MyData:What Is MyData? | Login/Account Info | Download Saved Files | Logout Description & Citation--Study No. 13593 | | | ICPSR Study No.: | 13593 |
|---|
| | |
Persistent URL:
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13593 |
|---|
| | | Title: | Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Health Screen, Wave 1, 1994-1997 |
|---|
| | | Principal Investigator(s): | Felton J. Earls, Harvard Medical School |
|---|
| | |
| Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Scientific Director. Columbia University. Teacher's College. Center for the Study of Children and Families |
|---|
| | |
| Stephen W. Raudenbush, Scientific Director. University of Michigan. School of Education and Survey Research Center |
|---|
| | |
| Robert J. Sampson, Scientific Director. Harvard University. Department of Sociology |
|---|
| | | Series: | Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Series |
|---|
| | | Funding Agency: | John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation |
|---|
| | |
| Child Care Bureau |
|---|
| | |
| Harris Foundation |
|---|
| | |
| Head Start Bureau of the Administration for Children and Families |
|---|
| | |
| National Institute of Child Health and Human Development |
|---|
| | |
| National Institute for Early Child Development and Education |
|---|
| | |
| National Institute of Justice |
|---|
| | |
| National Institute of Mental Health |
|---|
| | |
| Office of Education Research and Improvement of the United States Department of Education |
|---|
| | |
| Turner Foundation |
|---|
| | | Grant Number: | 93-IJ-CX-K005 |
|---|
| | | Bibliographic Citation: | Earls, Felton J., Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Stephen W. Raudenbush, and Robert J. Sampson. PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): HEALTH SCREEN, WAVE 1, 1994-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR13593-v2. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-09-27. doi:10.3886/ICPSR13593 |
|---|
| | | | Summary: | The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
(PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,
schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.
One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which
was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over
6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and
their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing
circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,
that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial
behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to
gauge various aspects of human development, including individual
differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such
measure was the Health Screen, used to obtain the general health
condition of the subjects, the frequency with which they were not
in good physical or mental health, and if this prevented them from
doing usual activities, such as playing. |
|---|
| | | Subject Term(s): | adolescents, child development, childhood, emotional problems, health behavior, health problems, health status, mental health, neighborhoods, social behavior |
|---|
| | | Geographic Coverage: | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
|---|
| | | Time Period: | 1994 - 1997 |
|---|
| | | Date(s) of Collection: | 1994 - 1997 |
|---|
| | | Unit of Observation: | individual |
|---|
| | | Universe: | Children, adolescents, young adults, and their primary
caregivers, living in the city of Chicago in 1994. |
|---|
| | | Data Type: | survey data |
|---|
| | | Data Collection Notes: | (1) The Murray Research Center conducted the initial
data and documentation processing for this collection. (2) At present,
only a restricted version of the data is available (see RESTRICTIONS
field). A downloadable version of the data is slated to be available
in the near future. |
|---|
| | | | Purpose of the Study: | Project on Human Development in Chicago
Neighborhoods The Project on Human Development in Chicago
Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of
how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent
development. It was designed to advance the understanding of the
developmental pathways of both positive and negative human social
behaviors. In particular, the project examined the causes and pathways
of juvenile delinquency, adult crime, substance abuse, and violence.
At the same time, the project provided a detailed look at the
environments in which these social behaviors took place by collecting
substantial amounts of data about urban Chicago, including its people,
institutions, and resources.
Longitudinal Cohort Study
One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which
was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over
6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and
their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing
circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,
that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial
behaviors. The age cohorts include birth (0), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
years. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge
various aspects of human development, including individual
differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences.
Health Screen
The data in this collection are from Wave 1 of the Longitudinal
Cohort Study, administered between 1994 and 1997. In order to report
on general characteristics of the subject's mental and physical
health, the Health Screen was administered. |
|---|
| | | Study Design: | Project on Human Development in Chicago
Neighborhoods
The city of Chicago was selected as the research site for the PHDCN
because of its extensive racial, ethnic, and social-class diversity.
The project collapsed 847 census tracts in the city of Chicago into
343 neighborhood clusters (NCs) based upon seven groupings of
racial/ethnic composition and three levels of socioeconomic status.
The NCs were designed to be ecologically meaningful. They were
composed of geographically contiguous census tracts, and geographic
boundaries and knowledge of Chicago's neighborhoods were considered in
the definition of the NCs. Each NC was comprised of approximately
8,000 people.
Longitudinal Cohort Study
For the Longitudinal Cohort Study, a stratified probability sample
of 80 neighborhoods was selected. The 80 NCs were sampled from the 21
strata (seven racial/ethnic groups by three socioeconomic levels) with
the goal of representing the 21 cells as equally as possible to
eliminate the confounding between racial/ethnic mix and socioeconomic
status. Once the 80 NCs were chosen, then block groups were selected
at random within each of the sample neighborhoods. A complete listing
of dwelling units was collected for all sampled block groups.
