James Heaton, Paul Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 32541 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32541.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28365 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28365 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-03-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28365 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2004 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2004, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2004. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28365.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28365 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28365.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31329 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31329 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2004 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31329 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2004 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2004, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31329.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31329 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31329.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28364 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28364 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28364 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2003 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2003, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2003. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28364.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28364 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28364.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31328 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31328 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2003 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31328 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2003 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2003, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31328.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31328 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31328.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04366 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04366 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 2003 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-12-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4366 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of, and payroll for, full-time, part-time, and full-time-equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04366.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4366 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04366.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28363 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28363 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28363 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2002 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2002, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2002. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28363.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28363 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28363.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31327 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31327 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2002 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31327 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2002 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2002, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31327.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31327 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31327.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04365 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2005 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04365 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 2002 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-12-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2005 ICPSR 4365 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of, and payroll for, full-time, part-time, and full-time-equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04365.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4365 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04365.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08451 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08451 MiAaI MiAaI Executions in the United States, 1608-2002 [electronic resource] The ESPY File M. Watt Espy , John Ortiz Smykla 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8451 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection furnishes data on executions performed under civil authority in the United States between 1608 and 2002. The dataset describes each individual executed and the circumstances surrounding the crime for which the person was convicted. Variables include age, race, name, sex, and occupation of the offender, place, jurisdiction, date, and method of execution, and the crime for which the offender was executed. Also recorded are data on whether the only evidence for the execution was official records indicating that an individual (executioner or slave owner) was compensated for an execution. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08451.v4 capital punishment icpsr crime icpsr executions icpsr historical data icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Espy, M. Watt Smykla, John Ortiz Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8451 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08451.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28362 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28362 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28362 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2001 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2001, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2001. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28362.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28362 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28362.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31326 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31326 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2001 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31326 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2001 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2001, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31326.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31326 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31326.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03928 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03928 MiAaI MiAaI Breaking the Cycle of Drugs and Crime in Birmingham, Alabama, Jacksonville, Florida, and Tacoma, Washington, 1997-2001 [electronic resource] Adele V. Harrell , Douglas Marlowe , Jeffrey Merrill 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3928 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was an evaluation of the Breaking the Cycle (BTC) demonstration projects conducted in Birmingham, Alabama, Jacksonville, Florida, and Tacoma, Washington, between 1997 and 2001. The BTC demonstrations tested the feasibility and impact of systemwide interventions to reduce drug use among offenders by identifying and intervening with drug-involved felony defendants. This study contains data collected as part of the impact evaluation of BTC, which was designed to test the hypotheses that BTC reduced criminal involvement, substance abuse, and problems related to the health, mental health, employment, and families of felony drug defendants in the demonstration sites. The evaluation examined the relationship between changes in these areas and characteristics of the participants, the kinds and levels of services and supervision they received, and perceptions of defendants about the justice system's handling of their cases. It also assessed how BTC affected case handling and the length of time required to reach a disposition, the number of hearings, and the kinds of sentences imposed. The impact evaluation was based on a quasi-experimental comparison of defendants in BTC with samples of similar defendants arrested in the year before BTC implementation. Interviews were conducted with sample members and additional data were gathered from administrative records sources, such as the BTC programs, arrest records, and court records. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03928.v1 courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr evaluation icpsr felony offenses icpsr intervention icpsr offenders icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Harrell, Adele V. Marlowe, Douglas Merrill, Jeffrey Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3928 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03928.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03962 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03962 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 2001 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2004-04-28 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3962 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of, and payroll for, full-time, part-time, and full-time-equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03962.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3962 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03962.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04540 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2006 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04540 MiAaI MiAaI Investigation and Prosecution of Homicide Cases in the United States, 1995-2000 [electronic resource] The Process for Federal Involvement Phyllis J. Newton , Candace M. Johnson , Timothy M. Mulcahy 2008-10-29 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2006 ICPSR 4540 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study addressed questions related to potential geographic and racial disparity in the investigation and prosecution of federal capital cases and examined the process by which criminal cases, specially homicide cases, enter the federal criminal justice system. The primary method of data collection used was face-to-face interviews of key criminal justice officials within each district included in the study. Between 2000 and 2004, the researchers visited nine federal districts and interviewed all actors in the state and federal criminal justice systems who potentially would play a role in determining whether a homicide case was investigated and prosecuted in the state or federal systems. The study focused on homicide cases because federal homicides represented the offense of conviction in all capital case convictions in the federal system under the 2000 and 2001 DOJ reports (see U.S. Department of Justice, "The Federal Death Penalty System: A Statistical Survey (1988-2000)," Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, September 12, 2000, and U.S. Department of Justice, "The Federal Death Penalty System: Supplementary Data, Analysis and Revised Protocols for Capital Case Review," Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, June 6, 2001). In addition, federally related homicides are frequently involved with drug, gang, and/or organized crime investigations. Using 11 standardized interview protocols, developed in consultation with members of the project's advisory group, research staff interviewed local investigative agencies (police chief or his/her representative, section heads for homicide, drug, gang, or organized crime units as applicable to the agency structure), federal investigative agencies (Special Agent-in-Charge or designee, section heads of relevant units), local prosecutors (District Attorney, Assistant District Attorney, including the line attorneys and section heads), and defense attorneys who practiced in federal court. Due to the extensive number of issues to be covered with the U.S. Attorneys' Offices, interviews were conducted with: (1) the U.S. Attorney or designated representative, (2) section heads, and (3) Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) within the respective sections. Because the U.S. Attorneys were appointed following the change in the U.S. Presidency in 2000, a slightly altered U.S. Attorney questionnaire was designed for interviews with the former U.S. Attorney who was in office during the study period of 1995 through 2000. In some instances, because the project focus was on issues and processes from 1995 through 2000, a second individual with longer tenure was chosen to be interviewed simultaneously when the head or section head was newer to the position. In some instances when a key respondent was unavailable during the site visit and no acceptable alternative could be identified, arrangements were made to complete the interview by telephone after the visit. The interviews included questions related to the nature of the local crime problem, agency crime priorities, perceived benefits of the federal over the local process, local and federal resources, nature and target of joint task forces, relationships between and among agencies, policy and agreements, definitions and understanding of federal jurisdiction, federal investigative strategies, case flow, and attitudes toward the death penalty. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04540.v1 capital punishment icpsr state courts icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr district courts icpsr ethnicity icpsr federal courts icpsr jurisdiction icpsr prosecution icpsr race icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Newton, Phyllis J. Johnson, Candace M. Mulcahy, Timothy M. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 4540 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04540.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR28361 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR28361 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-26 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 28361 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2000 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2000, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2000. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28361.v1 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 28361 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28361.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR31325 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2013 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR31325 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 2000 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-05-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2013 ICPSR 31325 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 2000 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2000, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31325.v1 parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr causes of death icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 31325 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31325.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03263 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03263 MiAaI MiAaI Homicide, Bereavement, and the Criminal Justice System in Texas, 2000 [electronic resource] Sarah Dugan Goodrum 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3263 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study assessed the influence of the criminal justice system on the bereavement process of individuals who have lost loved ones to homicide. The primary question motivating this research was: Can the criminal justice system help to heal the harm of the bereaved's loss? The three main goals of this study were to examine: (1) bereaveds' perceptions of and experiences with the criminal justice system and its professionals, (2) the ways criminal justice professionals perceive and manage the bereaved, and (3) the nature of the association between the criminal justice system and bereaveds' psychological well-being. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews conducted in June through December 2000 with two different groups of people. The first group represented individuals who had lost loved ones to murder between 1994 and 1998 in one county in Texas (Parts 1-33). The second group (Parts 34-55) was comprised county criminal justice professionals (murder detectives, prosecutors, criminal court judges, victim's service counselors, and victim's rights advocates). For Parts 1-33, interviewees were asked a series of open-ended questions about the criminal justice system, including how they learned about the death and the current disposition of the murder case. They also were asked what they would change about the criminal justice system's treatment of them. The bereaved were further asked about their sex, age, race, education, marital status, employment status, income, and number of children. Additional questions were asked regarding the deceased's age at the time of the murder, race, relationship to interviewee, and the deceased's relationship to the murderer, if known. For Parts 34-55, respondents were asked about their job titles, years in those positions, number of murder cases handled in the past year, number of murder cases handled over the course of their career, and whether they thought the criminal justice system could help to heal the harm of people who had lost loved ones to murder. All interviews (Parts 1-55) were tape-recorded and later transcribed by the interviewer, who replaced actual names of individuals, neighborhoods, cities, counties, or any other identifiable names with pseudonyms. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03263.v1 criminal justice system icpsr death counseling icpsr grief icpsr homicide icpsr judges icpsr loss adjustment icpsr murder icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr victim services icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Goodrum, Sarah Dugan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3263 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03263.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03795 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03795 MiAaI MiAaI National Evaluation of the Arrest Policies Program Under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), 1996-2000 [electronic resource] Cassandra Archer , Cheron DuPree 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3795 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the Arrest Policies Program, funded by the Violence Against Women Office (VAWO), on criminal justice system changes and offender accountability, and victim safety and well-being. Through convenience sampling, six project sites were chosen to participate in the study. Part 1, Case Tracking Data, contains quantitative data collected from criminal justice agencies on arrests, prosecution filings, criminal case disposition, convictions, and sentences imposed for intimate partner violence cases involving a male offender and female offender. Data for Part 2, Victim Interview Data, were collected from in-depth personal interviews with domestic violence victims/survivors (1) to learn more about victim experiences with and perceptions of the criminal justice response, and (2) to obtain victim perceptions about how the arrest and/or prosecution of their batterers affected their safety and well-being. The survey instrument covered a wide range of topics including severity and history of domestic violence, social support networks, perceptions of police response, satisfaction with the criminal justice process and the sentence, experiences in court, and satisfaction with prosecutors, victim services provider advocates, and probation officers. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03795.v1 prosecution icpsr process evaluation icpsr social support icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr victim safety icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr domestic violence icpsr offenders icpsr police response icpsr probation officers icpsr NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Archer, Cassandra DuPree, Cheron Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3795 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03795.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03501 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03501 MiAaI MiAaI Intimate Partner Homicide in California, 1987-2000 [electronic resource] William Wells , William DeLeon-Granados 2003-06-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3501 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Since 1976, the United States has witnessed a steady and precipitous decline in intimate partner homicides. This study builds on the work of Dugan et al. (1999, 2000) and Browne and Williams (1989) by examining, in greater detail, the relationship between intimate partner homicide and gender, race, criminal justice system response, and domestic violence services. Specifically, the study examines the net effect of criminal justice system response and federally-funded domestic violence shelters on victimization of white, African American, and Hispanic males and females. This study used aggregated data from the 58 counties in California from 1987 to 2000. Homicide data were gathered by the State of California Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Statistics Center. Data on domestic violence resources were obtained from the Governor's Office of Criminal Justice Planning, Domestic Violence Branch, in the form of detailed reports from domestic violence shelters in the state. Based on these records, the researchers computed the number of federally-funded shelter-based organizations in a given county over time. Data on criminal justice responses at the county level were gathered from the State of California Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Statistics Center. These data included domestic violence arrests and any convictions and incarceration that followed those arrests. The researchers disaggregated these criminal justice system measures by race and gender. In order to account for population differences and changes over time, rates were computed per 100,000 adults (age 18 and older). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03501.v1 African Americans icpsr victimization icpsr White Americans icpsr womens shelters icpsr arrest rates icpsr battered women icpsr criminal justice system icpsr domestic violence icpsr ethnicity icpsr gender icpsr Hispanic or Latino Americans icpsr homicide icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Wells, William DeLeon-Granados, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3501 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03501.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03961 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03961 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 2000 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2004-05-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3961 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time-equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03961.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3961 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03961.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29673 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29673 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29673 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1999 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1999, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1999. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29673.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29673 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29673.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29667 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29667 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1999 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29667 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1999 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1999, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29667.v1 causes of death icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29667 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29667.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03336 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03336 MiAaI MiAaI National Evaluation of the Violent Offender Incarceration/Truth-in-Sentencing Incentive Grant Program, 1996-1999 [electronic resource] Susan Turner , Terry Fain , Peter W. Greenwood , Elsa Y. Chen , James R. Chiesa 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3336 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. sing, the formal positions of the Judicial Council and Judges Association on the policies, whether the respondent or other judges had input into the policies, how likely "get tough" policies were to achieve certain goals, what results the respondent expected from the policies, the impact of the policies on the criminal justice process, years experience on the bench, the percentage of their caseload that involved criminal cases, whether they handled civil, family law/domestic relations, or juvenile cases, and the population of their jurisdiction. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03336.v1 correctional reform icpsr criminal justice system icpsr imprisonment icpsr legislative impact icpsr offenders sentencing icpsr program evaluation icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr sentencing reforms icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and Behavior Turner, Susan Fain, Terry Greenwood, Peter W. Chen, Elsa Y. Chiesa, James R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3336 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03336.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03409 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03409 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1999 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2002-06-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3409 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time-equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03409.v1 government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3409 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03409.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29672 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29672 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29672 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1998 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1998, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1998. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29672.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29672 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29672.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29666 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29666 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1998 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29666 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1998 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1998, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29666.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr causes of death icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29666 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29666.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02891 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02891 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of North Carolina's 1994 Structured Sentencing Law, 1992-1998 [electronic resource] James J. Collins , Donna L., et al. Spencer 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2891 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Effective October 1, 1994, the state of North Carolina implemented a new structured sentencing law that applied to all felony and misdemeanor crimes (except for driving while impaired) committed on or after October 1, 1994. Under the new structured sentencing law parole was eliminated, and a sentencing commission developed recommended ranges of punishment for offense and offender categories, set priorities for the use of correctional resources, and developed a model to estimate correctional populations. This study sought to investigate sentencing reforms by looking at the effects of structured sentencing on multiple aspects of the adjudication process in North Carolina. A further objective was to determine whether there were differences in the commission of institutional infractions between inmates sentenced to North Carolina prisons under the pre-structured versus structured sentencing laws. Researchers hoped that the results of this study may help North Carolina and jurisdictions around the country (1) anticipate the likely effects of structured sentencing laws, (2) design new laws that might better achieve the jurisdictions' goals, and (3) improve the potential of sentencing legislation in order to enhance public safety in an effective and equitable way. Administrative records data were collected from two sources. First, in order to examine the effects of structured sentencing on the adjudication process in North Carolina, criminal case data were obtained from the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts (Parts 1 and 2). The pre-structured sentencing and structured sentencing samples were selected at the case level, and each record in Parts 1 and 2 represents a charged offense processed in either the North Carolina Superior or District Court. Second, inmate records data were collected from administrative records provided by the North Carolina Department of Correction (Part 3). These data were used to compare the involvement in infractions of inmates sentenced under both pre-structured and structured sentencing. The data for Part 3 focused on inmates entering the prison system between June 1, 1995, and January 31, 1998. Variables for Parts 1 and 2 include type of charge, charged offense date, method of disposition (e.g., dismissal, withdrawal, jury trial), defendant's plea, verdict for the offense, and whether the offense was processed through the North Carolina Superior or District Court. Structured sentencing offense class and modified Uniform Crime Reporting code for both charged and convicted offenses are presented for Parts 1 and 2. There are also county, prosecutorial district, and defendant episode identifiers in both parts. Variables related to defendant episodes include types of offenses within episode, total number of charges and convictions, whether all charges were dismissed, whether any felony charge resulted in a jury trial, and the adjudication time for all charges. Demographic variables for Parts 1 and 2 include the defendant's age, race, and gender. Part 3 variables include the date of prison admission, sentence type, number of prior incarcerations, number of years served during prior incarcerations, maximum sentence length for current incarceration, jail credit in years, count of all infractions during current and prior incarcerations, reason for incarceration, infraction rate, the risk for alcohol and drug dependency based on alcohol and chemical dependency screening scores, and the number of assault, drug/alcohol, profanity/disobedience, work absence, and money/property infractions during an inmate's current incarceration. Demographic variables for Part 3 include race, gender, and age at the time of each inmate's prison admission. