|
|
Defining Compliance
OAIS Compliance
Compliance with the OAIS model is difficult to demonstrate and
measure as the lower level specifications and protocols are not
fully developed nor implemented in a range of organizational settings.
The model provides a high-level blueprint for implementing a digital
archive.
 Organizations may choose to build
or buy their digital archives system on their own or as part of
a consortium. This decision should be based upon the mission, need,
program scope, and resources (financial, human, and technical) of
the organization.
0101 The OAIS model allows for modular
development. The keys to success include leveraging existing developments
and infrastructure to realize a fully functioning digital archive,
and prioritizing design and implementation needs through a coordinated
sequence of development stages.
$$$$ Each organization will want
to conduct a cost-benefit analysis to test possible options for
the best fit to meet identified digital preservation requirements.
Should your institution build a repository, outsource its development,
join a consortium, etc.?
|
Exercise |
|
| |
As a group exercise for
your core working group on digital preservation, try this:
Take the OAIS reference model document.
Go through each section to identify and document text that
suggests mandatory, desirable, or optional actions or capabilities
for your OAIS.
The process will provide a team-building opportunity and
the result will be at least a starting point for the requirements
your organization will have to address to be OAIS compliant.
OAIS intentionally does not proscribe how an organization's
OAIS will operate; the organization must make that determination.
|
|
|
|
|
 Watch
This Space
Digital Preservation Repository Certification
What will certification mean for your organization?
An ISO standards development project was established in January 2007 to develop an ISO standard to enable
the audit and certification of digital repositories. RLG and the National Archives
and Records Administration sponsored the Digital Preservation Repository
Certification Task Force from 2003-2007, which produced version 1.0 of the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification (TRAC): Criteria and Checklist. The TRAC framework supports self-assessment for organizations and is informed by the foundation documents: Trusted Digital Repositories and the OAIS Reference Model. The Center for Research Libraries conducted a research project, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, that tested the use of the TRAC document in a
series of real-life assessments of repositories and develop the
processes and activities required to audit and certify digital archives. (For an extensive review, see the RLG DigiNews special issue on certification.)
Certification Principles
These are some principles to consider for the
certification process. It must be:
- external to the digital archives (cannot consist
solely of self-assessment)
- managed/performed by recognized authorities
- well-documented with comprehensive and explicit policies,
procedures, and practices
- sustainable and monitorable over time
- replicable
Certification Questions
Certification is a digital preservation community
issue. Like many other digital preservation areas, policies,
procedures, and processes for certification are being
developed.
Consider these implementation questions:
- What designated body will undertake the certification
of digital preservation repositories? Who will designate
that body?
- Who will be the certifiers? How will individuals
be qualified to perform certifications?
- What stakeholders will that board represent?
- What role will the digital preservation community
have in developing and maintaining the certification
process?
- What automated tools for certification will be developed,
by whom, and how used?
Consider these questions for your institution:
- What documentation would you be able to provide to
a certifying board?
- What would a certifying board say about your institution’s
digital preservation program?
 |
|
