CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT AND DELAY REDUCTION IN URBAN TRIAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1979, 1983-1985 (ICPSR 9918) Principal Investigator Barry Mahoney National Center for State Courts Institute for Court Management First ICPSR Edition September 1995 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Mahoney, Barry. CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT AND DELAY REDUCTION IN URBAN TRIAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1979, 1983-1985 [Computer file]. Conducted by the Institute for Court Management of the National Center for State Courts. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1994. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON USE OF ICPSR RESOURCES To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Please indicate in a cover letter which data were used. DATA DISCLAIMER The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary ................................................ 1 General Study Overview ................................. 3 Study Identification .............................. 3 Key Words ......................................... 3 Purpose of the Study .............................. 3 Methods ................................................ 4 Study Design ...................................... 4 Sources of Information ............................ 4 Sample ............................................ 4 Response Rates .................................... 5 Dates of Data Collection .......................... 5 Summary of Contents .................................... 5 Description of Variables .......................... 5 Presence of Common Scales ......................... 5 Unit of Observation ............................... 5 Extent of Processing .............................. 6 Extent of Collection .............................. 6 Data Collection Notes ............................. 6 File Specifications ............................... 6 Diskette User Information ......................... 11 Related Publications .............................. 14 Final Reports and Other Publications .............. 14 Data Completeness Report ............................... 15 SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to examine caseflow management in order to reduce delays in urban trial courts. The data contain information from court records that reached disposition in a cross-section of urban general-jurisdiction trial courts during 1979, 1983, 1984, and 1985. The 1979 data files contain the baseline data for this survey. Data were gathered on civil and criminal case processing times across a broad range of courts, and changes in case processing times over a period of years were analyzed for 18 different jurisdictions: Newark, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Miami, Wayne, Minneapolis, the Bronx, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, Dayton, Boston, Cleveland, Providence, Wichita, Detroit, Oakland, and Jersey City. The data are supplemented by information supplied by trial court administrators and presiding judges in the courts participating in the study. Data include information on the nature of the case, the dates of first and last trials, and the total number of trials and their manner of disposition. Page 2 ICPSR 9918 ICPSR 9918 Page 3 GENERAL STUDY OVERVIEW STUDY IDENTIFICATION CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT AND DELAY REDUCTION IN URBAN TRIAL COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1979, 1983-1985 Barry Mahoney National Center for State Courts. Institute for Court Management. Award No. 84-IJ-CX-0077 (NIJ), 84-SN-AX-0001 (BJA), and 87-DD-CX-0002 (BJA) KEY WORDS Courts, case flow, defendants, dispositions, sentencing, warrants PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study was to examine caseflow management in order to reduce delays in urban trial courts. Data were gathered on civil and criminal case processing times across a broad range of courts, and changes in case processing times over a period of years were analyzed for 18 different jurisdictions: Newark, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Miami, Wayne, Minneapolis, the Bronx, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, Dayton, Boston, Cleveland, Providence, Wichita, Detroit, Oakland, and Jersey City. These data contain information that reached disposition in a cross-section of urban general-jurisdiction trial courts during 1979, 1983, 1984, and 1985. The 1979 data files contain the baseline data for this survey. In selecting courts for inclusion in the study, a mix of urban courts from different geographic regions, all with at least ten judges, was sought. The intent was to include at least a few courts that met the following criteria: (1) courts that had been the subject of a prior empirical study of case processing times, (2) courts that had initiated a significant delay reduction or delay prevention effort during the 1977-1983 period, and (3) courts located in states in which a significant state-wide delay reduction effort had been initiated during the 1977-1983 period. Page 4 ICPSR 9918 METHODS STUDY DESIGN After the court selection, presiding judges or trial court administrators were contacted to arrange initial site visits. These visits served three purposes: (1) to help project staff members obtain an overview of civil and criminal case processing in the court through interviews with key judges and administrators, (2) to collect documentary information about the court, such as organizational charts, management information reports, local court rules, annual reports, etc., and (3) to study the court's record-keeping system. These systems provided a basis for developing a data collection framework. SOURCES OF INFORMATION Information was collected from the court records. In courts that were automated, computerized case history printouts were provided for the sampled cases. For courts that were not automated, information was collected through docket books, docket cards, case file jackets, pleadings, and other documents in case files. SAMPLE A general sample of approximately 500 criminal cases and 500 civil cases was selected for each disposition year--1979, 1983, 1984, and 1985. The 500-case sample was an approximate target and was considered to be large enough to represent the total population of the cases from which it was drawn, even after dropping the cases that were faulty or out-of-universe. The criteria for selecting criminal cases were: The general sample of criminal cases was limited to cases in which the most serious charge in the accusatory instrument (indictment or information) could result in imprisonment for a year or more, and in which the disposition (guilty plea, verdict, or dismissal) occurred in the year for which the sample was selected. For sampling purposes an indictment or information that included charges against several different defendants, and a single defendant with multiple offenses (in a single or multiple indictments) were treated as a single case while drawing the sample. In cases with multiple defendants, one of the defendants was chosen for inclusion in the sample by flip of a coin. These were the criteria for selecting civil cases: Cases concerned with domestic relations, juvenile, probate, and miscellaneous matters such as adoptions, name changes, bar admissions, etc., were excluded. The procedure to select the desired sample size of 500 was first to generate a list of all cases that reached disposition in the year under consideration. The total number of cases on the generated list was then divided by the target sample size (500) to obtain the sampling interval. Using the random number as a starting ICPSR 9918 Page 5 point, every nth (where n is the sampling interval) case on the list was picked up for inclusion in the sample. Supplementary sampling was done in a few courts (Wayne County, Minneapolis, Jersey City, San Diego, and Oakland in 1983, Wayne County, San Diego, Phoenix, and Cleveland in 1985). RESPONSE RATES Not applicable. DATES OF DATA COLLECTION 1979 (for New Jersey and Wichita), 1983 (no civil data available for Detroit), 1984 (no civil data available for Phoenix, Miami, Minneapolis, Newark, New Orleans, or Oakland), and 1985 (no civil data available for Detroit) SUMMARY OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION OF VARIABLES The criminal case survey instrument contains 22 basic question statements. Out of 22 basic data elements that are present in the data, eight are dates that include date of arrest, date trial started, date of disposition, and date of sentencing. Other elements include total number of defendants, most serious charge in indictment, number of counts or charges against this defendant, type of disposition, most serious charge at conviction, and sentence imposed. The civil case survey instrument contains 17 basic question statements. Out of 17 elements in the data six are dates which include date of complaint, first schedule trial date, date trial started, and date of disposition. Other elements include nature of case, number of plaintiffs, number of defendants, and manner of disposition. Supplemental data elements were added in particular sites. PRESENCE OF COMMON SCALES None UNIT OF OBSERVATION civil or criminal case Page 6 ICPSR 9918 EXTENT OF PROCESSING Consistency checks were performed by the data producer. Missing data codes were standardized within the collection by the data producer. Checks for undocumented codes were performed by the data producer and ICPSR. ICPSR also performed recodes. EXTENT OF COLLECTION This data collection consists of 21 data files, a machine- readable codebook for the criminal and civil data files, SAS and SPSS data definition statements for all parts, one generic machine-readable data collection instrument for the civil data, and one generic machine-readable data collection instrument for the criminal data. DATA COLLECTION NOTES Data for 1979 are supplied for New Jersey and Wichita only. No civil data are available for Detroit for 1983 and 1985, nor for Phoenix, Miami, Minneapolis, Newark, New Orleans, or Oakland in 1984. See the notes in the codebook for information particular to certain sites. The individual survey instrument for each site is available only in hardcopy form upon request from ICPSR. FILE SPECIFICATIONS PART NUMBER: 1 PART NAME: 1979 Civil Data File FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 986 VARIABLE COUNT: 16 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 2 PART NAME: 1983 Civil Data File FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 8,828 VARIABLE COUNT: 16 RECORD LENGTH: 54 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 ICPSR 9918 Page 7 PART NUMBER: 3 PART NAME: 1984 Civil Data File FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 5,847 VARIABLE COUNT: 16 RECORD LENGTH: 54 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 4 PART NAME: 1985 Civil Data File FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 8,833 VARIABLE COUNT: 16 RECORD LENGTH: 54 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 5 PART NAME: 1979 Criminal Data File for Jersey City FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 573 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 6 PART NAME: 1979 Criminal Data File for Wichita FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 466 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 7 PART NAME: 1983 Criminal Data File for Miami FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 474 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 8 PART NAME: 1983 Criminal Data File for the Bronx FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 642 VARIABLE COUNT: 32 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 Page 8 ICPSR 9918 PART NUMBER: 9 PART NAME: 1983 Criminal Data File for Portland FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 549 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 10 PART NAME: 1983 Criminal Data File for Jersey City FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 549 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 11 PART NAME: 1983 Criminal Data File for All Other Cities FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 7,898 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 12 PART NAME: 1984 Criminal Data File for Miami FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 415 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 13 PART NAME: 1984 Criminal Data File for the Bronx FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 660 VARIABLE COUNT: 32 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 14 PART NAME: 1984 Criminal Data File for Portland FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 484 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 ICPSR 9918 Page 9 PART NUMBER: 15 PART NAME: 1984 Criminal Data File for Jersey City FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 641 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 16 PART NAME: 1984 Criminal Data File for All Other Cities FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 7,473 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 17 PART NAME: 1985 Criminal Data File for Miami FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 473 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 18 PART NAME: 1985 Criminal Data File for the Bronx FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 559 VARIABLE COUNT: 32 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 19 PART NAME: 1985 Criminal Data File for Portland FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 517 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 20 PART NAME: 1985 Criminal Data File for Jersey City FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 501 VARIABLE COUNT: 29 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 Page 10 ICPSR 9918 PART NUMBER: 21 PART NAME: 1985 Criminal Data File for All Other Cities FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 7,238 VARIABLE COUNT: 31 RECORD LENGTH: 53 RECORDS PER CASE: 2 PART NUMBER: 22 PART NAME: Codebook for All Parts RECORD LENGTH: 79 PART NUMBER: 23 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for All Civil Data Files RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 24 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Jersey City Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 25 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for the Bronx Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 26 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Miami Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 27 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Portland Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 28 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Criminal Data for All Other Cities RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 29 PART NAME: SPSS Data Definition Statements for All Civil Data Files RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 30 PART NAME: SPSS Data Definition Statements for Jersey City Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 31 PART NAME: SPSS Data Definition Statements for the Bronx Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 ICPSR 9918 Page 11 PART NUMBER: 32 PART NAME: SPSS Data Definition Statements for Miami Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 33 PART NAME: SPSS Data Definition Statements for Portland Criminal Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 34 PART NAME: SPSS Data Definition Statements for Criminal Data for All Other Cities RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 35 PART NAME: User Guide RECORD LENGTH: 79 DISKETTE USER INFORMATION The file sizes for the diskette version of this study are listed below. The diskette contains 37 files requiring a total of approximately 4.6 megabytes of disk space. Instructions for working with compressed files are listed below. COMPRESSED UNCOMPRESSED UNCOMPRESSED FILENAME FILENAME FILE SIZE (DOS BYTES) DATA FILES: D9918P1.EXE DA9918.P1 55,216 (1979 Civil Data File) D9918P2.EXE DA9918.P2 494,368 (1983 Civil Data File) D9918P3.EXE DA9918.P3 327,432 (1984 Civil Data File) D9918P4.EXE DA9918.P4 494,648 (1985 Civil Data File) D9918P5.EXE DA9918.P5 48,705 (1979 Criminal Data File for Jersey City) D9918P6.EXE DA9918.P6 44,270 (1979 Criminal Data File for Wichita) D9918P7.EXE DA9918.P7 40,290 (1983 Criminal Data File for Miami) Page 12 ICPSR 9918 D9918P8.EXE DA9918.P8 62,274 (1983 Criminal Data File for the Bronx) D9918P9.EXE DA9918.P9 45,567 (1983 Criminal Data File for Portland) D9918P10.EXE DA9918.P10 46,665 (1983 Criminal Data File for Jersey City) D9918P11.EXE DA9918.P11 750,310 (1983 Criminal Data File for All Other Cities) D9918P12.EXE DA9918.P12 35,275 (1984 Criminal Data File for Miami;) D9918P13.EXE DA9918.P13 64,020 (1984 Criminal Data File for the Bronx) D9918P14.EXE DA9918.P14 40,172 (1984 Criminal Data File for Portland) D9918P15.EXE DA9918.P15 54,485 (1984 Criminal Data File for Jersey City) D9918P16.EXE DA9918.P16 709,935 (1984 Criminal Data File for All Other Cities) D9918P17.EXE DA9918.P17 40,205 (1985 Criminal Data File for Miami) D9918P18.EXE DA9918.P18 54,223 (1985 Criminal Data File for the Bronx) D9918P19.EXE DA9918.P19 42,911 (1985 Criminal Data File for Portland) D9918P20.EXE DA9918.P20 42,585 (1985 Criminal Data File for Jersey City) D9918P21.EXE DA9918.P21 687,610 (1985 Criminal Data File for All Other Cities) DATA DEFINITION STATEMENT FILES: ----- SA9918.P23 9,361 (SAS Data Definition Statements for All Civil Data Files) ----- SP9918.P24 9,643 (SAS Data Definition Statements for Jersey City Criminal Data) ----- SA9918.P25 11,022 ICPSR 9918 Page 13 (SAS Data Definition Statements for the Bronx Criminal Data) ----- SA9918.P26 11,702 (SAS Data Definition Statements for Miami Criminal Data) ----- SA9918.P27 11,628 (SAS Data Definition Statements for Portland Criminal Data) ----- SA9918.P28 11,174 (SAS Data Definition Statements for Criminal Data for All) ----- SA9918.P29 11,934 (SPSS Data Definition Statements for All Civil Data Files) ----- SP9918.P30 11,357 (SPSS Data Definition Statements for Jersey City Criminal Data) ----- SP9918.P31 12,036 (SPSS Data Definition Statements for the Bronx Criminal Data) ----- SP9918.P32 11,973 (SPSS Data Definition Statements for Miami Criminal Data) ----- SP9918.P33 11,492 (SPSS Data Definition Statements for Portland Criminal Data) ----- SP9918.P34 12,248 (SPSS Data Definition Statements for Criminal Data for All Other) DOCUMENTATION FILES (estimated file sizes): ----- CB9918.P22 51,000 (Codebook for All Parts) U9918P35.EXE UG9918.P35 216,000 (User Guide) ----- SDES9918 17,000 (Study Description) ----- README 12,000 Uncompressing Files Files with the .EXE extension are PKWARE Self-Extracting Compressed files. These files can be uncompressed by following the example below. Files without the .EXE extension are ASCII text files and can be read in their current form. Example of uncompressing a compressed file into an ASCII file Page 14 ICPSR 9918 (using file D9918P1.EXE): (1) attach to the drive/path where you wish to locate the uncompressed file, e.g., hard disk or C drive (2) place the diskette containing file D9918P1.EXE into disk drive A (3) then type: A:D9918P1 and press ENTER. This will access the self-executing file called D9918P1.EXE. An uncompressed file called, DA9918.P1, will be produced and reside on your C drive. RELATED PUBLICATIONS Mahoney, Barry, Larry L. Sipes, and Jeanne A. Ito. "Implementing Delay Reduction and Delay Prevention Programs in Urban Trial Courts: Preliminary Findings From Current Research." Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts, 1985. Mahoney, Barry, et al. "Caseflow Management and Delay Reduction in Urban Trial Courts." (Final Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1988. FINAL REPORTS AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS Final reports and other publications describing the original research conducted with the data in this collection are available from the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) at: NIJ/NCJRS, Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20850, 800-851-3420. ICPSR 9918 Page 15 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT NOTES CIVIL DATA 1. Data for all sites for a particular year of disposition are contained in one file. However, separate data completeness reports were generated for each site. 2. ICPSR did not performed consistency checks for skip patterns. Percent of missing data, due to the skip patterns, as documented in the data completeness reports, are based on the data supplied by the Principal Investigator. 