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02891.v1 punishment icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing reforms icpsr criminal justice system icpsr felony offenses icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr policies and procedures icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Collins, James J. Spencer, Donna L., et al. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2891 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02891.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03408 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03408 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1998 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2002-06-07 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3408 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time-equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03408.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3408 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03408.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29671 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29671 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29671 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1997 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1997, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1997. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29671.v2 probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29671 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29671.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29665 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29665 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1997 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29665 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1997 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1997, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29665.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29665 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29665.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03229 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03229 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1997 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-08-06 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3229 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03229.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3229 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03229.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02894 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02894 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1997 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2894 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1997 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02894.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2894 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02894.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29670 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1996 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1996, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1996. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29670.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29670.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29664 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29664 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1996 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29664 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1996 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1996, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29664.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29664 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29664.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02542 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02542 MiAaI MiAaI Florida's Criminal Justice Workforce Research Information System, 1985-1996 [electronic resource] Florida Department of Corrections. Bureau of Planning, Research, and Statistics 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2542 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This project sought to prove that research files could be created through the extraction of personnel management systems data. There were five goals associated with designing and creating the Florida Criminal Justice Workforce Research Information System: (1) to extract data from two transaction management information systems, which could then be used by researchers to describe and analyze the workforce that administers justice in Florida, (2) to pilot test the concept of developing a new research information source from existing data systems, (3) to forge partnerships with diverse criminal justice agencies having a mutual need to understand their respective workforces, (4) to design research files to enable internal and external researchers to utilize the data for analytical purposes, and (5) to describe the methodology used to create the workforce information system in sufficient detail to enable other states to replicate the process and develop their own criminal justice workforce research databases. The project was jointly conceived, designed, and completed by two state-level criminal justice agencies with diverse missions and responsibilities: the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and the Florida Department of Corrections (FDC). Data were extracted from two personnel management systems: the Automated Transaction Management System (ATMS) operated by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which contains data on all certified law enforcement, correctional, and correctional probation officers in Florida (Part 1), and the Cooperative Personnel Employment System (COPES) operated by the Department of Management Services, which contains data on all state employees (Part 2). Parts 3-5 consist of data extracted from Parts 1 and 2 regarding certification status (Part 3), education (Part 4), and training (Part 5). Two demographic variables, race and sex, are found in all parts. Parts 1 and 2 also contain variables on employment event type, employer type, position type, salary plan, job class, appointment status, and supervisor indicator. Part 3 variables are certification event type and certificate type. Part 4 variables include degree earned and area of degree. Part 5 includes a variable for passing or failing training certification. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02542.v1 correctional officers icpsr criminal justice system icpsr information management icpsr information systems icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr personnel management icpsr personnel records icpsr police officers icpsr probation officers icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Florida Department of Corrections. Bureau of Planning, Research, and Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2542 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02542.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02841 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02841 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1996 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2841 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1996 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02841.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2841 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02841.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03063 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03063 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1996 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-08-24 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3063 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03063.v2 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3063 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03063.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29669 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29669 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2013-02-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29669 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1995 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1995, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1995. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29669.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29669 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29669.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29663 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29663 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1995 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29663 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1995 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1995, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29663.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29663 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29663.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02467 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02467 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of Constitutional and Statutory Protection on Crime Victims' Rights in Four States in the United States, 1995 [electronic resource] David Beatty , Smith Howley, Susan , Dean G. Kilpatrick 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2467 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey of crime victims was undertaken to determine whether state constitutional amendments and other legal measures designed to protect crime victims' rights had been effective. It was designed to test the hypothesis that the strength of legal protection for victims' rights has a measurable impact on how victims are treated by the criminal justice system and on their perceptions of the system. A related hypothesis was that victims from states with strong legal protection would have more favorable experiences and greater satisfaction with the system than those from states where legal protection is weak. The Victim Survey (Parts 1, 4-7) collected information on when and where the crime occurred, characteristics of the perpetrators, use of force, police response, victim services, type of information given to the victim by the criminal justice system, the victim's level of participation in the criminal justice system, how the case ended, sentencing and restitution, the victim's satisfaction with the criminal justice system, and the effects of the crime on the victim. Demographic variables in the file include age, race, sex, education, employment, and income. In addition to the victim survey, criminal justice and victim assistance professionals at the state and local levels were surveyed because these professionals affect crime victims' ability to recover from and cope with the aftermath of the offense and the stress of participation in the criminal justice system. The Survey of State Officials (Parts 2 and 8) collected data on officials' opinions of the criminal justice system, level of funding for the agency, types of victims' rights provided by the state, how victims' rights provisions had changed the criminal justice system, advantages and disadvantages of such legislation, and recommendations for future legislation. The Survey of Local Officials (Parts 3 and 9) collected data on officials' opinions of the criminal justice system, level of funding, victims' rights to information about and participation in the criminal justice process, victim impact statements, and restitution. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02467.v1 constitutional amendments icpsr criminal justice system icpsr process evaluation icpsr victim rights icpsr victim safety icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD X. Victimization Beatty, David Smith Howley, Susan Kilpatrick, Dean G. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2467 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02467.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02899 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02899 MiAaI MiAaI Experiences and Needs of Formerly Intimate Stalking Victims in Southeastern Pennsylvania, 1991-1995 [electronic resource] Mary P. Brewster 2000-08-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2899 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study sought to explore the nature of the stalking experiences of noncelebrity stalking victims who had previously been in intimate relationships with their stalkers. These were cases in which the stalkers were seeking revenge and/or reconciliation through stalking. Data were collected from 187 female stalking victims during 1991-1995 living in Chester, Delaware, Bucks, Philadelphia, and Montgomery counties in southeastern Pennsylvania. Data collection was comprised of an extensive, semistructured, face-to-face interview conducted with each woman to gather information concerning the nature of the stalking, the relationship between the victim and the stalker, the victim's response to the stalking, the consequences of the stalking for the victim, the needs of stalking victims in general, and fulfillment of those needs in terms of victim services and interaction with and cooperation from the criminal justice system. A brief survey questionnaire was also administered to obtain demographic information about each victim and her stalker. Content analysis of the interview transcripts was used to identify variables. Each variable fell into one of six categories: (1) victim's prior relationship with the stalker, (2) characteristics of the stalking, (3) victim's attempt to discourage the stalker (through both legal and extralegal mechanisms), (4) assistance sought by the victim through formal and informal networks and the subsequent handling of the situation by others, (5) the physical and emotional effects of the stalking on the victim, and (6) other victimization experiences. Demographic variables include the age, race, education level, marital status, and employment status of both the victim and the stalker. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02899.v1 criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr needs assessment icpsr relationships icpsr stalking icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr women icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIII. Violence Against Women ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Brewster, Mary P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2899 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02899.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02805 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02805 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1995 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2805 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1995 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02805.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2805 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02805.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02840 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02840 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1995 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-01-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2840 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02840.v1 state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2840 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02840.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06720 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06720 MiAaI MiAaI National Opinion Survey of Crime and Justice, 1995 [electronic resource] Timothy J. Flanagan , Dennis R. Longmire 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6720 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this survey was to provide legislators, public officials, and Texas residents with a reliable source of information about citizens' opinions and attitudes concerning crime and criminal justice related-topics. The data collection consists of two distinctly different files, National Data (Part 2) and Texas Data (Part 1), which can be linked or used separately for analysis. The survey questions concern neighborhood atmosphere and presentation of crime in the media, worries regarding possible attacks--both robbery and physical attacks, confidence in and opinions of police and their effectiveness, problems dealing with courts, and attitudes regarding prisoners and prisons, drug laws and drug problems, and juvenile gangs. Other questions focused on attitudes concerning the death penalty, guns, and the availability of firearms. The National Data file contains additional information expanding on the respondent's sources of crime news and gang-related questions. Demographic information on respondents includes sex, age, race, income, education, and religion. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06720.v1 attitudes icpsr capital punishment icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug law offenses icpsr fear of crime icpsr firearms icpsr gangs icpsr handguns icpsr media coverage icpsr neighborhoods icpsr police effectiveness icpsr prison inmates icpsr prisons icpsr public opinion icpsr NACJD I. Attitude Surveys ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Flanagan, Timothy J. Longmire, Dennis R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6720 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06720.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29668 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2011 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29668 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Probation Survey, 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-12-10 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2011 ICPSR 29668 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1994 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 1994, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 1994. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29668.v2 criminal justice system icpsr offenses icpsr probation icpsr probationers icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD III. Corrections NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29668 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29668.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR29662 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2012 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR29662 MiAaI MiAaI Annual Parole Survey, 1994 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2012-09-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012 ICPSR 29662 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The 1994 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 1994, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29662.v1 criminal justice system icpsr parole icpsr parolees icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 29662 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29662.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02310 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02310 MiAaI MiAaI Justice Systems Processing of Child Abuse and Neglect Cases in a Local Jurisdiction (County) in the United States, 1993-1994 [electronic resource] Susan J., Wells , Andrea Sedlak 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2310 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive, case-level examination of the full spectrum of case processing of serious child abuse and neglect cases as they flowed through the justice process, from initial receipt of a report to final disposition in the criminal and/or civil court. This was accomplished by in-depth, detailed tracking, from a single jurisdiction, of both prospective and retrospective samples of serious child abuse cases reported to child protective services and law enforcement agencies. The four agencies that participated directly by providing case samples and case files for tracking were: (1) Child Protective Services (CPS), (2) the sheriff's office, (3) Dependency Court Legal Services (DCLS), and (4) the county prosecutor's office. Each case was abstracted at the point of sampling and then tracked throughout the other participating agencies. Data were collected over a nine-month period. Part 1, Maltreatment Abstract, Person Roster, and CPS Abstract Data, contains three types of data. First, information is provided on each maltreatment incident committed by each perpetrator, background of the perpetrator and the victim, and characteristics of the incident. The data continue with a roster of persons, which covers the relationships among the individuals in the case and whether any of these individuals were living together at the time of the maltreatment. Data from the CPS abstract include which source brought the case to the attention of Protective Services, the dates, priority, and investigation level of the report, if any prior allegations of maltreatment had occurred that involved either the same victims and/or perpetrators and, if so, information on those reports, and the perpetrator's response to the incident and level of cooperation with the investigation. For each victim, information is given on medical findings, if applicable, whether photographs were taken, whether a guardian was appointed, whether the victim was assigned an interim placement, and the CPS disposition of the case. Part 1 concludes with information on interviews with the victim, where the case was referred, the assessment of risk in the case, and whether the victim was placed in foster care. Part 2, Dependency Court Abstract Data, provides information on the case, the reason the case was closed, and the outcome as determined by the court. Part 3, Juvenile Court Schedule of Hearings Data, focuses on the schedule of hearings, such as who was present and if they were represented by an attorney, whether the hearing took place, and, if not, the reason for delay. Part 4, Law Enforcement Abstract Data, contains dates of incidents, reports, and arrests, details of the case, and how the case was handled. Part 5, State Attorney's Office Abstract Data, offers data on the case closing, charges, and sentencing, as well as information on the type of defense attorney representing the perpetrator, if a juvenile, how the defendant was referred to adult court, whether the state attorney filed cases on other perpetrators in the case, whether the victim was interviewed by the prosecutor prior to filing, and whether the victim was deposed by the state attorney after the case was filed. Part 6, Criminal Court Schedule of Hearings Data, contains information on date of arrest, filing, and court hearing, whether a public defender was assigned, number of hearings, type of hearing, and coded remarks about the hearing. Part 7, State Attorney Addendum Data, provides "no-file" data from the State Attorney Questionnaire Addendum, including if the no-file was a warrant or arrest, date of the no-file, and reason for the no-file. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02310.v1 court cases icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr domestic relations icpsr domestic violence icpsr family histories icpsr family violence icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr case processing icpsr child abuse icpsr child neglect icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Wells, Susan J., Sedlak, Andrea Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2310 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02310.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02789 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02789 MiAaI MiAaI Effectiveness of Alternative Victim Assistance Service Delivery Models in the San Diego Region, 1993-1994 [electronic resource] Cynthia Rienick , Hoctor Mulmat, Darlanne , Susan Pennell 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 2789 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. one year later to members of the San Diego Crisis Intervention Team (Part 5, Crisis Intervention Team Survey Data) and to the EYE Counseling and Crisis Services, Crisis and Advocacy Team (Part 6, EYE Crisis and Advocacy Team Survey Data). The survey questions for Parts 4-6 asked each respondent to provide their reasons for becoming involved with the program, the goals of the program, responsibilities of the staff or volunteers, the types of referral services their agency provided, the number of hours of training required, and the topics covered in the training. Respondents for Parts 4-6 were further asked about the specific types of services they provided to victims/witnesses/survivors. Part 4 also contains a series of variables regarding coordination efforts, problems, and resolutions encountered when dealing with other intervention agencies and law enforcement agencies. Demographic variables for Parts 4-6 include the ethnicity, age, gender, and highest level of education of each respondent, and whether the respondent was a staff member of the agency or volunteer. The fourth survey was mailed to 53 referral agencies used by police and crisis interventionists (Part 7, Service Provider Survey Data). Part 7 contains the same series of variables as Part 4 on dealing with other intervention and law enforcement agencies. Respondents in Part 7 were further asked to describe the type of victims/witnesses/survivors to whom they provided service (e.g., domestic violence victims, homicide witnesses, or suicide survivors) and to rate their level of satisfaction with referral procedures provided by law enforcement officers, hospitals, paramedics, religious groups, the San Diego Crisis Intervention Team, the EYE Crisis Team, and the District Attorney's Victim/Witness Program. Part 7 also includes the hours of operation for each service provider organization, as well as which California counties they serviced. Finally, respondents in Part 7 were given a list of services and asked if they provided any of those services to victims/witnesses/survivors. Services unique to this list included job placement assistance, public awareness campaigns, accompaniment to court, support groups, and advocacy with outside agencies (e.g., employers or creditors). Demographic variables for Part 7 include the ethnicity, age, and gender of each respondent. The last survey was distributed to over 1,000 law enforcement officers from the Escondido, San Diego, and Vista sheriff's agencies (Part 8, Law Enforcement Survey Data). Respondents in Part 8 were surveyed to determine their familiarity with intervention programs, how they learned about the program, the extent to which they used or referred others to intervention services, appropriate circumstances for calling or not calling in interventionists, their opinions regarding various intervention programs, their interactions with interventionists at crime scenes, and suggestions for improving delivery of services to victims. Demographic variables for Part 8 include the rank and agency of each law enforcement respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02789.v1 arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr coping icpsr criminal justice system icpsr crisis intervention icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr needs assessment icpsr psychological wellbeing icpsr victim services icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr violent crime icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Rienick, Cynthia Hoctor Mulmat, Darlanne Pennell, Susan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2789 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02789.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09296 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09296 MiAaI MiAaI Federal Justice Statistics Program Data, 1978-1994 [electronic resource] [United States] Abt Associates, Inc. , The Urban Institute 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9296 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. Data in this collection examine the processing of federal offenders. The Cases Terminated files (Parts 1-3 and 25-28) contain information about defendants in criminal cases filed in the United States Federal District Court and terminated in the calendar years indicated. Defendants in criminal cases may either be individuals or corporations, and there is one record for each defendant in each case terminated. Information on court proceedings, date the case was filed, date the case was terminated, most serious charge, and reason for termination is included. The Docket and Reporting System files (Parts 4-7, 31-34, and 42) include information on suspects in investigative matters that took an hour or more of a United States Attorney's time with one of the following outcomes: (1) the United States Attorney declined to prosecute, (2) the case was filed in Federal District Court, or (3) the matter was disposed by a United States magistrate. Codes for each disposition and change of status are also provided. The Pretrial Services data (Parts 8, 22, 43, and 47) present variables on the circuit, district, and office where the defendant was charged, type of action, year of birth and sex of the defendant, major offense charge, and results of initial and detention hearings. The Parole Decisions data (Part 9) contain information from various parole hearings such as court date, appeal action, reopening decision, sentence, severity of sentence, offense, and race and ethnicity of the defendant. The Offenders Under Supervision files (Parts 15-16 and 37-40) focus on convicted offenders sentenced to probation supervision and federal prisoners released to parole supervision. The Federal Prisoner files (Parts 18 and 20) supply data on when an offender entered and was released from confinement, as well as the amount of time served for any given offense. The Administrative Office of the United States Courts data files (Parts 44, 52, and 53) contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in Federal District Court and terminated in the calendar years indicated. There is one record for each defendant in each case. Variables include the date the case was filed, offense level, AO (Administrative Office) codes, and disposition date. The Bureau of Prisons data (both the Master and Detail files, Parts 45, 46, and 54-57 -- formerly known as the Federal Prisoner files) contain records of sentenced prisoners admitted to or released from federal prison during 1992-1994. These files consist of separate records for each prisoner's commitment to federal prison, and for each sentence imposed on a prisoner for a given commitment to federal prison. The Central System (CS) and Central Charge (CC) files of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) include information about suspects in criminal matters and defendants in criminal cases in 1993-1994. Each defendant in a criminal matter has a master Central System record (Parts 50 and 51) and may have one or more Central Charge records (Parts 48 and 49). The Federal Probation/Supervision Data files (Parts 58 and 59) provide information on supervision procedures and the sequence of events and proceedings in 1992-1994 from the time a case was opened for supervision until the case was terminated. These include reports of parole violations, transfers of supervision to other districts, and case removals due to, for example, rearrest or hospitalization. The Sentencing Commission data (Parts 60 and 61) contain information on federal criminal cases sentenced in 1992-1994 under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09296.v7 trial courts icpsr trial procedures icpsr administration icpsr case processing icpsr case dismissal icpsr court cases icpsr courtroom proceedings icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr federal courts icpsr federal offenses icpsr federal prisoners icpsr judicial decisions icpsr legal systems icpsr offenders icpsr parole icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial settlement icpsr prison inmates icpsr probation icpsr records icpsr sentencing icpsr statistical data icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Abt Associates, Inc. The Urban Institute Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9296 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09296.