MyData:What Is MyData? | Login/Account Info | Download Saved Files | Logout Description & Citation--Study No. 7541 | | | ICPSR Study No.: | 7541 |
|---|
| | |
Persistent URL:
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07541 |
|---|
| | | Title: | Free Press, Fair Trial Data, 1970 |
|---|
| | | Principal Investigator(s): | Stuart S. Nagel |
|---|
| | |
| Thomas Eimermann |
|---|
| | |
| Kathleen Reinbolt |
|---|
| | | Bibliographic Citation: | Nagel, Stuart S., Thomas Eimermann, and Kathleen Reinbolt. FREE PRESS, FAIR TRIAL DATA, 1970 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Urbana, IL: Stuart S. Nagel, Thomas Eimermann, and Kathleen Reinbolt, University of Illinois, Urbana [producers], 1970. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002. doi:10.3886/ICPSR07541 |
|---|
| | | | Summary: | This data collection contains information gathered in a
1970 survey of 623 newspaper editors, police chiefs, bar associations,
prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys from a sample of 166
cities across the country. The study's research objectives were to
develop a model for determining the optimum mix of free press and fair
trial in pending criminal cases, to compare alternative procedures for
handling the free press/fair trial problem, and to compare the
attitudes and procedures of the various decisionmakers involved.
Information gathered in the survey includes: (1) the degree of
pretrial press publicity allowed on pending criminal cases, (2)
relevant attitudes and opinions, especially concerning ways of
reducing the adverse effects of pretrial publicity while still having
an informed public (e.g., the degree to which the public needs to know
the details of criminal proceedings, whether the traditional legal
remedies of change of venue, voir dire, sequestering, etc., are
adequate to neutralize the effects of possibly prejudicial news
coverage, and whether the American Bar Association's restrictions on
the extent of information lawyers can release represents an
infringement upon the people's right to know), (3) the benefits seen
as derived from news coverage of criminal cases, and (4) prevailing
pretrial procedures by editors, police, prosecutors, defense
attorneys, and judges. Demographic data (e.g., population, region, and
whether an SMSA or not) about the 106 cities represented in the survey
are also included in the file. |
|---|
| | | Subject Term(s): | attitudes, attorneys, criminal justice policy, fair trial-free press, freedom of the press, freedom of information, media coverage, news media, opinions, pretrial procedures, pretrial publicity, trial procedures, trials, United States |
|---|
| | | Time Period: | 1970 |
|---|
| | | Date(s) of Collection: | 1967 - 1970 |
|---|
| | | Universe: | Newspaper editors, police chiefs, bar associations,
prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys in the United States. |
|---|
| | | Data Type: | survey data, and aggregate data |
|---|
| | | Data Collection Notes: | (1) Different questions were posed to different sets
of respondents. Responses to their individual questionnaires are all
combined in one data file. (2) This codebook is provided by ICPSR as a
Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed
by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader
software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to
obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web
site. |
|---|
| | | | Sample: | Newspaper editors, police chiefs, bar associations,
prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys from a sample of 166
cities across the country were sent questionnaires in the
mail. Fifty-four percent of the newspaper editors responded, 50
percent of the prosecuting attorneys, and 48 percent of the defense
attorneys, representing almost all 50 states. |
|---|
| | | Data Source: | self-enumerated questionnaires, and standard sources
providing demographic characteristics of cities |
|---|
| | | | Note: | A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the
summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the
file manifest. |
|---|
| | | Original ICPSR Release: | 1984-05-03 |
|---|
| | | Dataset(s): | - DS1: Free Press, Fair Trial Data, 1970
|
|---|
| |

|