<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
      <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
      <dc:title>Evaluation of the Focused Offender Disposition Program in Birmingham, Phoenix, and Chicago, 1988-1992</dc:title>
		
      		<dc:creator>Hepburn, John R.</dc:creator>
      	
		
      		<dc:subject>criminal justice system</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>drug offenders</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>drug testing</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>drug treatment</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>needs assessment</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>probationers</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>program evaluation</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>treatment programs</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>urinalysis</dc:subject>
      	
		
      		<dc:subject>ICPSR.XVII.E</dc:subject>
      	
      		<dc:subject>NACJD.III</dc:subject>
      	
      	<dc:description>The Drug Testing Technology/Focused Offender Disposition
 (FOD) program was designed to examine two issues regarding drug users
 in the criminal justice system: (1) the utility of need assessment
 instruments in appropriately determining the level of treatment and/or
 supervision needed by criminal offenders with a history of drug use,
 and (2) the use of urinalysis monitoring as a deterrent to subsequent
 drug use. This data collection consists of four datasets from three
 sites. The FOD program was first established in Birmingham, Alabama,
 and Phoenix, Arizona, in December 1988 and ran through August
 1990. The Chicago, Illinois, program began in October 1990 and ended
 in March 1992. These first three programs studied probationers with a
 history of recent drug use who were not incarcerated while awaiting
 sentencing. The subjects were assessed with one of two different
 treatment instruments. Half of all clients were assessed with the
 objective Offender Profile Index (OPI) created by the National
 Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors (NASADAD). The
 other half were assessed with the local instrument administered in
 each site by Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC),
 Inc. Regardless of which assessment procedure was used, offenders were
 then randomly assigned to one of two groups. Half of all offenders
 assessed by the OPI and half of the offenders assessed by the local
 instrument were assigned to a control group that received only random
 urinalysis monitoring regardless of the drug treatment intervention
 strategy prescribed by the assessment instrument. The other half of
 offenders in each assessment group were assigned to a treatment group
 that received appropriate drug intervention treatment. The Phoenix
 pilot study (Part 4), which ran from March 1991 to May 1992, was
 designed like the first Phoenix study, except that the sample for the
 pilot study was drawn from convicted felons who were jailed prior to
 sentencing and who were expected to be sentenced to probation. These
 data contain administrative information, such as current offense,
 number of arrests, number of convictions, and prior charges. The need
 assessment instruments were used to gather data on clients' living
 arrangements, educational and vocational backgrounds, friendships,
 history of mental problems, drug use history, and scores measuring
 stakes in conformity. In addition, the study specifically collected
 information on the monitoring of the clients while in the FOD program,
 including the number of urinalyses administered and their results, as
 well as the placement of clients in treatment programs. The files also
 contain demographic information, such as age, race, sex, and
education.</dc:description>
		
      	<dc:date>2006-03-30</dc:date>
	    
      		<dc:type>clinical data, survey data, and administrative records
data</dc:type>
      	
      	<dc:identifier>6214</dc:identifier>
      	<dc:identifier>10.3886/ICPSR06214.v1</dc:identifier>
    	
      		<dc:source>administrative records from Treatment Alternatives to
 Street Crime (TASC), Inc., and local probation offices, and personal
interviews</dc:source>
      	
    	
      		<dc:coverage>Alabama</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Arizona</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Birmingham</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Chicago</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Illinois</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>Phoenix</dc:coverage>
      	
      		<dc:coverage>United States</dc:coverage>
      	
		
      	<dc:rights> ICPSR metadata records are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 
        3.0 United States License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/).</dc:rights>
      </oai_dc:dc>