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06481 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06481 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment Program Survey of Criminal Justice Agencies in the United States, 1992-1994 [electronic resource] J. Thomas McEwen 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6481 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Assessment Program (NAP) Survey was conducted to determine the needs and problems of state and local criminal justice agencies. At the local level in each sampled county, survey questionnaires were distributed to police chiefs of the largest city, sheriffs, jail administrators, prosecutors, public defenders, chief trial court judges, trial court administrators (where applicable), and probation and parole agency heads. Data were collected at the state level through surveys sent to attorneys general, commissioners of corrections, prison wardens, state court administrators, and directors of probation and parole. For the 1992-1994 survey, 13 separate questionnaires were used. Police chiefs and sheriffs received the same survey instruments, with a screening procedure employed to identify sheriffs who handled law enforcement responsibilities. Of the 411 counties selected, 264 counties also employed trial court administrators. Judges and trial court administrators received identical survey instruments. A total of 546 surveys were mailed to probation and parole agencies, with the same questions asked of state and local officers. Counties that had separate agencies for probation and parole were sent two surveys. All survey instruments were divided into sections on workload (except that the wardens, jail administrators, and corrections commissioners were sent a section on jail use and crowding instead), staffing, operations and procedures, and background. The staffing section of each survey queried respondents on recruitment, retention, training, and number of staff. The other sections varied from instrument to instrument, with questions tailored to the responsibilities of the particular agency. Most of the questionnaires asked about use of automated information systems, programs, policies, or aspects of the facility or security needing improvement, agency responsibilities and jurisdictions, factors contributing to workload increases, budget, number of fulltime employees and other staff, and contracted services. Questions specific to police chiefs and sheriffs included activities aimed at drug problems and whether they anticipated increases in authorized strength in officers. Jail administrators, corrections commissioners, and wardens were asked about factors contributing to jail crowding, alternatives to jail, medical services offered, drug testing and drug-related admissions, and inmate classification. Topics covered by the surveys for prosecutors, public defenders, judges, and state and trial court administrators included types of cases handled, case timeliness, diversion and sentencing alternatives, and court and jury management. State and local probation and parole agency directors were asked about diagnostic tools, contracted services, and drug testing. Attorneys general were queried about operational issues, statutory authority, and legal services and support provided to state and local criminal justice agencies. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06481.v1 case processing icpsr corrections management icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr information systems icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr needs assessment icpsr police recruits icpsr police training icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prisons icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System McEwen, J. Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6481 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06481.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06882 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06882 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1994 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6882 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1994 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06882.v1 delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6882 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06882.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02513 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1999 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02513 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Surveys on Crime Trends and Criminal Justice Systems, 1970-1994 [electronic resource] Restructured Five-Wave Data Burnham, R.W. , Burnham, Helen 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1999 ICPSR 2513 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United Nations International Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch began the Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (formerly known as the World Crime Surveys) in 1978. The goal of the data collection effort was to conduct a more focused inquiry into the incidence of crime worldwide. To date, there have been five quinquennial surveys, covering the years 1970-1975, 1975-1980, 1980-1986, 1986-1990, and 1990-1994, respectively. Starting with the 1980 data, the waves overlap by one year to allow for reliability and validity checks of the data. For this data collection, the original United Nations data were restructured into a standard contemporary file structure, with each file consisting of all data for one year. Naming conventions were standardized, and each country and each variable was given a unique identifying number. Crime variables include counts of recorded crime for homicide, assault, rape, robbery, theft, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, drug trafficking, drug possession, bribery, and corruption. There are also counts of suspects, persons prosecuted, persons convicted, and prison admissions by crime, gender, and adult or juvenile status. Other variables include the population of the country and largest city, budgets and salaries for police, courts, and prisons, and types of sanctions, including imprisonment, corporal punishment, deprivation of liberty, control of freedom, warning, fine, and community sentence. The countries participating in the survey and the variables available vary by year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02513.v1 acquittals icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr courts icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Burnham, R.W. Burnham, Helen Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2513 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02513.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03686 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03686 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Fifth Survey, 1990-1994 United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3686 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Fifth United Nations Survey, covering the years 1990-1994, was designed to collect data on the incidence of reported crime and the operation of criminal justice systems with a view to improving the dissemination of that information globally. To that end, the survey facilitates an overview of trends and interrelationships among various parts of the criminal justice system to promote informed decision-making in its administration, nationally and crossnationally. Variables describe combined police and prosecution expenditure by year and by country, number of police personnel by gender, total number of homicides by country and by city, number of assaults, rapes, robberies, thefts, burglaries, frauds, and embezzlements, amount of drug crime, number of people formally charged with crime, age of suspects, number and gender of prosecutors, number of individuals prosecuted and the types of crimes prosecuted, gender and age of individuals prosecuted, types of courts, number of individuals convicted and acquitted, numbers sentenced to capital punishment and various other punishments, number of convictions on various charges, number of individuals sentenced and in detention, number of prisoners, sentence lengths, and prison demographics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03686.v1 assault icpsr burglary icpsr capital punishment icpsr convictions (law) icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr crime statistics icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr homicide icpsr international crime statistics icpsr law enforcement icpsr police icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr prosecution icpsr rape icpsr rape statistics icpsr robbery icpsr sentencing icpsr theft icpsr IAED VIII. Vocational Education NACJD VIII. Official Statistics IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3686 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03686.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR02257 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR02257 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1994 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001-02-01 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 2257 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02257.v1 full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 2257 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02257.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06793 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1998 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06793 MiAaI MiAaI Immigrant Populations as Victims in New York City and Philadelphia, 1994 [electronic resource] Robert C. Davis , Edna Erez 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998 ICPSR 6793 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to examine interrelated issues surrounding the use of the criminal justice system by immigrant victims and to identify ways to improve the criminal justice response to immigrants' needs and problems. Two cities, New York City and Philadelphia, were selected for intensive investigation of victimization of immigrants. In each of these cities, three immigrant communities in a neighborhood were chosen for participation. In New York's Jackson Heights area, Colombians, Dominicans, and Indians were the ethnic groups studied. In Philadelphia's Logan section, Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Koreans were surveyed. In all, 87 Jackson Heights victims were interviewed and 26 Philadelphia victims were interviewed. The victim survey questions addressed can be broadly divided into two categories: issues pertaining to crime reporting and involvement with the court system by immigrant victims. Variables include type of crime, respondent's role in the incident, relationship to the perpetrator, whether the incident was reported to police, and who reported the incident. Respondents were also asked whether they were asked to go to court, whether they understood what the people in court said to them, whether they understood what was happening in their case, and, if victimized again, whether they would report the incident to the police. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06793.v1 cities icpsr court cases icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice system icpsr immigrants icpsr needs assessment icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization RCMD VIII. Immigration ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime Davis, Robert C. Erez, Edna Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6793 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06793.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06795 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06795 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1993 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007-04-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 6795 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This file provides data on federal, state, and local governmental expenditures and employment for criminal justice activities in the United States. Information is supplied on police protection, judicial and legal services, and correctional institutions and agencies. Variables describing each of these criminal justice functions include number of and payroll for full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent employees, current total and general expenditures, capital outlay, and intergovernmental expenditures. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06795.v2 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6795 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06795.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03976 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03976 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecuting Adolescents in Juvenile and Criminal Jurisdictions in Selected Counties in New Jersey and New York, 1992-1993 [electronic resource] Aaron Kupchik 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3976 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. A different model of justice is assumed to be reflected in the prosecution of adolescents in juvenile jurisdictions compared to criminal jurisdictions, with a juvenile justice model in the juvenile jurisdiction and a criminal justice model in the criminal jurisdiction. These two models of justice are believed to be very different from one another across three dimensions: formality of case processing, evaluation of defendants, and punishment. This research project compared the prosecution and punishment of adolescent felony offenders in the New Jersey juvenile jurisdiction and the New York criminal jurisdiction to determine whether these two models of justice varied across the two jurisdiction types. Data from this collection were used by the researcher only to examine the dimension of punishment severity across jurisdiction types and across courts within each jurisdiction type. Data were collected on comparable cases of adolescent felony offenders from counties in New Jersey and New York. Due to the very different boundaries between juvenile and criminal jurisdictions in these adjacent states, the data include cases (matched by offense and offender age) in New Jersey's juvenile jurisdiction and New York's criminal jurisdiction. Cases of 15- and 16-year-old defendants who had been charged with aggravated assault, robbery, or burglary in three counties of New Jersey and three counties of New York City in 1992 and 1993 were sampled. Variables include offender characteristics, such as age at offense, sex, race, and ethnicity, offense characteristics, court action and sentencing information, state, and county. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03976.v1 adolescents icpsr case processing icpsr criminal courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr jurisdiction icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Kupchik, Aaron Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3976 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03976.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06489 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06489 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1992-1993 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2011-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6489 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. The 1992-1993 National Pretrial Reporting Program database includes cases filed in May 1992 that were tracked through April 1993. Offenses were recoded into 15 broad categories that conformed to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior criminal record, relationship to the criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06489.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6489 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06489.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06715 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06715 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1993 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6715 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1993 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06715.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6715 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06715.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09992 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09992 MiAaI MiAaI Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey, April 1992 [electronic resource] Justice and Civic Rights Centro de Investigaciones Sobre la Realidad Social (CIRES) 1993-04-09 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9992 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is part of a continuing series of semi-monthly surveys of individuals in Spain. Each survey consists of three sections. The first section collects information on respondents' attitudes regarding personal and national issues. This section includes questions on level of life satisfaction and frequency of relationships, as well as a rating of the importance of national issues. The second section varies according to the monthly topic, with this survey's topic focusing on justice and civic rights. Among the issues investigated are the respondent's personal experience with lawyers and police, evaluation of Spanish prisons and treatment accorded to those in prison, attitudes toward the death penalty, evaluation of the Spanish penal code and the "Corcuera Law," evaluation of government policy with respect to the administration of justice, and perceived image of judicial institutions and justice professionals. The third section collects demographic data such as sex, age, religion, income, and place of residence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09992.v1 public opinion icpsr social networks icpsr attitudes icpsr capital punishment icpsr civil rights icpsr criminal justice system icpsr justice icpsr law enforcement icpsr legal systems icpsr life satisfaction icpsr national identity icpsr national interests icpsr IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United States ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations Centro de Investigaciones Sobre la Realidad Social (CIRES) Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9992 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09992.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06436 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06436 MiAaI MiAaI National Victim Assistance Agency Survey, 1992 [electronic resource] J. Thomas McEwen 1995-08-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6436 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines victim assistance programs that are operated by law enforcement agencies, prosecutor's offices, and independent assistance agencies. Victim assistance programs came into being when it was discovered that, in addition to the physical, emotional, and financial impact of a crime, victims often experience a "second victimization" because of insensitive treatment by the criminal justice system. Specifically, this study sought to answer the following questions: (1) What are the current staffing levels of victim assistance programs? (2) What types of victims come to the attention of the programs? (3) What types of services are provided to victims? and (4) What are the operational and training needs of victim assistance programs? The survey was sent to 519 police departments, sheriff departments, and prosecutor's offices identified as having victim assistance programs. Also, 172 independent full-service agencies that were believed to provide referral or direct services to victims (not just advocacy) were also sent surveys. Variables on staffing levels include the number of full-time, part-time, and volunteer personnel, and the education and years of experience of paid staff. Victim information includes the number of victims served for various types of crime, and the percent of victims served identified by race/ethnicity and by age characteristics (under 16 years old, 17-64 years old, and over 65 years old). Variables about services include percent estimates on the number of victims receiving various types of assistance, such as information on their rights, information on criminal justice processes, "next-day" crisis counseling, short-term supportive counseling, or transportation. Other data gathered include the number of victims for which the agency arranged emergency loans, accompanied to line-ups, police or prosecutor interviews, or court, assisted in applying for state victim compensation, prepared victim impact statements, notified of court dates or parole hearings, or made referrals to social service agencies or mental health agencies. Information is also presented on training provided to criminal justice, medical, mental health, or other victim assistance agency personnel, and whether the agency conducted community or public school education programs. Agencies ranked their need for more timely victim notification of various criminal justice events, improvement or implementation of various forms of victim and public protection, and improvement of victim participation in various stages of the criminal justice process. Agencies also provided information on training objectives for their agency, number of hours of mandatory pre-service and in-service training, types of information provided during the training of their staff, sources for their training, and the priority of additional types of training for their staff. Agency variables include type of agency, year started, and budget information. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06436.v1 counseling icpsr criminal justice system icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr victim compensation icpsr victim rights icpsr victims services icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization McEwen, J. Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6436 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06436.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06579 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06579 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1992 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1996-01-22 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6579 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06579.v1 federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6579 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06579.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06544 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06544 MiAaI MiAaI Long-Range Planning Survey of Federal Judges, 1992 [electronic resource] [United States] Federal Judicial Center 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6544 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In October 1992, the Federal Judicial Center surveyed nearly all federal judges on a wide range of issues of concern to the federal courts. The survey was conducted for two purposes: to inform the deliberations of the Judicial Conference Committee on Long-Range Planning and to provide information for the Center's congressionally-mandated study of structural alternatives for the federal courts of appeals. Although the purposes were distinct, the areas of interest overlapped, resulting in a survey instrument that addressed many issues at differing levels of detail. The survey questions dealt with the nature and severity of problems in the federal courts, structure and relationships, jurisdiction size and resources, administration and governance, discovery, juries, criminal sanctions, deciding appeals in the current system, availability and compensation of counsel, and methods of civil dispute resolution. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06544.v1 appellate courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr federal courts icpsr judges icpsr ICPSR XII. Legal Systems NACJD V. Courts Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6544 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06544.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06634 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06634 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1992 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6634 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1992 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06634.v1 case processing icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6634 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06634.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06487 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06487 MiAaI MiAaI Metro Court Project [electronic resource] A Study of Mediation and Adjudication in Bernalillo County (Albuquerque), New Mexico, Small Claims Court, 1990-1992 Gary LaFree , Christine Rack 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6487 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study used court records and interviews with disputants, litigants, and mediators in Bernalillo County, New Mexico, to compare the effects of ethnicity and gender in mediated versus adjudicated small claims disputes. Initial structured telephone interviews with both adjudicated and mediated claimants and respondents (Parts 1-4) were conducted. Follow-up questionnaires (Parts 6-8) were then administered to the initial interviewed groups. Data from mediators (Part 9) were collected from self-administered structured questionnaires. Pertinent questions from all eight survey instruments were combined into a master file (Part 5). This data collection also includes two qualitative summary files of adjudicated and mediated cases (Parts 10-11). The unit of analysis is the small claims case. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06487.v1 courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr ethnicity icpsr gender icpsr mediation icpsr RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XII. Legal Systems LaFree, Gary Rack, Christine Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6487 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06487.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06719 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1996 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06719 MiAaI MiAaI Hospital-Based Victim Assistance for Physically Injured Crime Victims in Charleston, South Carolina, 1990-1991 [electronic resource] Connie L. Best 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1996 ICPSR 6719 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The central purpose of this study was to provide descriptive information about hospitalized crime victims. More specifically, patients' knowledge of victim services, the legal justice system, and victims' rights were explored through their use of medical and dental services. From July 1, 1990, to June 30, 1991, the project staff obtained daily reports from the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Admissions Office regarding new admissions to specified units. If patients granted permission, the staff member administered a Criminal Victimization Screening Schedule (CVSS) and asked permission to review the relevant portion of their medical charts. Patients were also asked if they would be willing to participate in interviews about their victimization. If so, they were given the Criminal Victimization Interview (CVI), a structured interview schedule developed for this study that included items on demographics, victim and assault characteristics, knowledge of victims' rights, and a post-traumatic stress disorder checklist. This information is contained in Part 1, Interview Data File. At the conclusion of the personal interviews, patients were referred to the Model Hospital Victim Assistance Program (MHVAP), which was developed for this project and which provided information, advocacy, crisis counseling, and post-discharge referral services to hospitalized crime victims and their families. The Follow-Up Criminal Victimization Interview (FUCVI) was administered to 30 crime victims who had participated in the study and who were successfully located 3 months after discharge from the hospital. The FUCVI included questions on health status, victim services utilization and satisfaction, and satisfaction with the criminal justice system. These data are found in Part 2, Follow-Up Data File. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06719.v1 counseling services icpsr criminal justice system icpsr dental health icpsr health care services icpsr health services utilization icpsr hospitals icpsr victim rights icpsr victim services icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Best, Connie L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6719 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06719.