MyData:What Is MyData? | Login/Account Info | Download Saved Files | Logout

NACJD home 

Description & Citation--Study No. 9982

Bibliographic Description

ICPSR Study No.:9982
 
Persistent URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09982
 
Title:Evaluating Alternative Police Responses to Spouse Assault in Colorado Springs: an Enhanced Replication of the Minneapolis Experiment, 1987-1989
 
Principal Investigator(s):Howard Black, Colorado Springs Police Department
 
  Richard Berk, Colorado Springs Police Department
 
  James Lily, Colorado Springs Police Department
 
  Robert Owenbey, Colorado Springs Police Department
 
  Giannina Rikoski, Colorado Springs Police Department
 
Funding Agency:United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice.
 
Grant Number:86-IJ-CX-0045
 
Bibliographic Citation:Black, Howard, Richard Berk, James Lily, Robert Owenbey, and Giannina Rikoski. EVALUATING ALTERNATIVE POLICE RESPONSES TO SPOUSE ASSAULT IN COLORADO SPRINGS: AN ENHANCED REPLICATION OF THE MINNEAPOLIS EXPERIMENT, 1987-1989 [Computer file]. Compiled by Howard Black, Richard Berk, James Lily, Robert Owenbey, and Giannina Rikoski, Colorado Springs Police Department. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1994. doi:10.3886/ICPSR09982
 

Scope of Study

Summary:The purpose of this study was to replicate an experiment in Minneapolis (MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT, 1986-1987 [ICPSR 9808]) testing alternative police response to cases of spouse assault, using a larger number of subjects and a more complex research design. The study focused on how police response affected subsequent incidents of spouse assault. Police responses studied included arrest, issuing emergency protection orders, referring the suspect to counseling, separating the suspect and the victim, and restoring order only (no specific action). Data were obtained through initial incident reports, counseling information, and personal interviews. Follow-up interviews were conducted at three- and six-month periods, and recidivists were identified through police and court record checks. Variables from initial incident reports include number of charges, date, location, and disposition of charges, weapon(s) used, victim injuries, medical attention received, behavior towards police, victim and suspect comments, and demographic information such as race, sex, relationship to victim/offender, age, and past victim/offender history. Data collected from counseling forms provide information on demographic characteristics of the suspect, type of counseling, topics covered in counseling, suspect's level of participation, and therapist comments. Court records investigate victim and suspect criminal histories, including descriptions of charges and their disposition, conditions of pretrial release, and the victim's contact with pretrial services. Other variables included in follow-up checks focus on criminal and offense history of the suspect. The data collection includes separate data files for the original, second, and final versions of some of the forms that were used.
 
Subject Term(s):arrests, counseling, crisis intervention, domestic assault, intervention, intervention strategies, police intervention, police response, recidivism, spouse abuse, victims
 
Geographic Coverage:Colorado, Colorado Springs, United States
 
Time Period:March 1987 - April 1989
 
Date(s) of Collection:1987 - 1989
 
Unit of Observation:Incidents, individuals, and court cases.
 
Universe:All domestic violence calls made to the Colorado Springs Police Department between March 1987 and April 1989.
 
Data Type:survey data, and event/transaction data
 
Data Collection Notes:All variables over two columns wide may contain values of "-22", "-66", "-77", "-99", "X". These values may or may not be documented in the codebook. All alphanumeric variables over seven columns wide with these same values are not listed in the "MISSING VALUE RECODE" nor in the "MISSING VALUES" files.
 

Methodology

Purpose of the Study:n/a
 
Study Design:This study employed a factorial design whereby the police response to spouse assault acted as the independent variable. Models of domestic violence were developed using two competing theories: Victim Empowerment and Specific Deterrence. When an officer arrived at the scene of a domestic violence incident, a random treatment was assigned via radio dispatch. Officers had final authority over assignment, and could assign another treatment at their own discretion. Treatments included arresting the suspect, issuing an emergency protection order, referring the suspect to counseling, separating the suspect and the victim, and restoring order only (no specific action). A unique four-digit project ID number was assigned to each subject. It was possible for an individual to appear several times: as a victim in one case and a suspect in another -- as a victim or suspect in several cases with different partners -- or as a repeat case that was not properly screened. Follow-up interviews were conducted with victims at three- and six-month periods. Recidivists were identified through extensive police and court record checks, and victim empowerment data were collected with a validated survey instrument.
 
