SPOUSE ABUSE REPLICATION PROJECT IN METRO-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, 1987-1989 (ICPSR 6008) Principal Investigators Antony Pate, Edwin E. Hamilton, and Sampson Annan The Police Foundation First ICPSR Version December 1994 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 1 1 BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Pate, Antony, Edwin E. Hamilton, and Sampson Annan. SPOUSE ABUSE REPLICATION PROJECT IN METRO-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, 1987-1989 âComputer fileã. Washington, DC: Police Foundation âproducerã, 1991. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research âdistributorã, 1994. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON USE OF ICPSR RESOURCES To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Please indicate in a cover letter which data were used. DATA DISCLAIMER The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary ................................................ 1 General Study Overview ................................. 3 Study Identification .............................. 3 Key Words ......................................... 3 Purpose of the Study .............................. 3 Methods ................................................ 4 Study Design ...................................... 4 Sources of Information ............................ 5 Sample ............................................ 5 Response Rates .................................... 5 Dates of Data Collection .......................... 5 Summary of Contents .................................... 5 Description of Variables .......................... 5 Presence of Common Scales ......................... 6 Unit of Observation ............................... 6 Extent of Processing .............................. 6 Extent of Collection .............................. 6 File Specifications ............................... 7 Diskette User Information ......................... 8 Related Publications .............................. 9 Final Reports and Other Publications .............. 9 Data Completeness Report ............................... 11 1 1 SUMMARY The Metro-Dade project replicated an earlier study of domestic violence, the Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment (SPECIFIC DETERRENT EFFECTS OF ARREST FOR DOMESTIC ASSAULT: MINNEAPOLIS, 1981- 1982 âICPSR 8250ã), which was conducted by the Police Foundation with a grant from the National Institute of Justice. The Metro-Dade study employed a research design that tested the relative effectiveness of various combinations of treatments that were randomly assigned in two stages. Initially, eligible spouse battery cases were assigned to either an arrest or a nonarrest condition. Later, cases were assigned either to receive or not to receive a follow-up investigation and victim counseling from a detective working with the Safe Streets Unit (SSU), a unit that deals specifically with domestic violence. Given the various treatment conditions employed, three types of dependent variables were examined: (1) prevalence--the proportion of suspects who engaged in repeat incidents, (2) incidence--the frequency with which repeat incidents occurred, and (3) "time to failure"--the interval between the presenting incident and subsequent incidents. Initial interviews were conducted with victims soon after the presenting incident, and follow-up interviews were attempted six months later. The interviews were conducted in either English or Spanish. The interview questions requested detailed background information about the suspect, victim, and any family members living with the victim at the time of the interview, including age, gender, and marital and employment status. Parallel sets of employment and education questions were asked about the victim and the suspect. Additionally, the interview questionnaire was designed to collect information on (1) the history of the victim's relationship with the suspect, (2) the nature of the presenting incident, including physical violence, property damage, and threats, (3) causes of the presenting incident, including the use of alcohol and drugs by both the victim and the offender, (4) actions taken by the police when they arrived on the scene, (5) the victim's evaluation of the services rendered by the police on the scene, (6) the nature of the follow-up contact by a detective from the Safe Street Unit and an evaluation of the services provided, (8) the victim's history of abuse by the offender, and (9) the nature of subsequent abuse since the presenting incident. Data for Parts 1 and 2 are self-reported data, obtained from interviews with victims. Part 4 consists of data recorded on Domestic Violence Continuation Report forms, indicating subsequent assaults or domestic disputes, and Part 5 contains criminal history data on suspects from arrest reports, indicating a subsequent arrest. 1 Page 2 ICPSR 6008 - 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 3 GENERAL STUDY OVERVIEW STUDY IDENTIFICATION SPOUSE ABUSE REPLICATION PROJECT IN METRO-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, 1987- 1989 Antony Pate, Edwin E. Hamilton, and Sampson Annan The Police Foundation Award No. 87-IJ-CX-K003 KEY WORDS Assault and battery, domestic assault PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The Metro-Dade project replicated an earlier study of domestic violence, the Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment (SPECIFIC DETERRENT EFFECTS OF ARREST FOR DOMESTIC ASSAULT: MINNEAPOLIS, 1981- 1982 âICPSR 8250ã), which was conducted by the Police Foundation with a grant from the National Institute of Justice. The Metro-Dade study employed a research design that tested the relative effectiveness of various combinations of treatments that were randomly assigned in two stages. Initially, eligible spouse battery cases were assigned to either an arrest or a nonarrest condition. Later, cases were assigned either to receive or not to receive a follow-up investigation and victim counseling from a detective working with the Safe Streets Unit (SSU), a unit that deals specifically with domestic violence. Initial interviews were conducted with victims soon after the presenting incident, and follow-up interviews were attempted six months later. The interviews were conducted in either English or Spanish. Given the various treatment conditions employed, three types of dependent variables were examined: (1) prevalence--the proportion of suspects who engaged in repeat incidents, (2) incidence--the frequency with which repeat incidents occurred, and (3) "time to failure"--the interval between the presenting incident and subsequent incidents. 1 Page 4 ICPSR 6008 METHODS STUDY DESIGN A Domestic Violence Committee, comprised of representatives drawn from the Metro-Dade Police Department, the State Attorney's office, the Dade County Department of Human Resources, the Victims Advocate Program, the Domestic Intervention Program, and the Police Foundation, assisted in the implementation of the field study. The Domestic Violence Committee established the following criteria to determine the eligibility of cases: (1) probable cause for misdemeanor spouse battery existed, (2) the couple involved were spouses or former spouses, (3) the victim was a female 18 years of age or older, (4) no felony had occurred, (5) victim and subject were both on the scene upon the officers' arrival, (6) victim was not in immediate danger, (7) officer was not assaulted by subject or victim, and (8) there were no outstanding arrest warrants, injunctions, or criminal protective orders for the victim or the subject. At the time the data collection phase began, the Florida misdemeanor spouse battery law, which permitted police to make arrests for incidents that did not occur in their presence, applied only to spouses or former spouses. In early 1989, following changes made in the relevant Florida statutes, the case eligibility criteria were expanded to include domestic batteries involving unmarried couples. Random assignment to the arrest/nonarrest condition was accomplished with the use of the police department's computerized dispatch system. In the event that the computer system was not operational, dispatchers were provided with a set of sealed envelopes that contained randomly determined arrest/nonarrest treatments. If the case was assigned