<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>







<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-2.2" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-2.2 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-2.2/metadata.xsd">
	<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.3886/ICPSR06628.v1</identifier>
	<creators>
    	
			<creator>
				<creatorName>Tunis, Sandra</creatorName>
			</creator>
    	
			<creator>
				<creatorName>Austin, James</creatorName>
			</creator>
    	
			<creator>
				<creatorName>Morris, Mark</creatorName>
			</creator>
    	
			<creator>
				<creatorName>Hardyman, Patricia</creatorName>
			</creator>
    	
			<creator>
				<creatorName>Bolyard, Melissa</creatorName>
			</creator>
    	
	</creators>
	<titles>
		<title>Drug Offender Treatment in Local Corrections in California and New York, 1991-1993     </title>
		
	</titles>
	<publisher>Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research</publisher>
	<publicationYear>1998</publicationYear>
	<subjects>
		
      		<subject>drug abuse</subject>
      	
      		<subject>drug offenders</subject>
      	
      		<subject>program evaluation</subject>
      	
      		<subject>recidivism</subject>
      	
      		<subject>treatment compliance</subject>
      	
      		<subject>treatment outcome</subject>
      	
      		<subject>treatment programs</subject>
      	
	</subjects>
	<dates>
		<date dateType="Available">1998-05-01</date>
		<date dateType="Updated">2005-11-04</date>
		
			
				
					<date dateType="StartDate">1991</date>
					<date dateType="EndDate">1993</date>
				
   				
   		
	</dates>
	<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">
		
			survey data, and event/transaction data
		
	</resourceType>
	<alternateIdentifiers>
		<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="ICPSR Study Number">6628</alternateIdentifier>
	</alternateIdentifiers>
	<version>1</version>
	<descriptions>
		<description>The purpose of this multisite program evaluation project
 was to provide detailed and systematic descriptions of participants
 and treatment program components for a sample of five drug treatment
 programs in local jails. Three of the programs were located in
 California: Jail Education and Treatment (JET), Deciding, Educating,
 Understanding, Counseling, and Evaluation (DEUCE), and Rebuilding,
 Educating, Awareness, Counseling, and Hope (REACH). Two programs were
 in New York State: Substance Abuse Intervention Division (SAID) and
 New Beginnings. The project was aimed at assessing program completion
 rates as well as 12-month post-release recidivism for program
 participants versus matched controls. Background information obtained
 about the participating offenders includes sex, race, age, education,
 marital status, and employment status, as well as history of drug use,
 previous drug treatment, mental illness, inpatient/outpatient
 episodes, and offenses and sentencing. Additional data cover program
 location, dates of release from the program and from jail, type of
 program termination, type of residence upon release, and anticipated
 post-custody treatment. Information on each conviction/disposition was
 obtained through state criminal information systems, and state-level
 criminal history data (rap sheets) were collected for both the
 treatment and comparison groups. The unit of analysis is arrest
events.</description>
		
			<description>The purpose of this project was to provide
 detailed and systematic descriptions of participants and services for
 a sample of five drug treatment programs in local jails. The project
 was aimed at assessing program completion rates as well as 12-month
 post-release recidivism for program participants versus matched
 controls. An intended benefit of the research was to provide
 recommendations regarding the status and efficacy of drug treatment in
jails.</description>
		
		
			<description>Five drug treatment programs in local jails were
 selected for the study. Three of the programs were located in
 California: Jail Education and Treatment (JET), Deciding, Educating,
 Understanding, Counseling, and Evaluation (DEUCE), and Rebuilding,
 Educating, Awareness, Counseling, and Hope (REACH). Two programs were
 in New York State: Substance Abuse Intervention Division (SAID) and
 New Beginnings. The data were collected by sampling offenders who
 entered and exited the programs during the evaluation period. In most
 sites, program participants were interviewed by a program staff member
 or NCCD researcher at both program admission and release. If personal
 interviews were not possible, client files were examined. The
 admission data were collected to (1) provide a description of the
 offenders served, (2) provide a basis for comparing treatment and
 control groups to assure no a priori differences, and (3) provide a
 set of "offender" variables that could potentially predict outcome.
 To develop comparison groups, strategies tailored to each site had to
 be developed. For most sites, a sample of offenders serving time in
 the same facility but not participating in drug treatment was obtained
 (through computerized files) by matching on race, age, primary
 offense, and sentence length. A 12-month cut-off date was determined
 for each person based on his or her jail release date. Conviction and
 disposition data during the three years prior to jail admission were
 also collected. Although attempts were made to acquire complete
 conviction information for all study cases, this was not possible. In
 some cases, rap sheets could not be located. It is possible that the
 conviction leading to incarceration -- and inclusion in this sample -- was
 for an offense that was not reportable to the state, or that
conviction was not obtained.</description>
		
		
			<description>The jail admission form solicited demographic
 information such as sex, age, race, education, marital status, and
 employment status, as well as information on history of drug use,
 mental illness, inpatient/outpatient episodes, and previous drug
 treatment. The exit form contained dates of release from the program
 and from jail, as well as information about type of program
 termination, type of residence upon release, and anticipated
 post-custody treatment. Program location is identified for each
 respondent. The data also include offense and sentencing information
for convictions prior to and subsequent to the current offense.</description>
		
 	</descriptions>
	
</resource>