3. Variable 16 is included in the data completeness reports only if it is valid for that site. 4. Data file part 4, 1985 disposition year, contains two records with invalid site ID. These records were not included when creating the data completeness report. Page 16 ICPSR 9918 ICPSR 9918 Page 17 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P1 Site Name: Wichita Site Identification: 15 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=556) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 Last trial date set 69.6% 87.6% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 69.6% 88.1% V12 Date trial started 69.6% 88.7% V9 First scheduled trial date 69.6% 97.3% V10 Total number of trial settings 69.8% 98.0% V8 Date of answer 99.8% 99.8% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 18 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P1 Site Name: Jersey City Site Identification: 18 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=430) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.3% (5 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 0.0% 100.0% V9 First scheduled trial date 0.0% 100.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 0.0% 100.0% V11 Last trial date set 0.0% 100.0% V12 Date trial started 0.0% 100.0% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 19 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Newark Site Identification: 1 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=501) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 9.6% 9.8% V11 Last trial date set 9.6% 9.8% V9 First scheduled trial date 9.2% 10.0% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V12 Date trial started 82.6% 82.8% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 82.4% 83.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 20 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Pittsburg Site Identification: 2 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=423) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 56.3% (9 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 35.5% 35.5% V11 Last trial date set 35.5% 35.5% V9 First scheduled trial date 35.5% 35.9% 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 42.6% 42.6% V12 Date trial started 65.5% 65.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 64.8% 72.6% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 21 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: New Orleans Site Identification: 3 Table 3: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=431) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 48.7% 49.7% V9 First scheduled trial date 51.5% 52.7% V10 Total number of trial settings 56.4% 57.3% V11 Last trial date set 63.3% 64.3% V12 Date trial started 87.7% 88.6% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 91.4% 94.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 22 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Miami Site Identification: 4 Table 4: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=463) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 68.3% 70.8% V11 Last trial date set 68.5% 71.1% V10 Total number of trial settings 68.7% 71.3% V8 Date of answer 67.6% 72.8% V12 Date trial started 91.6% 93.7% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 91.6% 93.7% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 23 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Wayne Site Identification: 5 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=479) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 63.0% 63.5% V9 First scheduled trial date 63.0% 64.1% V11 Last trial date set 82.5% 84.1% V12 Date trial started 83.9% 85.6% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 83.7% 86.4% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 24 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Minneapolis Site Identification: 6 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=594) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V4 Date of complaint 0.0% 6.2% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 69.0% 69.0% V9 First scheduled trial date 83.3% 83.3% V10 Total number of trial settings 83.7% 83.7% V11 Last trial date set 84.5% 84.5% V12 Date trial started 88.9% 88.9% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 88.9% 88.9% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 25 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Bronx Site Identification: 7 Table 7: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=547) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.3% (5 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V4 Date of complaint 0.4% 9.7% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 Last trial date set 90.3% 92.0% V12 Date trial started 93.4% 95.2% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 93.2% 95.8% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 26 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Phoenix Site Identification: 8 Table 8: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=521) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 63.1% 63.1% V8 Date of answer 71.8% 72.2% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 73.9% 74.1% V9 First scheduled trial date 74.1% 74.3% V11 Last trial date set 74.1% 74.3% V12 Date trial started 84.8% 85.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 27 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Portland Site Identification: 9 Table 9: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=529) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 55.8% 55.8% V10 Total number of trial settings 55.8% 56.0% V8 Date of answer 8.9% 58.8% V11 Last trial date set 69.4% 69.6% V12 Date trial started 90.4% 90.7% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 90.7% 91.3% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 28 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: San Diego Site Identification: 10 Table 10: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=543) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 17.9% 17.9% V9 First scheduled trial date 19.0% 19.7% 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 Last trial date set 21.4% 21.4% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V13 Number of court days spent in trial 72.0% 72.0% V12 Date trial started 72.2% 72.2% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 29 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Dayton Site Identification: 11 Table 11: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=465) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 71.6% 71.6% V10 Total number of trial settings 71.6% 71.6% V11 Last trial date set 71.6% 71.6% V12 Date trial started 97.6% 98.9% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 97.4% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 30 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Boston Site Identification: 12 Table 12: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=460) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 77.6% 79.8% V10 Total number of trial settings 77.8% 80.2% V11 Last trial date set 85.7% 87.8% V12 Date trial started 89.6% 91.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 89.3% 94.6% V8 Date of answer 93.0% 97.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 31 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Cleveland Site Identification: 13 Table 13: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=741) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.3% (5 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V15 Date of disposition 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 77.9% 83.8% V10 Total number of trial settings 77.9% 84.6% V11 Last trial date set 80.8% 87.4% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 87.4% 99.5% V12 Date trial started 87.4% 99.6% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 32 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Providence Site Identification: 14 Table 14: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=558) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 3.6% 45.0% V9 First scheduled trial date 79.0% 79.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 79.0% 79.0% V11 Last trial date set 80.5% 80.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 95.9% 96.2% V12 Date trial started 95.9% 97.1% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 33 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Wichita Site Identification: 15 Table 15: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=528) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 Last trial date set 70.5% 88.4% V9 First scheduled trial date 70.6% 91.1% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 71.0% 93.4% V12 Date trial started 71.0% 93.6% V10 Total number of trial settings 71.2% 96.8% V8 Date of answer 99.6% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 34 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Oakland Site Identification: 17 Table 17: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=445) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 36.4% 37.3% 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 58.4% 58.7% V10 Total number of trial settings 58.4% 58.7% V11 Last trial date set 65.8% 66.1% V12 Date trial started 79.1% 79.3% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 78.9% 79.3% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 35 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P2 Site Name: Jersey City Site Identification: 18 Table 18: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=600) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.3% (5 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 0.0% 14.2% V9 First scheduled trial date 13.0% 15.7% V10 Total number of trial settings 13.5% 16.3% 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 Last trial date set 22.5% 25.5% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V12 Date trial started 89.3% 91.8% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 89.2% 92.5% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 100.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 36 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Pittsburgh Site Identification: 2 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=519) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 33.5% 33.9% V11 Last trial date set 33.5% 33.9% V10 Total number of trial settings 33.5% 34.5% V8 Date of answer 22.0% 38.5% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V12 Date trial started 82.3% 82.