<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>







<resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-2.2" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-2.2 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-2.2/metadata.xsd">
	<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.3886/ICPSR20963.v1</identifier>
	<creators>
    	
			<creator>
				<creatorName>Kliesen, Kevin L.</creatorName>
			</creator>
    	
	</creators>
	<titles>
		<title>How Well Does Employment Predict Output?</title>
		
	</titles>
	<publisher>Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research</publisher>
	<publicationYear>2007</publicationYear>
	<subjects>
		
      		<subject>economic conditions</subject>
      	
      		<subject>economic growth</subject>
      	
      		<subject>economic trends</subject>
      	
      		<subject>employment</subject>
      	
      		<subject>employment projections</subject>
      	
      		<subject>financial planning</subject>
      	
      		<subject>financial policy</subject>
      	
      		<subject>inflation</subject>
      	
      		<subject>labor force</subject>
      	
      		<subject>labor markets</subject>
      	
      		<subject>macroeconomics</subject>
      	
      		<subject>policy analysis</subject>
      	
      		<subject>policy making</subject>
      	
	</subjects>
	<dates>
		<date dateType="Available">2007-09-17</date>
		<date dateType="Updated">2007-09-17</date>
		
	</dates>
	<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">
		
	</resourceType>
	<alternateIdentifiers>
		<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="ICPSR Study Number">20963</alternateIdentifier>
	</alternateIdentifiers>
	<version>1</version>
	<descriptions>
		<description>Economists, policymakers, and financial market analysts
 typically pay close attention to aggregate employment trends because
 employment is thought to be an important indicator of macroeconomic
 conditions. One difficulty is that there are two separate surveys of
 employment, which can diverge widely from one another, as the previous
 and current economic expansions demonstrate. The conventional wisdom
 is that, for assessing economic conditions, the survey that counts the
 number of jobs (establishment survey) is preferable to the survey that
 counts the number of people employed (household survey). However,
 results from a one-quarter-ahead forecasting exercise presented in
 this paper suggest that analysts should question whether employment is
a useful indicator for predicting output growth.</description>
		
		
		
 	</descriptions>
	
</resource>