Metadata record for National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), 1998-2004 -- Restricted Use Files Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License . 2013-05-24 National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), 1998-2004 -- Restricted Use Files 27868 10.3886/ICPSR27868.v2 David, Susan Hornik, Robert Maklan, David United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 2010-06-15 2011-03-07 2011-03-07 Frequencies have been added to the public-use codebooks. 2011-03-03 2011-03-03 Removed unnecessary program files. Added Frequencies to the public use codebooks. Added the principal investigator's original SAS files in Zip format. 2010-07-22 2010-07-22 Files are being released individually rather than as zipped packages. 2010-07-16 2010-07-16 Corrections were made to the codebook. David, Susan, Robert Hornik, and David Maklan. National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), 1998-2004 -- Restricted Use Files. ICPSR27868-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2011-03-03. doi:10.3886/ICPSR27868.v2 adolescents detoxification drug dependence drug use families households media influence news media parents substance abuse youths ICPSR.XVII.C.1 NAHDAP.I The National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY) is a survey conducted to evaluate the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign (Campaign). It focuses on the measurement of the outcomes and impact of Phase III of the Campaign on children and their parents concerning illegal drug use among youth. It contains four rounds of Restricted Use Files and includes all NSPY respondents. The Restricted Use Files also contain extensive data on youth, parents, and the Campaign advertisements, as well as other reference files. In addition, NSPY contains Public Use Files which were released in September 2004. The Public Use Files contain only the first three rounds of data and a subsample of respondents. Also, due to confidentiality reasons, the September 2004 Public Use File provides a limited set of variables about youth, and only a handful of variables about parents as it is not possible to link respondents across rounds using the Public Use Files, but it is possible using the Restricted Use Files. The survey was developed and implemented under contract to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Westat conducted the study in collaboration with the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania and, for the first two years of the project, with the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI). NSPY Round 1 was conducted in three waves, covering the periods November 1999 through May 2000 (Wave 1), July 2000 through December 2000 (Wave 2), and January 2001 through June 2001 (Wave 3). NSPY Round 2, the first follow-up of the initial survey, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2001 through December 2001 (Wave 4) and January 2002 through June 2002 (Wave 5). NSPY Round 3, the second follow-up data collection, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2002 through December 2002 (Wave 6) and January 2003 through June 2003 (Wave 7). Finally, NSPY Round 4, the third follow-up data collection, was conducted in two waves covering the periods July 2003 through December 2003 (Wave 8) and January 2004 through June 2004 (Wave 9). Youths and their parents were selected for NSPY through a multistage, dual frame probability sample design. The sample was selected in a manner designed to provide an efficient and representative cross-section of American youth. In general, youths living in all types of residential housing units were eligible for the study; however, youths living in institutions, group homes, or dormitories were excluded. The National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign seeks to educate and enable America's youth to reject illegal drugs; to prevent youth from initiating the use of drugs, especially marijuana and inhalants; and to convince occasional users of these drugs to stop using them. The evaluation had four objectives: (1) to measure changes in drug-related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in children and their parents; (2) to assess the relationship of the changes (in drug-related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors), and their association with self-reported measures of media exposure; (3) to assess the association between parent's drug-related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, and those of their children; and (4) to assess changes in the association between parent's drug-related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors and those of their children. NSPY employed a panel survey design with four rounds of data collection for youth and parents between November 1999 and June 2004. Round 1 of the NSPY is the recruitment phase of the study. It consists of three cross-sectional survey periods lasting about six months each. About 81,000 dwelling units were selected for the sample in Round 1 and approximately 8,100 youths and 5,600 parents were interviewed. Rounds 2 through 4 are the follow-up phases of the study. Round 2 included about 6,400 households from which approximately 6,500 youths and 4,600 parents were interviewed. Round 3 included about 5,950 households from which approximately 5,850 youths and 4,250 parents were interviewed. Round 4 included about 4,600 1-4 Introduction households from which approximately 4,850 youths and 3,600 parents were interviewed. The data generated by this design can be analyzed both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. The questionnaires were developed for Wave 1 of the National Survey of Parents and Youth and modified slightly for Wave 2. The Wave 2 versions are shown with footnotes to indicate where the Wave 1 instrument differed. There are four questionnaires. The first is a household screener. It comes in two parts. Part I was administered with paper and pencil, mostly at people's doorsteps. Its purpose was to establish the eligibility or ineligibility of a household. Part II of the screener was administered with a laptop computer. Its purpose was to select a sample of eligible youth and parents from each household. There are then three substantive questionnaires: one for children aged 9 to 11, one for adolescents and teens aged 12-18 (the "Teen" instrument), and one for parents. The child instrument is basically a shortened version of the teen instrument. It was made shorter because of the shorter attention spans of younger children and because of the difficulty of some of the concepts for them. The teen instrument covers the following topics: basic demographics; school and religion; media consumption; extra-curricular activities; personal usage of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and inhalants; expectations for future use of marijuana; feelings of self-efficacy to resist future offers of marijuana use; knowledge of friends' and classmates' use of marijuana; receipt of marijuana offers; family functioning; antisocial behavior of self and friends; approval/disapproval and perceived risk of marijuana and inhalants; perceived ease of parental discussion on drugs and perceived parental reactions to personal drug use; past discussions about drugs with parents, friends, and others; awareness of drug-related media stories and advertising; recollection and assessment of specific Campaign-sponsored antidrug advertisements on television and radio; Internet usage; and participation in drug education classes and programs. The parent instrument covers the following topics: media consumption; communication with child; monitoring of child; family functioning; knowledge about child's use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and inhalants; personal participation in community drug prevention activities; awareness of drug-related media stories and advertising; recollection and assessment of specific Campaign-sponsored antidrug advertisements on television and radio; personal usage of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and inhalants; basic demographics; and education, income and religion. When parents were being asked about their children, each question was targeted to a specific sample child and repeated for every sampled child in the household. Other questions that were not about their children were only asked once. 1998-01 1998-06 1998-07 1999-07 1999-11 2004-06 1998-01 1998-06 1998-07 1999-07 1999-11 2004-06 United States A national household-based survey of youth aged 9 to 18 years of age and parents from that same household. survey data Respondents were found via a door-to-door screening of a scientifically selected sample of 81,000 dwelling units within roughly 2,500 area segments and 400 building permit segments in 90 geographical areas called "primary sampling units" (PSUs). NSPY Round 1 Recruitment phase consisted of three cross-sectional survey periods lasting about six months each. About 81,000 dwelling units were selected for the sample in which 8,100 youths and 5,600 parents were interviewed. NSPY Round 2 follow-up phase included about 6,400 households from which approximately 6,500 youths and 4,600 parents were interviewed. NSPY Round 3 follow-up phase included about 5,950 households from which approximately 5,850 youths and 4,250 parents were interviewed. NSPY Round 4 follow-up phase included about 4,600 households from which approximately 4,850 youths and 3,600 parents were interviewed. audio computer-assisted self interview (ACASI) , computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) , paper and pencil interview (PAPI) The Youth Weight file, YOUTHWT, contains a total of 25,613 records. There is one record for each round in which a youth completed the NSPY interview. The Dyad Weight file, DYADWT, contains a total of 24,296 records. There is one record for each round in which a dyad (i.e., both members of a youth-parent pair) completed the NSPY interview. In preparation for the Phase III Evaluation, NIDA convened an expert panel to assist in the development of the data collection instruments. Moreover, Westat formed an instrument development team whose members included evaluation experts from Westat, the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and the National Development and Research Institutes (NDRI). Data collection for Round 1 used a brief, hard-copy household screening instrument and computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI). Data collection for Rounds 2, 3, and 4 used only computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI). Ann Arbor, Mi.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Additional special permissions, where applicable, are described in the restrictions field. The National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY) requires the user complete an online application before access. See ICPSR Restricted Data Contract Portal for information and instructions.

