 | Description & Citation--Study No. 3903 | | | ICPSR Study No.: | 3903 |
|---|
| | | Title: | National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002 |
|---|
| | | Principal Investigator(s): | United States Department of Health and Human
Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration. Office of Applied Studies |
|---|
| | | Series: | National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Series |
|---|
| | | Funding Agency: | United States Department of Health and Human
Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Office of Applied Studies |
|---|
| | | Grant Number: | 283-98-9008 |
|---|
| | | Bibliographic Citation: | U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied
Studies. NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH, 2002 [Computer
file]. ICPSR03903-v3. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle
Institute [producer], 2003. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium
for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2006-10-26. |
|---|
| | | | Summary: | The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) measures the
prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The
surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual,
estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs,
alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12
and older. Questions include age at first use as well as lifetime,
annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covers substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and includes questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey includes questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents are
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2002 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, gang involvement,
drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities,
exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and
perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as
school work. Several measures focused on prevention related themes in
this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access
to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of
drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on
the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey
and have been retained through the 2002 survey. Demographic data
include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition. |
|---|
| | | Subject Term(s): | addiction, alcohol, alcohol abuse, alcohol consumption, amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, controlled drugs, depression, drinking behavior, drug abuse, drug dependence, drug treatment, drug use, drugs, hallucinogens, heroin, households, inhalants, marijuana, mental health, mental health services, prescription drugs, sedatives, smoking, stimulants, substance abuse, substance abuse treatment, tranquilizers |
|---|
| | | Geographic Coverage: | United States |
|---|
| | | Time Period: | 2002 |
|---|
| | | Date(s) of Collection: | 2002 |
|---|
| | | Unit of Observation: | individual |
|---|
| | | Universe: | The civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the
United States aged 12 and older, including residents of
noninstitutional group quarters such as college dormitories, group
homes, shelters, rooming houses, and civilians dwelling on military
installations. |
|---|
| | | Data Type: | survey data |
|---|
| | | Data Collection Notes: | (1) Data were collected and prepared for release by
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. (2) Prior to
the 2002 survey, this series was titled National Household Surveys on
Drug Abuse. (3) Survey administration and process for this series
changed in 2002. Therefore the 2002 data should not be compared with
data collected in 2001 or earlier to assess changes over time. (4) For
selected variables, statistical imputation was performed following
logical inference to replace missing responses. These variables are
identified in the codebook as "...LOGICALLY ASSIGNED" for the logical
procedure, or by the designation "IMPUTATION-REVISED" in the variable
label when the statistical procedure was also performed. The names of
statistically imputed variables begin with the letters "IR". For each
imputation-revised variable there is a corresponding imputation
indicator variable that indicates whether a case's value on the
variable resulted from an interview response or was imputed. Missing
values for some demographic variables were imputed by the unweighted
hot-deck technique used in previous surveys. Beginning in 1999,
imputation of missing values for many other variables was accomplished
using predictive mean neighborhoods (PMN), a new procedure developed
specifically for this survey. Both the hot-deck and PMN imputation
procedures are described in the codebook. (5) To protect the privacy
of respondents, all variables that could be used to identify
individuals have been encrypted or collapsed in the public use
file. To further ensure respondent confidentiality, the data producer
used data substitution and deletion of state identifiers and a
subsample of records in the creation of the public use file. (6)
Previously published estimates may not be exactly reproducible from
the variables in the public use file due to the disclosure protection
procedures that were implemented. (7) The setup and dictionary files
for Stata are designed to be compatible with StataSE, Version 8. This
is a large data file requiring that approximately 250 megabytes of
Random Access Memory be allocated to Stata. Operations within Stata,
including conversion of the ASCII data to Stata format, are likely to
be slow. Analysts may wish to download subsets of data from the SAMHDA
Data Analysis System (DAS) for use with Stata. |
|---|
| | | | Sample: | Multistage area probability sample for each of the 50
states and the District of Columbia. A coordinated five-year sample
design was developed for 1999 through 2003. Although there is no
overlap with the 1998 sample, the design facilitates overlap in the
first-stage units (area segments) between each two successive years in
the five-year design. This design increases the precision of estimates
in year-to-year trend analysis. The sample is stratified on multiple
levels, beginning with states. Eight states are considered large
sample states and contribute approximately 3,600 respondents per
state. The remaining states are sampled to yield 900 respondents per
state. The second level of stratification divides states into Field
Interviewer (FI) Regions. The third level of stratification divides FI
regions into area segments consisting of adjacent census blocks.
