<?xml version="1.0"?>
<DDIInstance xmlns="ddi:instance:3_1"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="ddi:instance:3_1 http://www.ddialliance.org/sites/default/files/schema/ddi3.1/instance.xsd" 
    isMaintainable="true" 
    id="DDIInstance_02311" 
    versionDate="2013-06-19" 
    agency="us.icpsr">
    <VersionResponsibility xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">ICPSR</VersionResponsibility>
    <Citation xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
        <Title>Metadata record for Evaluation of the Midtown Community Court in New York City, 1992-1994</Title>
        <Creator>ICPSR</Creator>
        <Copyright>
        ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 
        3.0 United States License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/).
        </Copyright>
    </Citation>
 	
    <StudyUnit xmlns="ddi:studyunit:3_1" id="StudyUnit02311" versionDate="2006-03-30">
        <Citation xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
            <Title>Evaluation of the Midtown Community Court in New York City, 1992-1994</Title>
 				
	    	
				<Creator xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" affiliation="National Center for State Courts">Rottman, David</Creator>
	    	
				<Creator xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" affiliation="National Center for State Courts">Ostrom, Brian</Creator>
	    	
				<Creator xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" affiliation="National Center for State Courts">Sviridoff, Michele</Creator>
	    	
				<Creator xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" affiliation="National Center for State Courts">Curtis, Richard</Creator>
	    	
	    	<Publisher>Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research</Publisher>
  			<Contributor role="distributor">ICPSR</Contributor>
   			<PublicationDate>
    			<SimpleDate>2006-03-30</SimpleDate>
   			</PublicationDate>
   			<InternationalIdentifier xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" type="ICPSR Number">2311</InternationalIdentifier>
   			<InternationalIdentifier xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" type="DOI">doi://10.3886/ICPSR02311.v1</InternationalIdentifier>
        </Citation>

        <Abstract isIdentifiable="true" id="Abstract02311">
            <Content xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="Summary02311">In October 1993, the Midtown Community Court opened as a
three-year demonstration project designed to forge links with the
community in developing a problem-solving approach to quality-of-life
offenses. The problems that this community-based courthouse sought to
address were specific to the court's midtown New York City location:
high concentration of quality-of-life crimes, broad community
dissatisfaction with court outcomes, visible signs of disorder, and
clusters of persistent high-rate offenders with serious problems,
including addiction and homelessness. This study was conducted to
evaluate how well the new court was able to dispense justice locally
and whether the establishment of the Midtown Community Court made a
difference in misdemeanor case processing. Data were collected at two
time periods for a comparative analysis. First, a baseline dataset
(Part 1, Baseline Data) was constructed from administrative records,
consisting of a ten-percent random sample of all nonfelony
arraignments in Manhattan during the 12 months prior to the opening of
the Midtown Community Court. Second, comparable administrative data
(Part 2, Comparison Data) were collected from all cases arraigned at
the Midtown Court during its first 12 months of operation, as well as
from a random sample of all downtown nonfelony arraignments held
during this same time period. Both files contain variables on precinct
of arrest, arraignment type, charges, bonds, dispositions, sentences,
total number of court appearances, and total number of warrants
issued, as well as prior felony and misdemeanor
convictions. Demographic variables include age, sex, and race of
offender.</div>
             </Content>
        </Abstract>
        
  		<UniverseReference xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" isReference="true">
   			<ID>UniverseScheme02311</ID>
  		</UniverseReference>

 				
 				<FundingInformation xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
    				
  						<AgencyOrganizationReference>
							 <ID>Organization02311_1</ID>
   						</AgencyOrganizationReference>
  						
   							<GrantNumber>93-IJ-CX-0082</GrantNumber>
   						
    				
    				</FundingInformation>
				
        <Purpose id="Purpose02311">
            <Content xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
            
           	<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="StudyPurpose02311">In October 1993, the Midtown Community Court
 opened as a three-year demonstration project designed to forge links
 with the community in developing a problem-solving approach to
 quality-of-life offenses. The decision to establish the Midtown
 Community Court grew out of a belief that the traditional court
 response to low-level offenses was neither constructive nor meaningful
 to victims, defendants, or the community. The problems that this
 community-based courthouse sought to address were specific to the
 court's midtown New York City location: high concentration of
 quality-of-life crimes, broad community dissatisfaction with court
 outcomes, visible signs of disorder, and clusters of persistent
 high-rate offenders with serious problems, including addiction and
 homelessness. This study was conducted to evaluate how well the new
 court was able to dispense justice locally and whether the
 establishment of the Midtown Community Court made a difference in
misdemeanor case processing.</div>
           
