Bibliography Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002 This bibliography includes published and unpublished works that are related to ICPSR study 3815. It includes works that are based on primary or secondary analysis of the data, or which describe or critique those data or the collection methodology. This list represents all items known to ICPSR as of 2013-05-21. If you publish a work or know of other works that are based on these data, please send the complete citation and name of the ICPSR study used to: bibliography@icpsr.umich.edu. 1. Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program, "Preliminary Data on Drug Use and Related Matters Among Adult Arrestees and Juvenile Detainees, 2002." NCJ 200755, Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer], National Institute of Justice [distributor], 2003. Full text PDF: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/adam/ADAMPrelim2002.pdf 2. Bhati, Avinash Singh; Roman, John K., "Simulated evidence on the prospects of treating more drug-involved offenders." Journal of Experimental Criminology. Mar 2010, 6, (1), 1 - 113. DOI: 10.1007/s11292- 010-9088-2 NCJ 231011 Abstract: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=253060 3. Bond, Brittany M.; Caulkins, Jonathan P., "Potential for Legal Marijuana Sales in California to Supply Rest of U.S.." RAND Working Paper. 765, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, Jul 2010. Abstract: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=253060 4. Brownstein, Henry H.; Taylor, Bruce G., "Measuring the stability of illicit drug markets: Why does it matter?." Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Jan 2007, 90, (Supplement 1), 52 - 60. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.11.010 Abstract: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=253060 5. Burke, Cynthia, "Drug Use Among Adult Arrestees in San Diego County." CJ Bulletin. San Diego, CA: SANDAG, Criminal Justice Research Division, Sep 2004. Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 6. Caulkins, Jonathan P.; Bond, Brittany M., "Marijuana price gradients: Implications for exports and export-generated tax revenue for California after legalization." Journal of Drug Issues. Jan 2012, 42, (1), 28 - 45. DOI: 10.1177/0022042612436650 Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 7. Cooper, Jonathon A.; Fox, Andrew M.; Rodriguez, Nancy, "Race, structural disadvantage, and illicit drug use among arrestees." Criminal Justice Policy Review. Mar 2012, 23, (1), 18 - 39. DOI: 10.1177/0887403410390508 Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 8. Dave, Dhaval, "Illicit drug use among arrestees, prices and policy." Journal of Urban Economics. Mar 2008, 63, (2), 694 - 714. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.011 Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 9. Decker, Scott H.; Katz, Charles M.; Webb, Vincent J., "Assessing the validity of self-reports by gang members: Results from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program." Crime and Delinquency. Apr 2006, 52, (2), 232 - 252. Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 10. Decker, Scott H.; Katz, Charles M.; Webb, Vincent J., "Understanding the black box of gang organization: Implications for involvement in violent crime, drug sales, and violent victimization." Crime and Delinquency. Jan 2008, 54, (1), 153 - 172. DOI: 10.1177/0011128706296664 Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 11. Falkowski, Carol L., "Drug Abuse Trends." Center City, MN: Hazelden Foundation, Jun 2003. Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 12. Fitzpatrick, Kevin M.; Myrstol, Brad, "The jailing of America's homeless: Evaluating the rabble management thesis." Crime and Delinquency. Mar 2011, 57, (2), 271 - 297. DOI: 10.1177/0011128708322941 Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 13. Gilliam, Jay Trace, "Determinants of individual drug market patterns: Ecological predictors of where individuals drug uses by their drugs." Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 2006. ojp-98-c-001 Full text PDF: http://sandiegohealth.org/disease/drug/publicationid_1109_3506.pdf 14. Golub, Andrew; Johnson, Bruce D., "How Much Do Manhattan-Arrestees Spend on Drugs?." Final Report to the National Institute of Justice Regarding Monitoring Drug Markets in Manhattan with ADAM. NIJ 207147, New York, NY: National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., Jul 2004. 2003-IJ-CX-1028 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=207147 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/207147.pdf The cost of drugs to users can provide a number of valuable insights to researchers, such as the size of drug markets, drug-related criminal activities, and challenges for treatment. Until recently, most estimates of drug costs have relied on holistic reports of how much respondents spent on drugs. However, in 2000 the ADAM program questionnaire contained highly specific questions regarding drug costs. The current study examined ADAM data from a sample of 2,979 Manhattan arrestees during 2000-02 and compared it with ADAM data from 1998-99 regarding drug costs. Covariance of drug expenses were analyzed, revealing that among the 2000-02 Manhattan arrestees who reported obtaining drugs in the past 30 days, the median drug expense was estimated at $370 per month. Frequency of use accounted for 42 percent of the variance. Infrequent marijuana-only users had the lowest monthly drug expense at $5 per month, while heavy marijuana-only users spent an