Please read the terms of use below. If you agree to them, click on the "I Agree" button to proceed. If you do not agree, you can click on the "I Do Not Agree" button to return to the home page.

ICPSR adheres to the principles of the Data Seal of Approval , which, in part, require the data consumer to comply with access regulations imposed both by law and by the data repository, and to conform to codes of conduct that are generally accepted in higher education and scientific research for the exchange of knowledge and information.

These data are distributed under the following terms of use, which are governed by ICPSR. By continuing past this point to the data retrieval process, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements stated below:

Privacy of RESEARCH SUBJECTS

Any intentional identification of a RESEARCH SUBJECT (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of his or her confidential information violates the PROMISE OF CONFIDENTIALITY given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data agree:

To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for investigation of specific RESEARCH SUBJECTS, except when identification is authorized in writing by ICPSR (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

To make no use of the identity of any RESEARCH SUBJECT discovered inadvertently, and to advise ICPSR of any such discovery (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

 Redistribution of Data

You agree not to redistribute data or other materials without the written agreement of ICPSR, unless:

You serve as the OFFICIAL or DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE at an ICPSR MEMBER INSTITUTION and are assisting AUTHORIZED USERS with obtaining data, or

You are collaborating with other AUTHORIZED USERS to analyze the data for research or instructional purposes.

When sharing data or other materials in these approved ways, you must include all accompanying files with the data, including terms of use. More information on permission to redistribute data can be found on the ICPSR Web site.

Citing Data

You agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any publication that employs resources provided by ICPSR. Authors of publications based on ICPSR data are required to send citations of their published works to ICPSR for inclusion in a database of related publications (bibliography@icpsr.umich.edu ) .

Disclaimer

You acknowledge that the original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations

If ICPSR determines that the terms of this agreement have been violated, ICPSR will act according to our policy on terms of use violations . Sanctions can include:

ICPSR may revoke the existing agreement, demand the return of the data in question, and deny all future access to ICPSR data.

The violation may be reported to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution. A range of sanctions are available to institutions including revocation of tenure and termination.

If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, the case may be reported to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections. This may result in an investigation of the user's institution, which can result in institution-wide sanctions including the suspension of all research grants.

A court may award the payment of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the breach of the agreement.

 Definitions authorized user - A faculty member, staff member, or student at a member institutionICPSR - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchmember institution - An institutional member of ICPSROfficial/Designated Representative - An individual appointed to represent a university's interests in ICPSR. This individual is also charged with providing user support to campus users. promise of confidentiality - A promise to a respondent or research participant that the information the respondent provides will not be disseminated without the permission of the respondent; that the fact that the respondent participated in the study will not be disclosed; and that disseminated information will include no linkages to the identity of the respondent. Such a promise encompasses traditional notions of both confidentiality and anonymity. Names and other identifying information regarding respondents, proxies, or other persons on whom the respondent or proxy provides information, are presumed to be confidential.research subject - A person or organization observed for purposes of research. Also called a respondent. A respondent is generally a survey respondent or informant, experimental or observational subject, focus group participant, or any other person providing information to a study or on whose behalf a proxy provides information.

AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.

 The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Roster Data Youth Content Data Dyad Content Data Youth Ad Data Parent Ad Data Youth Weights Dyad Weights Ad Master Data Ad Broadcast Data