           </Content>
        </Purpose>
        
        
        
          <Coverage xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">

   <TopicalCoverage xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1" id="TopicalCoverage02311">
		
      		<Subject codeListAgency="ICPSR">ICPSR.XVII.E</Subject>
      	
      		<Subject codeListAgency="NAHDAP">NAHDAP.I</Subject>
      	
      		<Subject codeListAgency="NACJD">NACJD.IV</Subject>
      	
		
      		<Keyword>addiction</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>case processing</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>communities</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>courts</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>homelessness</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>misdemeanor offenses</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>offenders</Keyword>
      	
      		<Keyword>quality of life</Keyword>
      	
   </TopicalCoverage>
 

	
   <SpatialCoverage id="SpatialCoverage02311">
		<Description>
			
				New York (state), 
			
				New York City, 
			
				United States
			
		</Description>
    <TopLevelReference>
     <LevelName> </LevelName>
    </TopLevelReference>
    <LowestLevelReference>
     <LevelName> </LevelName>
    </LowestLevelReference>
   </SpatialCoverage>
   


	

   <TemporalCoverage id="TemporalCoverage02311">

		
    <ReferenceDate>
		
				
      		<StartDate>1992</StartDate>
      		<EndDate>1994</EndDate>
			
			
      		
    </ReferenceDate>
    
     
   </TemporalCoverage>
 
 
 
         </Coverage>
 

   		
   			<AnalysisUnitsCovered>Court cases (with one defendant per case).</AnalysisUnitsCovered>
    	


	    	
	    		<KindOfData>administrative records data</KindOfData>
	    	


        
   <ConceptualComponent xmlns="ddi:conceptualcomponent:3_1" id="ConceptualComponent02311">
   <UniverseScheme id="UniverseScheme02311">
	    	
    <Universe id="Universe02311_1">
     <HumanReadable>All nonfelony arraignments in Manhattan from October 1992
to September 1994.</HumanReadable>
    </Universe>
    
    
   </UniverseScheme>
   
   
   
   
  </ConceptualComponent>
        
  <DataCollection xmlns="ddi:datacollection:3_1" id="DataCollection02311">
  			
<Description xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
           <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="StudyDesign02311">This study was designed to compare case processing
 and case outcomes between the Midtown Community Court and the downtown
 court in light of six key decision points: (1) whether defendants
 given a Desk Appearance Ticket showed up as scheduled, (2) whether the
 case was disposed at arraignment or continued, (3) whether disposition
 was through dismissal, adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, or
 conviction, (4) whether the sentence involved an alternative sanction,
 traditional sentence, or no sanction, (5) whether jail sentences were
 imposed, and (6) whether sentenced offenders complied with alternative
 sanctions. Data were collected at two time periods for a comparative
 analysis. First, a baseline dataset (Part 1, Baseline Data) was
 constructed from administrative records, consisting of a ten-percent
 random sample of all nonfelony arraignments in Manhattan during the 12
 months prior to the opening of the Midtown Community Court. Second,
 comparable administrative data (Part 2, Comparison Data) were
 collected from all cases arraigned at the Midtown Court during its
 first 12 months of operation, as well as from a random sample of all
downtown nonfelony arraignments held during this same time period.</div>
    
</Description>
           



   <Methodology id="Methodology02311">

    <DataCollectionMethodology id="DataCollectionMethodology02311">
     <Content xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">None.</Content>
    </DataCollectionMethodology>


    <SamplingProcedure id="SamplingProcedure02311">
     <Content xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">Random sampling.</Content>
    </SamplingProcedure>
  
   </Methodology>
   
 
		
   <CollectionEvent id="CollectionEvent02311_1">
    
    <DataSource>
     <SourceDescription>
     
    		The Criminal Justice Agency, New York City and the
Department of Criminal Justice Service
    	