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 82.9% 83.8% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 37 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Wayne Site Identification: 5 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=418) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 88.5% 89.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 88.8% 89.0% V11 Last trial date set 94.7% 95.2% V12 Date trial started 95.9% 95.9% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 95.9% 95.9% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 38 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Bronx Site Identification: 7 Table 3: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=544) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 21.5% 23.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 26.8% 35.1% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V12 Date trial started 91.5% 93.4% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 91.5% 94.3% V11 Last trial date set 0.4% 99.1% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 39 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Portland Site Identification: 9 Table 4: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=555) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V14 Manner of disposition 0.0% 10.3% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 33.9% 57.8% V9 First scheduled trial date 61.1% 61.1% V10 Total number of trial settings 61.1% 61.1% V11 Last trial date set 61.4% 61.4% V12 Date trial started 91.2% 91.2% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 91.4% 92.6% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 40 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P10 Site Name: San Diego Site Identification: 10 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=586) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 56.3% (9 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 51.2% 51.4% V10 Total number of trial settings 51.4% 51.5% V11 Last trial date set 51.5% 51.7% V12 Date trial started 79.4% 79.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 79.4% 79.5% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 41 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Dayton Site Identification: 11 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=515) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 71.5% 72.2% V10 Total number of trial settings 71.5% 73.6% V11 Last trial date set 72.6% 74.8% V12 Date trial started 92.2% 95.3% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 92.8% 98.3% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 42 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Boston Site Identification: 491 Table 7: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=490) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 82.0% 86.5% V9 First scheduled trial date 82.0% 91.0% V11 Last trial date set 82.2% 91.4% V8 Date of answer 65.7% 94.1% V12 Date trial started 94.3% 95.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 94.5% 97.6% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 43 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Cleveland Site Identification: 13 Table 8: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=637) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 14.8% 56.0% V9 First scheduled trial date 87.1% 91.1% V10 Total number of trial settings 95.6% 97.2% V11 Last trial date set 96.1% 98.1% V12 Date trial started 97.0% 99.1% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 97.0% 99.2% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 44 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Providence Site Identification: 14 Table 9: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=552) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 44.2% 45.5% V9 First scheduled trial date 70.3% 70.7% V10 Total number of trial settings 70.8% 72.8% V11 Last trial date set 70.8% 73.4% V12 Date trial started 71.0% 90.2% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 71.2% 91.7% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 45 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Wichita Site Identification: 15 Table 10: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=499) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 66.1% 75.4% V11 Last trial date set 66.1% 76.2% V10 Total number of trial settings 66.1% 76.4% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 69.5% 87.2% V12 Date trial started 69.7% 87.8% V8 Date of answer 97.6% 98.4% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 46 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P3 Site Name: Jersey City Site Identification: 18 Table 11: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=532) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 25.2% 26.1% V10 Total number of trial settings 25.2% 26.5% V11 Last trial date set 25.2% 26.5% V8 Date of answer 11.1% 32.0% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V12 Date trial started 96.1% 97.9% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 95.9% 98.7% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 47 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Newark Site Identification: 1 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=476) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 2.1% 5.7% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 23.3% 28.8% V10 Total number of trial settings 24.8% 29.8% V11 Last trial date set 25.2% 30.3% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V12 Date trial started 92.0% 93.7% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 92.0% 95.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 48 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Pittsburgh Site Identification: 2 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=490) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 36.9% 53.3% V10 Total number of trial settings 37.1% 53.3% V11 Last trial date set 37.3% 53.7% V8 Date of answer 1.2% 67.8% V12 Date trial started 75.1% 75.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 75.1% 76.3% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 49 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: New Orleans Site Identification: 3 Table 3: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=477) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 56.4% 56.8% V10 Total number of trial settings 56.4% 57.0% V11 Last trial date set 56.6% 57.7% V8 Date of answer 56.0% 59.1% V12 Date trial started 89.9% 90.6% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 90.1% 91.2% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 50 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Miami Site Identification: 4 Table 4: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=588) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 84.7% 87.2% V8 Date of answer 83.3% 88.4% V12 Date trial started 86.6% 98.5% V11 Last trial date set 84.7% 99.8% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 86.6% 99.8% V9 First scheduled trial date 84.7% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 51 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Wayne Site Identification: 5 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=486) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 66.0% 69.3% V10 Total number of trial settings 67.3% 70.4% V11 Last trial date set 87.4% 88.7% V12 Date trial started 88.5% 88.7% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 88.5% 88.7% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 52 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Mianneapolis Site Identification: 6 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=476) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V4 Date of complaint 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 1.1% 75.0% V9 First scheduled trial date 79.2% 88.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 79.4% 88.0% V11 Last trial date set 79.4% 88.2% V12 Date trial started 95.2% 97.1% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 95.2% 97.1% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 53 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Bronx Site Identification: 7 Table 7: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=540) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V4 Date of complaint 1.1% 7.0% 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V10 Total number of trial settings 10.9% 14.6% 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V13 Number of court days spent in trial 87.6% 90.7% V12 Date trial started 88.3% 91.1% V11 Last trial date set 83.7% 95.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 54 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Phoenix Site Identification: 8 Table 8: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=507) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 1.2% 81.7% V9 First scheduled trial date 59.4% 84.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 59.6% 84.0% V11 Last trial date set 60.2% 86.8% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 88.6% 89.7% V12 Date trial started 64.3% 90.3% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 99.8% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 55 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Portland Site Identification: 9 Table 9: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=524) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 58.2% 59.2% V9 First scheduled trial date 63.4% 63.9% V10 Total number of trial settings 63.4% 63.9% V11 Last trial date set 63.7% 64.3% V12 Date trial started 93.1% 93.7% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 1.