Metadata record for New Approach to Evaluating Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) Data Imputation, 1990-1995 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License . 2013-05-25 New Approach to Evaluating Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) Data Imputation, 1990-1995 20060 10.3886/ICPSR20060.v1 Wadsworth, Tim Roberts, John M. United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice 2005-IJ-CX-0007 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 2007-12-18 Wadsworth, Tim, and John M. Roberts. New Approach to Evaluating Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) Data Imputation, 1990-1995. ICPSR20060-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-12-18. doi:10.3886/ICPSR20060.v1 arrests crime rates crime reporting crime statistics homicide murder offenders Uniform Crime Reports victims NACJD.XIV ICPSR.XVII.E NACJD.VIII The purpose of the project was to learn more about patterns of homicide in the United States by strengthening the ability to make imputations for Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) data with missing values. Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) and local police data from Chicago, Illinois, St. Louis, Missouri, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Phoenix, Arizona, for 1990 to 1995 were merged to create a master file by linking on overlapping information on victim and incident characteristics. Through this process, 96 percent of the cases in the SHR were matched with cases in the police files. The data contain variables for three types of cases: complete in SHR, missing offender and incident information in SHR but known in police report, and missing offender and incident information in both. The merged file allows estimation of similarities and differences between the cases with known offender characteristics in the SHR and those in the other two categories. The accuracy of existing data imputation methods can be assessed by comparing imputed values in an "incomplete" dataset (the SHR), generated by the three imputation strategies discussed in the literature, with the actual values in a known "complete" dataset (combined SHR and police data). Variables from both the Supplemental Homicide Reports and the additional police report offense data include incident date, victim characteristics, offender characteristics, incident details, geographic information, as well as variables regarding the matching procedure. The purpose of the project was to learn more about patterns of homicide in the United States by strengthening the ability to make imputations for Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) data with missing values. Several strategies for imputing missing homicide data have been suggested in recent years. However, aside from assessing their logic and the degree to which findings based on imputed data are in accordance with what is known broadly about homicide, such strategies are difficult to evaluate for the reason that the "true" values for cases with missing data cannot be observed. By combining different datasets available through the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data, this project offered a strategy for both testing imputation approaches that have been suggested in the literature and for using these results to advance the development of new methods for imputing SHR data. In order to better understand why data are missing and how missing and nonmissing data differ, Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) and local police data from Chicago, Illinois, St. Louis, Missouri, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Phoenix, Arizona, for 1990 to 1995 were merged to create a master file. The researchers used overlapping information on victim and incident characteristics from the SHR and police data from fields for which the data are very rarely missing even if the offender is unknown (age, sex, and race of victims, month of incident, and weapon) to link the two types of data sources. While this process became challenging when the characteristics of victims and incidents were identical across multiple incidents in a given month, this type of situation was extremely rare as usually at least one characteristic varied across incidents. Through this process, 96 percent of the cases in the SHR were matched with cases in the police files. The data contain variables for three types of cases: complete in SHR, missing offender and incident information in SHR but known in police report, and missing offender and incident information in both. The merged file allows estimation of similarities and differences between the cases with known offender characteristics in the SHR and those in the other two categories. The accuracy of existing data imputation methods can be assessed by comparing imputed values in an "incomplete" dataset (the SHR), generated by the three imputation strategies discussed in the literature, with the actual values in a known "complete" dataset (combined SHR and police data), for both case-by-case imputation as well as distributions at the aggregate level. Variables from both the Supplemental Homicide Reports and the police report offense data include incident date (year and month), victim characteristics (age, sex, and race), offender characteristics (age, sex, race, and relationship to victim), and incident details (weapon used, circumstance, and situation of offense). Data also contain geographic variables (UCR state code, agency, population group, region, population, county, and SMSA), as well as matching information, such as from which source the offender data were missing, the number of victims in the SHR data, the number of offenders in the SHR data, the researchers' confidence in the case match, their comments, and several aggregated and derived variables. 1990 1995 1990 1995 Arizona Chicago Illinois Missouri Pennsylvania Philadelphia Phoenix St. Louis United States jurisdiction homicides Homicides known to the police in Chicago, Illinois, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Phoenix, Arizona, St. Louis, Missouri, from 1990 to 1995. administrative records data Not applicable. record abstracts UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS [UNITED STATES]: SUPPLEMENTARY HOMICIDE REPORTS, 1976-1999 (ICPSR 3180) CHANGING PATTERNS IN SOCIAL POLICY IN PHILADELPHIA, PHOENIX, AND ST. LOUIS, 1980-1994 (ICPSR 2729). Data for St. Louis were supplied by the St. Louis Homicide Project (Scott Decker and Richard Rosenfeld, principal investigators). HOMICIDES IN CHICAGO, 1965-1995 (ICPSR 6399) Data contain three weight variables associated with the SHR data: WTNONE, WTUS, and WTST.

ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes. Users are encouraged to refer to the project final report for more information about imputation methods used and the processes the researchers used to assess them. Not applicable. None Ann Arbor, Mi.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Additional special permissions, where applicable, are described in the restrictions field.

Please read the terms of use below. If you agree to them, click on the "I Agree" button to proceed. If you do not agree, you can click on the "I Do Not Agree" button to return to the home page.

ICPSR adheres to the principles of the Data Seal of Approval , which, in part, require the data consumer to comply with access regulations imposed both by law and by the data repository, and to conform to codes of conduct that are generally accepted in higher education and scientific research for the exchange of knowledge and information.

These data are distributed under the following terms of use, which are governed by ICPSR. By continuing past this point to the data retrieval process, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements stated below:

Privacy of RESEARCH SUBJECTS

Any intentional identification of a RESEARCH SUBJECT (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of his or her confidential information violates the PROMISE OF CONFIDENTIALITY given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data agree:

To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for investigation of specific RESEARCH SUBJECTS, except when identification is authorized in writing by ICPSR (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

To make no use of the identity of any RESEARCH SUBJECT discovered inadvertently, and to advise ICPSR of any such discovery (netmail@icpsr.umich.edu )

Redistribution of Data

You agree not to redistribute data or other materials without the written agreement of ICPSR, unless:

You serve as the OFFICIAL or DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE at an ICPSR MEMBER INSTITUTION and are assisting AUTHORIZED USERS with obtaining data, or

You are collaborating with other AUTHORIZED USERS to analyze the data for research or instructional purposes.

When sharing data or other materials in these approved ways, you must include all accompanying files with the data, including terms of use. More information on permission to redistribute data can be found on the ICPSR Web site.

Citing Data

You agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any publication that employs resources provided by ICPSR. Authors of publications based on ICPSR data are required to send citations of their published works to ICPSR for inclusion in a database of related publications (bibliography@icpsr.umich.edu ) .

Disclaimer

You acknowledge that the original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations

If ICPSR determines that the terms of this agreement have been violated, ICPSR will act according to our policy on terms of use violations . Sanctions can include:

ICPSR may revoke the existing agreement, demand the return of the data in question, and deny all future access to ICPSR data.

The violation may be reported to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution. A range of sanctions are available to institutions including revocation of tenure and termination.

If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, the case may be reported to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections. This may result in an investigation of the user's institution, which can result in institution-wide sanctions including the suspension of all research grants.

A court may award the payment of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the breach of the agreement.

Definitions authorized user - A faculty member, staff member, or student at a member institutionICPSR - Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchmember institution - An institutional member of ICPSROfficial/Designated Representative - An individual appointed to represent a university's interests in ICPSR. This individual is also charged with providing user support to campus users. promise of confidentiality - A promise to a respondent or research participant that the information the respondent provides will not be disseminated without the permission of the respondent; that the fact that the respondent participated in the study will not be disclosed; and that disseminated information will include no linkages to the identity of the respondent. Such a promise encompasses traditional notions of both confidentiality and anonymity. Names and other identifying information regarding respondents, proxies, or other persons on whom the respondent or proxy provides information, are presumed to be confidential.research subject - A person or organization observed for purposes of research. Also called a respondent. A respondent is generally a survey respondent or informant, experimental or observational subject, focus group participant, or any other person providing information to a study or on whose behalf a proxy provides information.

In addition, the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data stipulates the following conditions:

Federal law and regulations require that research data collected by the U.S. Department of Justice or by its grantees and contractors may only be used for research or statistical purposes. The applicable laws and regulations may be found in the United States Code, 42 USC Section 3789g(a), the Code of Federal Regulations, 28 CFR 22, and 62 F.R. 35044 (June 27, 1997) (The Federal Confidentiality Order). Accordingly, any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment may violate federal law as well as the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data collected by or with the support from the U.S. Department of Justice and distributed by NACJD or other ICPSR archives must agree to abide by these regulations and understand that ICPSR may report any potential violation to the U.S. Department of Justice.

AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.

The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.