nmm 22 4500 ICPSR01267 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2003 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR01267 MiAaI MiAaI Aviation Security and Terrorism [electronic resource] A Review of the Economic Issues Cletus Coughlin , Jeffrey P. Cohen , Sarosh R. Khan 2003-04-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2003 ICPSR 1267 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public. Also available as downloadable files. Following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the passage of the Aviation and Transportation Act mandated a substantial increase in resources devoted to aviation security. This paper summarized the specific changes stemming from this legislation. In addition, the paper examines the economic issues underlying the regulation and provision of aviation security. The fact that security at one airport can affect the well-being of those at other airports and elsewhere, an example of a network externality (spillover), provides an economic justification for governmental involvement in aviation security. A fundamental question is whether the federal role should be restricted to setting and monitoring security standards or whether the role should also include the financing and implementation of security. A controversial change is that the federal government has assumed responsibility from the airlines and airports for the actual provision of aviation security. Proponents of this change argue that, relative to private provision, public provision reduces the incentives to reduce quality through cost reductions. On the other hand, a public agency might not provide security services efficiently because it can operate in a more-or-less monopolistic way. Furthermore, a public agency might provide an excessive amount of security and incur unnecessary expenses because it is likely to be judged on its security record and not on all the attributes encompassed by air transportation services for consumers. Thus, economic theory does not provide a clear answer to what is likely to be a continuing source of controversy -- the appropriate scope of governmental involvement in aviation security. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01267.v1 aircraft security icpsr airport security icpsr counterterrorism icpsr national security icpsr public safety icpsr security systems icpsr terrorism icpsr TPDRC I. Terrorism ICPSR XVIII. ICPSR Publication-Related Archive Coughlin, Cletus Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Cohen, Jeffrey P. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Khan, Sarosh R. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01267.v1