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 56 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: San Diego Site Identification: 10 Table 10: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=579) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 59.4% 59.8% V10 Total number of trial settings 59.8% 59.8% V11 Last trial date set 61.3% 61.3% V12 Date trial started 79.6% 79.6% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 80.3% 80.7% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 57 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Dayton Site Identification: 11 Table 11: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=516) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 50.0% (8 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 67.4% 67.4% V10 Total number of trial settings 67.8% 67.8% V11 Last trial date set 68.2% 68.2% V12 Date trial started 97.1% 98.3% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 97.3% 98.6% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 58 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Boston Site Identification: 12 Table 12: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=415) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.3% (5 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 84.8% 85.1% V10 Total number of trial settings 85.3% 85.8% V11 Last trial date set 85.3% 85.8% V8 Date of answer 66.7% 92.8% V12 Date trial started 94.0% 94.5% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 94.2% 98.6% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 59 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Cleveland Site Identification: 13 Table 13: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=674) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 84.7% 90.5% V11 Last trial date set 85.5% 93.2% V10 Total number of trial settings 85.2% 93.9% V12 Date trial started 90.4% 97.3% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 90.4% 97.8% V8 Date of answer 7.0% 99.4% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 60 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Providence Site Identification: 14 Table 14: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=501) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 37.5% (6 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 13.6% 50.1% V9 First scheduled trial date 75.2% 76.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 75.6% 76.0% V11 Last trial date set 76.4% 76.8% V12 Date trial started 94.0% 95.2% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 94.0% 95.2% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 61 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Wichita Site Identification: 15 Table 15: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=534) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.3% (5 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 Last trial date set 67.8% 68.0% V10 Total number of trial settings 67.8% 68.2% V9 First scheduled trial date 67.8% 68.5% V12 Date trial started 79.0% 82.8% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 79.0% 83.1% V8 Date of answer 100.0% 100.0% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 62 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Oakland Site Identification: 17 Table 17: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=555) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 6.3% (1 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date of answer 44.1% 46.1% V9 First scheduled trial date 63.2% 66.7% V10 Total number of trial settings 63.4% 67.7% V11 Last trial date set 63.8% 67.7% V12 Date trial started 77.8% 87.6% V13 Number of court days spent in trial 78.0% 88.1% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. ICPSR 9918 Page 63 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P4 Site Name: Jersey City Site Identification: 18 Table 18: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values (Total cases=493) MD-Skip MD-Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (7 of 16 variables) have 0% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 12.5% (2 of 16 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 16 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 25.0% (4 of 16 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 First scheduled trial date 28.6% 34.3% V10 Total number of trial settings 28.8% 34.9% V11 Last trial date set 31.6% 36.7% V8 Date of answer 0.0% 37.5% 18.8% (3 of 16 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V13 Number of court days spent in trial 91.1% 96.3% V12 Date trial started 91.3% 96.8% V16 Was the city of New York a defendent 0.0% 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 64 ICPSR 9918 ICPSR 9918 Page 65 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT NOTES CRIMINAL DATA 1. Because of differences in their record layouts, the data for Bronx, Jersey City, Miami and Portland are in separate files. Data for the rest of the sites for a particular year of disposition are contained in individual files by year. However, separate Data Completeness Reports were generated for each site. 2. ICPSR did not perform consistency checks for skip patterns. Data Completeness Reports for the criminal data do not refelect missing data percentages for skip patterns. 3. Undocumented codes in the data were not included when calculating percentages for missing data as listed in the Data Completeness Report. Page 66 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Criminal data files--1979 This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P5 Site Name: Jersy City Site Identification: 18 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=573) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.4% (12 of 29 variables) have 0% Missing Values 17.2% (5 of 29 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V21 Date of sentencing 6.1% 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 11.9% 24.1% (7 of 29 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 37.0% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 37.0% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 37.0% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 37.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 37.0% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 37.0% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 37.0% 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V14 Date trial started 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 67 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P6 Site Name: Wichita Site identification: 15 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=466) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 24.9% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 25.3% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 34.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 34.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 34.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 34.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 35.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 35.2% V21 Date of sentencing 36.9% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 51.7% V7 Date of arrest 60.3% V14 Date trial started 90.6% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 99.4% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 68 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Criminal data file--1983 This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Newark Site Identification: 1 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=562) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 7.1% 22.6% (7 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 14.9% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 16.4% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 16.9% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 18.3% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 18.9% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 19.0% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 19.4% 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 21.0% V21 Date of sentencing 21.2% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 21.5% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 22.2% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 56.6% V14 Date trial started 84.2% V7 Date of arrest 94.7% ======================================================================= ICPSR 9918 Page 69 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 70 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Pittsburg Site Identification: 2 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=459) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 22.6% (7 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V17 Date of disposition 5.2% 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V28 Sentence imposed:Other 13.9% V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 14.4% 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 24.0% V7 Date of arrest 28.5% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 34.4% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 45.1% V21 Date of sentencing 57.5% V11 First scheduled trial date 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 71 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: New Orleans Site Identification: 3 Table 3: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=498) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V21 Date of sentencing 5.2% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 43.8% V14 Date trial started 81.1% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 99.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 72 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P7 Site Name: Miami Site Identification: 4 Table 4: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=474) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 48.4% (15 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 16.5% 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 28.5% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 28.5% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 28.5% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 28.5% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 28.5% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 28.5% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 28.5% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 30.2% V21 Date of sentencing 32.7% 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 94.3% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 73 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Wayne Site Identification: 5 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=588) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 32.3% (10 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 24.