    </SourceDescription>
    </DataSource>
    
		<DataCollectionDate>
 		
				
      		<StartDate xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">1993</StartDate>
      		<EndDate xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">1994</EndDate>
			
			
      		
      		</DataCollectionDate>

    


   </CollectionEvent>
      	
 
 
 
    
   <ProcessingEvent id="ProcessingEvent02311">


    <CleaningOperation>
     <Description xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
 
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="CleaningOperation02311">

 <p>ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. 
 ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software 
 formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR 
 performed the following processing steps for this data collection:</p>

	<ul>
  
   		
			<li>
		    	
				
				
				
				
				
				Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.
			</li>
	   	
			<li>
		    	
				
				
				
				
				
				Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
			</li>
	   	
	</ul>

</div>

     </Description>
    </CleaningOperation>
   
    
   

   

    <DataAppraisalInformation>
    	<ResponseRate>
    	
    		Not applicable.
    	
    	</ResponseRate>
</DataAppraisalInformation>

    
   </ProcessingEvent>
  </DataCollection>

  			
<LogicalProduct xmlns="ddi:logicalproduct:3_1" id="LogicalProduct02311">
    <Description xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
          <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="VariablesDescription02311">Both files contain variables on precinct of arrest,
 arraignment type, charges, bonds, dispositions, sentences, total
 number of court appearances, and total number of warrants issued, as
 well as prior felony and misdemeanor convictions. Demographic
variables include age, sex, and race of offender.</div>
                
    </Description>
</LogicalProduct>
          

  <Archive xmlns="ddi:archive:3_1" id="Archive02311">
   <ArchiveSpecific>




    <ArchiveOrganizationReference>
     <ID xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">ICPSR</ID>
    </ArchiveOrganizationReference>




    <DefaultAccess id="DefaultAccess02311">
     
     <AccessConditions>
     
        
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="AccessConditions02311">

 			
                
					AVAILABLE.  This study is freely available to the general public.
                
                  
                

</div>

</AccessConditions>
<AccessConditions>
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="AccessConditions02311-disclaimer">
The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no 
                responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
                </div>

                </AccessConditions>

			
       



    </DefaultAccess>
   
   
   </ArchiveSpecific>
   
   <OrganizationScheme id="OrganizationScheme02311">
    <Organization id="ICPSR" xmlns="ddi:archive:3_1">
     <OrganizationName xmlns="ddi:archive:3_1">Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Rearch</OrganizationName>
     <Nickname>ICPSR</Nickname>
     <Location id="LocationICPSR">
      <Address>
       <City>Ann Arbor</City>
       <State>MI</State>
      </Address>
     </Location>
     <URL>http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/</URL>
     <Email>netmail@icpsr.umich.edu</Email>
    </Organization>

 				
    				
						<Organization xmlns="ddi:archive:3_1" id="Organization02311_1">
   							<OrganizationName xmlns="ddi:archive:3_1">United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice</OrganizationName>
  						</Organization>
    				
				


   </OrganizationScheme>
  
 
   <LifecycleInformation xmlns="ddi:reusable:3_1">
 
 
    	
           
<LifecycleEvent id="LifecyleEvent02311-2006-03-30">
             <Date>
             <SimpleDate>2006-03-30</SimpleDate>
             </Date>
     <AgencyOrganizationReference>
      <ID>ICPSR</ID>
     </AgencyOrganizationReference>
             <Description>2006-03-30 File CB2311.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads.</Description>
           </LifecycleEvent>
    	
           
<LifecycleEvent id="LifecyleEvent02311-2005-11-04">
             <Date>
             <SimpleDate>2005-11-04</SimpleDate>
             </Date>
     <AgencyOrganizationReference>
      <ID>ICPSR</ID>
     </AgencyOrganizationReference>
             <Description>2005-11-04  On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one
 or  more datasets.  These files included additional setup files as well
 as one or more of the following: SAS  program, SAS transport, SPSS portable, 
 and Stata system files. The  metadata record was revised  2005-11-04 to 
reflect these additions.</Description>
           </LifecycleEvent>
    	
 
 
    
 
   </LifecycleInformation>


    

  </Archive>
        
        
        
    </StudyUnit>
</DDIInstance>