to an arrest condition, the suspect would be arrested for battery on a spouse. If the case was assigned to the nonarrest condition, the officers on the scene would provide the victim with a brochure explaining her legal rights and remedies and leave the scene. For those cases assigned to receive SSU contact, background checks were conducted to determine whether the disputants had been involved in previous incidents, what referrals had been made, whether the referral agencies had been involved in the case, and what remedial steps had been taken. The SSU detective assigned to a particular case interviewed the victim and discussed the presenting incident and the circumstances surrounding it, clarifying the ultimate consequences of prolonged continuation of such behavior. The detective would then make either a passive or active referral to one or more agencies capable of providing assistance to the disputants. In the case of a passive referral, the initiative was left to the disputants to make contact with the sources of support. In the case of an active referral, the detective personally made appointments for or physically took one or more of the disputants to the most relevant agency. The initial and six-month interviews were conducted only by female interviewers, since all of those interviewed were female and given the sensitive nature of the subject matter. Each victim was sent a letter informing her that an interviewer would contact her to arrange for an interview and that she would receive $20 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 5 for her participation in the survey. (An increase in the incentive to $25 boosted the response rate by 15 percent during the second month of the interviewing process.) Interviews were conducted either in person or by telephone. In-person interviews were conducted either in the victim's home or, for reasons of safety or convenience, at a location other than the victim's home (e.g., the SSU office). SOURCES OF INFORMATION Three types of data were collected: (1) self-reported data, from interviews with victims, (2) data recorded on Domestic Violence Continuation Report forms indicating subsequent assaults or domestic disputes, and (3) suspect criminal history data from arrest reports. SAMPLE Every case of domestic assault that met the selection criteria was selected for inclusion in the study. RESPONSE RATES A total of 907 incidents were considered eligible cases. Of these, interviews were completed with 595 complainants, or 66 percent. Follow-up interviews were obtained from 385 complainants, or 65 percent. DATES OF DATA COLLECTION August 1987-January 1989 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION OF VARIABLES The initial interview questionnaire produced by the Police Foundation integrated a set of core items supplied by the Program Review Team for the National Institute of Justice with additional items concerning spouse abuse issues. The questions requested detailed background information about the suspect, victim, and any family members living with the victim at the time of the interview, including age, gender, and marital and employment status. Parallel sets of employment and education questions were asked about the victim and the subject. Additionally, the questionnaire was designed to collect information on (1) the history of the victim's relationship with the 1 Page 6 ICPSR 6008 suspect, (2) the nature of the presenting incident, including physical violence, property damage, and threats, (3) causes of the presenting incident, including the use of alcohol and drugs by both the victim and the offender, (4) actions taken by the police when they arrived on the scene, (5) the victim's evaluation of the services rendered by the police on the scene, (6) the nature of the follow-up contact by a detective from the Safe Street Unit and an evaluation of the services provided, (8) the victim's history of abuse by the offender, and (9) the nature of subsequent abuse since the presenting incident. The questionnaire for the six-month follow-up interview was an abbreviated version of the initial interview: it focused on the relationship between the victim and the offender and any recidivistic behavior on the part of the offender since the initial interview. The follow-up questionnaire was designed also to suggest whether the actions taken by the police and the detective from the Safe Streets Unit had any impact on the relationship. Data for Parts 1 and 2 are self-reported data, obtained from interviews with victims. Part 4 consists of data recorded on Domestic Violence Continuation Report forms, indicating subsequent assaults or domestic disputes, and Part 5 contains criminal history data on suspects from arrest reports, indicating a subsequent arrest. PRESENCE OF COMMON SCALES None. UNIT OF OBSERVATION Individuals. EXTENT OF PROCESSING Missing data codes were standardized and checks for undocumented codes were performed by ICPSR. Data and documentation were reformatted by ICPSR. EXTENT OF COLLECTION This collection consists of 6 data files, with machine-readable documentation, SAS and SPSS data definition statements, and data collection instruments. 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 7 FILE SPECIFICATIONS PART NUMBER: 1 PART NAME: Initial Interview Data FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 595 VARIABLE COUNT: 545 RECORD LENGTH: 741 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 2 PART NAME: Six-Month Follow-Up Interview Data FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 385 VARIABLE COUNT: 314 RECORD LENGTH: 461 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 3 PART NAME: Selected Variables From Initial and Follow-Up Interview Data FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 907 VARIABLE COUNT: 74 RECORD LENGTH: 125 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 4 PART NAME: Domestic Violence Continuation Data FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 908 VARIABLE COUNT: 77 RECORD LENGTH: 127 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 5 PART NAME: Suspect Criminal History Data FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 911 VARIABLE COUNT: 52 RECORD LENGTH: 110 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 PART NUMBER: 6 PART NAME: Randomized Treatments Data FILE STRUCTURE: rectangular CASE COUNT: 916 VARIABLE COUNT: 104 RECORD LENGTH: 120 RECORDS PER CASE: 1 1 Page 8 ICPSR 6008 PART NUMBER: 7 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Initial Interview Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 8 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Six-Month Follow-Up Interview Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 9 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Selected Variables From Initial and Follow-Up Interview Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 10 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Domestic Violence Continuation Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 11 PART NAME: SAS Data Definition Statements for Suspect Criminal History Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 12 PART NAME: SAS Data Dafinition Statements for Randomized Treatments Data RECORD LENGTH: 75 PART NUMBER: 13 PART NAME: User Guide RECORD LENGTH: 79 DISKETTE USER INFORMATION The file sizes for the diskette version of this study are listed below. If all of the files are uncompressed and loaded onto a hard drive, approximately 2.4 megabytes of disk space will be required. Data Files DA6008.P1 442,085 bytes compressed into 54,192 bytes. DA6008.P2 178,255 bytes compressed into 18,341 bytes. DA6008.P3 115,189 bytes compressed into 16,284 bytes. DA6008.P4 117,132 bytes compressed into 10,708 bytes. DA6008.P5 102,032 bytes compressed into 12,040 bytes. DA6008.P6 111,752 bytes compressed into 20,161 bytes. 