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 25.2% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 25.3% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 25.3% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 25.5% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 25.5% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 25.5% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 25.5% V21 Date of sentencing 26.7% V11 First scheduled trial date 29.8% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 70.6% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 74 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Minneapolis Site Identification: 6 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=592) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 16.4% 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 23.5% V21 Date of sentencing 24.7% 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 51.7% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 61.1% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 68.2% V14 Date trial started 73.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 76.7% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 88.3% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 95.9% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 99.7% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 75 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P8 Site Name: Bronx Site Identification: 7 Table 7: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=642) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 40.6% (13 of 32 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.3% (2 of 32 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.1% (1 of 32 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.1% (1 of 32 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.1% (1 of 32 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 5.3% 31.3% (10 of 32 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 14.8% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 16.8% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 17.6% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 17.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 17.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 17.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 17.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 17.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 17.8% V21 Date of sentencing 18.7% 3.1% (1 of 32 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 29.6% 9.4% (3 of 32 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 71.7% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% V32 Was interpreter used for proceedings 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 76 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Phoinex Site Identification: 8 Table 8: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=603) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 8.0% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 9.8% 22.6% (7 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V21 Date of sentencing 10.1% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 10.1% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 10.3% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 10.6% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 10.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 10.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 10.9% 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 25.4% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 27.2% V7 Date of arrest 28.4% 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 80.6% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 77 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P9 Site Name: Portland Site Identification: 9 Table 9: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=549) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.4% (12 of 29 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 17.3% V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 17.5% 34.5% (10 of 29 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 26.4% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 27.3% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 27.3% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 27.3% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 27.3% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 27.3% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 27.3% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 27.3% V21 Date of sentencing 28.1% V29 Sentence imposed:Financial obligation 29.0% 10.3% (3 of 29 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 55.9% V14 Date trial started 88.9% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 99.5% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 78 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: San Diego Site Identification: 10 Table 10: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=565) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V28 Sentence imposed:Other 6.7% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 6.9% V21 Date of sentencing 7.4% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 8.7% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 9.4% 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 10.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 11.5% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 12.0% V7 Date of arrest 14.3% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 85.3% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 79 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Dayton Site Identification: 11 Table 11: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=625) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 13.4% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 13.8% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 15.0% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 15.0% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 15.0% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 15.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 15.0% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 15.0% V21 Date of sentencing 15.8% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 57.3% V30 Date alias capias issued 81.9% V14 Date trial started 82.1% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 85.4% V31 Date of return on warrent 86.1% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 80 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Boston Site Identification: 12 Table 12: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=652) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 18.4% 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 23.2% V21 Date of sentencing 29.0% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 30.2% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 36.2% 32.3% (10 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 52.5% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 56.9% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 67.5% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 68.4% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 71.0% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 73.3% V7 Date of arrest 99.7% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 81 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Cleveland Site Identification: 13 Table 13: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=458) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 13.5% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 14.0% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 14.0% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 14.0% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 14.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 14.0% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 14.0% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 14.0% V21 Date of sentencing 14.8% 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 26.2% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 50.2% V11 First scheduled trial date 70.1% V14 Date trial started 87.8% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 82 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Providence Site Identification: 14 Table 14: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=582) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 32.3% (10 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 16.0% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 17.9% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 17.9% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 17.9% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 17.9% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 17.9% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 17.9% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 17.9% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 17.9% V21 Date of sentencing 18.0% 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 29.0% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 48.8% V11 First scheduled trial date 74.2% V14 Date trial started 74.4% V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 91.2% V30 Date alias capias issued 95.7% V31 Date of return on warrent 96.6% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 83 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Wichita Site Identification: 15 Table 15: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=505) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 5.3% 22.6% (7 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 14.7% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 19.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 19.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 19.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 19.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 19.