estimated $600 per month. Heroin and cocaine costs to Manhattan arrestees were estimated at $1,000 or more per month. When compared to the 1998-99 estimates, the drug costs for 2000-02 were twice as large. While it appears that ADAM’s more specific questions regarding drug costs may advance the estimation of drug expenses, more research is necessary to conclusively establish the accuracy of the estimator. References, tables, figures 15. Golub, Andrew; Johnson, Bruce D.; Dunlap, Eloise, "The race/ethnicity disparity in misdemeanor marijuana arrests in New York City." Criminology and Public Policy. Feb 2007, 6, (1), 131 - 164. OJP-98-C-001 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=207147 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/207147.pdf The cost of drugs to users can provide a number of valuable insights to researchers, such as the size of drug markets, drug-related criminal activities, and challenges for treatment. Until recently, most estimates of drug costs have relied on holistic reports of how much respondents spent on drugs. However, in 2000 the ADAM program questionnaire contained highly specific questions regarding drug costs. The current study examined ADAM data from a sample of 2,979 Manhattan arrestees during 2000-02 and compared it with ADAM data from 1998-99 regarding drug costs. Covariance of drug expenses were analyzed, revealing that among the 2000-02 Manhattan arrestees who reported obtaining drugs in the past 30 days, the median drug expense was estimated at $370 per month. Frequency of use accounted for 42 percent of the variance. Infrequent marijuana-only users had the lowest monthly drug expense at $5 per month, while heavy marijuana-only users spent an estimated $600 per month. Heroin and cocaine costs to Manhattan arrestees were estimated at $1,000 or more per month. When compared to the 1998-99 estimates, the drug costs for 2000-02 were twice as large. While it appears that ADAM’s more specific questions regarding drug costs may advance the estimation of drug expenses, more research is necessary to conclusively establish the accuracy of the estimator. References, tables, figures 16. Gorman, Dennis M.; Huber, J. Charles, Jr., "Do medical cannabis laws encourage cannabis use?." International Journal of Drug Policy. May 2007, 18, (3), 160 - 167. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.10.001 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=207147 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/207147.pdf The cost of drugs to users can provide a number of valuable insights to researchers, such as the size of drug markets, drug-related criminal activities, and challenges for treatment. Until recently, most estimates of drug costs have relied on holistic reports of how much respondents spent on drugs. However, in 2000 the ADAM program questionnaire contained highly specific questions regarding drug costs. The current study examined ADAM data from a sample of 2,979 Manhattan arrestees during 2000-02 and compared it with ADAM data from 1998-99 regarding drug costs. Covariance of drug expenses were analyzed, revealing that among the 2000-02 Manhattan arrestees who reported obtaining drugs in the past 30 days, the median drug expense was estimated at $370 per month. Frequency of use accounted for 42 percent of the variance. Infrequent marijuana-only users had the lowest monthly drug expense at $5 per month, while heavy marijuana-only users spent an estimated $600 per month. Heroin and cocaine costs to Manhattan arrestees were estimated at $1,000 or more per month. When compared to the 1998-99 estimates, the drug costs for 2000-02 were twice as large. While it appears that ADAM’s more specific questions regarding drug costs may advance the estimation of drug expenses, more research is necessary to conclusively establish the accuracy of the estimator. References, tables, figures 17. Griffin, Marie L.; Rodriguez, Nancy, "The gendered nature of drug acquisition behavior within marijuana and crack drug markets." Crime and Delinquency. May 2011, 57, (3), 408 - 431. DOI: 10.1177/0011128708327955 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=207147 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/207147.pdf The cost of drugs to users can provide a number of valuable insights to researchers, such as the size of drug markets, drug-related criminal activities, and challenges for treatment. Until recently, most estimates of drug costs have relied on holistic reports of how much respondents spent on drugs. However, in 2000 the ADAM program questionnaire contained highly specific questions regarding drug costs. The current study examined ADAM data from a sample of 2,979 Manhattan arrestees during 2000-02 and compared it with ADAM data from 1998-99 regarding drug costs. Covariance of drug expenses were analyzed, revealing that among the 2000-02 Manhattan arrestees who reported obtaining drugs in the past 30 days, the median drug expense was estimated at $370 per month. Frequency of use accounted for 42 percent of the variance. Infrequent marijuana-only users had the lowest monthly drug expense at $5 per month, while heavy marijuana-only users spent an estimated $600 per month. Heroin and cocaine costs to Manhattan arrestees were estimated at $1,000 or more per month. When compared to the 1998-99 estimates, the drug costs for 2000-02 were twice as large. While it appears that ADAM’s more specific questions regarding drug costs may advance the estimation of drug expenses, more research is necessary to conclusively establish the accuracy of the