Pregnant women, children, and young adults in seven age cohorts
(birth, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 years) were identified through
in-person screening of approximately 40,000 dwelling units within the
80 NCs. The screening response rate was 80 percent. Children within
six months of the birthday that qualified them for the sample were
selected for inclusion in the Longitudinal Cohort Study. A total of
8,347 participants were identified through the screening. Of the
eligible study participants, 6,228 were interviewed.
For all cohorts except 0 and 18, primary caregivers as well as the
child were interviewed. The primary caregiver was the person found to
spend the most time taking care of the child. Separate research
assistants administered the primary caregiver interviews and the child
interviews. The primary method of data collection was face-to-face
interviewing, although participants who refused to complete the
personal interview were administered a phone interview. Interviews
were conducted in Spanish, English, and Polish. In Wave 1 the complete
protocol was translated into Spanish and Polish. An interpreter was
hired for participants who spoke a language other than English,
Spanish, or Polish. Depending on the age and wave of data collection,
participants were paid between $5 and $20 per interview. Other
incentives, such as free passes to museums, the aquarium, and monthly
drawing prizes were also included.
Interview protocols included a wide range of questions. For
example, some questions assessed impulse control and sensation-seeking
traits, cognitive and language development, leisure activities,
delinquency and substance abuse, friends' activities, and
self-perception, attitudes, and values. Caregivers were also
interviewed about family structure, parent characteristics,
parent-child relationships, parent discipline styles, family mental
health, and family history of criminal behavior and drug use.
Health Screen
Completed between 1994 and 1997, the Health Screen instrument was
administered to either the primary caregivers of subjects belonging to
Cohorts 3 and 6, or to the subjects belonging to Cohorts 9, 12, 15,
and 18 of the PHDCN Longitudinal Cohort Study. The instrument obtained
information regarding the general health condition of the subject
(rated as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor), the frequency
with which the subject was not in good physical or mental health
(which included stress, depression, or other problems with emotions)
within the past 30 days, and if the poor physical or mental health
condition prevented the subject from doing usual activities, such as
work, self-care, or recreation/playing. |
|---|
| | | Sample: | Stratified probability sample. |
|---|
| | | Weight: | none |
|---|
| | | Mode of Data Collection: | face-to-face interview |
|---|
| | |
| telephone interview |
|---|
| | | Description of Variables: | In addition to the variables containing the
responses to the Health Screen instrument, the data contain
administrative variables that record identification numbers for
respondents and interviewers, cohort, and wave number, as well as the
time and date each interview was completed. |
|---|
| | | Response Rates: | The overall response rate for Wave 1 of the
Longitudinal Cohort Study was 75 percent or 6,228 participants. The
response rates by cohort were:
- 76.2 percent (1,269) for Cohort 0
- 76.6 percent (1,003) for Cohort 3
- 75.0 percent (980) for Cohort 6
- 75.9 percent (828) for Cohort 9
- 74.3 percent (820) for Cohort 12
- 71.6 percent (696) for Cohort 15
- 70.3 percent (632) for Cohort 18
|
|---|
| | | Presence of Common Scales: | none |
|---|
| | | | Note: | A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the
summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the
file manifest. |
|---|
| | |
Some instruments administered as part of this
study may contain contents from copyrighted
instruments. Reproductions of the instruments
are provided solely as documentation for
the analysis of the data associated with this
collection. Please contact the data producers for
information on permissions to use the instruments
for other purposes.
|
|---|
| | | Restrictions: | The data are restricted from general dissemination.
Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted
Data Use Agreement form and specify the reasons for the request. A
copy of the Restricted Data Use Agreement form can be requested by
calling 800-999-0960. Researchers can also download this form as a
Portable Document Format (PDF) file from the download page associated
with this dataset. Completed forms should be returned to: Director,
National Archive of Criminal Justice Data, Inter-university Consortium
for Political and Social Research, Institute for Social Research,
P.O. Box 1248, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, or by
fax: 734-647-8200. |
|---|
| | | Original ICPSR Release: | 2005-07-22 |
|---|
| | | Version History: | The last update of this study occurred on 2007-09-27. |
|---|
| | |
| 2007-09-27 - The Wave 1 Questionnaire file has been
added. |
|---|
| | | Dataset(s): | - DS1: Cohort 3
- DS2: Cohort 6
- DS3: Cohort 9
- DS4: Cohort 12
- DS5: Cohort 15
- DS6: Cohort 18
|
|---|
| |

|