nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20002 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20002 MiAaI MiAaI National Fertility Survey, 1965 [electronic resource] Charles F. Westoff , Norman B. Ryder 2008-02-25 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20002 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. re asked about their ideal number of children, whether they had their ideal number of children or if they really wanted fewer children, as well as whether their husbands wanted more or less children than they did. Respondents were then asked how many additional births they expected, how many total births they expected, when they expected their next child, and at what age they expected to have their last child. Respondents were asked how they felt about interrupting a pregnancy and whether they approved of abortion given different circumstances such as if the pregnancy endangered the woman's health, if the woman was not married, if the couple could not afford another child, if the couple did not want another child, if the woman thought the child would be deformed, or if the woman had been raped. Respondents were also asked to share their opinions with respect to world population growth. They were asked whether certain countries' populations were growing faster or slower than the United States, if they considered overall world population growth to be a serious problem, and how serious the problem of population growth, both in the United States and worldwide, was relative to other problems such as poverty and crime. The survey also included a thorough review of all of the respondents' pregnancies and their outcomes. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20002.v1 reproductive history icpsr sexual behavior icpsr world population icpsr abortion icpsr attitudes icpsr birth icpsr birth control icpsr birth expectations icpsr education icpsr family history icpsr family planning icpsr family size icpsr fertility icpsr income icpsr population growth icpsr pregnancy icpsr religious beliefs icpsr ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies IFSS I. Integrated Fertility Survey Series Westoff, Charles F. Ryder, Norman B. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20002 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20002.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR20003 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2008 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR20003 MiAaI MiAaI National Fertility Survey, 1970 [electronic resource] Charles F. Westoff , Norman B. Ryder 2008-08-08 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2008 ICPSR 20003 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. th a doctor problems related to the methods of contraception. Respondents were asked why they used the pill and other methods of contraception, why they had stopped using a particular method, whether the methods were being used for family planning, and during what intervals the methods were used. Respondents also were asked questions about sterility including whether they were able to have children, whether they or their husband had undergone a sterilization operation, and if so, what kind of operation it was, the motive for having such an operation, whether the respondent had arrived at menopause, and if they had seen a doctor if they were unable to have a baby. They were also asked about their ideals with respect to children including their ideal number of children, the ideal number of boys and girls, as well as the ideal age for having their first and last child. The survey also sought each respondent's opinions regarding abortion, such as when, if ever, it was acceptable, the legal status of abortion, gender roles at home and in the work place, and world population and the gravity of the problem relative to other problems such as poverty, race relations, and nuclear war. Respondents were also asked to give detailed birth histories describing all live births, total number of wanted and unwanted children, total number of wanted and unwanted pregnancies, planning status by birth order, and the date and order of the last wanted birth. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20003.v1 family planning icpsr family size icpsr fertility icpsr income icpsr population growth icpsr pregnancy icpsr religious beliefs icpsr reproductive history icpsr sexual behavior icpsr world population icpsr abortion icpsr attitudes icpsr birth icpsr birth control icpsr birth expectations icpsr education icpsr family history icpsr ICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and Gender IFSS I. Integrated Fertility Survey Series DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Westoff, Charles F. Ryder, Norman B. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 20003 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20003.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03959 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2004 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03959 MiAaI MiAaI National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 [electronic resource] Ohio State University. Center for Human Resource Research 2007-06-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2004 ICPSR 3959 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) is one of six surveys, designed by the United States Department of Labor, comprising the National Longitudinal Survey (NLS) Series. Created to be representative of United States residents in 1997 who were born between the years of 1980 and 1984, the NLSY97 documents the transition from school to work experienced by today's youths through seven rounds of data collection spanning the time period 1997-2003. The majority of the oldest cohort members (age 16 as of December 31, 1996) were still in school during the first survey round and the youngest respondents (age 12) had not yet entered the labor market. The NLSY97 addresses eleven main topics of interest including: employment, schooling, vocational training, income and assets, family formation, family background, future expectations, attitudes, behaviors, and time use, health, political participation, and environmental characteristics. Respondents were asked about their employment status including hours worked per week, job history, benefits, job satisfaction, freelance employment opportunities, occupation and pay during military service, and periods of unemployment. Respondents were also asked about their education history, current enrollment status, high school curriculum, whether they received a diploma or GED, participation in any school-based learning programs, whether they attended college or university and whether or not they graduated, the cost of tuition, their grade point average, and field of study. Respondents were asked to give information about training programs in which they had participated such as the type of training program, amount of time spent in training, skills obtained, and whether or not the training