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 9 De-compressing Files Files with the .EXE extension are PKWARE Self-Extracting Compressed files. When these files are uncompressed they will require 1,066,445 bytes of disk space. The compressed data files were named using the convention D6008P#.EXE. When uncompressed the files will be named DA6008.P#. Example of decompressing a compressed file into an ASCII file (using file D6008P1.EXE): (1) attach to the drive/path where you wish to locate the uncompressed file, e.g., hard disk or C drive (2) place the diskette containing file D6008P1.EXE into disk drive A (3) then type: A:D6008P1 and press ENTER. This will access the self-executing file called D6008P1.EXE. An uncompressed file called, DA6008.P1, will be produced and reside on your C drive. Documentation The User Guide and Codebook files require approximately 770,000 bytes of disk space. The SAS and SPSS data definition statements require approximately 500,000 bytes of disk space. RELATED PUBLICATION Pate, Antony, Edwin E. Hamilton, and Sampson Annan. "Metro-Dade Spouse Abuse Replication Project" (Final Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1991. FINAL REPORTS AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS Final reports and other publications describing the original research conducted with the data in this collection are available from the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) at: NIJ/NCJRS, Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20850, 800-851-3420. 1 Page 10 ICPSR 6008 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 11 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA6008.P1 Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=595) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.5% (41 of 545 variables) have 0% Missing Values 5.1% (28 of 545 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.6% (3 of 545 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.4% (2 of 545 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.2% (1 of 545 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values Q5T HOW LONG LIVING WITH SUSPECT BEFORE INC 9.7% 0.9% (5 of 545 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values Q5U HOW LONG: UNITS 12.9% Q16T LENGTH OF ARGUMENT BEFORE HURT: METRIC 17.5% Q216 NUMBER HOURS PER WEEK SUSPECT WORKS 17.5% Q218 SUSPECT GROSS PAY 17.5% Q217 SUSPECT PAY PERIOD 17.6% 1.5% (8 of 545 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values Q16U LENGHT OF ARGUMENT: UNITS 20.3% Q25 RESPONDENT RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMENT O 31.4% Q27 RESPONDENT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 31.6% Q26 RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED MEDICAL TREATMEN 37.3% Q204 NUMBER HOURS PER WEEK RESPONDENT WORKS 38.0% Q14A RESPONDENT CALLED POLICE 38.2% Q205 RESPONDENT PAY PERIOD 38.2% Q206 RESPONDENT GROSS PAY BEFORE DEDUCTIONS 38.3% 83.9% (457 of 545 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values Q35A POLICE SPOKE TO RESPONDENT AND SUSPECT 40.8% ======================================================================= 1 Page 12 ICPSR 6008 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q35B POLICE SPOKE TO RESPONDENT ALONE 40.8% Q35C POLICE SPOKE TO SUSPECT ALONE 40.8% Q35D POLICE CALMED THE SITUATION 40.8% Q35E POLICE PROVIDED ADVICE ON COOPERATION 40.8% Q35F POLICE SPOKE TO RESPONDENT ABOUT LEGAL 40.8% Q35G POLICE ADVISED RESPONDENT TO SEE PRIVAT 40.8% Q35H POLICE INFORMED RESPONDENT ABOUT SHELTE 40.8% Q35L POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO LEGAL SER 40.8% Q35M POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO WITNESS / 40.8% Q35N POLICE EXPLAINED LEGAL RIGHTS TO RESPON 40.8% Q35O POLICE PROVIDED LEGAL RIGHTS FACT SHEET 40.8% Q36 POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO SPECIFIC 40.8% Q38 POLICE ENCOURAGED RESPONDENT TO WORK OU 40.8% Q41 SUSPECT LEFT PREMISES WHILE POLICE PRES 40.8% Q43 RESPONDENT SAW SUSPECT BEING HANDCUFFED 40.8% Q44 RESPONDENT WANTED SUSPECT TO BE ARRESTE 40.8% Q46 AMOUNT OF TIME POLICE SPENT AT PREMISES 40.8% Q48 ATTENTION PAID BY POLICE TO SUSPECT 40.8% Q50 POLICE SEEMED AS THOUGH THEY WANTED TO 40.8% Q53 SUSPECT THREATENED RESPONDENT WHILE BEI 40.8% Q54 HOW SAFE RESPONDENT FELT AFTER POLICE L 40.8% Q34 NUMBER OF OFFICERS RESPONDING TO CALL 41.0% Q35I POLICE ADVISED RESPONDENT TO CONTACT SH 41.0% Q35K POLICE TRANSPORTED RESPONDENT TO HOSPIT 41.0% Q35P POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO DOMESTIC 41.0% Q51 RESPONDENT SATISFACTION WITH POLICE 41.0% Q58 SUSPECT MADE BAIL / WENT TO JAIL 41.0% Q61T HOW LONG BEFORE SPOUSE RETURNED: METRIC 41.0% Q63C POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL BRAV 41.0% Q63E POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL ENCO 41.0% Q64 SAFE STREET UNIT DETECTIVE CONTACTED RE 41.0% Q35Q POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO HEALTH AN 41.2% Q47 ATTENTION PAID BY POLICE TO RESPONDENT 41.2% Q49 POLICE TOOK SITUATION SERIOUSLY 41.2% Q63A POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL POWE 41.2% Q63B POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL IN / 41.2% Q63D POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL STRO 41.2% Q63F POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL DETE 41.2% Q35J POLICE ADVISED RESPONDENT TO SEEK FAMIL 41.3% Q40 RESPONDENT LEFT PREMISES WHILE POLICE P 41.3% Q61U HOW LONG: UNITS 44.0% Q32A SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO RES 49.7% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 13 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q24I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 52.1% Q56 HOW LONG AFTER POLICE LEFT DID RESPONDE 57.0% Q80 NUMBER OF POLICE OFFICERS WHO ENETERED 58.8% Q81A POLICE SPOKE TO RESPONDENT AND SUSPECT 58.8% Q177 NUMBER OF ABUSIVE INCIDENTS 58.8% Q178 RESPONDENT SUFFERED ANY INJURY AS A RES 58.8% Q81B POLICE SPOKE TO RESPONDENT ALONE 59.0% Q81D POLICE CALMED THE SITUATION 59.0% Q81E POLICE PROVIDED ADVICE ON COOPERATION 59.0% Q81F POLICE SPOKE TO RESPONDENT ABOUT LEGAL 59.0% Q81J POLICE ADVISED RESPONDENT TO SEEK FAMIL 59.0% Q81K POLICE TRANSPORTED RESPONDENT TO HOSPIT 59.0% Q81L POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO LEGAL SER 59.0% Q81M POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO WITNESS / 59.0% Q81N POLICE EXPLAINED LEGAL RIGHTS TO RESPON 59.0% Q81P POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO DOMESTIC 59.0% Q81Q POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO HEALTH AN 59.0% Q82 POLICE REFERRED RESPONDENT TO SPECIFIC 59.0% Q84 POLICE ENCOURAGED RESPONDENT TO WORK OU 59.0% Q88 POLICE HANDCUFFED SOMEONE DURING INCIDE 59.0% Q90 RESPONDENT LEFT PREMISES WHILE POLICE P 59.0% Q93 AMOUNT OF TIME POLICE SPENT AT PREMISES 59.0% Q94 ATTENTION PAID BY POLICE TO RESPONDENT 59.0% Q96 POLICE TOOK SITUATION SERIOUSLY 59.0% Q97 POLICE SEEMED AS THOUGH THEY WANTED TO 59.0% Q98 RESPONDENT SATISFACTION WITH POLICE 59.0% Q101 HOW SAFE RESPONDENT FELT AFTER POLICE L 59.0% Q105A POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL POWE 59.0% Q105E POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL ENCO 59.0% Q105F POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL DETE 59.0% Q106 SAFE STREET UNIT DETECTIVE CONTACTED RE 59.0% Q81C POLICE SPOKE TO SUSPECT ALONE 59.2% Q81G POLICE ADVISED RESPONDENT TO SEE PRIVAT 59.2% Q81I POLICE ADVISED RESPONDENT TO CONTACT SH 59.2% Q81O POLICE PROVIDED LEGAL RIGHTS FACT SHEET 59.2% Q86 RESPONDENT WANTED SUSPECT ARRESTED 59.2% Q91 SUSPECT LEFT PREMISES WHILE POLICE PRES 59.2% Q105B POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL IN / 59.2% Q105C POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL BRAV 59.2% Q105D POLICE ACTION MADE RESPONDENT FEEL STRO 59.2% Q95 ATTENTION PAID BY POLICE TO SUSPECT 59.3% Q81H POLICE INFORMED RESPONDENT ABOUT SHELTE 59.5% ======================================================================= 1 Page 14 ICPSR 6008 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q207 DURATION OF RESPONDENT UNEMPLOYMENT 61.3% Q60 AMOUNT OF JAIL TIME 64.7% Q32H SUSPECT THREATENED TO EMBARRASS / HUMIL 65.5% Q55G RESPONDENT STAYED AT HOME 68.2% Q62F UPON RETURN SUSPECT ATTEMPTED RECONCILL 68.2% Q45 RESPONDENT ASKED POLICE TO ARREST SUSPE 69.6% Q180 RESPONDENT RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMENT O 70.1% Q182 RESPONDENT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 70.1% Q65 SAFE STREET UNIT CONTACT HOW LONG AFTER 70.6% Q66 SAFE STREET UNIT CONTACT MADE IN-PERSON 70.6% Q68 DETECTIVE MADE APPOINTMENT FOR RESPONDE 70.8% Q71 RESPONDENT CONTACTED ANY AGENCY 70.8% Q79 RESPONDENT WOULD RECOMMEND OTHERS TO SA 70.8% Q69 DETECTIVE INQUIRED ABOUT SUPPORT FOR RE 70.9% Q74 DETECTIVE PROVIDED BUSINESS CARD 70.9% Q76 UTILITY OF INFO AND ASSISTANCE PROVIDED 70.9% Q77 COPING ABILITY OF RESPONDENT 70.9% Q78 DETECTIVE