estimator. References, tables, figures 18. Harcourt, Bernard E.; Ludwig, Jens, "Reaction Essay. Reefer madness: Broken windows policing and misdemeanor marijuana arrests in New York City, 1989-2000." Criminology and Public Policy. Feb 2007, 6, (1), 165 - 181. OJP-98-C-001 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=207147 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/207147.pdf The cost of drugs to users can provide a number of valuable insights to researchers, such as the size of drug markets, drug-related criminal activities, and challenges for treatment. Until recently, most estimates of drug costs have relied on holistic reports of how much respondents spent on drugs. However, in 2000 the ADAM program questionnaire contained highly specific questions regarding drug costs. The current study examined ADAM data from a sample of 2,979 Manhattan arrestees during 2000-02 and compared it with ADAM data from 1998-99 regarding drug costs. Covariance of drug expenses were analyzed, revealing that among the 2000-02 Manhattan arrestees who reported obtaining drugs in the past 30 days, the median drug expense was estimated at $370 per month. Frequency of use accounted for 42 percent of the variance. Infrequent marijuana-only users had the lowest monthly drug expense at $5 per month, while heavy marijuana-only users spent an estimated $600 per month. Heroin and cocaine costs to Manhattan arrestees were estimated at $1,000 or more per month. When compared to the 1998-99 estimates, the drug costs for 2000-02 were twice as large. While it appears that ADAM’s more specific questions regarding drug costs may advance the estimation of drug expenses, more research is necessary to conclusively establish the accuracy of the estimator. References, tables, figures 19. Heliotis, Joanna; Kuck, Sarah; Hunt, Dana, "Analytic Guide for ADAM." Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, May 2001. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/analguid.pdf 20. Hunt, Dana; Rhodes, William, "Methodology Guide for ADAM." Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, May 2001. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 21. Johnson, Bruce D.; Golub, Andrew, "Dependence on and treatment for street drugs among Manhattan arrestees." In Cole, Spencer M., New Research on Street Drugs. 13 - 29, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers,2006. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 22. Jones, Peter R., "Drug use trends across the DUF/ADAM divide: 1988- 2002." American Society of Criminology Annual Conference, Boston, MA, Nov 2005. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 23. Katz, Charles M.; Webb, Vincent J.; Decker, Scott H., "Using the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program to further understand the relationship between drug use and gang membership." Justice Quarterly. Mar 2005, 22, (1), 58 - 88. DOI: 10.1080/0741882042000333645 Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 24. Katz, Charles M.; Webb, Vincent J.; Fox, Kate; Shaffer, Jennifer N., "Understanding the relationship between violent victimzation and gang membership." Journal of Criminal Justice. Jan-Feb 2011, 39, (1), 48 - 59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.10.004 Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 25. Kposowa, Augustine Joseph; Adams, Michelle A.; Tsunokai, Glenn T., "Citizenship status and arrest patterns in the United States: Evidence from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring program." Crime, Law and Social Change. Mar 2010, 53, (2), 159 - 181. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-009-9224-y Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 26. Kremling, Janine, "An Analysis of the Influence of Sampling Methods on Estimation of Drug Use Prevalence and Patterns among Arrestees in the United States: Implications for Research and Policy." Dissertation, University of South Florida, 2010. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 27. Lord, Vivian B.; Friday, Paul C.; Brennan, Pauline K., "The effects of interviewer characteristics on arrestees' responses to drug-related questions." Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice. 2005, 1, (1), 36 - 55. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 28. Miller, Riane N.; Kuhns, Joseph B., "Exploring the impact of medical marijuana laws on the validity of self-reported marijuana use among juvenile arrestees over time." Criminal Justice Policy Review. Mar 2012, 23, (1), 40 - 66. DOI: 10.1177/0887403410392026 Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/Admguid.pdf 29. National Drug Intelligence Center, "National Drug Threat Assessment 2004." Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center, Apr 2004. Full text PDF: http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs8/8731/8731p.pdf 30. National Institute on Drug Abuse , "Marijuana Abuse." NIDA Research Report Series . NIH Pub No. 05-3859, Bethesda, MD : United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health , Jul 2005. Full text: http://www.drugabuse.gov/ResearchReports/Marijuana/ Full text PDF: http://www.drugabuse.gov/PDF/RRMarijuana.pdf 31. Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo; Kilmer, Beau; Grossman; Chaloupka, Frank J., "Risks and Prices: The Role of User Sanctions in Marijuana Markets." NBER Working Paper Series. NCJ 13415, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Sep 2007. Full text: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13415 Full text PDF: http://www.nber.org.proxy.lib.umich.edu/papers/w13415.pdf?new_window=1 32. Rhodes, William; Hunt, Dana; Chapman, Meg; Kling, Ryan; Dyous, Christina; Fuller, Doug, "Using ADAM Data to Investigate the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement." NCJ 221073, Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc., Nov 2007. 