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03465 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03465 MiAaI MiAaI Executions in the United States, 1608-1991 [electronic resource] The Espy File [Instructional Materials] James W. Oberly 2003-01-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 3465 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. These instructional materials were prepared for use with EXECUTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1608-1991: THE ESPY FILE (ICPSR 8451), compiled by M. Watt Espy and John Ortiz Smykla. The data file (an SPSS portable file) and accompanying documentation are provided to assist educators in instructing students about the history of capital punishment in the United States. An instructor's handout is also included. This handout contains the following sections, among others: (1) general goals for student analysis of quantitative datasets, (2) specific goals in studying this dataset, (3) suggested appropriate courses for use of the dataset, (4) tips for using the dataset, and (5) related secondary source readings. This dataset furnishes data on executions performed under civil authority in the United States between 1608 and April 24, 1991, and describes each individual executed and the circumstances surrounding the crime for which the person was convicted. Variables include age, race, name, sex, and occupation of the offender, place, jurisdiction, date, and method of execution, and the crime for which the offender was executed. Also recorded are data on whether the only evidence for the execution was official records indicating that an individual (executioner or slave owner) was compensated for an execution. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03465.v1 capital punishment icpsr civil rights icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr executions icpsr instructional materials icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR X.A.3. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Instructional Packages, Other Instructional Packages ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Oberly, James W. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3465 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03465.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06136 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06136 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1990-1991 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2011-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 6136 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. Offenses were recoded into 14 broad categories that conform to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior record, relationship to criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06136.v1 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6136 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06136.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06582 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06582 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1991 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6582 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1991 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06582.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6582 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06582.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09772 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09772 MiAaI MiAaI Study of Tribal and Alaska Native Juvenile Justice Systems in The United States, 1990 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 1992-10-31 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9772 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection focuses on juvenile justice systems administered by federally recognized Indian tribes throughout the United States. Responses were received from 93 tribes who indicated that they administered some form of juvenile justice system and from 57 tribes who indicated that they did not. Variables in the data collection include number of Indian juveniles aged 10-17 in the jurisdiction, types of cases that the juvenile justice system exercised jurisdiction over, type of court (tribal, state, federal), annual budget and sources of funds for the court, number of court personnel, types of legal statutes covering court activities, kinds of diversionary options available to the court, and the circumstances under which juveniles were held with adults. A separate file on juvenile offense rates according to tribe is provided. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09772.v1 Alaskan Natives icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr juvenile justice icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr Native Americans icpsr RCMD IX.F. Native American RCMD IX. Minority Populations NACJD V. Courts RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9772 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09772.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06508 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1995 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06508 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1990 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995 ICPSR 6508 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1990 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. It is the most detailed information available on youth who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and on the activities of the nation's juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases, number of status offense cases, number of dependency cases, and total number of cases. The data distinguish cases with and without the filing of a petition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06508.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6508 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06508.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06191 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06191 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1990 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-09-02 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6191 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06191.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6191 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06191.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06945 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1997 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06945 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Fourth Survey, 1986-1990 United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1997 ICPSR 6945 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Fourth United Nations Survey, covering the years 1986-1990, was designed to increase knowledge regarding the incidence of reported crime and the structure of criminal justice systems, as a basis for improving the international exchange of information. The main objectives of the survey were to determine which data are generally available in national databases and to provide an instrument for strengthening cooperation among member states of the United Nations by putting the review and analysis of national crime-related data in a broader context. Variables describe combined police and prosecution expenditure by year and by country, number of police personnel by gender, total number of homicides by country and by city, number of assaults, rapes, robberies, thefts, burglaries, frauds, and embezzlements, amount of drug crime, number of people formally charged with crime, age of suspects, number and gender of prosecutors, number of individuals prosecuted and the types of crimes prosecuted for, gender and age of individuals prosecuted, types of courts, number of individuals convicted and acquitted, numbers sentenced to capital punishment and to various other punishments, number of convictions on various charges, number of individuals sentenced and in detention, number of prisoners, sentence lengths, and prison demographics. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06945.v1 trends icpsr United Nations icpsr acquittals icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr convictions (law) icpsr courts icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime rates icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drug related crimes icpsr embezzlement icpsr fraud icpsr homicide icpsr international crime statistics icpsr larceny icpsr law enforcement icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr police reports icpsr population characteristics icpsr prosecution icpsr punishment icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sanctions icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies NACJD VIII. Official Statistics IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations United Nations Office at Vienna. Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6945 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06945.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09670 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09670 MiAaI MiAaI Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] Jeffrey Fagan , Steven Belenko , Bruce D. Johnson 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9670 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This collection examines the characteristics of users and sellers of crack cocaine and the impact of users and sellers on the criminal justice system and on drug treatment and community programs. Information was also collected concerning users of drugs other than crack cocaine and the attributes of those users. Topics covered include initiation into substance use and sales, expenses for drug use, involvement with crime, sources of income, and primary substance of abuse. Demographic information includes subject's race, educational level, living area, social setting, employment status, occupation, marital status, number of children, place of birth, and date of birth. Information was also collected about the subject's parents: education level, occupation, and place of birth. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09670.v2 crack cocaine icpsr criminality icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug related crimes icpsr drug traffic icpsr drug treatment icpsr drug use icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Fagan, Jeffrey Belenko, Steven Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9670 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09670.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09588 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09588 MiAaI MiAaI Victim Impact Statements [electronic resource] Their Effect on Court Outcomes and Victim Satisfaction in New York, 1988-1990 Robert C. Davis , Madeline Henley , Barbara Smith 1999-12-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9588 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to assess the effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions and on victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system. Victims were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: (1) Victims were interviewed, with an impact statement written and immediately distributed to the prosecutor, defense attorney, and judge on the case, (2) Victims were interviewed to assess impact but no statement was written, and (3) Victims were assigned to a control condition in which there was no interview or statement. Subsequent interviews evaluated victims' perceptions of their role in the proceedings and their satisfaction with the outcome. Data were also recorded on charges filed against the defendants (both the arraignment and final charges), sentences, and special conditions of sentences. Standard demographic information was gathered as well. The remaining variables fall into two categories. The first category includes questions about the defendant(s) in the case. For all defendants in each case (up to six per victim) the researchers recorded information on the nature and severity of the arraignment charges and final charges, and on the sentence received. Additional information was recorded for the first and second defendants in a case. This included information on special conditions of the sentence such as a drug treatment program or restraining order. Orders to pay restitution were noted. Also recorded was information on the defendant's status with the criminal justice system, including number of prior convictions and number of open cases against the defendant. Finally, whether the Victim Impact Statement appeared in the assistant district attorney's file on the case and whether the statement had been opened were noted. The second category of variables includes information about the victim's reactions to the crime and the criminal justice system. Victims were asked to assess the impact the crime had on them in terms of physical injury, financial losses, psychological effect, and behavioral effect (i.e., changes in behavior resulting from the experience). They were also questioned about their experiences with the criminal justice system. The researchers inquired about their participation in the sentencing decision, their satisfaction with the outcome, and how they felt they had been treated by various court officials. Victims were asked whether they felt that court officials were aware of and were concerned about the effect the crime had on them. They were also asked whether victims should have a greater role in the court proceedings and whether court officials should be aware of victim impact as part of the sentencing procedure. Finally, the researchers investigated whether the victims believed that going to court was a waste of time. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09588.v1 convictions (law) icpsr court cases icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization Davis, Robert C. Henley, Madeline Smith, Barbara Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9588 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09588.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06121 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06121 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1989 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6121 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1989 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases by sex, number of status offense cases by sex, number of dependency cases by sex, and total number of cases by sex. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06121.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6121 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06121.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06190 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06190 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1989 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6190 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06190.v2 policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6190 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06190.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09508 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09508 MiAaI MiAaI National Pretrial Reporting Program, 1988-1989 [electronic resource] Pretrial Services Resource Center 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9508 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was undertaken to determine whether accurate and comprehensive pretrial data can be collected at the local level and subsequently aggregated at the state and federal levels. The data contained in this collection provide a picture of felony defendants' movements through the criminal courts. Offenses were recoded into 14 broad categories that conform to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' crime definitions. Other variables include sex, race, age, prior record, relationship to criminal justice system at the time of the offense, pretrial release, detention decisions, court appearances, pretrial rearrest, adjudication, and sentencing. The unit of analysis is the defendant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09508.v2 case processing icpsr courts icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr felons icpsr felony courts icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial detentions icpsr pretrial hearings icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr pretrial release icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Pretrial Services Resource Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9508 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09508.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09587 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09587 MiAaI MiAaI Electronic Monitoring of Nonviolent Convicted Felons [electronic resource] An Experiment in Home Detention in Marion County, Indiana, 1986-1988 Terry L. Baumer , Robert I. Mendelsohn 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9587 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the study was to provide information about home detention monitoring systems and to evaluate their effectiveness. The principal investigators sought to determine (1) whether electronic monitoring systems relieved some of the burdens associated with manual monitoring of home detention, such as making telephone calls and field visits, (2) how home detention affected the lifestyles of offenders, (3) whether the methods of monitoring influenced offender behavior during the program, (4) how electronic monitoring differed from manual monitoring in terms of supervision of the offenders, (5) how offenders reacted to electronic monitoring, (6) how offenders' families reacted to electronic monitoring, and (7) whether the method of monitoring influenced the probability of an arrest or subsequent contact with the criminal justice system after release from the program. Part 1 contains demographic information, such as age, race, marital status, number of children, living arrangements, employment, and education for each offender. Also included is information on the offense leading to the current case, including numbers and types of charges and convictions for both felonies and misdemeanors, recommendations and judicial disposition for the current case, and information on the criminal history of the offender. Part 2 contains data from the intake interview with the offender, such as information on the offender's family, living arrangements, education, employment, past alcohol and drug use, and expectations for the home detention program and monitoring procedures. Part 3 contains information collected in the exit interview and is similar in content to Part 2. Part 4 contains information on the program delivery (type of release from the program, violations of the program, results of tests for alcohol and drug use, errand time, payment, contacts with offenders, and the characteristics and results of the contacts with electronically monitored offenders). Part 5 is a check of criminal histories of offenders for at least one year after their release from the program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09587.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr electronic monitoring icpsr felony offenses icpsr house arrest icpsr misdemeanor offenses icpsr offenders icpsr program evaluation icpsr supervised liberty icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections Baumer, Terry L. Mendelsohn, Robert I. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9587 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09587.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09446 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09446 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [electronic resource] CJEE individual Units File and Estimates File, 1988 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1996-12-19 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9446 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data for all states, counties, and certain municipal governments. Specific variables include full- and part-time employees and payroll, expenditures for current operations, capital outlay and contributions to employee benefits, and intergovernmental expenditures paid to state and local governments. Sectors represented in this survey include police protection, judicial services, legal services and prosecution, public defense, and corrections, as well as other criminal justice services. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09446.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9446 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09446.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09523 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09523 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1988 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9523 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09523.v5 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9523 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09523.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06120 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06120 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1988 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6120 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1988 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases by sex, number of status offense cases by sex, number of dependency cases by sex, and total number of cases by sex. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06120.v1 delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr case processing icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6120 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06120.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09293 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09293 MiAaI MiAaI Delinquency in a Birth Cohort II [electronic resource] Philadelphia, 1958-1988 Robert M. Figlio , Paul E. Tracy , Marvin E. Wolfgang 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9293 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to follow a birth cohort born in Philadelphia during 1958 with a special focus on delinquent activities as children and as adults. The respondents were first interviewed in DELINQUENCY IN A BIRTH COHORT IN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, 1945-1963 (ICPSR 7729). Part 1 offers basic demographic information, such as sex, race, date of birth, church membership, age, and socioeconomic status, on each cohort member. Two files supply offense data: Part 2 pertains to offenses committed while a juvenile and Part 3 details offenses as an adult. Offense-related variables include most serious offense, police disposition, location of crime, reason for police response, complainant's sex, age, and race, type of victimization, date of offense, number of victims, average age of victims, number of victims killed or hospitalized, property loss, weapon involvement, and final court disposition. Part 4, containing follow-up survey interview data collected in 1988, was designed to investigate differences in the experiences and attitudes of individuals with varying degrees of involvement with the juvenile justice system. Variables include individual histories of delinquency, health, household composition, marriage, parent and respondent employment and education, parental contacts with the legal system, and other social and demographic variables. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09293.v3 adult offenders icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr police response icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Figlio, Robert M. Tracy, Paul E. Wolfgang, Marvin E. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9293 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09293.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08169 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08169 MiAaI MiAaI Survey of Jail and Prison Inmates, 1978 [electronic resource] California, Michigan, Texas Rand Corporation 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8169 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey was was conducted as part of the Rand Corporation's research program on career criminals. Rand's Second Inmate Survey was administered in late 1978 and early 1979 to convicted male inmates at 12 prisons and 14 county jails in California, Michigan, and Texas. The purpose of the survey was to provide detailed information about the criminal behavior of offenders and their associated characteristics. Emphasis was also placed on investigating other major areas of interest such as the quality of prisoner self-reports, varieties of criminal behavior, selective incapacitation, and prison treatment programs. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08169.v2 social attitudes and behavior icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Rand Corporation Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8169 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08169.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09448 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09448 MiAaI MiAaI Missouri Juvenile Court Records, 1984-1987 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice , Missouri Division of Youth Services 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9448 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collections provides information on each juvenile case disposed in the state of Missouri during calendar years 1984-1987. The state of Missouri began collecting and disseminating juvenile court data in 1975 as the result of legislation by the Division of Youth Services within the Department of Social Services. Despite this legislation no binding laws required the courts to submit data to the Division of Youth Services. In 1980, such a law was passed, and data were first collected in 1982 and 1983. The system was automated in 1984, and these data are now available for public use. The data files provide information on juveniles' progress through the juvenile justice system from the time of referral to juvenile court to final disposition. Variables include sex, race, and birth date of the juveniles, court referral date, major allegation, number of law violations, number of prior referrals, detention status, jail status, court orders, placement status, and final court action. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09448.v1 court cases icpsr courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile offenders icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Missouri Division of Youth Services Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9448 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09448.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08915 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08915 MiAaI MiAaI Nebraska Juvenile Court Records, 1975-1987 [electronic resource] National Center for Juvenile Justice , Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8915 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. UNAVAILABLE. This study is currently unavailable. Also available as downloadable files. Data in this collection provide information on the disposition of juvenile court cases in the state of Nebraska. The data files contain individual records on each delinquency, status offense, neglect, and dependency case disposed. Cases processed formally (with a petition) and those handled informally (without a petition) are included for most courts. Records contain a county code, the youth's date of birth, age at referral, sex, date of referral, source of referral, number of prior referrals, care pending disposition, reason for referral, manner of handling, date of disposition, and case disposition. A case may have included more than one offense, but only the "most serious" offense (in the opinion of court personnel) is recorded. The majority of records also include information on diagnostic services needed, educational attainment, employment and school status, length of residence of child in county, child's living arrangements at referral, marital status of natural parents, combined family annual income, whether or not the youth was represented by counsel, and the occupation of the primary parent or guardian. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08915.v2 children icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr families icpsr juvenile courts icpsr living conditions icpsr youths icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8915 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08915.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09565 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09565 MiAaI MiAaI Mandatory Drug Offender Processing Data, 1987 [electronic resource] New York Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association 1997-08-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9565 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Consortium for Assessing Drug Control Initiatives, funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and coordinated by the Criminal Justice Statistics Association, collected drug offender processing data from the state of New York. The purpose of the project was to track adult drug offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final court disposition, regardless of whether the offender was released without trial, acquitted, or convicted. These data allow researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes drug offenders, to measure the changing volume of drug offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the drug offender population. For purposes of this project, a drug offender was defined as any person who had been charged with a felony drug offense. The data are structured into six segments pertaining to (1) record identification, (2) the offender (date of birth, sex, race, and ethnic origin), (3) arrest information (date of arrest, age at arrest, arrest charge code), (4) prosecution information (filed offense code and level, prosecution disposition and date), (5) court disposition information (disposition offense and level, court disposition, final disposition date, final pleading, type of trial), and (6) sentencing information (sentence and sentence date, sentence minimum and maximum). Also included are elapsed time variables. The unit of analysis is the felony drug offender. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09565.v1 adults icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug offenders icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Bureau of Justice Assistance and Criminal Justice Statistics Association Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9565 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09565.