Sample:A random sampling method was used in the assignment of all five of the officer response alternatives. Officers had final authority over assignment, and could assign another treatment at their own discretion.
 
Data Source:personal interviews, counseling session forms, and police and court records
 
Description of Variables:Variables from initial incident reports include number of charges, date, location, and disposition of charges, victim and suspect demographics, weapon(s) used, victim injuries, medical attention received, behavior towards police, and victim and suspect comments. Data collected from counseling forms provide information on suspect demographics, type of counseling, topics covered in counseling, suspect's level of participation, and therapist comments. Court records investigate victim and suspect criminal histories, including descriptions of charges and their disposition, conditions of pretrial release, and the victim's contact with pretrial services. Other variables included in follow-up checks focus on criminal and offense history of the suspect.
 
Response Rates:Of the 1,150 cases in the project (excluding the repeat cases), 80 percent received an initial interview. Final interviews were completed on 1,079 (70 percent) of the 1,202 cases that received the randomly assigned treatment.
 
Presence of Common Scales:None
 

Access and Availability

Note:A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the file manifest.
 
Original ICPSR Release:1994-06-03
 
Version History:The last update of this study occurred on 2006-01-12.
 
  2006-01-12 - All files were removed from dataset 44 and flagged as study-level files, so that they will accompany all downloads.
 
  2006-01-12 - All files were removed from dataset 25 and flagged as study-level files, so that they will accompany all downloads.
 
Dataset(s):
  • DS1: Initial Call Implementation Form Data
  • DS2: Final Version of Suspect Counseling Form Data
  • DS3: Second Version of Suspect Counseling Form Data
  • DS4: Original Version of Suspect Counseling Form Data
  • DS5: Original Version of Initial Victim Interview Data
  • DS6: Second Version of Initial Victim Interview Data
  • DS7: Final Version of Initial Victim Interview Data
  • DS8: Original Version of Final Victim Interview Data
  • DS9: Final Version of Final Victim Interview Data
  • DS10: Initial Suspect Criminal History Check Data
  • DS11: Initial Victim Criminal History Check Data
  • DS12: Six-Month Suspect Criminal History Check Data
  • DS13: Six-Month Victim Criminal History Check Data
  • DS14: Initial Suspect Charge Check Data
  • DS15: Initial Suspect Victimization Check Data
  • DS16: Initial Victim Charge Check Data
  • DS17: Initial Victim Victimization Check Data
  • DS18: Six-Month Suspect Charge Check Data
  • DS19: Six-Month Suspect Victimization Check Data
  • DS20: Six-Month Victim Charge Check Data
  • DS21: Six-Month Victim Victimization Check Data
  • DS22: Final Version of Court Penetration Form Data
  • DS23: Second Version of Court Penetration Form Data
  • DS24: Original Version of Court Penetration Form Data
  • DS25: Codebook for All Parts
  • DS26: SAS Data Definition Statements for Initial Call Implementation Form Data
  • DS27: SAS Data Definition Statements for Final Version of Suspect Counseling Form Data
  • DS28: SAS Data Definition Statements for Second Version of Suspect Counseling Form Data
  • DS29: SAS Data Definition Statements for Original Version of Suspect Counseling Form Data
  • DS30: SAS Data Definition Statements for Original Version of Initial Victim Interview Data
  • DS31: SAS Data Definition Statements for Second Version of Initial Victim Interview Data
  • DS32: SAS Data Definition Statements for Final Version of Initial Victim Interview Data
  • DS33: SAS Data Definition Statements for Original Version of Final Victim Interview Data
  • DS34: SAS Data Definition Statements for Final Version of Final Victim Interview Data
  • DS35: SAS Data Definition Statements for Initial Suspect Criminal History Check Data
  • DS36: SAS Data Definition Statements for Initial Victim Criminal History Check Data
  • DS37: SAS Data Definition Statements for Six-Month Suspect Criminal History Check Data
  • DS38: SAS Data Definition Statements for Six-Month Victim Criminal History Check Data
  • DS39: SAS Data Definition Statements for Check Data, Parts 14-21
  • DS40: SAS Data Definition Statements for Final Version of Court Penetration Form Data
  • DS41: SAS Data Definition Statements for Second Version of Court Penetration Form Data
  • DS42: SAS Data Definition Statements for Original Version of Court Penetration Form Data
  • DS43: SPSS Data Definition Statements for Check Data, Parts 14-21
  • DS44: User Guide
 

 

NACJD