INTEREST IN RESPONDENT PROBLE 70.9% Q70 DETECTIVE OFFERED ASSISTANCE 71.1% Q75 AMOUT TIME RESPONDENT SPENT TALKING TO 71.3% Q208 RESPONDENT GROSS PAY BEFORE DEDUCTIONS 71.6% Q103 HOW LONG AFTER POLICE LEFT DID RESPONDE 71.8% Q52H RESPONDENT WANTED NOTHING ELSE FROM POL 71.9% Q191 NUMBER OF THREATS 75.0% Q102G RESPONDENT STAYED AT HOME 76.0% Q181 RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED MEDICAL TREATMEN 76.0% Q32J SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL RESPONDENT 76.1% Q59 BAIL POSTED BY SUSPECT / RESPONDENT 76.5% Q107 SAFE STREET UNIT CONTACT HOW LONG AFTER 77.5% Q116 DETECTIVE PROVIDED BUSINESS CARD 77.5% Q119 COPING ABILITY OF RESPONDENT 77.5% Q120 DETECTIVE INTEREST IN RESPONDENT PROBLE 77.5% Q179I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 77.5% Q112 DETECTIVE OFFERED ASSISTANCE 77.6% Q113 RESPONDENT CONTACTED ANY AGENCY 77.6% Q117 AMOUT TIME RESPONDENT SPENT TALKING TO 77.6% Q121 RESPONDENT WOULD RECOMMEND OTHERS TO SA 77.6% Q108 SAFE STREET UNIT CONTACT MADE IN-PERSON 77.8% Q110 DETECTIVE MADE APPOINTMENT FOR RESPONDE 77.8% Q111 DETECTIVE INQUIRED ABOUT SUPPORT FOR RE 77.8% Q118 UTILITY OF INFO AND ASSISTANCE PROVIDED 77.8% Q85 RESPONDENT SUCCESSFUL IN REACHING SOLUT 79.7% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 15 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q192A SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO RES 79.8% Q202D AGE OF CHILD 4 80.0% Q24H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, 80.2% Q99I RESPONDENT WANTED NOTHING ELSE FROM POL 80.8% Q14C FAMILY MEMBER CALLED POLICE 81.0% Q172 POLICE CALLED DURING INCIDENT 81.8% Q196A RESPONDENT CALLED POLICE 81.8% Q210B INCOME FROM PENSION 81.8% Q211 REPONDENT, MONTHLY INCOME FROM OTHER SO 82.0% Q220 SUSPECT GROSS PAY BEFORE DEDUCTIONS 83.0% Q194 NUMBER TIMES SUSPECT DAMAGED PROPERTY D 83.9% Q87 RESPONDENT ASKED POLICE TO ARREST SUSPE 84.0% Q14D SOMEONE ELSE CALLED POLICE 84.7% Q127 NUMBER OF THREATS SINCE DATE OF INCIDEN 84.9% Q219 DURATION OF SUSPECT UNEMPLOYMENT 84.9% Q123 RESPONDENT, NUMBER OF TIMES ABUSED SINC 85.5% Q175 RESPONDENT AND SPOUSE LIVED TOGETHER PA 85.5% Q55E RESPONDENT CALLED RELATIVE / FRIEND 85.7% Q55F RESPONDENT CRIED A LOT 85.9% Q67D DOMESTIC INTERVENTION PROGRAM INFO PROV 86.1% Q100G SUSPECT LEFT PREMISES AFTER POLICE LEFT 86.2% Q148D FIRST THREAT - DAY 86.2% Q24G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HE 86.4% Q57T HOW LONG DID YOU STAY AWAY FROM YOUR HO 86.4% Q133 RESPONDENT SUFFERED ANY INJURY AS A RES 86.4% Q148M FIRST THREAT - MONTH 86.4% Q132M FIRST HURT - MONTH 86.6% Q39 RESPONDENT SUCCESSFUL IN REACHING SOLUT 86.7% Q132D FIRST HURT - DAY 87.1% Q132Y FIRST HURT - YEAR 87.1% Q67A STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE INFO PROVIDED 87.2% Q130 SUSPECT ACTS OCCURRED AT SAME / DIFFERE 87.2% Q148Y FIRST THREAT - YEAR 87.2% Q192H SUSPECT THREATENED TO EMBARRASS / HUMIL 87.9% Q109D DOMESTIC INTERVENTION PROGRAM INFO PROV 88.1% Q52G RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO DO SOMETHIN 88.6% Q179H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, 88.7% Q192J SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL RESPONDENT 89.1% Q52B RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO TALK MORE W 89.2% Q55A RESPONDENT WENT TO FRIENDS / RELATIVES 89.2% Q109A STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE INFO PROVIDED 89.2% Q149A SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO RES 89.4% ======================================================================= 1 Page 16 ICPSR 6008 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q6 LIVE WITH SUSPECT AT OTHER TIMES BEFORE 89.6% Q24E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 89.7% Q52F RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO ADVISE SUSP 89.7% Q57U HOW LONG: UNITS 89.7% Q100F SUSPECT ATTEMPTED RECONCILLIATION WITH 89.7% Q32E SUSPECT THREATENED PROPERTY DAMAGE TO H 89.9% Q7 SUSPECT HAS LIVED WITH RESPONDENT ALL T 90.1% Q9 SUSPECT HAS LIVED WITH RESPONDENT SOME 90.1% Q67F INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION INFO PROVIDED 90.1% Q202C AGE OF CHILD 3 90.3% Q52A RESPONDENT WANTED MORE DISCUSSION WITH 90.4% Q73H NO CONTACT, OTHER REASON 90.4% Q42A POLICE ORDERED SUSPECT TO LEAVE PREMISE 90.6% Q131 NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ACTS BY SUSPECT 90.8% Q222A SUSP OTHER INCOME: SS 90.8% Q100E SUSPECT SEEMED SORRY AFTER POLICE LEFT 90.9% Q102A RESPONDENT WENT TO FRIENDS / RELATIVES 90.9% Q222B SUSP OTHER INCOME: PENSION 90.9% Q222C SUSP OTHER INCOME: VETERANS 90.9% Q222D SUSP OTHER INCOME: SAVINGS 90.9% Q222E SUSP OTHER INCOME: STOCKS 90.9% Q222F SUSP OTHER INCOME: UNEMP COMP 90.9% Q222H SUSP OTHER INCOME: ALIMONY 90.9% Q55H RESPONDENT DID SOMETHING ELSE 91.1% Q73G NO CONTACT, RESPONDENT / SUSPECT WORKED 91.1% Q222G SUSP OTHER INCOME: WELFARE 91.1% Q223 SUSPECT, MONTHLY INCOME FROM OTHER SOUR 91.1% Q192E SUSPECT THREATENED PROPERTY DAMAGE TO H 91.3% Q109F INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION INFO PROVIDED 91.8% Q169M SECOND THREAT - MONTH 91.8% Q67B SAFESPACE INFO PROVIDED 91.9% Q169D SECOND THREAT - DAY 91.9% Q99F RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO ARREST SUSP 92.1% Q154 RESPONDENT SUFFERED ANY INJURY AS A RES 92.1% Q115G NO CONTACT, RESPONDENT / SUSPECT WORKED 92.3% Q179G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HE 92.3% Q102H RESPONDENT DID SOMETHING ELSE 92.4% Q153M SECOND HURT - MONTH 92.4% Q169Y SECOND THREAT - YEAR 92.4% Q104T HOW LONG DID YOU STAY AWAY FROM YOUR HO 92.6% Q153D SECOND HURT - DAY 92.6% Q100H SUSPECT DID SOMETHING ELSE AFTER POLICE 92.8% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 17 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q92A POLICE ORDERED SUSPECT TO LEAVE PREMISE 92.9% Q32I SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL SELF 93.1% Q99E RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO BE MORE OBJ 93.1% Q99G RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO ADVISE SUSP 93.1% Q115H NO CONTACT, OTHER REASON 93.1% Q135 RESPONDENT RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMENT O 93.1% Q137 RESPONDENT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 93.1% Q153Y SECOND HURT - YEAR 93.3% Q32F SUSPECT THREATENED TO TAKE CHILD AWAY 93.4% Q29A SUSPECT ASSAULTED CHILD DURING INCIDENT 93.6% Q62A UPON RETURN SUSPECT TOOK UP ARGUMENT WI 93.6% Q149H SUSPECT THREATENED TO EMBARRASS / HUMIL 93.6% Q136 RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED MEDICAL TREATMEN 93.8% Q170A SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO YOU 93.8% Q102F RESPONDENT CRIED A LOT 93.9% Q109B SAFESPACE INFO PROVIDED 93.9% Q129 NUMBER OF TIMES PROPERTY DAMAGED SINCE 93.9% Q179E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 93.9% Q67G HOMESTEAD FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INFO PR 94.1% Q52E RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO BE MORE OBJ 94.3% Q104U HOW LONG UNITS 94.3% Q149J SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL RESPONDENT 94.3% Q150M FIRST DAMAGED - MONTH 94.3% Q151 POLICE CALLED DURING INCIDENT 94.3% Q185 NUMBER OF ABUSIVE INCIDENTS 94.3% Q150D FIRST DAMAGED - DAY 94.5% Q150Y FIRST DAMAGED - YEAR 94.5% Q24B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 94.6% Q37 PROGRAM TO WHICH POLICE REFERRED RESPON 94.6% Q99A RESPONDENT WANTED MORE DISCUSSION WITH 94.6% Q99C RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO REMOVE SUSP 94.6% Q188 FAMILY MEMBER SUFFERED ANY INJURY AS A 94.6% Q134I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 94.8% Q202B AGE OF CHILD 2 94.8% Q102E RESPONDENT CALLED RELATIVE / FRIEND 95.1% Q100A SUSPECT BECOME MORE NGRY AFTER POLICE L 95.3% Q32B SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO CHI 95.5% Q52C RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO REMOVE SUSP 95.5% Q99B RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO TALK MORE W 95.5% Q109H HOMESTEAD FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INFO PR 95.5% Q149E SUSPECT THREATENED PROPERTY DAMAGE TO H 95.8% Q67E ADVOCATES FOR RESPONDENTS PROGRAM INFO 96.0% ======================================================================= 1 Page 18 ICPSR 6008 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q173A RESPONDENT CALLED POLICE 96.0% Q99H RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO DO