<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  
	


 






	

	

	
 



<record>
	<leader>     nmm  22        4500</leader>
	<controlfield tag="001">ICPSR09272</controlfield> 
	<controlfield tag="003">MiAaI</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="006">m    f   a u      </controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="007">cr mn mmmmuuuu</controlfield>
	<controlfield tag="008">130518s1997    miu    f   a        eng d</controlfield>
	<datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">(MiAaI)ICPSR09272</subfield> 
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">MiAaI</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">MiAaI</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">
			
				
				Dutch Parliamentary Election Panel Study, 1981-1986
			
		</subfield>
		<subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
			
		<subfield code="c">
			
				
					
					C. van der Eijk
				, 				
			
				
					
					G.A. Irwin
				, 				
			
				
					
					B. Niemoeller
								
			
		</subfield>
	</datafield>				
	<datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">1997-10-08</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Mich.</subfield>
		<subfield code="b">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]</subfield>
		<subfield code="c">1997</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR</subfield>
		<subfield code="v">9272</subfield> 
	</datafield>	
	
	<datafield tag="516" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Numeric</subfield>
	</datafield>
	
	<datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-18.</subfield>
	</datafield>
		
	
	
	
		<datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
	
	
	
	<datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Also available as downloadable files.</subfield>
	</datafield>	
	
	
	<datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">
			This panel study was conducted within the framework of the
Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies. The survey was administered in
five waves. Three waves were conducted in 1981, two before the
election of May 26 and one afterward. The fourth wave occurred in the
fall of 1982 and the final wave in 1986. The purpose of this
collection was to assess electoral change in the Netherlands. Main
topics covered in the first wave included political interest, national
problems of importance to the respondent, voting behavior in 1977,
party identification and membership, vote intention, sense of
political efficacy, left-right political ratings, and expectations of
election outcome. Many first-wave questions were repeated in the
succeeding waves. In the second wave, new questions were added on
coalition preference, political knowledge (identification of leading
politicians and their functions), faith in prospective premiers,
political issues such as the economy (unemployment, inflation),
abortion, nuclear energy (closing nuclear plants), and income
differences, and which party offered the best solution for solving
unemployment, crime, pollution, the housing shortage, welfare fraud,
evasion welfare levies (taxes), and nuclear armaments. Respondents'
views on religion in society (confessional attitude score),
satisfaction with the government, and social participation were also
ascertained. The third wave added items on voting behavior in 1981,
sense of civic competence, civic political participation,
(post-)materialist values, women's liberation, legitimacy of social
protest and government reaction, political distrust and political
cynicism, and beliefs about religion and society. New items in the
fourth wave concerned voting behavior in 1982, the effect of
television debates, and future voting. New topics in the fifth wave
centered on voting behavior in 1986 and experience with
unemployment. Demographic variables include respondent's gender, age,
marital status, employment status and profession, education, and
religion. Other background variables are available on number of
persons in the household, household income, and region. 
			Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09272.v1
		</subfield>
	</datafield>	
		
		
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">abortion</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">crime</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">domestic policy</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">Dutch Parliament</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">foreign policy</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">government performance</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">housing shortages</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">income</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">inflation</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">nuclear energy</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">nuclear weapons</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">parliamentary elections</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political affiliation</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political apathy</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political attitudes</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political change</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political issues</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political leaders</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">political participation</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">pollution</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">public approval</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">public opinion</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">religious attitudes</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">social protest</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">trust in government</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">unemployment</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">voting behavior</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">welfare services</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
	
		<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
			<subfield code="a">womens rights</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">icpsr</subfield>
		</datafield>
		
	<datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
		
			<subfield code="a">ICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United States</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">IDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political Behavior</subfield>
		
			<subfield code="a">IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data</subfield>
		
	</datafield>
	
		
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">van der Eijk, C.</subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
			
		
	
		
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Irwin, G.A.</subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
			
		
	
		
			
				<datafield tag="700" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
					<subfield code="a">Niemoeller, B.</subfield>
				</datafield>
			
			
			
		
	
	<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
		<subfield code="a">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.</subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
		<subfield code="a">ICPSR (Series)</subfield>
		<subfield code="v"></subfield>
	</datafield>
	<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
		<subfield code="z">Access restricted ; authentication may be required:</subfield>
		<subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09272.v1</subfield>
	</datafield>
</record>


</collection>