2005-IJ-CX-0024 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242921 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221073.pdf The study concludes that an ADAM-type survey would be a useful means of evaluating the effectiveness of drug enforcement programs designed to decrease the availability of illegal drugs and hence the abuse of those drugs. The study reached this conclusion because of three findings. First, major enforcement events apparently influenced drug markets, causing buyers to alter their purchasing behaviors. Second, major drug enforcement events apparently temporarily reduced supply and increased illegal drug prices, although the effect was difficult to identify because of the absence of county-specific price data. Third, major drug enforcement events apparently had no important effect on consumption, presumably because markets adjusted by substituting lower purity drugs when drugs were in relatively short supply. The current ADAM survey, however, was not designed as an evaluation tool for drug enforcement strategies. A research agenda designed to modify the ADAM survey for evaluation purposes would focus on aspects of local drug markets that should be sensitive to enforcement practices and that would be valuable as criteria for the effectiveness of enforcement practices. In addition to a modified survey instrument, there should also be systematic collections of data on major drug enforcement events and price/purity for drugs exchanged at retail. Researchers collected ADAM data from 10 counties and matched the ADAM data with illegal drug prices from the System to Retrieve Information From Drug Evidence. Data on drug law enforcement events were obtained primarily through newspaper accounts, accompanied by verification with police officials when possible. 4 figures, 15 tables, 62 references, and appended statistical methodology for recoding market indicator variables and the identification of drug law enforcement events 33. Rhodes, William; Kling, Ryan; Johnston, Patrick, "Using booking data to model drug user arrest rates: A preliminary to estimating the prevalence of chronic drug use." Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Mar 2007, 23, (1), 1 - 22. DOI: 10.1007/s10940-006-9016-9 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242921 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221073.pdf The study concludes that an ADAM-type survey would be a useful means of evaluating the effectiveness of drug enforcement programs designed to decrease the availability of illegal drugs and hence the abuse of those drugs. The study reached this conclusion because of three findings. First, major enforcement events apparently influenced drug markets, causing buyers to alter their purchasing behaviors. Second, major drug enforcement events apparently temporarily reduced supply and increased illegal drug prices, although the effect was difficult to identify because of the absence of county-specific price data. Third, major drug enforcement events apparently had no important effect on consumption, presumably because markets adjusted by substituting lower purity drugs when drugs were in relatively short supply. The current ADAM survey, however, was not designed as an evaluation tool for drug enforcement strategies. A research agenda designed to modify the ADAM survey for evaluation purposes would focus on aspects of local drug markets that should be sensitive to enforcement practices and that would be valuable as criteria for the effectiveness of enforcement practices. In addition to a modified survey instrument, there should also be systematic collections of data on major drug enforcement events and price/purity for drugs exchanged at retail. Researchers collected ADAM data from 10 counties and matched the ADAM data with illegal drug prices from the System to Retrieve Information From Drug Evidence. Data on drug law enforcement events were obtained primarily through newspaper accounts, accompanied by verification with police officials when possible. 4 figures, 15 tables, 62 references, and appended statistical methodology for recoding market indicator variables and the identification of drug law enforcement events 34. Rodriguez, Nancy; Katz, Charles; Webb, Vincent J.; Schaefer, David R., "Examining the impact of individual, community, and market factors on methamphetamine use: A tale of two cities." Journal of Drug Issues. Fal 2005, 35, (4), 665 - 693. DOI: 10.1177/002204260503500402 ojp-98-c-001 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242921 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221073.pdf The study concludes that an ADAM-type survey would be a useful means of evaluating the effectiveness of drug enforcement programs designed to decrease the availability of illegal drugs and hence the abuse of those drugs. The study reached this conclusion because of three findings. First, major enforcement events apparently influenced drug markets, causing buyers to alter their purchasing behaviors. Second, major drug enforcement events apparently temporarily reduced supply and increased illegal drug prices, although the effect was difficult to identify because of the absence of county-specific price data. Third, major drug enforcement events apparently had no