SOMETHIN 96.1% Q186A CHILD WAS ASSAULTED 96.1% Q24F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCAT 96.3% Q170J SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL RESPONDENT 96.3% Q196D SOMEONE ELSE CALLED POLICE 96.3% Q109E ADVOCATES FOR RESPONDENTS PROGRAM INFO 96.5% Q67C HEALTH REHAB SERVICES PROVIDED 96.6% Q72D RESPONDENT CONTACTED DOMESTIC INTERVENT 96.6% Q109C HEALTH REHAB SERVICES PROVIDED 96.6% Q156 RESPONDENT RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMENT O 96.6% Q158 RESPONDENT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 96.6% Q170H SUSPECT THREATENED TO EMBARRASS / HUMIL 96.6% Q192F SUSPECT THREATENED TO TAKE CHILD AWAY 96.6% Q196C FAMILY MEMBER CALLED POLICE 96.6% Q192I SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL SELF 96.8% Q202A AGE OF CHILD 1 96.8% Q157 RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED MEDICAL TREATMEN 97.0% Q42E SUSPECT LEFT PREMISES FOR OTHER REASONS 97.1% Q72A RESPONDENT CONTACTED STATE ATTORNEY OFF 97.1% Q83 PROGRAM TO WHICH POLICE REFERRED RESPON 97.1% Q92D SUSPECT WANTED TO LEAVE PREMISES 97.1% Q155I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 97.1% Q179F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCAT 97.1% Q192B SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO CHI 97.1% Q14B SUSPECT CALLED POLICE 97.3% Q125 OTHER FAMILY MBR, NUMBER OF TIMES ABUSE 97.3% Q24A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 97.5% Q55D RESPONDENT WENT TO EMERGENCY ROOM 97.5% Q134H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, 97.5% Q170E SUSPECT THREATENED PROPERTY DAMAGE TO H 97.5% Q100B SUSPECT THREATENED RESPONDENT AFTER POL 97.6% Q109G HUMAN RESOURCES SERVICES INFO PROVIDED 97.6% Q139M FIRST HURT - MONTH 97.6% Q139D FIRST HURT - DAY 97.6% Q171M SECOND DAMAGE - MONTH 97.6% Q171D SECOND DAMAGE - DAY 97.6% Q179A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 97.6% Q179B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 97.6% Q192D SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO FRI 97.6% Q32D SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO FRI 97.8% Q55C RESPONDENT PROVIDED BAIL FOR SPOUSE 97.8% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 19 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q62E UPON RETURN SUSPECT THREATENED RESPONDE 97.8% Q114D RESPONDENT CONTACTED DOMESTIC INTERVENT 97.8% Q139Y FIRST HURT - YEAR 97.8% Q142 FAMILY MEMBER SUFFERED ANY INJURY AS A 97.8% Q160M SECOND HURT FAMILY - MONTH 97.8% Q52D RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO REMOVE SUSP 98.0% Q99D RESPONDENT WANTED POLICE TO REMOVE SUSP 98.0% Q134G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HE 98.0% Q171Y SECOND DAMAGE - YEAR 98.0% Q28 NUMBER OF DAYS RESPONDENT HOSPITALIZED 98.2% Q149F SUSPECT THREATENED TO TAKE CHILD AWAY 98.2% Q160D SECOND HURT FAMILY - DAY 98.2% Q163 FAMILY MEMBER SUFFERED ANY INJURY AS A 98.2% Q29D SUSPECT ASSAULTED ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER 98.3% Q32C SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO PAR 98.3% Q115F NO CONTACT, DO NOT BELIEVE AGENCIES CAN 98.3% Q149D SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO FRI 98.3% Q149I SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL SELF 98.3% Q160Y SECOND HURT FAMILY - YEAR 98.3% Q187 RELATIONSHIP OF FAMILY MEMBER TO RESPON 98.3% Q189I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 98.3% Q114A RESPONDENT CONTACTED STATE ATTORNEY OFF 98.5% Q183 NUMBER OF DAYS RESPONDENT HOSPITALIZED 98.5% Q192C SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO PAR 98.5% Q29C SUSPECT ASSAULTED FRIEND DURING INCIDEN 98.7% Q73E NO CONTACT, PROCESS TAKES TOO MUCH TIME 98.7% Q140A CHILD WAS ASSAULTED 98.7% Q162 RELATIONSHIP OF FAMILY MEMBER TO RESPON 98.7% Q186D ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER WAS ASSAULTED 98.7% Q89S POLICE HANDCUFFED - SUSPECT 98.8% Q92C SUSPECT HAD SOMEWHERE TO GO 98.8% Q149C SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO PAR 98.8% Q152A RESPONDENT CALLED POLICE 98.8% Q155G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HE 98.8% Q170I SUSPECT THREATENED TO KILL SELF 98.8% Q192G SUSPECT THREATENED TO INJURE OR KILL PE 98.8% Q10M WHEN DID HE LEAVE, MONTH 99.0% Q10D WHEN DID HE LEAVE, DAY 99.0% Q10Y WHEN DID HE LEAVE, YEAR 99.0% Q11M LAST TIME LIVE WITH YOU, MONTH 99.0% Q11D LAST TIME LIVE WITH YOU, DAY 99.0% Q11Y LAST TIME LIVE WITH YOU, YEAR 99.0% ======================================================================= 1 Page 20 ICPSR 6008 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q12 ANY CONTACT BETWEEN RESPONDENT & SUSPEC 99.0% Q29B SUSPECT ASSAULTED PARENT DURING INCIDEN 99.0% Q32G SUSPECT THREATENED TO INJURE OR KILL PE 99.0% Q72B RESPONDENT CONTACTED SAFESPACE 99.0% Q73A NO CONTACT, LACK OF TRANSPORTATION 99.0% Q100D SUSPECT PHYSICALLY ABUSED OTHER FAMILY 99.0% Q149B SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO CHI 99.0% Q155H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, 99.0% Q170F SUSPECT THREATENED TO TAKE CHILD AWAY 99.0% Q196B SUSPECT CALLED POLICE 99.0% Q62B UPON RETURN SUSPECT PHYSICALLY ASSAULTE 99.2% Q73F NO CONTACT, AGENCIES NOT TOO HELPFUL 99.2% Q92E SUSPECT LEFT PREMISES FOR OTHER REASONS 99.2% Q100C SUSPECT DAMAGED PROPERTY AFTER POLICE L 99.2% Q102D RESPONDENT WENT TO EMERGENCY ROOM 99.2% Q141 RELATIONSHIP OF FAMILY MEMBER TO RESPON 99.2% Q173D SOMEONE ELSE CALLED POLICE 99.2% Q8T LENGTH OF TIME SUSPECT LIVED WITH SUSPE 99.3% Q72E RESPONDENT CONTACTED ADVOCATES FOR RESP 99.3% Q73D NO CONTACT, NO MONEY FOR EXPENSES 99.3% Q115A NO CONTACT, LACK OF TRANSPORTATION 99.3% Q115D NO CONTACT, NO MONEY FOR EXPENSES 99.3% Q115E NO CONTACT, PROCESS TAKES TOO MUCH TIME 99.3% Q134E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 99.3% Q170D SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO FRI 99.3% Q173C FAMILY MEMBER CALLED POLICE 99.3% Q189H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, 99.3% Q62D UPON RETURN SUSPECT DAMAGED PROPERTY 99.5% Q72F RESPONDENT CONTACTED HUMAN RESOURCES SE 99.5% Q89V POLICE HANDCUFFED - VICTIM 99.5% Q115B NO CONTACT, LACK OF CHILD CARE 99.5% Q152D SOMEONE ELSE CALLED POLICE 99.5% Q161D ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER WAS ASSAULTED 99.5% Q186B PARENT WAS ASSAULTED 99.5% Q8U LENGTH OF TIME: UNITS 99.7% Q24D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 99.7% Q42C SUSPECT HAD SOMEWHERE TO GO 99.7% Q62C UPON RETURN SUSPECT PHYSICALLY ASSUALTE 99.7% Q72C RESPONDENT CONTACTED HEALTH AND REHAB S 99.7% Q114B RESPONDENT CONTACTED SAFESPACE 99.7% Q114C RESPONDENT CONTACTED HEALTH AND REHAB S 99.7% Q114F RESPONDENT CONTACTED HUMAN RESOURCES SE 99.7% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 21 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q115C NO CONTACT, AGENCIES TOO FAR AWAY 99.7% Q134B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 99.7% Q134F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCAT 99.7% Q140B PARENT WAS ASSAULTED 99.7% Q140D ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER WAS ASSAULTED 99.7% Q152C FAMILY MEMBER CALLED POLICE 99.7% Q164I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 99.7% Q165 FAMILY MEMBER RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMEN 99.7% Q166 FAMILY MEMBER WAS OFFERED MEDICAL TREAT 99.7% Q167 RESPONDENT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 99.7% Q170B SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO CHI 99.7% Q170C SUSPECT THREATENED PHYSICAL HARM TO PAR 99.7% Q173B SUSPECT CALLED POLICE 99.7% Q189G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HE 99.7% Q42B SUSPECT REQUIRED MEDICAL CARE 99.8% Q72G RESPONDENT CONTACTED HOMESTEAD FAMILY S 99.8% Q73B NO CONTACT, LACK OF CHILD CARE 99.8% Q73C NO CONTACT, AGENCIES TOO FAR AWAY 99.8% Q92B SUSPECT REQUIRED MEDICAL CARE 99.8% Q102B RESPONDENT WENT TO SHELTER 99.8% Q114E RESPONDENT CONTACTED ADVOCATES FOR RESP 99.8% Q134D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 99.8% Q138 NUMBER OF DAYS RESPONDENT HOSPITALIZED 99.8% Q143I PAIN OR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, SCRATCHES/B 99.8% Q144 FAMILY MEMBER RECEIVED MEDICAL TREATMEN 99.8% Q145 FAMILY MEMBER WAS OFFERED MEDICAL TREAT 99.8% Q146 RESPONDENT TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 99.8% Q149G SUSPECT THREATENED TO INJURE OR KILL PE 99.8% Q152B SUSPECT CALLED POLICE 