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09287 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09287 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1987 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9287 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09287.v3 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9287 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09287.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR06119 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1994 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR06119 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1987 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1994 ICPSR 6119 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed in 1987 by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth by juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases by sex, number of status offense cases by sex, number of dependency cases by sex, and total number of cases by sex. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06119.v1 juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 6119 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06119.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08608 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08608 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] National Sample, 1979-1987 [Revised Questionnaire] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2004-06-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8608 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of the National Crime Surveys is to provide data on the level of crime victimization in the United States and to collect data on the characteristics of crime incidents and victims. Information about each household and personal victimization was recorded. The data include type of crime, description of the offender, severity of crime, injuries or losses, and demographic characteristics of household members. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08608.v7 census data icpsr violent crime icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr households icpsr neighborhoods icpsr offenses icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr NACJD X. Victimization ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8608 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08608.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09160 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09160 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1986 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9160 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09160.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9160 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09160.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09985 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09985 MiAaI MiAaI Impact of the Court Process on Sexually Abused Children in North Carolina, 1983-1986 [electronic resource] Desmond K. Runyan , Mark D. Everson , Wanda M. Hunter , Nancy M.P. King 1994-02-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9985 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the psychological impact of judicial processes on child sexual abuse victims. More specifically, it provides information on how sexual abuse and the subsequent judicial processes affect the mental health functioning of child victims by assessing the impact of (1) additional harm to victims from out-of-home placement, (2) criminal prosecution of the offender/family member, (3) subject testimony in juvenile or criminal court, and (4) family and professional support for the children. Children were enrolled in the study at the time that social services personnel substantiated claims of sexual abuse, and they were followed for a period of 18 months. Assessments of the mental health functioning of the children were made at the time of initial investigation, five months later, and 18 months later, using a combination of self-reports, parent and teacher reports, and psychological tests. After obtaining informed consent from the parent or guardian, each child was interviewed using a structured psychiatric inventory. The specific impacts of the various judicial processes or interventions under study were examined through comparisons of subgroups of the sample that did and did not experience particular interventions. The interventions included social services investigation, court process, foster placement, and psychological therapy. Other information in the file includes the type of sexual abuse experienced, judicial interventions the child experienced, and the child's level of depression, anxiety, and social adjustment. Demographic variables include age, sex, and race. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09985.v1 child abuse icpsr children icpsr criminal justice system icpsr intervention icpsr judicial process icpsr mental health icpsr psychological evaluation icpsr sexual abuse icpsr victims icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Runyan, Desmond K. Everson, Mark D. Hunter, Wanda M. King, Nancy M.P. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9985 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09985.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09923 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09923 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment Program Survey of Criminal Justice Personnel in the United States, 1986 [electronic resource] J. Thomas McEwen , Barbara Webster , Edward Connors 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9923 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey probed the needs and problems facing local criminal justice practitioners. Within each sampled county, survey questionnaires were distributed to the police chief of the largest city, the sheriff, the jail administrator, the prosecutor, the chief trial court judge, the trial court administrator (where applicable), and probation and parole agency heads. Although the general topics covered in the questionnaires are similar, specific items are not repeated across the questionnaires, except for those given to the sheriffs and the police chiefs. The sheriffs surveyed were those with law enforcement responsibilities, so the questions asked of the police chiefs and the sheriffs were identical. The questionnaires were tailored to each group of respondents, and dealt with five general areas: (1) background characteristics, including staff size, budget totals, and facility age, (2) criminal justice system problems, (3) prison crowding, (4) personnel issues such as training needs and programs, and (5) operations and procedures including management, management information, and the specific operations in which the respondents were involved. In some cases, sets of question items were grouped into question batteries that dealt with specific topic areas (e.g., staff recruitment, judicial training, and number of personnel). For example, the Staff Recruitment battery items in the Probation and Parole Questionnaire asked respondents to use a 4 point scale to indicate the seriousness of each of the following problems: low salaries, poor image of corrections work, high entrance requirements, location of qualified staff, shortage of qualified minority applicants, and hiring freezes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09923.v1 law enforcement agencies icpsr personnel icpsr personnel management icpsr police departments icpsr prison administration icpsr prison overcrowding icpsr training icpsr budgets icpsr criminal justice system icpsr correctional facilities icpsr courts icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McEwen, J. Thomas Webster, Barbara Connors, Edward Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9923 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09923.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09089 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09089 MiAaI MiAaI Factors Influencing the Quality and Utility of Government-Sponsored Criminal Justice Research in the United States, 1975-1986 [electronic resource] Lois Recascino Wise 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9089 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the effects of organizational environment and funding level on the utility of criminal justice research projects sponsored by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). The data represent a unique source of information on factors that influence the quality and utility of criminal justice research. Variables describing the research grants include NIJ office responsible for monitoring the grant (e.g., courts, police, corrections, etc.), organization type receiving the grant (academic or nonacademic), type of data (collected originally, existing, merged), and priority area (crime, victims, parole, police). The studies are also classified by: (1) sampling method employed, (2) presentation style, (3) statistical analysis employed, (4) type of research design, (5) number of observation points, and (6) unit of analysis. Additional variables provided include whether there was a copy of the study report in the National Criminal Justice Archive, whether the study contained recommendations for policy or practice, and whether the project was completed on time. The data file provides two indices--one that represents quality and one that represents utility. Each measure is generated from a combination of variables in the dataset. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09089.v1 funding icpsr grants icpsr policies and procedures icpsr research icpsr criminal justice system icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Wise, Lois Recascino Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9089 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09089.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08912 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08912 MiAaI MiAaI Historical Statistics on Prisoners in State and Federal institutions, Yearend 1925-1986 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 8912 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection supplies annual data on the size of the prison population and the size of the general population in the United States for the period 1925 to 1986. These yearend counts include tabulations for prisons in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as the federal prisons, and are intended to provide a measure of the overall size of the prison population. The figures were provided from a voluntary reporting program in which each state, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons reported summary statistics as part of the statistical information on prison populations in the United States. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08912.v1 crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr United States icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8912 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08912.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09330 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09330 MiAaI MiAaI Illegal Immigration and Crime in San Diego and El Paso Counties, 1985-1986 [electronic resource] Susan Pennell , Christine Curtis , Jeff Tayman 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9330 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to examine whether a rising crime rate in El Paso, Texas and San Diego, California in 1986 could be attributed to, among other factors, the influx of undocumented aliens. Variables include level of involvement of undocumented aliens in serious felony arrests in San Diego and El Paso Counties, the outcome of serious felony arrest cases involving undocumented persons compared to others arrested for similar offenses, the impact of arrests of undocumented aliens on the criminal justice system in terms of workload and cost, the extent that criminal justice agencies coordinate their efforts to apprehend and process undocumented aliens who have committed serious crimes in San Diego and El Paso counties, and how differences in agency objectives impede or enhance coordination. Data are also provided on how many undocumented persons were arrested/convicted for repeat offense in these counties and which type of policies or procedures could be implemented in criminal justice agencies to address the issue of crimes committed by undocumented aliens. Data were collected in the two cities with focus on serious felony offenses. The collection includes sociodemographic characteristics, citizenship status, current arrest, case disposition, and prior criminal history with additional data from San Diego to compute the costs involving undocumented aliens. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09330.v1 arrests icpsr crime rates icpsr criminal justice system icpsr felony offenses icpsr illegal immigrants icpsr immigration icpsr RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency Pennell, Susan Curtis, Christine Tayman, Jeff Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9330 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09330.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09691 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09691 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1986 [electronic resource] Reported Cases in Calendar Year Data Base National Center for Juvenile Justice 1992-03-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9691 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this series is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth done by juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases by sex, number of status cases by sex, number of dependency cases by sex, and total number of cases by sex. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09691.v1 youths icpsr case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9691 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09691.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09130 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09130 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1986 [electronic resource] Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9130 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09130.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9130 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09130.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09790 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09790 MiAaI MiAaI Changing Patterns of Drug Abuse and Criminality Among Crack Cocaine Users in New York City [electronic resource] Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice System Processing, 1983-1984, 1986 Jeffrey Fagan , Steven Belenko , Bruce D. Johnson 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9790 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection compares a sample of persons arrested for offenses related to crack cocaine with a sample arrested for offenses related to powdered cocaine. The collection is one of two parts of a study designed to examine the characteristics of crack users and sellers, the impact of large numbers of crack-related offenders on the criminal justice system, and their effects on drug treatment and community programs. Official arrest records and supplementary data bases are used to analyze the official arrest, conviction, and incarceration histories of powdered cocaine and crack defendants. Questions addressed by the collection include: (1) How are defendants charged with crack-related offenses different from defendants charged with offenses related to powdered cocaine? (2) Is there a difference between the ways the criminal justice system handles crack offenders and powdered cocaine offenders in pretrial detention, charges filed, case dispositions, and sentencing? (3) How do the criminal careers of crack offenders compare with the criminal careers of powdered cocaine offenders, especially in terms of total arrest rates, frequencies of nondrug crimes, and frequencies of violent crimes? (4) Is violence more strongly associated with crack dealing than with powdered cocaine dealing? and (5) How does the developmental history of powdered cocaine sales and possession compare with the history of crack sales and possession? Variables include demographic information such as gender, residence, and race, arrest, conviction, and incarceration histories, prior criminal record, community ties, and court outcomes of the arrests. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 imprisonment icpsr arrest records icpsr case processing icpsr crack cocaine icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr criminality icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr drug abuse icpsr drug offenders icpsr NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Fagan, Jeffrey Belenko, Steven Johnson, Bruce D. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9790 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09790.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09161 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09161 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1985 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1998-05-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9161 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09161.v2 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9161 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09161.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08650 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08650 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [electronic resource] CJEE Individual Units File and Estimates File, 1985 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1993-03-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8650 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey provides criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data and for all states, counties, and certain municipal governments. Specific variables include full- and part-time employees and payroll, expenditures for current operations, capital outlay and contributions to employee benefits, and intergovernmental expenditures paid to state and local governments. Sectors represented in this survey include police protection, judicial services, legal services and prosecution, public defense, and corrections, as well as other criminal justice services. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08650.v1 part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8650 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08650.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08933 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08933 MiAaI MiAaI Improving Prison Classification Procedures in Vermont [electronic resource] Applying an Interaction Model, 1983-1985 William K. Apao 2000-03-21 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8933 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this data collection was to develop and test an interactive model for classifying prisoners. The model includes person variables, environmental or situation variables, and prison-environmental interaction variables in order to study the interactions between individuals and their environments and to predict offender behaviors such as escape, misconduct, and violence. The model was designed to enhance the predictive validity of the National Institute of Corrections' classification system that was being used in Vermont prisons. Included are scores from the National Institute of Corrections' custody classification and reclassification instruments, scores from a needs assessment, sentencing information, and characteristics of the prison in which the inmate was housed. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08933.v1 violence icpsr Vermont icpsr United States icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr living conditions icpsr sentencing icpsr socioeconomic indicators icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Apao, William K. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8933 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08933.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08934 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08934 MiAaI MiAaI Police Response to Street Gang Violence in California [electronic resource] Improving the Investigative Process, 1985 Malcolm W. Klein , Cheryl L. Maxson , Margaret A. Gordon 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8934 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines gang and non-gang homicides as well as other types of offenses in small California jurisdictions. Data are provided on violent gang offenses and offenders as well as on a companion sample of non-gang offenses and offenders. Two separate data files are supplied, one for participants and one for incidents. The participant data include age, gender, race, and role of participants. The incident data include information from the "violent incident data collection form" (setting, auto involvement, and amount of property loss), and the "group indicators coding form" (argot, tattoos, clothing, and slang terminology). Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08934.v1 crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr death icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr gangs icpsr murder icpsr violence icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Klein, Malcolm W. Maxson, Cheryl L. Gordon, Margaret A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8934 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08934.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08667 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08667 MiAaI MiAaI Census of State Felony Courts, 1985 [electronic resource] [United States] United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8667 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to provide a current listing of all felony courts in this country and to provide a universe from which a sample of courts could be selected based on felony caseload. The study includes information on all state felony courts in the United States, including the number of cases filed and disposed by conviction, acquittal, dismissal, or other means. Court administrators were asked to indicate the manner in which cases filed and disposed were counted, such as by defendant, charge, or indictment information. The total number of cases disposed during the period was also collected for juvenile delinquents and for traffic offenses (moving violations) where applicable. Finally, data were gathered on whether felonies reduced to misdemeanors were included in the felony count and whether lower courts in the jurisdiction accepted guilty pleas to felonies. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08667.v2 convictions (law) icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr juvenile delinquency icpsr states (USA) icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8667 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08667.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09297 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09297 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1985 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 1992-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9297 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status, and dependency cases). Inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts, this collection is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth done by juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases by sex, number of dependency cases by sex, and total number of cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09297.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9297 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09297.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08911 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08911 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1985 [electronic resource] Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8911 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08911.v2 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr policies and procedures icpsr prosecution icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8911 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08911.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08495 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08495 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1984-1985 [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention , United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2011-01-11 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8495 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey is the eighth in a series of data collection efforts aimed at providing information on the number and type of juveniles placed in state and local residential facilities for juvenile offenders. Six types of public and private facilities are covered: (1) detention centers, (2) shelters, (3) reception or diagnostic centers, (4) training schools, (5) ranches, forestry camps, and farms, and (6) halfway houses and group homes. Survey items include facility capacity, number of full-time and part-time staff, number of admissions and discharges, average quarterly population, and expenditures by the facility. Data for facility residents include age, sex, and average length of stay. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08495.v5 public expenditures icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr expenditures icpsr government agencies icpsr census data icpsr juvenile delinquency icpsr personnel work icpsr population icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD III. Corrections United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8495 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08495.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09162 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09162 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1984 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1998-04-20 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 9162 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09162.v2 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9162 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09162.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09349 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09349 MiAaI MiAaI Crime Stoppers [electronic resource] A National Evaluation of Program Operations and Effects, 1984 Dennis P. Rosenbaum , Arthur J. Lurigio , Paul J. Lavrakas 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9349 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The goal of this data collection was to answer three basic questions about the Crime Stoppers (CS) program, a program encouraging citizen involvement in averting crime and apprehending suspects. First, how does Crime Stoppers work in theory and in practice? Second, what are the opinions and attitudes of program participants toward the Crime Stoppers program? Third, how do various components of the program such as rewards, anonymity, use of informants, and media participation affect criminal justice outcome measures such as citizen calls and arrests? This collection marks the first attempt to examine the operational procedures and effectiveness of Crime Stoppers programs in the United States. Police coordinators and board chairs of local Crime Stoppers programs described their perceptions of and attitudes toward the Crime Stoppers program. The Police Coordinator File includes variables such as the police coordinator's background and experience, program development and support, everyday operations and procedures, outcome statistics on citizen calls (suspects arrested, property recovered, and suspects prosecuted), reward setting and distribution, and program relations with media, law enforcement, and the board of directors. Also available in this file are data on citizen calls received by the program, the program's arrests and clearances, and the program's effects on investigation procedure. The merged file contains data from police coordinators and from Crime Stoppers board members. Other variables include city population, percent of households living in poverty, percent of white population, number of Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Part I crimes involved, membership and performance of the board, fund raising methods, and ratings of the program. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09349.v1 arrests icpsr attitudes icpsr community involvement icpsr community policing icpsr Crime Stoppers programs icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr police icpsr police investigations icpsr program evaluation icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Rosenbaum, Dennis P. Lurigio, Arthur J. Lavrakas, Paul J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9349 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09349.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09965 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1993 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09965 MiAaI MiAaI Alternative Procedures for Reducing Delays in Criminal Appeals [electronic resource] Sacramento, Springfield, and Rhode Island, 1983-1984 Joy A. Chapper , Roger A. Hanson 1994-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1993 ICPSR 9965 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection investigates the effectiveness of alternative approaches to reducing delays in criminal appeals. Interviews were conducted with court representatives from districts employing differing alternatives. These districts and approaches are (1) case management in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fourth District, in Springfield, (2) staff screening for submission without oral argument in the California Court of Appeals, Third District, in Sacramento, and (3) fast-tracking procedures in the Rhode Island Supreme Court. Parallel interviews were conducted in public defenders' offices in three additional locations: Colorado, the District of Columbia, and Minnesota. Questions focused on the backlogs courts were facing, the reasons for the backlogs, and the consequences. Participants were asked about the fairness and possible consequences of procedures employed by their courts and other courts in this study. Case data were acquired from court records of the Springfield, Sacramento, and Rhode Island courts. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09965.v1 appeal procedures icpsr appellate courts icpsr case management icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Chapper, Joy A. Hanson, Roger A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9965 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09965.