nmm 22 4500 ICPSR04062 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130519s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR04062 MiAaI MiAaI Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2002.2, September-October 2002 [electronic resource] Life in the Candidate Countries, Attachment to Nationality and Identification with Europe, Contact with Other Countries and Cultures, and European Union Enlargement Thomas Christensen , Ruben Mohedano-Brethes , Renaud Soufflot de Magny 2011-01-27 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 4062 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-19. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Candidate Countries Eurobarometer (CCEB) series, first conducted in 2001, gathers information from the countries applying to become members of the European Union (EU) in a way that allows direct comparison with the standard Eurobarometer series carried out in the existing EU countries. The CCEB provides decision-makers and the European public with opinion data on the similarities and differences between the EU and the candidate countries. The CCEB continuously tracks support for EU membership in each country and records changes in attitudes related to European issues in the candidate countries. This round of the CCEB surveys was conducted between September 2 and October 15, 2002, in the 13 candidate countries: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Turkey. Respondents were queried on such topics as life satisfaction and expectations, their native language, European countries visited and worked in, attitudes towards foreigners, trust in institutions, national and European identity, European currency, European elections, political participation, democracy satisfaction, and information media access. Respondents also answered questions focusing on their knowledge of the EU, as well as their opinion on its importance and meaning, national decision-making policies, policy priorities, image, membership, enlargement, unification, and constitution. Respondents were also asked questions about their awareness and familiarity with organizations like the United Nations, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe, and the European Court of Human Rights. Background variables include nationality, age, gender, income, current occupation, whether the respondent was paid directly or indirectly by the state, local government, or other public administration, marital status, level of education, number of people living in household, whether anyone in the household owned a color television set, video recorder, video camera, automatic washing machine, dishwasher, home computer, microwave oven, mobile phone, or two or more cars, religious affiliation, how often religious services were attended, and voting intent. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04062.v2 attitudes icpsr communication technology icpsr defense policy icpsr domestic policy icpsr European unification icpsr European Union icpsr foreign policy icpsr foreigners icpsr information technology icpsr knowledge (awareness) icpsr life satisfaction icpsr monetary policy icpsr political influence icpsr public opinion icpsr social attitudes icpsr social change icpsr IDRC VII. Public Opinion Data ICPSR XIV.C.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Attitudes Toward Regional Integration, Europe Christensen, Thomas European Commission Mohedano-Brethes, Ruben European Commission Soufflot de Magny, Renaud European Commission Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04062.v2