99.8% Q155B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 99.8% Q155D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 99.8% Q155E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 99.8% Q161A CHILD WAS ASSAULTED 99.8% Q161B PARENT WAS ASSAULTED 99.8% Q161C FRIEND WAS ASSAULTED 99.8% Q164G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HE 99.8% Q170G SUSPECT THREATENED TO INJURE OR KILL PE 99.8% Q179D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 99.8% Q189B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 99.8% Q24C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q30 FAMILY MEMBER ASSAULTED BY SUSPECT 100.0% Q42D SUSPECT WANTED TO LEAVE PREMISES 100.0% ======================================================================= 1 Page 22 ICPSR 6008 Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q55B RESPONDENT WENT TO SHELTER 100.0% Q89O POLICE HANDCUFFED - OTHER 100.0% Q102C RESPONDENT PROVIDED BAIL FOR SPOUSE 100.0% Q114G RESPONDENT CONTACTED HOMESTEAD FAMILY SU 100.0% Q134A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 100.0% Q134C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q140C FRIEND WAS ASSAULTED 100.0% Q143A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 100.0% Q143B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 100.0% Q143C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q143D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 100.0% Q143E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 100.0% Q143F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCATE 100.0% Q143G PAIN OR INJURY: CONCUSSION / BUMP ON HEA 100.0% Q143H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, B 100.0% Q147 NUMBER OF DAYS RESPONDENT HOSPITALIZED 100.0% Q152E 100.0% Q155A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 100.0% Q155C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q155F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCATE 100.0% Q159 NUMBER OF DAYS RESPONDENT HOSPITALIZED 100.0% Q164A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 100.0% Q164B PAIN OR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 100.0% Q164C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q164D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 100.0% Q164E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 100.0% Q164F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCATE 100.0% Q164H PAIN OR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES, B 100.0% Q168 NUMBER OF DAYS RESPONDENT HOSPITALIZED 100.0% Q179C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q186C FRIEND WAS ASSAULTED 100.0% Q189A PAIN OR INJURY: BLACKOUT 100.0% Q189C PAIN OR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q189D PAIN OR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 100.0% Q189E PAIN OR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 100.0% Q189F PAIN OR INJURY: BROKEN BONES / DISLOCATE 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 23 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA6008.P2 Table 2: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=385) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.6% (5 of 314 variables) have 0% Missing Values 6.1% (19 of 314 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.6% (2 of 314 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 1.3% (4 of 314 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 314 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 314 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 2.2% (7 of 314 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values Q130 SPOUSE WORKS ____ HOURS PER WEEK 25.2% Q131 SPOUSE PAID HOW 25.5% Q132 SPOUSE GROSS PAY PER PERIOD 25.5% Q4 HAS SUSPECT LIVED WITH R ALL TIME SINCE 36.1% Q118 HOURS WORKED PER WEEK 36.1% Q119 HOW OFTEN PAID 36.4% Q120 GROSS PAY PER PAY PERIOD 36.4% 88.2% (277 of 314 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values Q6 LIVED WITH SUSPECT AT OTHER TIMES 63.4% Q8 HAD ANY CONTACT SINCE HE LEFT 63.6% Q121 HOW LONG UNEMPLOYED - MONTHS 64.2% Q122 WHEN WORKED: GROSS PAY PER PAY PERIOD 75.3% Q133 SPOUSE HOW LONG EMPLOYED 75.3% Q134 WHEN WORKING, GROSS MONTHLY PAY 75.3% Q116A AGE CHILD 1 NOT LIVING WITH R 79.5% Q9A KIND OF CONTACT: TALK ON PHONE 81.0% Q15 N TIMES HURT YOU SINCE THEN 81.3% Q16M FIRST HURT - MONTH 81.3% ======================================================================= 1 Page 24 ICPSR 6008 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q17 FIRST HURT - TIME 24 HR CLOCK 81.3% Q18 ARGUE BEFORE HE HURT YOU 81.3% Q20 SPOUSE DRINKING BEFORE INCIDENT 81.3% Q21 YOU DRINKING BEFORE INCIDENT 81.3% Q22 SPOUSE USING DRUGS BEFORE INCIDENT 81.3% Q23 YOU USING DRUGS BEFORE INCIDENT 81.3% Q24A INCIDENT FACTOR: MONEY 81.3% Q24C INCIDENT FACTOR: PREGNANCY 81.3% Q24D INCIDENT FACTOR: ALCOHOL USE 81.3% Q24E INCIDENT FACTOR: DRUG USE 81.3% Q24F INCIDENT FACTOR: HOUSEKEEPING 81.3% Q24H INCIDENT FACTOR: SEX 81.3% Q24I INCIDENT FACTOR: FRIENDS 81.3% Q24J INCIDENT FACTOR: WORK 81.3% Q24K INCIDENT FACTOR: CHILD SUPPORT/ALIMONY 81.3% Q24L INCIDENT FACTOR: SPOUSE RUNNING AROUND 81.3% Q24M INCIDENT FACTOR: SPOUSE NAGGING 81.3% Q24N INCIDENT FACTOR: DIVORCE/SEPARATION 81.3% Q26 ANY INJURY FROM INCIDENT 81.3% Q36 POLICE CALLED DURING INCIDENT 81.3% Q16Y FIRST HURT - YEAR 81.6% Q24G INCIDENT FACTOR: CHILDREN 81.6% Q34 SUSPECT DAMAGE PROPERTY 81.6% Q24B INCIDENT FACTOR: IN-LAWS 81.8% Q16D FIRST HURT - DAY 82.3% Q125 OTHER SOUREC: HOW MUCH PER MONTH 82.6% Q19T HOW LONG ARGUE BEFORE HURT YOU 85.5% Q9B KIND OF CONTACT: HE CAME TO VISIT 86.0% Q19U HOW LONG: UNITS 86.2% Q25 MAIN FACTOR 86.2% Q54 THREATS: N TIMES 86.5% Q58 THREATS: POLICE CALLED DURING INCIDENT 86.5% Q55M THREATS FIRST TIME: MONTH 86.8% Q55D THREATS FIRST TIME: DAY 87.0% Q56 THREATS FIRST TIME: TIME 24 HR CLOCK 87.0% Q55Y THREATS FIRST TIME: YEAR 87.5% Q67 N OFFICERS CAME TO HOUSE 87.5% Q68 OFFICERS LANGUAGE 87.5% Q69B TALK TO YOU BY YOURSELF 87.5% Q69C TALK TO SPOUSE ALONE 87.5% Q69D CALM THINGS DOWN 87.5% Q69E ADVICE ON HOW TO GET ALONG 87.5% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 25 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q69F TALK ABOUT LEGAL RIGHTS 87.5% Q69G RECOMMEND GETTING AN ATTORNEY 87.5% Q69H TELL YOU ABOUT SHELTERS 87.5% Q69I HELP YOU CONTACT A SHELTER 87.5% Q69J REFER YOU TO FAMILY COUNSELING 87.5% Q69K TRANSPORT YOU TO A HOSPITAL/SHELTER 87.5% Q69M REFER YOU TO A WITNESS ADVOCACY PROGRAM 87.5% Q69N EXPLAIN YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS 87.5% Q69O GIVE YOU INFORMATION SHEET ABOUT YOUR R 87.5% Q69P REFER YOU TO DOMESTIC INTERVENTION PROG 87.5% Q69Q REFER YOU TO HEALTH AND REHAB. SERVICES 87.5% Q70 POLICE REFER YOU TO SPECIFIC SUPPORT SE 87.5% Q72 DID POLICE TRY TO GET YOU TO SOLVE PROB 87.5% Q74 DID YOU WANT POLICE TO ARREST YOUR SPOU 87.5% Q84 HOW LONG POLICE THERE: MINUTES 87.5% Q85 OFFICERS LISTEN CAREFULLY TO YOU 87.5% Q86 OFFICERS LISTEN CAREFULLY TO SPOUSE 87.5% Q87 OFFICERS TAKE SITUATION SERIOUSLY 87.5% Q88 OFFICERS WANT TO HELP 87.5% Q89 HOW SATISFIED WITH OFFICERS 87.5% Q91 AFTER POLICE LEFT, HOW SAFE 87.5% Q95 SAFE STREET UNIT OFFICER CONTACT YOU 87.5% Q69A TALK TO BOTH OF YOU 87.8% Q69L REFER YOU TO LEGAL SERVICES 87.8% Q76 DID POLICE ARREST SPOUSE AND TAKE AWAY 87.8% Q66M MOST RECENT INCIDENT: MONTH 88.1% Q66Y MOST RECENT INCIDENT: YEAR 88.1% Q66D MOST RECENT INCIDENT: DAY 88.3% Q93 POLICE LEFT: WHEN DID YOU LEAVE - MINUT 88.3% Q38 DID POLICE ARREST SUSPECT 88.6% Q116B AGE CHILD 2 NOT LIVING WITH R 88.6% Q7T HOW LONG TOGETHER BEFORE HE/YOU LEFT 89.4% Q28 GIVEN MEDICAL TREATMENT 89.4% Q30 TAKEN TO HOSPITAL 89.4% Q29 OFFERED TREATMENT BUT REFUSED 90.1% Q35A THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM YOU 90.4% Q57A THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM YOU 90.9% Q137 SPOUSE HOW MUCH FROM OTH SRCE, MONTHLY 90.9% Q7U HOW LONG: UNITS 91.2% Q37A YOU CALLED POLICE 91.2% Q61 DAMAGE PROPERTY: N TIMES 92.2% Q75 DID YOU ASK POLICE TO ARREST HIM 92.2% ======================================================================= 1 Page 26 ICPSR 6008 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q64 DAMAGE PROPERTY: WERE POLICE CALLED 92.5% Q62M DAMAGE PROPERTY: MONTH 92.7% Q62Y DAMAGE PROPERTY: YEAR 92.7% Q63 DAMAGE PROPERTY: TIME 24 HR CLOCK 92.7% Q5T HOW LONG LIVING WITH YOU SINCE INCIDENT 93.0% Q62D DAMAGE PROPERTY: DAY 93.0% Q124G OTHER SOURCE: CHILD SUPPORT 93.5% Q27I KIND