programs were completed. The survey also addressed the topic of income and assets with questions focusing on the respondents' wages or salary, other sources of income, assets such as real estate, stock or mutual funds, retirement plans, and income from sources such as workers compensation, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), and Food Stamps. Respondents were asked about their family including their marital status, number, sex, and ages of any biological or adopted children, outcomes of pregnancies not ending in live births. Respondents were asked to answer a series of questions pertaining to their family history such as their parents nationality and place of birth, grandparents place of birth, native language spoken by parents, parents education, whether or not the respondents lived with their parents, other relatives living in the household, as well as questions about the household environment. Respondents were asked about their expectations for the future and specifically, where they expected to be in the next year, in the next five years, by the age of 20 and by the age of 30. Respondents were asked about their attitudes, behaviors, and time use. They were asked about their perception of teachers, school, peers, as well as their sexual activity, drug and alcohol use, crimes committed, and how much time they devoted to homework, classes, reading, and watching television. Respondents were asked questions about their general physical health, mental health, any chronic health conditions, and any health conditions that limited school or work activities. Respondents were asked if they were interested in government and public affairs, whether they were registered to vote, and whether they voted in recent elections. Finally, respondents were asked questions about their living environment, residential moves, whether their current residence was urban or rural, whether their current residence was in a metropolitan area, and the region of residence. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03959.v2 labor (work) icpsr labor force icpsr labor markets icpsr occupational mobility icpsr political participation icpsr secondary education icpsr time allocation icpsr training icpsr wages and salaries icpsr work experience icpsr young adults icpsr youths icpsr attitudes icpsr demographic characteristics icpsr economic indicators icpsr educational background icpsr expectations icpsr family background icpsr health icpsr high school students icpsr household composition icpsr income icpsr job history icpsr job training icpsr AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions CCEERC IX.E. Family Structure NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR III. Health ICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and Behavior DSDR VI. Population Characteristics CCEERC IX.D. Family and Work CCEERC IV.B. Population Dynamics NACJD I. Attitude Surveys DSDR IV. Family and Household Structure Ohio State University. Center for Human Resource Research Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3959 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03959.v2 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR07439 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s1984 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR07439 MiAaI MiAaI Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968-1999 [electronic resource] Annual Core Data Sandra Hofferth , Frank P. Stafford , Wei-Jun J. Yeung , Greg J. Duncan , Martha S. Hill , James Lepkowski , James N. Morgan 2006-01-12 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1984 ICPSR 7439 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) is an ongoing data collection effort begun in 1968 in an attempt to fill the need for a better understanding of the determinants of family income and its changes. Core data are collected annually, with each new wave of family data constituting a separate data file (Parts 2-27, 201-205). Data on individuals are contained in Part 1, Cross-Year Individual File, 1968-1993 (Waves 1-26) [Public Release II], and an early release of individual-level data through 1999 is included in Part 201, Cross-Year Individual File, 1968-1999 (Waves 1-31) [Public Release I]. The PSID has continued to trace individuals from the original national sample of approximately 4,800 households, whether those individuals are living in the same dwelling or with the same people. The investigators hoped to discover whether most short-term changes in economic status are due to forces outside the family or if they can be traced to something in the individual's own background or in the pattern of his or her thinking and behavior. The data can shed light on what causes family income to rise above or fall below the poverty line. In line with the theoretical model, the questions asked fall generally under the headings of economic status, economic behavior, demographics, and attitudes. Specifically, they deal with topics such as employment, income sources and amounts, housing, car ownership, food expenditures, transportation, do-it-yourself home maintenance and car repairs, education, disability, time use, family background, family composition changes, and residential location. Content of a more sociological or psychological nature is also included in some waves of the study. Information gathered in the survey applies to the circumstances of the family unit as a whole (e.g., type of housing) or to particular persons in the family unit (e.g., age, earnings). While some information is collected about all individuals in the family unit, the greatest level of detail is ascertained for the primary adults heading the family unit. Core topics in the PSID include income sources and amounts, poverty status, public assistance in the form of food or housing, other financial matters (e.g., taxes, inter-household transfers), family structure and demographic measures (e.g., marital events, birth and adoptions, children forming households), labor market participation (e.g., employment status, vacation/sick time, occupation, industry, work experience), housing (e.g., own/rent, house value/rent payment, size), geographic mobility (e.g., when and why moved, where head of household grew up, all states head of household lived in), and socioeconomic background (e.g., education, ethnicity, religion, military service, parents' education, occupation, poverty status). Beginning in 1985, comprehensive retrospective fertility and marriage histories of individuals in the households were assembled. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07439.v1 poverty icpsr social change icpsr social indicators icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr economic behavior icpsr economic change icpsr economic conditions icpsr employment history icpsr families icpsr family history icpsr fertility icpsr food aid icpsr attitudes icpsr household expenditures icpsr household income icpsr housing icpsr income icpsr marriage icpsr population trends icpsr AHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic Conditions ICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and Behavior NACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older Adults DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies DSDR IX. NIA Supported Studies RCMD XI. Poverty and Income Hofferth, Sandra Stafford, Frank P. Yeung, Wei-Jun J. Duncan, Greg J. Hill, Martha S. Lepkowski, James Morgan, James N. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 7439 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07439.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03202 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2002 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03202 MiAaI MiAaI Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968-1999 [electronic resource] Supplemental Files Sandra Hofferth , Frank P. Stafford , Wei-Jun J. Yeung , Greg J. Duncan , Martha S. Hill , James Lepkowski , James N. Morgan 2005-11-04 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2002 ICPSR 3202 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. the wealth supplemental files for 1984, 1989, and 1994. Part 12, Family Wealth Supplement Data, 1984 (Wave 17), and Part 13, Family Wealth Supplement Data, 1989 (Wave 22), were derived, respectively, from the Public Release II versions (final release versions) of Parts 18 and 19 of ICPSR study 7439, and Part 14, Family Wealth Supplement Data, 1994 (Wave 27), was derived from Part 202, Family File, 1994 (Wave 27), an early release version. The components of wealth were collected at the family level. Part 15, Estimating Risk Tolerance from the 1996 PSID, asked how willing employed respondents were to take jobs with different income prospects. Parts 16 and 17 focus on active saving and cover the time periods 1984-1989 and 1989-1994, respectively. Sequences in these files are intended to measure flows of money into and out of different assets such as putting money into or taking it out of the stock market, putting money into annuities or cashing them in. In combination with changes in the companion wealth components these measures can be used to study savings versus capital gains. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03202.v1 adoption icpsr attitudes icpsr child care icpsr divorce icpsr economic behavior icpsr economic change icpsr economic conditions icpsr families icpsr family history icpsr fertility icpsr health care costs icpsr health status icpsr household expenditures icpsr household income icpsr income icpsr job history icpsr marriage icpsr military service icpsr neighborhood characteristics icpsr older adults icpsr poverty icpsr social indicators icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr working hours icpsr DSDR IX. NIA Supported Studies NACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older Adults ICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and Behavior DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Hofferth, Sandra Stafford, Frank P. Yeung, Wei-Jun J. Duncan, Greg J. Hill, Martha S. Lepkowski, James Morgan, James N. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3202 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03202.v1 nmm 22 4500 ICPSR03203 MiAaI m f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu 130525s2001 miu f a eng d (MiAaI)ICPSR03203 MiAaI MiAaI Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1989-1990 [electronic resource] Latino Sample Sandra Hofferth , Frank P. Stafford , Wei-Jun J. Yeung , Greg J. Duncan , Martha S. Hill , James Lepkowski , James N. Morgan 2006-03-30 Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2001 ICPSR 3203 Numeric Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2013-05-25. AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions. Also available as downloadable files. The Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) is an ongoing data collection effort begun in 1968 in an attempt to fill the need for a better understanding of the determinants of family income and its changes. The PSID has continued to trace individuals from the original national sample of approximately 4,800 households, whether those individuals are living in the same dwelling or with the same people. The investigators hoped to discover whether most short-term changes in economic status are due to forces outside the family or if they can be traced to something in the individual's own background or in the pattern of his or her thinking and behavior. The data can shed light on what causes family income to rise above or fall below the poverty line. In line with the theoretical model, the questions asked fall generally under the headings of economic status, economic behavior, demographics, and attitudes. Specifically, they deal with topics such as employment, income sources and amounts, housing, car ownership, food expenditures, transportation, do-it-yourself home maintenance and car repairs, education, disability, time use, family background, family composition changes, and residential location. This collection is comprised of the PSID Latino sample data. For these files, a Latino was defined as having at least one parent solely of Mexican, Cuban, or Puerto Rican ancestry, or having at least two (any two) grandparents solely of Mexican, Cuban, or Puerto Rican ancestry. Part 1, 1990 Latino Sample Family-Individual File, offers data on individuals who were members of the 2,043 households in the 1990 PSID Latino sample. This sample was taken from Temple University's 1989 Latino National Political Survey (LNPS). To permit comparisons across ethnic groups, a second file, Part 2, 1989 Core Sample Family-Individual File for Use With Latino Sample, is provided. This file contains data on members of the original 1989 PSID sample. Part 3, 1990 Latino Sample Nonresponse File, presents data on Latino individuals who responded to the 1989 LNPS but were not successfully followed and reinterviewed in the 1990 PSID Latino wave. Information is included on language proficiency, immigration, family earnings, school status, general health status, and employment. Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03203.v1 attitudes icpsr automobile expenses icpsr economic behavior icpsr economic change icpsr economic conditions icpsr ethnicity icpsr families icpsr family history icpsr Hispanic or Latino origins icpsr household expenditures icpsr household income icpsr income icpsr job history icpsr poverty icpsr social indicators icpsr socioeconomic status icpsr RCMD IX.E. Latino ICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and Behavior DSDR IX. NIA Supported Studies RCMD XI. Poverty and Income NACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older Adults DSDR VIII. NICHD Supported Studies Hofferth, Sandra Stafford, Frank P. Yeung, Wei-Jun J. Duncan, Greg J. Hill, Martha S. Lepkowski, James Morgan, James N. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR (Series) 3203 Access restricted ; authentication may be required: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03203.v1