important effect on consumption, presumably because markets adjusted by substituting lower purity drugs when drugs were in relatively short supply. The current ADAM survey, however, was not designed as an evaluation tool for drug enforcement strategies. A research agenda designed to modify the ADAM survey for evaluation purposes would focus on aspects of local drug markets that should be sensitive to enforcement practices and that would be valuable as criteria for the effectiveness of enforcement practices. In addition to a modified survey instrument, there should also be systematic collections of data on major drug enforcement events and price/purity for drugs exchanged at retail. Researchers collected ADAM data from 10 counties and matched the ADAM data with illegal drug prices from the System to Retrieve Information From Drug Evidence. Data on drug law enforcement events were obtained primarily through newspaper accounts, accompanied by verification with police officials when possible. 4 figures, 15 tables, 62 references, and appended statistical methodology for recoding market indicator variables and the identification of drug law enforcement events 35. Ross, Michael W.; Risser, Jan; Peters, Ronald J., "Cocaine use and syphilis trends: Findings from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program and syphilis epidemiology in Houston." American Journal on Addictions. Nov/Dec 2006, 15, (6), 473 - 477. DOI: 10.1080/10550490601000462 Abstract: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242921 Full text PDF: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221073.pdf The study concludes that an ADAM-type survey would be a useful means of evaluating the effectiveness of drug enforcement programs designed to decrease the availability of illegal drugs and hence the abuse of those drugs. The study reached this conclusion because of three findings. First, major enforcement events apparently influenced drug markets, causing buyers to alter their purchasing behaviors. Second, major drug enforcement events apparently temporarily reduced supply and increased illegal drug prices, although the effect was difficult to identify because of the absence of county-specific price data. Third, major drug enforcement events apparently had no important effect on consumption, presumably because markets adjusted by substituting lower purity drugs when drugs were in relatively short supply. The current ADAM survey, however, was not designed as an evaluation tool for drug enforcement strategies. A research agenda designed to modify the ADAM survey for evaluation purposes would focus on aspects of local drug markets that should be sensitive to enforcement practices and that would be valuable as criteria for the effectiveness of enforcement practices. In addition to a modified survey instrument, there should also be systematic collections of data on major drug enforcement events and price/purity for drugs exchanged at retail. Researchers collected ADAM data from 10 counties and matched the ADAM data with illegal drug prices from the System to Retrieve Information From Drug Evidence. Data on drug law enforcement events were obtained primarily through newspaper accounts, accompanied by verification with police officials when possible. 4 figures, 15 tables, 62 references, and appended statistical methodology for recoding market indicator variables and the identification of drug law enforcement events 36. The White House, "National Drug Control Strategy." Data Supplement 2008. NCJ 221951, Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, Jul 2008. Full text PDF: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs08_data_supl/ndcs_suppl08.pdf 37. The White House, "National Drug Control Strategy: Data Supplement 2009." NCJ 225448, Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, Jan 2009. Full text PDF: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs09/ndcs09_data_supl/09datasupplement.pdf 38. Webb, Vincent J.; Katz, Charles M.; Decker, Scott H., "Assessing the Validity of Self-Reports by Gang Members: Results From the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program." Presented at the Conference of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Las Vegas, NV, Mar 2004. Full text PDF: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs09/ndcs09_data_supl/09datasupplement.pdf 39. Wood, Darryl S., "Criterion validity of self-reported drug use among Alaska Native and non-Native arrestees in Anchorage, Alaska." Criminal Justice Studies. Mar 2008, 21, (1), 49 - 60. DOI: 10.1080/14786010801972688 Full text PDF: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs09/ndcs09_data_supl/09datasupplement.pdf 40. Yang, Y. Michael, "Survey errors and survey costs: Experience from surveys of arrestees." Presented at the Joint Statistical Methods, Toronto, Aug 2004. Full text PDF: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs09/ndcs09_data_supl/09datasupplement.pdf 41. Zhang, Zhiwei, "Modeling Nonresponse and Underreporting in Response Surveys of Arrestees." Presented at the 2009 Joint Statistical Meeting, 2009 Joint Statistical Meeting, Washington, DC, 2009. Full text PDF: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2009/Files/305170.pdf 42. Zhang, Zhiwei; Shaw-Taylor, Yoku; Toce-Gerstein, Marianna; Hendrickson, James, "Annualized Site Reports 2002: Adult Male Weighted Data, Adult Female Unweighted Data, Juvenile Unweighted Data." ADAM: Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, Oct 2003. Full text PDF: http://www.adam-nij.net/files/2002_Annualized_Site_Reports.pdf