Metadata record for Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newlywed Couples, 1998-2004, Louisiana Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License . 2013-06-19 Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newlywed Couples, 1998-2004, Louisiana 29582 10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1 Nock, Steven L. Sanchez, Laura A. Wright, James D. National Science Foundation SBR-9803736, SES-9819156 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 2012-06-29 Nock, Steven L., Laura A. Sanchez, and James D. Wright. Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newlywed Couples, 1998-2004, Louisiana. ICPSR29582-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2012-06-29. doi:10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1 adultery children conflict resolution dating (social) divorce domestic responsibilities domestic violence educational background employment family background family conflict family relations health household composition income life satisfaction marital relations marital satisfaction marital status marriage marriage ceremonies marriage counseling mental health political attitudes religious beliefs remarriage social attitudes social issues social values spouses ICPSR.XVII.H In 1997, Louisiana enacted a covenant marriage law which gave couples an alternative to a conventional marriage license. By requiring premarital counseling and proof of fault for a subsequent divorce, along with other features, covenant marriages were intended to be more difficult both to enter and to exit. The Marriage Matters panel survey was designed to examine the effects of covenant marriage on rates of marital dissolution, relationship quality, and other outcomes. The data were collected in three waves. Wave 1 was collected approximately 3 to 6 months after marriage. Respondents were asked questions about their recent marriage, the time leading up to their recent marriage, premarital counseling, convenant marriage, previous marriages, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, satisfaction in marriage, household responsibilities, their background, health and happiness, their social and political views, and about the questionnaire itself. Wave 2 was administered approximately 18 months after the first wave. The second wave queried respondents on their marriage today, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. Wave 3 was administered 12 to 24 months after the second wave. Respondents answered questions on their marriage today, views about marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, the celebration of holidays, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. In the divorce questionnaire, the following topics were addressed: how things stand at the moment, feelings about their marriage, arguments during their marriage, social life since the separation or divorce, their health and well-being, moving to a divorce agreement, advice and counseling, the divorce process and convenant marriage, and household income the year before and after the separation. Demographic information collected across all three waves includes: age, gender, religious participation, employment status, education level, number of children birthed or adopted, household composition, and household income. Demographic information collected in Wave 1 only includes: race, religious affiliation, number of previous marriages, and political affiliation. Demographic information collected through the divorce questionnaire includes: gender, marital status, and personal and partner income. The design was a three wave panel survey involving self-administered questionnaires to a sample comprised of approximately equal numbers of standard and covenant couples. Respondents (1,271 men and women representing 707 married couples) were first surveyed within 1 to 6 months of their marriages, then again approximately 2 years later, and finally at the 5-year mark. Husbands and wives were surveyed independently at all waves. When applicable, information regarding the couple's divorce were also collected. 1998 2004 1998 2004 Louisiana United States state married couple Adult couples marrying in either covenant or standard marriages between 1998 and 2004 in 17 of 60 randomly selected parishes in Louisiana. survey data The sample selection criteria consisted of two steps. First, 17 of 60 parishes were selected randomly and proportionate to size. Second, from these 17 parishes, all covenant marriage licenses and the standard marriage licenses filed next to the standard licenses were drawn. Standard licenses were purposefully over-sampled because of the expectation that the covenant marriage innovators would be more committed to the rigors and duration of the study. Of the 1,714 licenses that were validly part of the sampling frame, 1,310 couples were eventually confirmed for a confirmation rate of 76.4 percent. Demographically, respondents were similar to recently married people all over the United States: average age of 31; 80 percent White, 15 percent African American, 5 percent from other ethnic backgrounds; 60 percent with one or more years of college education; average family income of just over $50,000 a year. About 60 percent of the couples were both in their first marriages. For 20 percent, one partner had been previously married one or more times, and for the remaining 20 percent, this was true of both partners. mail questionnaire , telephone interview

ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes. In the ICPSR version of the collection, all variables have been renamed in order to conform to standard SAS variable naming conventions which do not allow the symbols $ or @. The "Data Documentation" section of the ICPSR codebook includes a listing of the original variable names and the names as provided by ICPSR. Also included is an SPSS program file that can be used to rename the variables back to their original names. To limit possible disclosure risk, a number of variables have not been included in the ICPSR version of this collection, as determined in conjunction with the Primary Investigator. Please see the "Data Documentation" section of the ICPSR codebook for a list of these variables. The description of the project methodology and results are published in book form: Nock, Steven L., Laura A. Sanchez, and James D. Wright. COVENANT MARRIAGE: THE MOVEMENT TO RECLAIM TRADITION IN AMERICA. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2008. Wave 1: 49 percent total response rate. Wave 2: 85 percent total response rate. Wave 3: 92 percent total response rate. Ann Arbor, Mi.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Additional special permissions, where applicable, are described in the restrictions field.

Please read the terms of use below. If you agree to them, click on the "I Agree" button to proceed. If you do not agree, you can click on the "I Do Not Agree" button to return to the home page.

ICPSR adheres to the principles of the Data Seal of Approval , which, in part, require the data consumer to comply with access regulations imposed both by law and by the data repository, and to conform to codes of conduct that are generally accepted in higher education and scientific research for the exchange of knowledge and information.

These data are distributed under the following terms of use, which are governed by ICPSR. By continuing past this point to the data retrieval process, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements stated below:

Privacy of RESEARCH SUBJECTS

Any intentional identification of a RESEARCH SUBJECT (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of his or her confidential information violates the PROMISE OF CONFIDENTIALITY given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data agree:

To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for investigation of specific RESEARCH SUBJECTS, except when identification is authorized in writing by ICPSR (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

To make no use of the identity of any RESEARCH SUBJECT discovered inadvertently, and to advise ICPSR of any such discovery (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

 Redistribution of Data

You agree not to redistribute data or other materials without the written agreement of ICPSR, unless:

You serve as the OFFICIAL or DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE at an ICPSR MEMBER INSTITUTION and are assisting AUTHORIZED USERS with obtaining data, or

You are collaborating with other AUTHORIZED USERS to analyze the data for research or instructional purposes.

When sharing data or other materials in these approved ways, you must include all accompanying files with the data, including terms of use. More information on permission to redistribute data can be found on the ICPSR Web site.

Citing Data

You agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any publication that employs resources provided by ICPSR. Authors of publications based on ICPSR data are required to send citations of their published works to ICPSR for inclusion in a database of related publications (bibliography@icpsr.umich.edu ) .

Disclaimer

You acknowledge that the original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations

If ICPSR determines that the terms of this agreement have been violated, ICPSR will act according to our policy on terms of use violations . Sanctions can include:

ICPSR may revoke the existing agreement, demand the return of the data in question, and deny all future access to ICPSR data.

The violation may be reported to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution. A range of sanctions are available to institutions including revocation of tenure and termination.

If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, the case may be reported to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections. This may result in an investigation of the user's institution, which can result in institution-wide sanctions including the suspension of all research grants.

A court may award the payment of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the breach of the agreement.

 Definitions authorized user - A faculty member, staff member, or student at a member institutionICPSR - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchmember institution - An institutional member of ICPSROfficial/Designated Representative - An individual appointed to represent a university's interests in ICPSR. This individual is also charged with providing user support to campus users. promise of confidentiality - A promise to a respondent or research participant that the information the respondent provides will not be disseminated without the permission of the respondent; that the fact that the respondent participated in the study will not be disclosed; and that disseminated information will include no linkages to the identity of the respondent. Such a promise encompasses traditional notions of both confidentiality and anonymity. Names and other identifying information regarding respondents, proxies, or other persons on whom the respondent or proxy provides information, are presumed to be confidential.research subject - A person or organization observed for purposes of research. Also called a respondent. A respondent is generally a survey respondent or informant, experimental or observational subject, focus group participant, or any other person providing information to a study or on whose behalf a proxy provides information.

AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.

 The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.