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 19.8% 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 20.2% V21 Date of sentencing 28.5% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 55.8% V14 Date trial started 90.5% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 93.7% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 84 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Detroit Site Identification: 16 Table 16: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=730) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 22.3% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 24.2% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 24.2% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 24.2% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 24.2% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 24.2% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 24.2% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 24.2% V21 Date of sentencing 24.4% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 60.4% V14 Date trial started 64.2% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 85 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P11 Site Name: Oakland Site Identification: 17 Table 17: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=479) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 10.9% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 11.1% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 11.1% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 11.1% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 11.1% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 11.1% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 11.1% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 11.1% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 61.0% V14 Date trial started 91.4% V21 Date of sentencing 92.1% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 86 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P10 Site Name: Jersey City Site Identification: 18 Table 18: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=549) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 48.3% (14 of 29 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 9.1% 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 11.3% 34.5% (10 of 29 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 27.5% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 30.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 32.6% V21 Date of sentencing 33.3% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 33.5% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 33.7% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 33.7% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 33.7% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 33.7% V11 First scheduled trial date 39.0% 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V28 Sentence imposed:Other 86.2% V14 Date trial started 92.9% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 87 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Criminal data file--1984 This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Newark Site Identification: 1 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=445) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 6.3% 32.3% (10 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 11.2% V21 Date of sentencing 12.8% V7 Date of arrest 13.0% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 13.7% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 13.7% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 13.7% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 13.7% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 13.7% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 13.9% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 18.9% 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 36.9% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V28 Sentence imposed:Other 40.7% V14 Date trial started 77.5% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= Page 88 ICPSR 9918 *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 89 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Pittsburg Site Identification: 2 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=607) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 22.4% 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 41.8% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 41.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 41.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 41.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 41.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 41.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 41.8% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 41.8% V21 Date of sentencing 42.0% V14 Date trial started 86.3% V11 First scheduled trial date 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 90 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: New Orleans Site Identification: 3 Table 3: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=417) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 48.4% (15 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 9.8% 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 11.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 11.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 11.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 12.0% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 12.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 12.0% V21 Date of sentencing 12.2% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 15.6% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 46.5% V14 Date trial started 86.6% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 91 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P12 Site Name: Miami Site Identification: 4 Table 4: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=415) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 32.3% (10 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 27.0% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 34.7% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 36.6% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 36.6% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 36.6% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 36.6% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 36.6% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 36.6% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 36.6% V21 Date of sentencing 36.9% 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 69.9% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 92 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Wayne Site Identification: 5 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=689) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 14.2% 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 20.8% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 20.9% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 20.9% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 20.9% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 20.9% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 20.9% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 20.9% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 20.9% V21 Date of sentencing 21.8% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 84.2% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 93 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Minneapolis Site Identification: 6 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=577) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 18.9% 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 23.9% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 24.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 24.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 24.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 24.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 24.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 24.8% V21 Date of sentencing 25.1% 22.6% (7 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 92.0% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 99.7% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 94 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P13 Site Name: Bronx Site Identification: 7 Table 7: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=660) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 43.8% (14 of 32 variables) have 0% Missing Values 9.4% (3 of 32 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 32 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 32 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.1% (1 of 32 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 5.8% 31.3% (10 of 32 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 12.0% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 12.0% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 12.0% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 12.0% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 12.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 12.0% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 12.0% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 12.0% V21 Date of sentencing 14.1% V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 17.1% 3.1% (1 of 32 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 21.8% 9.4% (3 of 32 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 81.4% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% V32 Was interpreter used for proceedings 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 95 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Phoenix Site Identification: 8 Table 8: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=466) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 11.2% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 12.9% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 13.1% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 13.1% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 13.1% V21 Date of sentencing 13.5% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 13.5% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 13.5% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 13.5% V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 14.2% V11 First scheduled trial date 16.1% V7 Date of arrest 18.5% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 42.5% V14 Date trial started 82.4% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 96 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P14 Site Name: Portland Site Identification: 9 Table 9: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=484) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.4% (12 of 29 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 6.2% 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 15.1% 34.5% (10 of 29 