OF INJURY: MINOR CUTS, BRUISES 93.8% Q92G POLICE LEFT: DID NOTHING 93.8% Q124H OTHER SOURCE: WELFARE 94.0% Q35J THREATS: KILL YOU 94.3% Q90H DIFFERENT: NOTHING 94.3% Q5U HOW LONG: UNITS 94.5% Q27J KIND OF INJURY: ACHES AND PAINS 94.8% Q9C KIND OF CONTACT: YOU WENT TO VISIT 95.1% Q35H THREATS: HUMILIATE YOU 95.3% Q77 DID YOU SEE POLICE HANDCUFF YOUR SPOUSE 95.3% Q78 DID SPOUSE THREATEN YOU AS ARRESTED 95.3% Q57J THREATS: KILL YOU 95.6% Q79 DID SPOUSE MAKE BAIL OR GO TO JAIL 95.6% Q82T HOW LONG TILL SPOUSE RETURNED 95.6% Q9G KIND OF CONTACT: OTHER 95.8% Q107 HOW LONG TALKING TO YOU - MINUTES 95.8% Q9F KIND OF CONTACT: WE MET OUTSIDE HOME 96.1% Q59A THREATS WHO CALLED POLICE: YOU 96.1% Q73 DID YOU REACH A SOLUTION TO PROBLEM 96.1% Q96 N DAYS TIL DETECTIVE CONTACT YOU 96.1% Q97 OFFICERS LANGUAGE 96.1% Q98 HOW DETECTIVE CONTACT YOU 96.1% Q100 DETECTIVE MAKE APOINTMENT FOR YOU 96.1% Q101 DETECTIVE ASK YOU ABOUT FOLLOW UP 96.1% Q102 DETECTIVE OFFER ASSISTANCE 96.1% Q103 DID YOU CONTACT ANY AGENCIES 96.1% Q106 DETECTIVE GIVE YOU BUSINESS CARD 96.1% Q108 HOW HELPFUL WAS THE INFORMATION 96.1% Q109 BETTER ABLE TO DEAL WITH PROBLEMS 96.1% Q110 HOW INTERESTED WAS DECTECTIVE 96.1% Q111 RECOMMEND SAFE STREET UNIT TO OTHERS 96.1% Q116C AGE CHILD 3 NOT LIVING WITH R 96.1% Q57H THREATS: EMBARASS OR HUMILIATE YOU 96.4% Q57E THREATS: DAMAGE PROPERTY AROUND HOUSE 96.6% Q124J OTHER SOURCE: SPOUSE/PARENT/FAMILY 96.6% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 27 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q65A DAMAGE PROP WHO CALL POLICE: YOU 96.9% Q81 HOW LONG SPOUSE IN JAIL 96.9% Q82U HOW LONG: UNITS 96.9% Q94T TIME YOU STAYED AWAY FROM YOUR HOME 97.1% Q27H KIND OF INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS, BRUISES 97.4% Q35I THREATS: KILL HIMSELF 97.7% Q57K THREATS: DO SOMETHING ELSE 97.7% Q35E THREATS: DAMAGE PROPERTY 97.9% Q35K THREATS: DO SOMETHING ELSE 97.9% Q40 N TIMES HURT OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS 97.9% Q90E DIFFERENT: BE MORE OBJECTIVE 97.9% Q90G DIFFERENT: SOMETHING ELSE 97.9% Q92A POLICE LEFT: WENT TO FRIENDS 97.9% Q94U TIME AWAY FROM HOME: UNITS 97.9% Q9D KIND OF CONTACT: HE GOT BELONGINGS 98.2% Q71 WHICH SUPPORT SERVICE/SHELTER 98.2% Q90D DIFFERENT: MAKE SUSPECT LEAVE, PERM 98.2% Q41M FIRST HURT OTHER FAMILY - MONTH 98.4% Q41D FIRST HURT OTHER FAMILY - DAY 98.4% Q41Y FIRST HURT OTHER FAMILY - YEAR 98.4% Q45 FAMILY MEMBERS HURT 98.4% Q51 POLICE CALLED DURING INCIDENT 98.4% Q80 WHO POSTED BAIL 98.4% Q90F DIFFERENT: ADVISE HIM TO SEEK HELP 98.4% Q92F POLICE LEFT: CRIED A LOT 98.4% Q105H WHY NOT: OTHER 98.4% Q27F KIND OF INJURY: BROKEN BONES 98.7% Q42 FIRST HURT OTHER FAMILY - TIME 24 HR 98.7% Q57I THREATS: KILL HIMSELF 98.7% Q83F RETURNED: MAKE UP 98.7% Q90B DIFFERENT: TALK TO SUSPECT MORE 98.7% Q92E POLICE LEFT: CALLED FRIEND 98.7% Q92H POLICE LEFT: DID SOMETHING ELSE 98.7% Q99F ASSISTANCE: INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION 98.7% Q124A OTHER SOURCE: SOCIAL SECURITY 98.7% Q136A SPOUSE OTH SRCE: SOCIAL SECURITY 98.7% Q136F SPOUSE OTH SRCE: UNEMPLOYMENT COMP 98.7% Q27E KIND OF INJURY: EYE OR TEETH INJURY 99.0% Q32A INCIDENT: HURT CHILD 99.0% Q37C FAMILY MEMBER CALL POLICE 99.0% Q57B THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM YOUR OR HIS CH 99.0% Q83G RETURNED: SOMETHING ELSE 99.0% ======================================================================= 1 Page 28 ICPSR 6008 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q90A DIFFERENT: TALK TO VICTIM MORE 99.0% Q116D AGE CHILD 4 NOT LIVING WITH R 99.0% Q136C SPOUSE OTH SRCE: VETERANS PAYMENT 99.0% Q136I SPOUSE OTH SRCE: ALIMONY 99.0% Q35B THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM CHILD 99.2% Q35F THREATS: TAKE CHILDREN AWAY 99.2% Q37D SOMEONE ELSE CALL POLICE 99.2% Q43A HURT: YOUR OR HIS CHILD 99.2% Q90C DIFFERENT: MAKE SUSPECT LEAVE, TMP 99.2% Q99D ASSISTANCE: DOMESTIC INTERVENTION PRG 99.2% Q99H ASSISTANCE: OTHER 99.2% Q9E KIND OF CONTACT: YOU GOT BELONGINGS 99.5% Q27G KIND OF INJURY: CONCUSSION 99.5% Q35D THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM FRIEND 99.5% Q37B SPOUSE CALL POLICE 99.5% Q46I FAM MBR INJURY: MINOR CUTS, BRUISES 99.5% Q47 FAMILY MEMBER GIVEN TREATMENT AT SCENE 99.5% Q49 FAMILY MEMBER TAKEN TO HOSPTAL 99.5% Q57D THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM FRIEND 99.5% Q57F THREATS: TAKE AWAY CHILDREN 99.5% Q59C THREATS WHO CALLED POLICE: FAM MBR 99.5% Q65D DAMAGE PROP WHO CALL POLICE: SOMEONE EL 99.5% Q92D POLICE LEFT: WENT TO EMER RM 99.5% Q99A ASSISTANCE: STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE 99.5% Q104D WHICH AGENCIES: DOMESTIC INTERV PRG 99.5% Q105E WHY NOT: PROCESS TAKES TOO LONG 99.5% Q124D OTHER SOURCE: PERSONAL SAVINGS 99.5% Q124E OTHER SOURCE: STOCKS AND BONDS 99.5% Q136B SPOUSE OTH SRCE: PENSION RETIREMENT 99.5% Q27A KIND OF INJURY: LOSE CONSCIOUSNESS 99.7% Q27B KIND OF INJURY: INTERNAL INJURIES 99.7% Q32C INCIDENT: HURT FRIEND 99.7% Q32D INCIDENT: HURT OTHER FAMILY MEMBER 99.7% Q43C HURT: YOUR OR HIS FRIEND 99.7% Q43D HURT: ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER 99.7% Q44 RELATIONSHIP TO YOU 99.7% Q46B FAM MBR INJURY: INTERNAL INJURY 99.7% Q46H FAM MBR INJURY: SERIOUS CUTS BRUISES 99.7% Q46J FAM MBR INJURY: ACHES AND PAINS 99.7% Q48 FAMILY MEMBER REFUSE TREATMENT 99.7% Q52A WHO CALLED POLICE: YOU 99.7% Q52C WHO CALLED POLICE: FAMILY MBR 99.7% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 29 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q59D THREATS WHO CALLED POLICE: SOMEONE ELSE 99.7% Q65C DAMAGE PROP WHO CALL POLICE: FAM MBR 99.7% Q99G ASSISTANCE: HOMESTEAD FAMILY SUPPORT 99.7% Q104A WHICH AGENCIES: STATE ATTORNEY 99.7% Q105C WHY NOT: AGENCIES TOO FAR AWAY 99.7% Q105D WHY NOT: NO MONEY FOR EXPENSES 99.7% Q105G WHY NOT: WE WORKED THINGS OUT 99.7% Q124B OTHER SOURCE: PENSION RETIREMENT 99.7% Q124C OTHER SOURCE: VETERANS PAYMENT 99.7% Q136G SPOUSE OTH SRCE: CHILD SUPPORT 99.7% Q9H KIND OF CONTACT: REFUSED 100.0% Q27C KIND OF INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q27D KIND OF INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 100.0% Q31 N DAYS IN HOSPITAL 100.0% Q32B INCIDENT: HURT PARENT 100.0% Q33 RELATIONSHIP OF PERSON TO YOU 100.0% Q35C THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM PARENT 100.0% Q35G THREATS: KILL HOUSEHOLD PET 100.0% Q43B HURT: YOUR OR HIS PARENT 100.0% Q46A FAM MBR INJURY: LOSE CONSCIOUSNESS 100.0% Q46C FAM MBR INJURY: GUNSHOT WOUND 100.0% Q46D FAM MBR INJURY: KNIFE WOUND 100.0% Q46E FAM MBR INJURY: EYE OR TEETH 100.0% Q46F FAM MBR INJURY: BROKEN BONES 100.0% Q46G FAM MBR INJURY: CONCUSSION 100.0% Q50 FAMILY MEMBER N DAYS IN HOSPITAL 100.0% Q52B WHO CALLED POLICE: SPOUSE 100.0% Q52D WHO CALLED POLICE: SOMEONE ELSE 100.0% Q57C THREATS: PHYSICALLY HARM PARENT 100.0% Q57G THREATS: INJURE OR KILL HOUSEHOLD PET 100.0% Q59B THREATS WHO CALLED POLICE: SPOUSE 100.0% Q65B DAMAGE PROP WHO CALL POLICE: SPOUSE 100.0% Q83A RETURNED: START ARGUMENT AGAIN 100.0% Q83B RETURNED: HURT YOU 100.0% Q83C RETURNED: HURT FAMILY MEMBER 100.0% Q83D RETURNED: DAMAGE PROPERTY 100.0% Q83E RETURNED: THREATEN YOU 100.0% Q92B POLICE LEFT: WENT TO SHELTER 100.0% Q92C POLICE LEFT: BAIL SPOUSE OUT 100.0% Q99B ASSISTANCE: SAFESPACE 100.0% Q99C ASSISTANCE: HEALTH REHAB SERVICES 100.0% Q99E ASSISTANCE: ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS PRG 100.0% ======================================================================= 1 Page 30 ICPSR 6008 Table 2 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q104B WHICH AGENCIES: SAFESPACE 100.0% Q104C WHICH AGENCIES: HEALTH REHAB SRV 100.0% Q104E WHICH AGENCIES: ADVOCATES FOR VICT 100.0% Q104F WHICH AGENCIES: INJUCTION 100.0% Q104G WHICH AGENCIES: HOMESTEAD FAMILY SUPP 100.0% Q104H WHICH AGENCIES: OTHER 100.0% Q105A WHY NOT: LACK TRANSPORTATION 100.0% Q105B WHY NOT: LACK OF CHILD CARE 100.0% Q105F WHY NOT: AGENCIES NOT TOO HELPFUL 100.0% Q124F OTHER SOURCE: UNEMPLOY COMP 100.0% Q124I OTHER SOURCE: ALIMONY 100.0% Q136D SPOUSE OTH SRCE: PERSONAL SAVINGS 100.0% Q136E SPOUSE OTH SRCE: STOCKS AND BONDS 100.0% Q136H SPOUSE OTH SRCE: WELFARE 100.0% Q136J SPOUSE OTH SRCE: SPOUSE/PARENT/FAMILY 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 31 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA6008.P3 Table 3: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=907) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.4% (1 