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08254 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08254 MiAaI MiAaI Search Warrant Procedures in Seven Cities, 1984 [electronic resource] [United States] Richard L. Van Duizend , Paul Sutton , Charlotte A. Carter 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8254 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were collected in seven unnamed cities by the National Center of State Courts. Court cases were identified in one of three ways: (1) observation during real-time interviews, (2) court records of real-time interviews, or (3) court records of historical cases. The variables in this dataset include the rank of the law enforcement officer applying for the warrant, the type of agency applying for the warrant, general object of the search requested, specific area to be searched, type of crime being investigated, central offense named in the warrant, evidence upon which the warrant application is based, and disposition of the warrant application. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08254.v1 arrests icpsr criminal investigations icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr police response icpsr search warrants icpsr state courts icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IX. Police Van Duizend, Richard L. Sutton, Paul Carter, Charlotte A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8254 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08254.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08262 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08262 MiAaI MiAaI State Appellate Court Adaptation to Caseload Increase, 1968-1984 [electronic resource] [United States] Thomas Marvell , Carlisle Moody 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8262 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the impact of caseload pressures on both intermediate appellate courts and supreme courts for each state in the nation. The data describe in detail the changes made by appellate courts and supply information related to each change. These changes include (1) adding judges, law clerks and staff attorneys, (2) expanding or creating intermediate appellate courts, (3) reducing panel size, (4) using summary procedures, (5) curtailing opinion practices by deciding cases without opinion or unpublished and memo opinions, and (6) curtailing oral argument length. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08262.v1 court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr judicial process icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Marvell, Thomas Moody, Carlisle Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8262 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08262.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08619 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08619 MiAaI MiAaI Employment Services for Ex-Offenders, 1981-1984 [electronic resource] Boston, Chicago, and San Diego Raymond H. Milkman 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8619 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was conducted to test whether job counseling and placement services, accompanied by intensive follow-up after placement, would significantly increase the effectiveness of employment programs for individuals recently released from prison. Data were collected on personal, criminal, and employment backgrounds, including the type, duration, and pay of previous employment, living arrangements, marital status, criminal history, and characteristics of the employment placement. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08619.v2 correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr living conditions icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Milkman, Raymond H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8619 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08619.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08940 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08940 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1984 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8940 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes in quantitative terms the volume of juvenile cases disposed by courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency, status and dependency cases). This collection is the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth done by juvenile courts, a record inaugurated in 1926 to furnish an index of the problems brought before the juvenile courts. Information is provided on state, county, number of delinquency cases by sex, number of dependency cases by sex, and total number of cases. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08940.v1 case processing icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr state courts icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr statistical data icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8940 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08940.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08675 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08675 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1984 [electronic resource] Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8675 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08675.v4 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8675 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08675.v4 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09328 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09328 MiAaI MiAaI Repeat Offender Laws in the United States [electronic resource] Forms, Uses, and Perceived Value, 1983 William F. McDonald , Lonnie A. Athens , Thomas J. Minton 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9328 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey of prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges in jurisdictions with sentence enhancement statutes for repeat offenders collected information about the characteristics of the laws and criminal justice professionals regarding the fairness, effectiveness, and practice of the laws. The jurisdiction file includes variables such as jurisdiction size, number of provisions in the law, number of felony cases handled under the law per year, number of defendants sentenced as repeat offenders, frequency of charging and sentencing under the law, and minimum and maximum sentences specified in the statutes. The variables in the three surveys of practitioners contain data related to their familiarity with the laws, descriptions of recent cases, and satisfaction with the new statutes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09328.v1 attorneys icpsr criminal justice system icpsr felony offenses icpsr judges icpsr jurisdiction icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr recidivists icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System McDonald, William F. Athens, Lonnie A. Minton, Thomas J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9328 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09328.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08362 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08362 MiAaI MiAaI National Assessment of Criminal Justice Needs, 1983 [electronic resource] [United States] Kent Chabotar 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8362 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. In 1983, the National Institute of Justice sponsored a program evaluation survey by Abt Associates that was designed to identify the highest priority needs for management and operational improvements in the criminal justice system. Six groups were surveyed: judges and trial court administrators, corrections officials, public defenders, police, prosecutors, and probation/parole officials. Variables in this study include background information on the respondents' agencies, such as operating budget and number of employees, financial resources available to the agency, and technical assistance, research, and initiative programs used by the agency. The codebook includes the mailed questionnaire sent to each of the six groups in the study as well as a copy of the telephone interview guide. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08362.v1 government agencies icpsr judicial process icpsr legal systems icpsr management icpsr organizational behavior icpsr parole services icpsr police icpsr policies and procedures icpsr program evaluation icpsr United States icpsr administration icpsr budgets icpsr correctional facilities icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Chabotar, Kent Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8362 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08362.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08316 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08316 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Victim Risk Supplement, 1983 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1999-02-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8316 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This special one-time survey was designed to collect data on persons aged 12 and over reporting household victimizations. The supplement, administered over a one-month period as part of the National Crime Survey, gathered data on people's lifestyles in order to determine whether certain lifestyles were related to crime victimization. Five questionnaires used by the Census Bureau for data collection served as the data collection model for this supplement. The first and second questionnaires, VRS-1 and VRS-2, contained basic screen questions and an incident report, respectively. VRS-3, the third questionnaire, was completed for every household member aged 16 or older, and included items specifically designed to determine whether a person's lifestyle at work, home, or during leisure time affected the risk of crime victimization. The interviewers completed the fourth and fifth questionnaires, VRS-4 and VRS-5. They were instructed to answer questions about the respondents' neighborhoods and behavior during the interview. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08316.v2 crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr households icpsr leisure icpsr living conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr quality of life icpsr residential environment icpsr victimization icpsr work environment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8316 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08316.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09668 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1992 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09668 MiAaI MiAaI Registry of Randomized Criminal Justice Experiments in Sanctions, 1951-1983 [electronic resource] David Weisburd , Lawrence Sherman , Anthony Petrosino 1997-08-15 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1992 ICPSR 9668 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This registry categorizes, summarizes, and analyzes datasets containing information on randomized criminal justice experiments in sanctions. These datasets vary in methodology, geographic region, and other aspects. Among the topics covered in this registry are the nature of offense being sanctioned, type of sanction, racial and sexual composition of the sample, and procedures and outcomes of each collection. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09668.v2 criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr gender icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr race icpsr sanctions icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Weisburd, David Sherman, Lawrence Petrosino, Anthony Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9668 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09668.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08278 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08278 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Determinant Sentencing on Institutional Climate and Prison Administration [electronic resource] Connecticut, Minnesota, Illinois, 1981-1983 Lynne Goodstein , John H. Kramer , John R. Hepburn , Doris L. MacKenzie 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8278 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the effects of determinant sentencing on prison climate and administration. Three data collection periods are covered in the dataset. Parts 1-3 contain data taken from a total random sample of offenders housed at five prisons over all three data collection periods. Part 4 is an additional sample from the state of Connecticut of inmates serving determinate sentences, collected during the third period of data collection. Parts 5 and 6 comprise indeterminate sample data from all three data collection periods, while Parts 7-9 contain determinate panel sample data from all three collection periods. There were six questionnaires used in collecting these data, covering inmates' feelings about their arrest, court case, and conviction, their feelings about the law, physical problems developed during their prison term, how their time was spent in prison, family contacts outside prison, relationships with other prisoners and guards, involvement in prison programs, and criminal history. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08278.v1 correctional facilities icpsr correctional reform icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr imprisonment icpsr inmate attitudes icpsr justice icpsr parole icpsr prison administration icpsr prison conditions icpsr prison inmates icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Goodstein, Lynne Kramer, John H. Hepburn, John R. MacKenzie, Doris L. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8278 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08278.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08455 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08455 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1983 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1997-04-14 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8455 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08455.v1 correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8455 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08455.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08656 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08656 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1983 [United States] [electronic resource] United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8656 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection describes the volume of juvenile cases disposed of during calendar year 1983 in courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters (delinquency and dependency/neglect cases) in the fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the territories of the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. This collection is part of the oldest continuous source of information on the processing of delinquent and dependent youth done by juvenile courts, a record inaugurated in 1926. It furnishes an index of the general nature and extent of the problems brought before the juvenile courts. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08656.v1 juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr juvenile courts icpsr status offenses icpsr case processing icpsr county courts icpsr youths icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8656 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08656.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08449 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08449 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1983 [electronic resource] California, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virgin Islands, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8449 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08449.v7 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8449 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08449.v7 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08437 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08437 MiAaI MiAaI Improving Correctional Classification, New York, 1981-1983 [electronic resource] Kevin Wright 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8437 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. There were three specific goals of this research. The first was to evaluate three procedures currently available for the classification of correctional inmates: the Risk Analysis method, Megargee's Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Typology, and Toch's Prison Preference Inventory. Second, the research devised and tested a postdictive model of adjustment to prison life. Third, a new classification scheme was developed for predicting inmate adjustment to prison life that considers individual and organizational (contextual) factors and various interactions between the two. These data were collected from a sample of 942 volunteer inmates from ten New York state correctional facilities, five of which were maximum security and five of which were medium security facilities. Only one-half of the original 942 inmates completed the MMPI. Background and questionnaire data were collected during the summer and fall of 1983. Outcome data on each inmate infraction were collected for a three-year period prior to that time. Each case in Part 1, Merged Survey Response File [PPQ, PEI, PAQ], represents survey response data from an individual inmate, with variables from the Prison Preference Questionnaire (PPQ), the Prison Environment Inventory (PEI), and the Prison Adjustment Questionnaire (PAQ). Cases in Part 2, Medical Records, are records of medical contacts and diagnoses of inmates' illnesses. Part 3, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, contains personality assessment information and scores for each individual offender. Data in Part 4, Sample Data [Background Characteristics], consist of individual-based variables covering inmates' background characteristics. Part 5, Offenses and Disciplinary Action Records, contains records of offenses and disciplinary action by individual offender. The client number is unique and consistent across all data files. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08437.v1 criminal justice system icpsr correctional facilities icpsr health icpsr inmates icpsr mental health icpsr United States icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Wright, Kevin Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8437 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08437.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07635 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07635 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] National Sample, 1973-1983 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1998-10-05 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7635 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Crime Survey (NCS), a study of personal and household victimization, measures victimization for six selected crimes, including attempts. The NCS was designed to achieve three primary objectives: to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to police, and to provide uniform measures of selected types of crime. The surveys cover the following types of crimes, including attempts: rape, robbery, assault, burglary, larceny, and auto or motor vehicle theft. Crimes such as murder, kidnapping, shoplifting, and gambling are not covered. Questions designed to obtain data on the characteristics and circumstances of the victimization were asked in each incident report. Items such as time and place of occurrence, injuries suffered, medical expenses incurred, number, age, race, and sex of offender(s), relationship of offender(s) to victim (stranger, casual acquaintance, relative, etc.), and other detailed data relevant to a complete description of the incident were included. Legal and technical terms, such as assault and larceny, were avoided during the interviews. Incidents were later classified in more technical terms based upon the presence or absence of certain elements. In addition, data were collected in the study to obtain information on the victims' education, migration, labor force status, occupation, and income. Full data for each year are contained in Parts 101-110. Incident-level extract files (Parts 1-10, 41) are available to provide users with files that are easy to manipulate. The incident-level datasets contain each incident record that appears in the full sample file, the victim's person record, and the victim's household information. These data include person and household information for incidents only. Subsetted person-level files also are available as Parts 50-79. All of the variables for victims are repeated for a maximum of four incidents per victim. There is one person-level subset file for each interview quarter of the complete national sample from 1973 through the second interview quarter in 1980. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07635.v6 census data icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr households icpsr neighborhoods icpsr residential environment icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD X. Victimization United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7635 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07635.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08705 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08705 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1982 [electronic resource] St. Louis Abt Associates, Inc. 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8705 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection provides statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts disposed of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes in an individual urban jurisdiction, St. Louis. The cases in the data file represent cases initiated in 1982, defined as screened, or filed in 1982. The collection includes disposition data on felonies for which an initial court charge was filed (cases filed) and for those felony arrests that were ultimately indicted or bound over to the felony court for disposition (cases indicted). It does not include information on all felony arrests declined for prosecution. It is, with a few exceptions, extracted from the defendant, case, charge and sentence records. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08705.v1 arrests icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Abt Associates, Inc. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8705 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08705.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08717 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08717 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1982 [electronic resource] Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C. Abt Associates, Inc. 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8717 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study provides statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts disposed of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes in two individual urban jurisdictions, Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C. Cases in the data files were initiated or filed in 1982. Both the Washington, D.C. file and the Portland file contain information on all felony arrests (which include arrests declined as well as those filed), cases filed, and cases indicted. Sentencing information is provided in the Portland file but is not available for Washington D.C. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08717.v1 arrests icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Abt Associates, Inc. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8717 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08717.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08921 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08921 MiAaI MiAaI Prison Crowding and Forced Releases in Illinois, 1979-1982 [electronic resource] James Austin 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8921 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were collected in the Illinois prison system where, in response to a prison overcrowding crisis, approximately two-thirds of the inmates released by the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) were discharged prior to serving their expected sentences. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of an early release program on prisoners, prison populations, offense rates, local criminal justice systems, and the general public. The files contain extensive Federal Bureau of Investigation arrest history information and other personal and social indicators describing inmates released from the state prison system. Data are available for three comparison groups: (1) a sample of prisoners who served their regular sentences prior to the "forced release" program, (2) a group that served regular sentences after implementation of the program, and (3) a group of inmates who were released early under the program (i.e., before serving their full sentences). The "inmate jacket file," which is the comprehensive institutional file maintained for all inmates, contains variables for each inmate on social and personal characteristics, criminal history, risk scales, court decisions for each offense, institutional conduct, prior release and return records, method of release, condition of supervision, and parole violation records. The arrest file includes variables that describe the type and number of charges at arrest, case disposition of each charge, probation length, incarceration length, admission and release dates, and release type. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08921.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmates icpsr parole system icpsr probation icpsr socioeconomic indicators icpsr United States icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Austin, James Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8921 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08921.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08100 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08100 MiAaI MiAaI ABC News Poll of Public Opinion on Crime, December 1982 [electronic resource] ABC News 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8100 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. This special topic poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. In this poll, respondents were questioned regarding their perceptions of crime and the criminal justice system. Questions assessed the respondents' fear of crime, perceptions of the seriousness of crime in the United States, evaluation of the judicial and penal systems, assessment of police performance, and confidence in the ability of the police to prevent crime. The poll also asked for respondents' opinions about President Ronald Reagan's policies, the state of the economy, and government spending. Demographic information was collected, including the respondent's sex, age, education level, race, and income level. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08100.v2 attitudes icpsr correctional system icpsr crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr economic conditions icpsr fear of crime icpsr firearms icpsr government spending icpsr law enforcement icpsr police performance icpsr political attitudes icpsr political issues icpsr presidential performance icpsr public opinion icpsr Reagan, Ronald icpsr NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System ABC News Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8100 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08100.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08919 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08919 MiAaI MiAaI Supervised Pretrial Release Programs, 1979-1982 [electronic resource] Miami, Milwaukee, and Portland James Austin , Barry Krisberg 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8919 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection effort was designed to assess the effects of different types of supervised pretrial release (SPR). Four major types of effects were examined: (1) defendants' behaviors while awaiting trial (failure to appear and arrests for new offenses), (2) the costs of SPR to victims and the criminal justice system, (3) pretrial release practices, and (4) jail populations. This study provides detailed information for a selected group of defendants awaiting trial on criminal histories and arrests while awaiting trial. Data are also available on services provided between arrest and disposition. The study produced four different data sets. The first, Supervised Release Information System (SRIS), contains intake information on current arrest, criminal record, socio-economic status, ties with the community, contact with mental health and substance abuse facilities, and pretrial release decisions. The release section of this data base contains information on services provided, intensity of supervision, termination from program, personal characteristics at termination, criminal charges at disposition, and new charges resulting from arrests while under pretrial status. The Arrest Data Set includes variables on type and number of crimes committed by SPR defendants, property costs to victims, personal injury costs, and court disposition for each offense. The Retrospective Data Set supplies variables on charges filed and method of release, personal characteristics, length of pretrial incarceration, bail, whether the defendant was rebooked during the pretrial period, charge at disposition, sentence, total court appearances, and total failures to appear in court (FTAs). The Jail Population Data Set contains monthly counts of jail population and average daily population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08919.v1 arrests icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr drugs icpsr mental health icpsr sentencing icpsr trials icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD III. Corrections Austin, James Krisberg, Barry Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8919 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08919.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08307 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08307 MiAaI MiAaI Felony Prosecution and Sentencing in North Carolina, 1981-1982 [electronic resource] Stevens Clarke 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8307 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey assesses the impact of a determinant sentencing law, the Fair Sentencing Act, which became effective July 1, 1981, in North Carolina. Specific variables include information from official court records on witness testimony and quality of evidence, information from prison staff and probation/parole officers, and social, demographic, and criminal history for defendants. In this dataset it is also possible to trace defendants through the criminal justice system from arrest to disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08307.v3 criminal justice system icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Clarke, Stevens Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8307 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08307.