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 20.7% V21 Date of sentencing 21.1% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 21.1% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 21.1% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 21.1% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 21.1% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 21.1% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 21.1% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 21.1% V29 Sentence imposed:Financial obligation 21.5% 10.3% (3 of 29 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 89.3% V11 First scheduled trial date 97.1% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 97 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: San Diego Site Identification: 10 Table 10: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=588) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.2% (14 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 7.8% V21 Date of sentencing 9.0% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 9.2% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 9.2% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 9.2% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 9.2% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 9.2% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 9.2% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 9.7% 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 12.6% 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 36.9% V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 36.9% V11 First scheduled trial date 37.4% 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 77.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Page 98 ICPSR 9918 Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 99 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Dayton Site Identification: 11 Table 11: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=448) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 9.4% 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V28 Sentence imposed:Other 10.7% V21 Date of sentencing 10.9% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 11.2% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 11.2% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 11.4% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 11.4% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 11.4% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 11.4% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 69.9% V30 Date alias capias issued 74.6% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 77.2% V31 Date of return on warrent 79.0% V14 Date trial started 92.2% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 100 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Boston Site Identification: 12 Table 12: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=479) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 32.3% (10 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 30.7% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 31.7% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 31.7% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 31.7% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 31.7% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 31.7% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 31.7% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 31.9% V11 First scheduled trial date 32.6% V21 Date of sentencing 33.0% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 81.2% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 101 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Cleveland Site Identification: 13 Table 13: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=548) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 41.9% (13 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V21 Date of sentencing 17.2% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 17.2% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 17.2% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 17.2% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 17.2% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 17.2% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 17.2% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 17.2% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 17.3% 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 31.8% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V8 Date lower court complaint filed 54.0% V11 First scheduled trial date 68.1% V14 Date trial started 82.8% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 102 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Providence Site Identification: 14 Table 14: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=527) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 35.5% (11 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 14.4% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 17.3% V21 Date of sentencing 17.6% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 17.6% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 17.6% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 17.6% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 17.6% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 17.6% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 17.6% V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 17.8% V9 Date indictment or accusation filed 18.8% 3.2% (1 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 21.4% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V30 Date alias capias issued 74.8% V31 Date of return on warrent 76.5% V11 First scheduled trial date 79.7% V14 Date trial started 87.3% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 103 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Wichita Site Identification: 15 Table 15: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=493) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 6.5% V11 First scheduled trial date 8.7% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 31.6% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 32.0% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 32.0% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 32.3% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 32.3% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 32.3% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 32.3% V21 Date of sentencing 33.1% 19.4% (6 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 51.7% V14 Date trial started 89.0% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 93.1% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 104 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Detroit Site Identification: 16 Table 16: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=636) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 9.7% (3 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 6.5% (2 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 29.0% (9 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 30.5% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 31.0% V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 31.3% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 31.3% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 31.3% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 31.3% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 31.3% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 31.3% V21 Date of sentencing 31.8% 16.1% (5 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V11 First scheduled trial date 66.4% V14 Date trial started 71.7% V7 Date of arrest 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 105 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P16 Site Name: Oakland Site Identification: 17 Table 17: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=553) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 38.7% (12 of 31 variables) have 0% Missing Values 12.9% (4 of 31 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 25.8% (8 of 31 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 9.8% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 9.8% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 9.8% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 9.8% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 9.8% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 9.8% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 9.8% V18 Most serious charge at conviction 9.9% 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 31 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 22.6% (7 of 31 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V21 Date of sentencing 99.5% V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 99.8% V11 First scheduled trial date 100.0% V14 Date trial started 100.0% V29 Was a Psychological evaluation ordered? 100.0% V30 Date alias capias issued 100.0% V31 Date of return on warrent 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Page 106 ICPSR 9918 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA9918.P15 Site Name: Jersey City Site Identification: 18 Table 18: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=641) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 48.3% (14 of 29 variables) have 0% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 3.4% (1 of 29 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 29 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 24.1% (7 of 29 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values V22 Sentence imposed:Fine/Penalty 8.1% V23 Sentence imposed:Restitution 8.1% V24 Sentence imposed:Probation 8.1% V25 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison ... 8.1% V26 Sentence imposed:Jail/Prison-Over 12 mo 8.1% V27 Sentence imposed:Suspended sentence 8.1% V10 Date of arrgnmnt on indictment/accusatn 8.3% 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values V7 Date of arrest 10.5% V8 Date lower court complaint filed 13.7% 10.3% (3 of 29 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values V18 Most serious charge at conviction 36.2% V11 First scheduled trial date 37.0% V21 Date of sentencing 37.8% 6.9% (2 of 29 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values V14 Date trial started 92.8% V28 Sentence imposed:Other 95.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. ICPSR 9918 Page 107