MyData:What Is MyData? | Login/Account Info | Download Saved Files | Logout Description & Citation--Study No. 6565 | | | ICPSR Study No.: | 6565 |
|---|
| | |
Persistent URL:
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06565 |
|---|
| | | Title: | Extended National Assessment Survey of Law Enforcement Anti-Gang Information Resources, 1993-1994 |
|---|
| | | Principal Investigator(s): | G. David Curry, University of Missouri-St. Louis. Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice |
|---|
| | |
| Richard A. Ball, University of Missouri-St. Louis. Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice |
|---|
| | |
| Scott H. Decker, University of Missouri-St. Louis. Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice |
|---|
| | | Funding Agency: | United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice. |
|---|
| | | Grant Number: | 93-IJ-CX-0040 |
|---|
| | | Bibliographic Citation: | Curry, G. David, Richard A. Ball, and Scott H. Decker. EXTENDED NATIONAL ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ANTI-GANG INFORMATION RESOURCES, 1993-1994 [Computer file]. ICPSR06565-v1. St. Louis, MO: University of Missouri-St. Louis, Dept. of Criminology and Criminal Justice [producer], 1994. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1996. doi:10.3886/ICPSR06565 |
|---|
| | | | Summary: | This survey extended a 1992 survey (NATIONAL ASSESSMENT
SURVEY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ANTI-GANG INFORMATION RESOURCES, 1990-1992
[ICPSR 6237]) in two ways: (1) by updating the information on the 122
municipalities included in the 1992 survey, and (2) by including data
on all cities in the United States ranging in population from 150,000
to 200,000 and including a random sample of 284 municipalities ranging
in population from 25,000 to 150,000. Gang crime problems were defined
in the same manner as in the 1992 survey, i.e., a gang (1) was
identified by the police as a "gang," (2) participated in criminal
activity, and (3) involved youth in its membership. As in the 1992
survey, a letter was sent to the senior law enforcement departmental
administrator of each agency describing the nature of the survey. For
jurisdictions included in the 1992 survey, the letter listed the
specific information that had been provided in the 1992 survey and
identified the departmental representative who provided the 1992 data.
The senior law enforcement administrator was asked to report whether a
gang crime problem existed within the jurisdiction in 1994. If a
problem was reported, the administrator was asked to identify a
representative of the department to provide gang crime statistics and
a representative who was most knowledgeable on anti-gang field
operations. Annual statistics on gang-related crime were then
solicited from the departmental statistical representative. Variables
include city, state, ZIP code, and population category of the police
department, and whether the department reported a gang problem in
1994. Data on the number of gangs, gang members, and gang-related
incidents reported by the police department are also provided. If
actual numbers were not provided by the police department, estimates
of the number of gangs, gang members, and gang-related incidents were
calculated by sampling category. |
|---|
| | | Subject Term(s): | cities, crime, gang membership, gang violence, gangs, police departments, youths |
|---|
| | | Geographic Coverage: | United States |
|---|
| | | Time Period: | 1993 - 1994 |
|---|
| | | Date(s) of Collection: | 1994 |
|---|
| | | Unit of Observation: | Police departments. |
|---|
| | | Universe: | Police departments in cities with populations over 25,000
and 11 counties in the United States. |
|---|
| | | Data Type: | survey data |
|---|
| | | Data Collection Notes: | The data collection instrument is provided as an
electronic image file in Portable Document File (PDF) format. The PDF
format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed
using the Adobe Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the
Adobe Reader is provided in the README file on the diskettes and
through the NACJD Web Pages on the Internet. The data collection
instrument is also available in hardcopy form upon request from
ICPSR. |
|---|
| | | | Purpose of the Study: | The 1994 national-level survey of law enforcement
information on gang-related crime extended a 1992 survey (NATIONAL
ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ANTI-GANG INFORMATION RESOURCES,
1990-1992 [ICPSR 6237]) in two ways: (1) chronologically, the study
updated information on the 122 municipalities included in the 1992
survey, and (2) geographically, the study was extended to include data
on all cities in the United States ranging in population from 150,000
to 200,000 and to include a random sample of 284 of the 1,126
municipalities ranging in population from 25,000 to 150,000. |
|---|
| | | Study Design: | As much as possible, the 1994 survey replicated
procedures for gathering data used in the 1992 survey. Gang crime
problems were defined in the same manner as in the 1992 survey, i.e.,
a gang (1) was identified by the police as a "gang," (2)
participated in criminal activity, and (3) involved youth in its
membership. As in the 1992 survey, a letter was sent to the senior law
enforcement departmental administrator of each agency describing the
nature of the survey. For jurisdictions included in the 1992 survey,
the letter listed the specific information that had been provided in
the 1992 survey and identified the departmental representative who
provided the 1992 data. Each letter was accompanied by a letter of
support for the survey from an NIJ official. The senior law
enforcement administrator, usually a chief of police or police
commissioner, was asked to report whether a gang crime problem existed
within the jurisdiction in 1994. If a problem was reported, the
administrator was asked to identify a representative of the department
to provide gang crime statistics and a representative who was most
knowledgeable on anti-gang field operations. Sometimes this was the
same individual, but more often separate departmental representatives
were identified. Annual statistics on gang-related crime were then
solicited from the departmental statistical representative. |
|---|
| | | Sample: | All United States cities with populations over 150,000
were included. A random sample of 284 jurisdictions with populations
between 25,000 and 150,000 was also selected. The 31 remaining smaller
cities included in the 1992 study were excluded from selection in the
random sample. Eleven counties that had provided gang information to
the 1992 survey were recontacted for the 1994 survey. Two counties not
included in the 1992 survey were included in the 1994 survey because
they were identified as providing law enforcement services to smaller
municipalities selected in the random sample of cities with
populations of 25,000 to 150,000. |
|---|
| | | Data Source: | telephone interviews |
|---|
| | | Description of Variables: | Variables include city, state, ZIP code, and
population category of the police department, and whether the
department reported a gang problem in 1994. Data on the number of
gangs, gang members, and gang-related incidents reported by the police
department are also provided. If actual numbers were not provided by
the police department, estimates of the number of gangs, gang members,
and gang-related incidents were calculated by sampling category. |
|---|
| | | Response Rates: | Not available. |
|---|
| | | Presence of Common Scales: | None. |
|---|
| | | | Note: | A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the
summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the
file manifest. |
|---|
| | | Original ICPSR Release: | 1997-02-13 |
|---|
| | | Version History: | The last update of this study occurred on 2005-11-04. |
|---|
| | |
| 2005-11-04 - On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one
or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well
as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable,
and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to
reflect these additions. |
|---|
| | | Dataset(s): | - DS1: Data File
- DS2: SAS Data Definition Statements
- DS3: Data Collection Instrument in PDF Format
|
|---|
| |

|