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08259 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08259 MiAaI MiAaI Cost Effectiveness of Misdemeanant Probation in Hamilton County, Ohio, 1981-1982 [electronic resource] Richard Hartigan 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8259 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This research was designed to determine whether the supervision of misdemeanant probationers was cost-effective for increasing the level of successful probation completions in Hamilton County, Ohio. The primary objective was to examine the relationships among these factors: supervision costs, the collection of court costs, fines, and restitution, types of supervision, risk assessment, and probationer conduct for the population of probationers. Probationers were initially classified according to risk assessment and then randomly assigned to a supervision category. The probationer's risk potential was a numerical score derived from demographic background variables, prior record, and history of substance use. The DSCP (Degree of Successful Completion of Probation) was developed specifically to measure probationer conduct and to compare trends and relationships. The variables examined in the study include: risk assessment at intake, supervision level assigned, number of times the probationer was assigned to probation, start and planned termination dates, date of last status change, status at termination, degree of successful completion of probation achieved, costs incurred in administering probation, and amounts collected from each probationer for court costs, restitution, and fines. Although data were collected on 7,072 misdemeanant probation experiences, there are only 2,756 probationers included in the study. The remaining 4,316 cases were excluded due to failure of the probationer to show up for screening or for other reasons that did not meet the research criteria. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08259.v1 administrative costs icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr court costs icpsr criminal justice system icpsr probation icpsr probation conditions icpsr program evaluation icpsr restitution programs icpsr risk assessment icpsr supervised liberty icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Hartigan, Richard Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8259 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08259.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08417 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08417 MiAaI MiAaI National Indigent Criminal Defense Survey, 1982 [electronic resource] Abt Associates, Inc. 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8417 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This survey was conducted to provide national-level data on basic information such as system types, funding sources, costs, and caseloads of indigent defense programs for defense practitioners, policymakers, and planners in the criminal justice system. The goal of the survey was to provide data that could begin to answer questions regarding the nature and scope of indigent service delivery. Specifically, the three basic objectives were to provide descriptive data, to assess the level of response to defense service delivery requirements, and to facilitate further research. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08417.v2 caseloads icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defense (law) icpsr legal aid icpsr legal representation icpsr public defenders icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Abt Associates, Inc. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8417 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08417.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08359 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08359 MiAaI MiAaI Learning Deficiencies Among Adult Inmates, 1982 [electronic resource] Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Washington Raymond Bell , Elizabeth H., et al. Conard 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8359 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The National Institute of Justice sponsored this study of 1,065 prison inmates in Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Respondents were administered an academic achievement test, the Tests of Adult Basic Education, and an individual intelligence test, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). Other screening tests were also given to certain respondents, including the Mann-Suiter Disabilities Screening Test and the Adaptive Behavior Checklist. Data for each inmate includes offenses committed, prior institutionalization, juvenile adjudication, years of formal education, academic and vocational participation while incarcerated, previous diagnoses, childhood home situation, death of parents, number of siblings, and any childhood problems. Information on demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, race, employment history, and physical condition, is available for each respondent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08359.v1 academic ability icpsr academic achievement icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr educational background icpsr educationally disadvantaged icpsr family histories icpsr health status icpsr inmate programs icpsr job history icpsr justice icpsr learning disabilities icpsr prison inmates icpsr test scores icpsr vocational education icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Bell, Raymond Conard, Elizabeth H., et al. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8359 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08359.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08358 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08358 MiAaI MiAaI Judicial Decision Guidelines for Bail [electronic resource] The Philadelphia Experiment, 1981-1982 John S. Goldkamp , Michael R. Gottfredson 1993-03-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8358 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to test the utility of draft guidelines in informing judicial decisions about bail. A sample of judges, based upon a stratified quota sampling design, was selected from the Philadephia Municipal Court to rule on sample cases. Eight judges were randomly selected to use guidelines and be "experimental judges," and eight others were randomly selected to be nonguideline or "control judges." Data for the sample cases were taken from defendants' files. Variables provided in this collection include number of suspects involved, number of different offenses charged, most serious injury experienced by the victim(s), preliminary arraignment disposition, amount of bail, socioeconomic status and demographics of the defendant, prior criminal history of the defendant, and reason for granting or denying bail. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08358.v1 bail icpsr criminal justice system icpsr decision making icpsr judges icpsr judicial decisions icpsr offenses icpsr pretrial procedures icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts NACJD III. Corrections Goldkamp, John S. Gottfredson, Michael R. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8358 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08358.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08700 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08700 MiAaI MiAaI Effects of Prison Versus Probation in California, 1980-1982 [electronic resource] Joan Petersilia , Susan Turner , Joyce Peterson 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8700 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study was divided into two phases. The first assessed the effects of different sanctions on separate criminal populations, focusing on probation as a sentencing alternative for felons. The second phase used a quasi-experimental design to address how imprisonment affects criminal behavior when criminals are released. Specific issues included: (a) the effect that imprisonment (vs. probation) and length of time served have on recidivism, (b) the amount of crime prevented by imprisoning offenders rather than placing them on probation, and (c) costs to the system for achieving that reduction in crime. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08700.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr government performance icpsr inmates icpsr probation icpsr sentencing icpsr social accounts icpsr social expenditures icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Petersilia, Joan Turner, Susan Peterson, Joyce Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8700 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08700.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08625 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08625 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] National Sample of Rape Victims, 1973-1982 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8625 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to provide an in-depth look at rapes and attempted rapes in the United States. Part 1 of the collection offers data on rape victims and contains variables regarding the characteristics of the crime, such as the setting, the relationship between the victim and offender, the likelihood of injury, and the reasons why rape is not reported to police. Part 2 contains data on a control group of females who were victims of no crime or of crimes other than rape. The information contained is similar to that found in Part 1. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08625.v3 census data icpsr victimization icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr households icpsr neighborhoods icpsr physical violence icpsr rape icpsr residential environment icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8625 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08625.v3 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08515 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1986 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08515 MiAaI MiAaI Matching Treatment and Offender [electronic resource] North Carolina, 1980-1982 Mary Ellen Marsden , Thomas Orsagh 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1986 ICPSR 8515 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data were gathered in order to evaluate the implications of rational choice theory for offender rehabilitation. The hypothesis of the research was that income-enhancing prison rehabilitation programs are most effective for the economically motivated offender. The offender was characterized by demographic and socio-economic characteristics, criminal history and behavior, and work activities during incarceration. Information was also collected on type of release and post-release recidivistic and labor market measures. Recividism was measured by arrests, convictions, and reincarcerations, length of time until first arrest after release, and seriousness of offense leading to reincarceration. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08515.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime prevention icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmates icpsr United States icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Marsden, Mary Ellen Orsagh, Thomas Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8515 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08515.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09961 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s2000 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09961 MiAaI MiAaI Study of Race, Crime, and Social Policy in Oakland, California, 1976-1982 [electronic resource] Lloyd Street 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2000 ICPSR 9961 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. olice officer, why they believed crime was down, and how they would describe certain beats in terms of drug availability, crime rates, socioeconomic status, number of juveniles, potential for violence, residential versus commercial, and degree of danger. Officers were also asked about problems particular neighborhoods were experiencing, strategies for reducing crime, difficulties in doing police work well, and work conditions. Demographic variables include age, sex, race, marital status, level of education, and years on the force. In Part 5, Public Defender/District Attorney Survey Data, public defenders and district attorneys were queried regarding which offenses were increasing most rapidly in Oakland, and they were asked to rank certain offenses in terms of seriousness. Respondents were also asked about the public's influence on criminal justice agencies and on the performance of certain criminal justice agencies. Respondents were presented with a list of crimes and asked how typical these offenses were and what factors influenced their decisions about such cases (e.g., intent, motive, evidence, behavior, prior history, injury or loss, substance abuse, emotional trauma). Other variables measured how often and under what circumstances the public defender and client and the public defender and the district attorney agreed on the case, defendant characteristics in terms of who should not be put on the stand, the effects of Proposition 8, public defender and district attorney plea guidelines, attorney discretion, and advantageous and disadvantageous characteristics of a defendant. Demographic variables include age, sex, race, marital status, religion, years of experience, and area of responsibility. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09961.v1 communities icpsr crime icpsr crime statistics icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr ethnicity icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhoods icpsr police officers icpsr policies and procedures icpsr public defenders icpsr race icpsr RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency RCMD XIII. Race and Ethnicity Street, Lloyd Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9961 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09961.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08601 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08601 MiAaI MiAaI Recidivism Among Convicted Drunk Drivers [electronic resource] Minnesota, 1982 Minnesota Criminal Justice System Driving While Intoxicated Task Force 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8601 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection focuses on recidivism among persons convicted for driving while intoxicated. It contains information about the charging and sentencing of drunk driving offenders and repeat offenders. Variables include charge, conviction, sentence, number of alcohol and non-alcohol related violations, subsequent action, sex, age, and date of sentencing. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08601.v2 alcohol consumption icpsr convictions (law) icpsr criminal justice system icpsr drinking behavior icpsr driving under the influence icpsr drug law offenses icpsr recidivism icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime Minnesota Criminal Justice System Driving While Intoxicated Task Force Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8601 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08601.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08382 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08382 MiAaI MiAaI Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States] [electronic resource] CJEE Extracts File, 1982 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1997-02-13 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8382 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE) data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal, state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is included on total employment, total police protection, police protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08382.v1 state government icpsr wages and salaries icpsr correctional system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr employment icpsr federal government icpsr full time employment icpsr government expenditures icpsr law enforcement icpsr local government icpsr part time employment icpsr NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8382 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08382.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08440 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08440 MiAaI MiAaI Juvenile Court Statistics, 1982 [electronic resource] [United States] National Center for Juvenile Justice 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8440 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data describe the volume of juvenile cases disposed of by courts in the fifty states, the District of Columbia and the territories of the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico during calendar year 1982. The data contain all available summary information on children's cases disposed of in courts having jurisdiction over juvenile matters, delinquency status, and dependency or neglect. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08440.v1 case processing icpsr status offenses icpsr youths icpsr county courts icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr dependents icpsr juvenile courts icpsr juvenile justice icpsr state courts icpsr statistical data icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing RCMD I. Crime ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System National Center for Juvenile Justice Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8440 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08440.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08408 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08408 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1982 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, Virgin Islands, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8408 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08408.v6 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8408 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08408.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08920 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1988 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08920 MiAaI MiAaI Differential Use of Jail Confinement in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Yolo Counties, 1981 [electronic resource] James Austin , Barry Krisberg 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1988 ICPSR 8920 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study provides detailed information on inmate characteristics, length of time in jail, methods of release, conditions of release, disciplinary violations, and types of program participation while in jail. The file contains variables for each inmate, including information about inmates' demographic characteristics, current offenses, prior records, confinement conditions, disciplinary problems, and nature and time of disposition. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08920.v1 arrests icpsr correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr inmates icpsr United States icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Austin, James Krisberg, Barry Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8920 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08920.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08407 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08407 MiAaI MiAaI Implementation of Community Corrections in Oregon, Colorado, and Connecticut [1981] [electronic resource] Dennis J. Palumbo , Michael Musheno , Steven Maynard-Moody 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8407 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Data were collected from three states to evaluate the success of community corrections programs and to identify the conditions that underlie these successes. In-person field interviews, telephone interviews, and mailback questionnaires were used at state, county, and district levels. The variables in the study were designed to examine the kinds of people who implement and maintain these programs, the level of commitment by judicial and prison officials to these programs, community support, and the goals of cost reduction, work training, and rehabilitation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08407.v1 achievement icpsr communities icpsr community service programs icpsr correctional facilities icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr criminal justice system icpsr goals icpsr parole services icpsr personnel icpsr program evaluation icpsr rehabilitation programs icpsr success icpsr training icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Palumbo, Dennis J. Musheno, Michael Maynard-Moody, Steven Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8407 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08407.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08438 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08438 MiAaI MiAaI Keeping the Peace [electronic resource] Police Discretion and the Mentally Disordered in Chicago, 1980-1981 Linda A. Teplin 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8438 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. For this data collection, information on police-citizen encounters was collected to explore the peacekeeping functions of the police and their handling of encounters with mentally ill persons. The data were gathered for part or all of 270 shifts through observations by researchers riding in police cars in two Chicago police districts during a 14-month period in 1980-1981. In Part 1 (Shift Level), information was collected once per shift on the general level of activity during the shift and the observer's perceptions of emotions/attitudes displayed by the police officers he/she observed. The file also contains, for each of the 270 shifts, information about the personal characteristics, work history, and working relationships of the police officers observed. Part 2 (Encounter Level) contains detailed information on each police-citizen encounter including its nature, location, police actions and/or responses, citizens involved, and their characteristics and behavior. A unique and consistent shift identification number is attached to each encounter so that information about police officer characteristics from Part 1 may be matched with Part 2. There are 1,382 police-citizen encounters involving 2,555 citizens in this collection. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08438.v1 criminal justice system icpsr decision making icpsr emotional states icpsr job history icpsr mental disorders icpsr mental health icpsr offenders icpsr police citizen interactions icpsr police officers icpsr police performance icpsr police response icpsr work attitudes icpsr NACJD IX. Police ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Teplin, Linda A. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8438 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08438.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08249 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1989 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08249 MiAaI MiAaI Criminal Justice Response to Victim Harm in the United States, 1981 [electronic resource] Jolene C. Hernon , Brian Forst 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1989 ICPSR 8249 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection examines the ways in which victim harm affects decisions regarding arrest, prosecution, and sentencing, and the impact of these decisions on the victim's perception of the criminal justice system. Five types of offenses were studied: homicide, sexual assault, burglary, robbery, and aggravated assault. The victim file contains information on personal characteristics, results of victimization, involvement in case processing, use of victim assistance service, satisfaction with case outcomes, and opinions about the court system. The police file and the prosecutor file variables cover personal background, screening decisions on scenario cases, communication with victims, and opinions about the role of victims in the criminal justice system. The prosecutor file also includes sentencing recommendations on the scenarios. Data in the judge file cover personal background, sentencing recommendations on the scenario cases, communications with victims, sources of information regarding victim harm, and opinions about the role of victims in the criminal justice system. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08249.v1 aggravated assault icpsr arrests icpsr burglary icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr homicide icpsr perceptions icpsr prosecution icpsr robbery icpsr sentencing icpsr sexual assault icpsr victim services icpsr victimization icpsr victims icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies Hernon, Jolene C. Forst, Brian Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8249 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08249.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09311 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1990 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09311 MiAaI MiAaI Individual Responses to Affirmative Action Issues in Criminal Justice Agencies, 1981 [electronic resource] [United States] William H. Feyerherm 1992-02-17 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1990 ICPSR 9311 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data, which are part of a larger study undertaken by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, evaluate the responses of criminal justice employees to affirmative action within criminal justice agencies. Information is provided on employees' (1) general mood, (2) attitudes across various attributes, such as race, sex, rank, education and length of service, and (3) demographic characteristics including age, sex, race, educational level, parents' occupations, and living arrangements. The use of criminal justice employees as the units of analysis provides attitudinal and perceptual data in assessing affirmative action programs within each agency. Variables include reasons for becoming a criminal justice employee, attitudes toward affirmative action status in general, and attitudes about affirmative action in criminal justice settings. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09311.v1 Affirmative Action icpsr attitudes icpsr criminal justice system icpsr law enforcement agencies icpsr workers icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Feyerherm, William H. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9311 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09311.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08277 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08277 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1981 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, and Virginia United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8277 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08277.v5 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8277 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08277.v5 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08355 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08355 MiAaI MiAaI Alternative Probation Strategies in Baltimore, Maryland [electronic resource] James J. Collins 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8355 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of supervised probation, unsupervised probation, and community service. Data were collected from several sources: input-intake forms used by the State of Maryland, probation officers' case record files, Maryland state police rap sheets, FBI sources, and interviews with Maryland probationers. Non-violent, less serious offenders who normally received probation sentences of 12 months or less were offered randomly selected assignments to one of three treatment methods over a five-month period. Baseline data for probationers in each of the three samples were drawn from an intake form that was routinely completed for cases. An interim assessment of recidivism was made at the midpoint of the intervention for each probationer using information drawn from police records. Probationers were interviewed six and twelve months after probation ended. Demographic information on the probationers includes sex, race, age, birthplace, marital status, employment status, and education. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08355.v1 alternatives to institutionalization icpsr community service programs icpsr cost effectiveness icpsr criminal justice system icpsr inmate release plans icpsr offenders icpsr postrelease programs icpsr probation services icpsr probationers icpsr program evaluation icpsr recidivism icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD V. Courts Collins, James J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8355 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08355.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07951 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07951 MiAaI MiAaI Characteristics of High and Low Crime Neighborhoods in Atlanta, 1980 [electronic resource] Stephanie Greenberg 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7951 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examines the question of how some urban neighborhoods maintain a low crime rate despite their proximity and similarity to relatively high crime areas. The purpose of the study is to investigate differences in various dimensions of the concept of territoriality (spatial identity, local ties, social cohesion, informal social control) and physical characteristics (land use, housing, street type, boundary characteristics) in three pairs of neighborhoods in Atlanta, Georgia. The study neighborhoods were selected by locating pairs of adjacent neighborhoods with distinctly different crime levels. The criteria for selection, other than the difference in crime rates and physical adjacency, were comparable racial composition and comparable economic status. This data collection is divided into two files. Part 1, Atlanta Plan File, contains information on every parcel of land within the six neighborhoods in the study. The variables include ownership, type of land use, physical characteristics, characteristics of structures, and assessed value of each parcel of land within the six neighborhoods. This file was used in the data analysis to measure a number of physical characteristics of parcels and blocks in the study neighborhoods, and as the sampling frame for the household survey. The original data were collected by the City of Atlanta Planning Bureau. Part 2, Atlanta Survey File, contains the results of a household survey administered to a stratified random sample of households within each of the study neighborhoods. Variables cover respondents' attitudes and behavior related to the neighborhood, fear of crime, avoidance and protective measures, and victimization experiences. Crime rates, land use, and housing characteristics of the block in which the respondent resided were coded onto each case record. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07951.v1 cities icpsr communities icpsr crime icpsr crime rates icpsr criminal justice system icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr fear of crime icpsr household composition icpsr housing icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr neighborhood conditions icpsr neighborhoods icpsr police protection icpsr police response icpsr race relations icpsr urban crime icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System RCMD I. Crime NACJD II. Community Studies Greenberg, Stephanie Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7951 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07951.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08439 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08439 MiAaI MiAaI Judicial District Data Book, 1983 [electronic resource] [United States] Federal Judicial Center 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8439 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Federal Judicial Center contracted with Claritas Corporation to produce the three data files in this collection from the Census Bureau's 1983 County and City Data Book. The data, which are summarized by judicial units, were compiled from a county-level file and include information on area and population, households, vital statistics, health, income, crime rates, housing, education, labor force, government finances, manufacturers, wholesale and retail trade, service industries, and agriculture. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08439.v1 agriculture icpsr census data icpsr counties icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr education icpsr government expenditures icpsr health icpsr households icpsr housing icpsr income icpsr industry icpsr labor force icpsr manufacturing industry icpsr population icpsr service industry icpsr trade icpsr vital statistics icpsr United States icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Federal Judicial Center Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8439 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08439.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07911 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07911 MiAaI MiAaI New Jersey Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1980 [electronic resource] Inmate Survey Data Richard F. Sparks 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7911 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: MASSACHUSETTS STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7909) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7910). The data in this study consist of interviews to determine the opinions of inmates about the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of punishments, appropriateness of penalties for various kinds of crimes, and the use of sentencing guidelines to structure judicial sentencing decisions. Frequency distributions and the survey instrument are included in the documentation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07911.v1 attitudes icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr inmates icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr punishment icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sparks, Richard F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7911 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07911.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08621 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08621 MiAaI MiAaI Comparing Court Case Processing in Nine Courts, 1979-1980 [electronic resource] Peter Nardulli , James Eisenstein , Roy B. Fleming 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8621 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study looks at the characteristics of officials who are involved in court case processing. Data were collected on the cases and defendants, the officials involved in the cases, personality characteristics of the officials and the perceptions that these officials have of each other. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08621.v1 attorneys icpsr civil service icpsr court cases icpsr court system icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr defense counsel icpsr government employees icpsr legal representation icpsr plea negotiations icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Nardulli, Peter Eisenstein, James Fleming, Roy B. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8621 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08621.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09038 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09038 MiAaI MiAaI Operation Hardcore [Crime] Evaluation [electronic resource] Los Angeles, 1976-1980 Los Angeles District Attorney's Office 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 9038 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This evaluation was developed and implemented by the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office to examine the effectiveness of specialized prosecutorial activities in dealing with the local problem of rising gang violence, in particular the special gang prosecution unit Operation Hardcore. One part of the evaluation was a system performance analysis. The purposes of this system performance analysis were (1) to describe the problems of gang violence in Los Angeles and the ways that incidents of gang violence were handled by the Los Angeles criminal justice system, and (2) to document the activities of Operation Hardcore and its effect on the criminal justice system's handling of the cases prosecuted by that unit. Computer-generated listings from the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office of all individuals referred for prosecution by local police agencies were used to identify those individuals who were subsequently prosecuted by the District Attorney. Data from working files on all cases prosecuted, including copies of police, court, and criminal history records as well as information on case prosecution, were used to describe criminal justice handling. Information from several supplementary sources was also included, such as the automated Prosecutors Management Information System (PROMIS) maintained by the District Attorney's Office, and court records from the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles County, the local felony court. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09038.v2 arrests icpsr assault icpsr burglary icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr delinquent behavior icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr district attorneys icpsr driving under the influence icpsr drug possession icpsr felony offenses icpsr gang violence icpsr gangs icpsr hearings icpsr jails icpsr kidnapping icpsr murder icpsr plea negotiations icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr sentencing icpsr theft icpsr victimization icpsr weapons icpsr witnesses icpsr RCMD I. Crime NACJD XIV. Homicide Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD VI. Criminal Justice System Los Angeles District Attorney's Office Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9038 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09038.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08226 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08226 MiAaI MiAaI Early Identification of the Chronic Offender, [1978-1980 [electronic resource] California] Rudy A. Haapanen , Carl F. Jesness 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8226 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Patterns of adult criminal behavior are examined in this data collection. Data covering the adult years of peak criminal activity (from approximately 18 to 26 years of age) were obtained from samples of delinquent youths who had been incarcerated in three California Youth Authority institutions during the 1960s: Preston, Fricot, and the Northern California Youth Center. Data were obtained from three sources: official arrest records of the California Bureau of Criminal Investigation and Identification (CII), supplementary data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the California Bureau of Vital Statistics. Follow-up data were collected between 1978 and 1981. There are two files per sample site. The first is a background data file containing information obtained while the subjects were housed in Youth Authority institutions, and the second is a follow-up history offense file containing data from arrest records. Each individual is identified by a unique ID number, which is the same in the background and offense history files. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08226.v1 United States icpsr criminal justice system icpsr crime icpsr crime prevention icpsr juvenile delinquency icpsr arrests icpsr NACJD VII. Crime and Delinquency ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Haapanen, Rudy A. Jesness, Carl F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8226 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08226.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08649 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08649 MiAaI MiAaI Relationships Between Employment and Crime [electronic resource] A Survey of Brooklyn Residents, 1979-1980 James W. Thompson 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8649 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The study was designed to explore the relationship between employment and involvement with the criminal justice system. Males arrested primarily for felony offenses were interviewed at the central booking agency in Brooklyn, New York, at the time of their arrests in 1979. A subsample of 152 arrestees was reinterviewed in 1980. The data include information on labor market participation, arrests, periods of incarceration, and the respondents' demographic characteristics. The labor market information spans a two-year period prior to those arrests. Arrest history and other criminal justice data cover the two years prior to arrest and one year following the arrest. Additional variables supply information on employment and occupation, social and neighborhood characteristics, and perceptions of the risk of committing selected crimes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08649.v2 arrests icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr employment icpsr job history icpsr labor markets icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr occupations icpsr NACJD II. Community Studies ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Thompson, James W. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8649 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08649.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08248 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08248 MiAaI MiAaI Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1980 [electronic resource] California, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania, and Utah United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8248 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest) through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing structure of the offender population. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08248.v6 adult offenders icpsr arrests icpsr case processing icpsr criminal justice system icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr prosecution icpsr policies and procedures icpsr sentencing icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8248 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08248.v6 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR09571 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1991 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR09571 MiAaI MiAaI United Nations World Crime Surveys [electronic resource] First Survey, 1970-1975 and Second Survey, 1975-1980 Graeme Newman , Bruce DiCristina 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1991 ICPSR 9571 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The United Nations began its World Crime Surveys in 1978. The first survey collected statistics on a small range of offenses and on the criminal justice process for the years 1970-1975. The second survey collected data on a wide range of offenses, offenders, and criminal justice process data for the years 1975-1980. Several factors make these two collections difficult to use in combination. Some 25 percent of those countries responding to the first survey did not respond to the second and, similarly, some 30 percent of those responding to the second survey did not respond to the first. In addition, many questions asked in the second survey were not asked in the first survey. This data collection represents the efforts of the investigators to combine, revise, and recheck the data of the first two surveys. The data are divided into two parts. Part 1 comprises all data on offenses and on some criminal justice personnel. Crime data are entered for 1970 through 1980. In most cases 1975 is entered twice, since both surveys collected data for this year. Part 2 includes data on offenders, prosecutions, convictions, and prisons. Data are entered for 1970 through 1980, for every even year. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09571.v1 convictions (law) icpsr correctional facilities icpsr crime icpsr crime patterns icpsr crime prevention icpsr crime reporting icpsr criminal justice policy icpsr criminal justice system icpsr international crime statistics icpsr nations icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr persecution icpsr trends icpsr United Nations icpsr IDRC VI. Human Dimension of International Relations NACJD VIII. Official Statistics ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Newman, Graeme DiCristina, Bruce Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 9571 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09571.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08484 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08484 MiAaI MiAaI National Crime Surveys [electronic resource] Redesign Data, 1975-1979 United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8484 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. These data are a product of the National Crime Surveys Redesign Project. The purpose of the data collection was to create several different data files from existing public-use National Crime Surveys files. For each crime, information is gathered on the victim's housing unit and household and the incident itself. A personal history and interview are also included. Several data files contain National Crime Survey and Uniform Crime Report data on the following index crimes: robbery, larceny-theft, burglary, motor vehicle theft, rape, and aggravated assault. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08484.v1 assault icpsr auto theft icpsr burglary icpsr census data icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr households icpsr larceny icpsr neighborhoods icpsr rape icpsr robbery icpsr victimization icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD X. Victimization RCMD I. Crime United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8484 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08484.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08288 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08288 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS), Rhode Island, 1979 [electronic resource] Institute for Law and Social Research 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8288 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS) is a computer-based information system for public prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially developed with funds from the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) to cope with problems of a large, urban prosecution agency where mass production operations had superseded the traditional practice of a single attorney preparing and prosecuting a given case from inception to final disposition. The combination of massive volumes of cases and assembly-line fragmentation of responsibility and control had created a situation in which one case was indistinguishable from another and the effects of problems at various stages in the assembly line on ultimate case disposition went undetected and uncorrected. One unique feature of PROMIS that addresses these problems is the automated evaluation of cases. Through the application of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS assigns two numerical ratings to each case: one signifying the gravity of the crimes through the measurement of the amount of harm done to society, and the other signifying the gravity of the prior record of the accused. These ratings make it possible to select the more important cases for intensive, pre-trial preparation and to assure even-handed treatment of cases with similar degrees of gravity. A complementary feature of PROMIS is the automation of reasons for decisions made or actions taken along the assembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases prior to trial on their merits can be related to earlier cycles of postponement for various reasons and the reasoning behind intake and screening decisions. The PROMIS data include information about the defendant, case characteristics and processes, charge, sentencing and continuance processes, and the witnesses/victims involved in the case. PROMIS was first used in 1971 in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer the concepts and software to other communities, LEAA awarded a grant to the Institute for Law xand Social Research (INSLAW) in Washington, DC. The Rhode Island PROMIS data collection is a product of this grant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08288.v1 case management icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr information systems icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr case processing icpsr computer programs icpsr court cases icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr databases icpsr decision making icpsr defendants icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Institute for Law and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8288 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08288.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08219 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08219 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutor's Management and Information System (PROMIS), New Orleans, 1979 [electronic resource] Institute for Law and Social Research 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 8219 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Prosecutor's Management and Information System (PROMIS) is a computer-based management information system for public prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially developed with funds from the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) to cope with the problems of a large, urban prosecution agency where mass production operations had superseded the traditional practice of a single attorney preparing and prosecuting a given case from inception to final disposition. The combination of massive volumes of cases and the assembly-line fragmentation of responsibility and control had created a situation in which one case was indistinguishable from another and the effects of problems at various stages in the assembly line on ultimate case disposition went undetected and uncorrected. One unique feature of PROMIS that addresses these problems is the automated evaluation of cases. Through the application of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS assigns two numerical ratings to each case: one signifying the gravity of the crime through a measurement of the amount of harm done to society, and the other signifying the gravity of the prior criminal record of the accused. These ratings make it possible to select the more important cases for intensive, pre-trial preparation and to assure even-handed treatment of cases of like gravity. A complementary feature of PROMIS is the automation of reasons for decisions made or actions taken along the assembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases prior to trial on their merits can be related to earlier cycles of postponements for various reasons and to the reasoning behind intake and screening decisions. The PROMIS data include information about the defendant, case characteristics and processes, charge, sentencing and continuance processes, and the witnesses/victims involved with a case. PROMIS was first used in 1971 in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer the PROMIS concepts and software to other communities, LEAA awarded a grant to the Institute for Law and Social Research (INSLAW) in Washington, DC. The New Orleans PROMIS data collection is a product of this grant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08219.v1 case management icpsr case processing icpsr computer programs icpsr court cases icpsr crime icpsr criminal justice system icpsr databases icpsr decision making icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr information systems icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System NACJD IV. Court Case Processing Institute for Law and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8219 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08219.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07910 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07910 MiAaI MiAaI New Jersey Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1979 [electronic resource] Richard F. Sparks 2006-01-18 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7910 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: MASSACHUSETTS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979: SENTENCTING DATA (ICPSR 7909) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1980: INMATE SURVEY DATA (ICPSR 7911). The data in this study is contained in two files. It consists of interviews to determine the opinions of inmates about the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of punishments, appropriateness of penalties for various kinds of crimes, and the use of sentencing guidelines to structure judicial sentencing decisions. Part 1, Inmate Background Data, contains socioeconomic, residential, and current and prior criminal history information in a random sample of 226 Rahway, New Jersey, State Prison inmates. Background information was collected for all of the inmates selected to participate in the 1979 New Jersey inmate survey. However, not all of those inmates selected agreed to be interviewed when the actual survey was conducted. Therefore, Part 1 includes information on survey respondents and nonrespondents. Part 2, Inmate Survey Data, contains information on 146 inmates. Frequency distributions and the survey instrument are included in the documentation. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07910.v1 attitudes icpsr crime icpsr criminal histories icpsr criminal justice system icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr inmates icpsr offender profiles icpsr offenders icpsr offenses icpsr place of residence icpsr punishment icpsr sentencing icpsr sentencing guidelines icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr state correctional facilities icpsr state courts icpsr NACJD V. Courts ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Sparks, Richard F. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7910 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07910.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08225 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1985 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08225 MiAaI MiAaI Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS), St. Louis, 1979 [electronic resource] Institute for Law and Social Research 1992-02-16 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1985 ICPSR 8225 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. The Prosecutor's Management Information System (PROMIS) is a computer-based information system for public prosecution agencies. PROMIS was initially developed with funds from the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) to cope with problems of a large, urban prosecution agency where mass production operations had superceded the traditional practice of a single attorney preparing and prosecuting a given case from inception to final disposition. The combination of massive volumes of cases and assembly-line fragmentation of responsibility and control had created a situation in which one case was indistinguishable from another and the effects of problems at various stages in the assembly line on ultimate case disposition went undetected and uncorrected. One unique feature of PROMIS that addresses these problems is the automated evaluation of cases. Through the application of a uniform set of criteria, PROMIS assigns two numerical ratings to each case: one signifying the gravity of the crimes through the measurement of the amount of harm done to society, and the other signifying the gravity of the prior record of the accused. These ratings make it possible to select the more important cases for intensive, pre-trial preparation and to assure even-handed treatment of cases with similar degrees of gravity. A complementary feature of PROMIS is the automation of reasons for decisions made or actions taken along the assembly line. Reasons for dismissing cases prior to trial on their merits can be related to earlier cycles of postponement for various reasons and the reasoning behind intake and screening decisions. The PROMIS data include information about the defendant, case characteristics and processes, charge, sentencing and continuance processes, and the witness/victims involved in the case. PROMIS was first used in 1971 in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. To enhance the ability to transfer the concepts and software to other communities, LEAA awarded a grant to the Institute for Law and Social Research (INSLAW) in Washington, DC. The St. Louis PROMIS data collection is a product of this grant. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08225.v1 case processing icpsr computer programs icpsr case management icpsr crime icpsr court cases icpsr criminal justice system icpsr databases icpsr decision making icpsr defendants icpsr disposition (legal) icpsr information systems icpsr prosecuting attorneys icpsr sentencing icpsr victims icpsr witnesses icpsr NACJD IV. Court Case Processing ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Institute for Law and Social Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8225 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08225.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR08684 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1987 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR08684 MiAaI MiAaI Women Correctional Officers in California, 1979 [electronic resource] Herbert Holeman , Barbara J. Krepps-Hess 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1987 ICPSR 8684 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study examined women correctional officers working in the 11 institutions for men operated by the California Department of Corrections in 1979. For Part 1, Census, researchers conducted a census of all 386 female correctional officers working in these institutions to collect demographic characteristics and baseline data. For Parts 2 (Staff) and 3 (Inmate), a survey was administered to staff and inmates asking their opinions about differences in performance between male and female correctional officers. Part 4, Profile, contains demographic and background data for the officers participating in the Part 2 survey. For Parts 5 (Female) and 6 (Male), researchers gathered job performance data for female correctional officers in 7 of the 11 institutions, as well as a matched sample of male correctional officers. Variables in Parts 1 and 4-6 include demographic information such as age, ethnicity, marital status, number of children, and educational and occupational history. Other variables measure attributes such as age, weight, and height, and record career information such as date and location of permanent assignment as a correctional officer, any breaks in service, and other criminal justice work experience. Additional variables in Parts 5 and 6 include job performance measures, such as ratings on skills, knowledge, work habits, learning ability, overall work habits, quality and quantity of work, and commendations. Parts 2 and 3 present information on staff and inmate evaluations of male and female correctional officers performing specific roles, such as control work officer, yard officer, or security squad officer. Additional variables include opinions on how well male and female officers handled emergency situations, maintained control under stress, and used firearms when necessary. Questions were also asked about whether inmates' or officers' safety was endangered with female officers, whether women should be hired as correctional officers, and whether female officers were gaining acceptance in correctional facilities. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08684.v2 correctional facilities icpsr criminal justice system icpsr gender roles icpsr women icpsr NACJD III. Corrections ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System Holeman, Herbert Krepps-Hess, Barbara J. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 8684 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08684.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07710 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130521s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07710 MiAaI MiAaI Evaluation of Pre-Trial Settlement Conference [electronic resource] Dade County, Florida, Criminal Court, 1979 Wayne A. Kerstetter 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7710 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-21. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. This study reports on the implementation in Dade County, Florida, of a proposal to involve, on a voluntary basis, victims, defendants, and police in a judicial plea negotiation conference. The study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department of Justice. Parts 1-3, Defendants, Victims, and Police files, consist of responses to questionnaires given to defendants, victims, and police. The questionnaires w