<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
      <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
      <dc:title>Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration:  [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992</dc:title>
		
      		<dc:creator>MacKenzie, Doris Layton</dc:creator>
      	
		
      		<dc:subject>alcohol abuse</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>criminal histories</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>drug abuse</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>offenders</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>parole</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>prison inmates</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>probation</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>program evaluation</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>shock incarceration programs</dc:subject>
      	
		
      		<dc:subject>ICPSR.XVII.E</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>NACJD.III</dc:subject>
      	
      	<dc:description>This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp)
 programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South
 Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot
 camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were
 sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock
 incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1)
 changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during
 incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during
 and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community
 supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables
 measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes
 toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic
 variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and
 military experience. The community supervision data contain
 information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such
 as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and
 employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and
 contacts with community supervision officers, along with
 demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key
 areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a
 psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community
 supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For
 most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey
 were different from those who were surveyed in the community
 supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and
 sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are
 organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state
level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender.</dc:description>
		
      	<dc:date>2006-03-30</dc:date>
	    
      		<dc:type>survey data, and administrative records data</dc:type>
      	
      	<dc:identifier>6986</dc:identifier>
      	<dc:identifier>10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1</dc:identifier>
    	
      		<dc:source>personal interviews, self-enumerated questionnaires,
and official records from correctional institutions</dc:source>
      	
    	
      		<dc:coverage>Florida</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Georgia</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Illinois</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Louisiana</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Oklahoma</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>South Carolina</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Texas</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>United States</dc:coverage>
      	
		
      	<dc:rights> ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 
        3.0 United States License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/).</dc:rights>
      </oai_dc:dc>