These area segments were used as the primary sampling units. Dwelling
units in area segments were listed in a standardized order and were
selected by systematic sampling. Field interviewers visited each
sample address to determine dwelling unit eligibility, to list all
eligible persons at the address, and to conduct interviews. Each
respondent who completed a full interview was given a $30 cash
payment. Persons were selected from the address roster using a
handheld computer. To improve the precision of estimates, the sample
allocation process targeted five age groups: 12-17, 18-25, 26-34,
35-49, and 50 and older. The size measures used in selecting the area
segments were coordinated with the dwelling unit and person selection
process so that a nearly self-weighting sample could be achieved in
each of the five age groups. The sample design included approximately
equal numbers of persons in the 12-17, 18-25, and 26 and older age
groups. The achieved sample for the 2002 NSDUH was 68,126 persons. The
public use file contains 54,079 records due to a subsampling step used
in the disclosure protection procedures. Minimum item response
requirements were defined for cases to be retained for weighting and
further analysis (i.e., "usable" cases). These requirements, as well
as full sampling methodology, are detailed in the codebook. |
|---|
| | | Weight: | Due to various adjustments, such as those for nonresponse
and poststratification, the 2002 NSDUH sample design is not
self-weighting. Analysts are advised to use the final sample weight
when attempting to use the 2002 NSDUH data to draw inferences about
the target population or any subdomains of the target population. All
estimates published in SAMHSA reports (such as the Results from the
2002 NSDUH) are weighted using the final analysis weight for the full
sample. For the public use file, the corresponding final sample weight
is denoted as ANALWT_C, with the "C" denoting confidentiality
protection. This sample weight represents the total number of target
population persons each record on the file represents. Note that the
sum of ANALWT_C, over all records on the data file, represents an
estimate of the total number of people in the target population. |
|---|
| | | Mode of Data Collection: | computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) |
|---|
| | |
| audio computer-assisted self interview (ACASI) |
|---|
| | | Response Rates: | The study yielded a weighted screening response rate
of 91 percent and a weighted interview response rate for the Computer
Assisted Interview (CAI) of 79 percent. |
|---|
| | | | Note: | A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the
summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as LRECL, case count, and variable count) is listed in the
file manifest. |
|---|
| | | Restrictions: | Users are reminded by the United States Department of
Health and Human Services that these data are to be used solely for
statistical analysis and reporting of aggregated information and not
for the investigation of specific individuals or treatment
facilities. |
|---|
| | | Original ICPSR Release: | 2004-02-05 |
|---|
| | | Version History: | The last update of this study occurred on 2006-10-26. |
|---|
| | |
| 2006-10-26 - The data producer resupplied the data
file and codebook documentation. Thirty-three variables were modified,
20 variables were dropped, and 118 new variables were added. Some of
these changes were to correct for data errors, but most of these
changes were done to provide consistency with the 2004 NSDUH study.
Of these changes, the most important change to note is that two study
design variables (VEREP and VESTR) were revised to provide consistency
with the 2004 study, which collapsed the strata in order to maximize
the number of people in each replicate. |
|---|
| | |
| 2004-02-24 - Variable NRCH17_2 (RECODED # R's
CHILDREN < 18 IN HOUSEHOLD) was replaced to correct a coding error. |
|---|
| |
|  |