of 74 variables) have 0% Missing Values 2.7% (2 of 74 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 74 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 1.4% (1 of 74 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 74 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 74 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 16.2% (12 of 74 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values Q5 INTERVR# 34.3% Q3D INTERVDATE - DAY 34.5% Q3Y INTERVDATE - YEAR 34.5% Q3M INTERVDATE - MONTH 34.6% Q11 ANXIETYCHNGE 34.7% Q13 VICTHOSTILE 34.7% Q9 INTERVLOCAT 34.8% Q10 VICTANXIETY 34.8% Q4 #ATTEMPTS 35.0% Q7 INTERVSEX 35.1% Q15 VICTINTEREST 35.1% Q20 ENDRELAX 35.1% 78.4% (58 of 74 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values Q21 INTERVRESULT 58.3% Q22M INTERVDATE - MONTH 59.5% Q22Y INTERVDATE - YEAR 59.5% Q22D INTERVDATE - DAY 59.6% Q23 #ATTEMPTS 60.0% ======================================================================= 1 Page 32 ICPSR 6008 Table 3 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q26 INTERVSEX 60.1% Q41 DETECT# 60.1% Q42 DETECTRACE 61.7% Q43 DETECTSEX 61.7% Q44 DETECTAGE 61.7% Q6 INTERVRACE 62.1% Q45M DATESSUF/U - MONTH 62.6% Q45D DATESSUF/U - DAY 62.6% Q45Y DATESSUF/U - YEAR 62.6% Q28 INTERVLOCAT 62.7% Q30 ANXIETYCHNGE 62.7% Q32 VICTHOSTILE 62.7% Q29 VICTANXIETY 62.8% Q34 VICTINTEREST 62.8% Q39 ENDRELAX 63.1% Q8 INTERVRAGE 69.3% Q24 INTERVR# 69.3% Q25 INTERVRACE 70.7% Q18 INTERRUP 71.6% Q35 DIFF/ENGLISH 71.7% Q37 INTERRUP 71.7% Q36 DIFF/QUES 71.8% Q19 BREAKOFF 72.8% Q17 DIFF/QUES 72.9% Q16 DIFF/ENGLISH 73.9% Q38 BREAKOFF 76.2% Q27 INTERVRAGE 77.2% Q47 TIMESSUSPENT - MINUTES 80.0% Q49 REFDIP 80.2% Q48 REFSAO 82.1% Q58 REFDETECTIVE 83.9% Q52 REFIFP 84.2% Q53 REFSAFESPACE 87.5% Q46 #ATTEMPTS 89.4% Q12 WHATCHNGE 90.5% Q56 REFLS 90.6% Q51 REFAFV 91.6% Q57 REFADTP 91.8% Q54 REFCFCD 92.0% Q50 REFHRS 92.1% Q55 REFHRP 92.1% Q31 WHATCHNGE 94.4% ======================================================================= 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 33 Table 3 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q33 HOWHOSTILE 94.8% Q14 HOWHOSTILE 96.8% Q60 STTSTATION 100.0% Q61H STATIONTIME - HOURS 100.0% Q61M STATIONTIME - MINUTES 100.0% Q62 STTJAIL 100.0% Q63H TTTJAIL - HOURS 100.0% Q63M TTTJAIL - MINUTES 100.0% Q64D JAILTIME - DAY 100.0% Q64M JAILTIME - MONTH 100.0% Q64Y JAILTIME - YEAR 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. 1 Page 34 ICPSR 6008 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 35 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA6008.P4 Table 4: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=908) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 32.5% (25 of 77 variables) have 0% Missing Values 7.8% (6 of 77 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 1.3% (1 of 77 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 77 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 77 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 77 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 77 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 58.4% (45 of 77 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values Q6B2Y FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SS SV - YEAR 81.8% Q6B2D FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SS SV - DAY 82.2% Q6B2M FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SS SV - MONTH 82.9% Q5B2Y MOST RECENT DOMESTIC SS SV - YEAR 85.9% Q5B2M MOST RECENT DOMESTIC SS SV - MONTH 85.9% Q5B2D MOST RECENT DOMESTIC SS SV - DAY 85.9% Q6A2Y 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SS SV - YEAR 86.6% Q6A2M 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SS SV - MONTH 86.6% Q6A2D 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SS SV - DAY 86.6% Q5A2D MOST RECENT PRIOR ASSAULT SS SV - DAY 87.7% Q5A2M MOST RECENT PRIOR ASSAULT SS SV - MONTH 87.8% Q5A2Y MOST RECENT PRIOR ASSAULT SS SV - YEAR 87.9% Q6B4M FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SAV - MONTH 93.3% Q6B4D FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SAV - DAY 93.3% Q6B4Y FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SAV - YEAR 93.4% Q5B4Y MOST RECENT DOMESTIC SAV - YEAR 96.1% Q5B4M MOST RECENT DOMESTIC SAV - MONTH 96.1% Q5B4D MOST RECENT DOMESTIC SAV - DAY 96.3% ======================================================================= 1 Page 36 ICPSR 6008 Table 4 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q6C2Y FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SS SV - YEAR 96.6% Q6C2M FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SS SV - MONTH 96.6% Q6C2D FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SS SV - DAY 96.6% Q6A4Y 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SAV - YEAR 97.5% Q6A4M 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SAV - MONTH 97.5% Q6A4D 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SAV - DAY 97.5% Q5C2Y MOST RECENT OTHER SS SV - YEAR 98.1% Q5C2M MOST RECENT OTHER SS SV - MONTH 98.1% Q5C2D MOST RECENT OTHER SS SV - DAY 98.1% Q5A4Y MOST RECENT PRIOR ASSAULT SAV - YEAR 98.2% Q5A4M MOST RECENT PRIOR ASSAULT SAV - MONTH 98.2% Q5A4D MOST RECENT PRIOR ASSAULT SAV - DAY 98.2% Q6C4Y FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SAV - YEAR 98.2% Q6C4M FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SAV - MONTH 98.2% Q6C4D FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SAV - DAY 98.2% Q6A6Y 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SS OV - YEAR 98.5% Q6A6M 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SS OV - MONTH 98.5% Q6A6D 1ST SUBSQNT ASSAULT SS OV - DAY 98.5% Q6B6Y FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SS OV - YEAR 99.7% Q6B6M FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SS OV - MONTH 99.7% Q6B6D FIRST SUBSQNT DOMESTIC SS OV - DAY 99.7% Q6C6Y FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SS OV - YEAR 99.7% Q6C6M FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SS OV - MONTH 99.7% Q6C6D FIRST SUBSQNT OTHER SS OV - DAY 99.7% Q5C4Y MOST RECENT OTHER SAV - YEAR 100.0% Q5C4M MOST RECENT OTHER SAV - MONTH 100.0% Q5C4D MOST RECENT OTHER SAV - DAY 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 37 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA6008.P5 Table 5: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=911) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 26.9% (14 of 52 variables) have 0% Missing Values 9.6% (5 of 52 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 52 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 52 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 5.8% (3 of 52 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values Q6M DATE OF LAST SEARCH - MONTH 8.1% Q6Y DATE OF LAST SEARCH - YEAR 8.2% Q6D DATE OF LAST SEARCH - DAY 8.6% 0.0% (0 of 52 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 52 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values 57.7% (30 of 52 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values Q8 DISPOSITION OF ARREST FOR PRESENTING IN 40.7% Q9Y DATE OF DISPOSITION - YEAR 48.3% Q9M DATE OF DISPOSITION - MONTH 48.3% Q11 N TIMES ARRESTED SINCE PRESENTING INC 90.8% Q12Y DATE OF FIRST SUB ARREST - YEAR 90.8% Q12M DATE OF FIRST SUB ARREST - MONTH 90.9% Q15 SUSPECT ARREST FOR CRIME AGAINST VICTIM 90.9% Q13 DISPOSITION OF FIRST SUB ARREST 91.1% Q14Y DATE OF DISPO FIRST SUB - YEAR 91.8% Q14M DATE OF DISPO FIRST SUB - MONTH 91.8% Q16 N TIMES ARRESTED SINCE PRESENTING INC 96.9% Q17Y DATE 1ST ARREST CRIME AGAINST VIC - YEA 96.9% Q17M DATE 1ST ARREST CRIME AGAINST VIC -MONT 96.9% Q18 DISPOSITION FIRST CRIME AGAINST VICTIM 96.9% ======================================================================= 1 Page 38 ICPSR 6008 Table 5 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Q20 SUSP ARR AGGRAVATED ASSAULT SINCE PI 96.9% Q25 SUSPECT ARRESTED NONAGG ASSAULT SINCE P 96.9% Q19Y DATE OF DISPO FIRST CRIME - YEAR 97.1% Q19M DATE OF DISPO FIRST CRIME - MONTH 97.1% Q26 N TIMES ARRESTED NONAGG ASSAULT SINCE P 97.4% Q27Y DATE 1ST ARREST NONAGG ASSAULT - YEAR 97.4% Q27M DATE 1ST ARREST NONAGG ASSAULT - MONTH 97.4% Q28 DISPOSITION 1ST NONAGG ASSAULT 97.4% Q29Y DATE DISPO 1ST NONAGG ASSAULT - YEAR 97.6% Q29M DATE DISPO 1ST NONAGG ASSAULT - MONTH 97.6% Q21 N TIMES ARREST AGG ASSAULT SINCE PI 99.6% Q22Y DATE 1ST SUB AGG ASSAULT ARREST -YR 99.6% Q22M DATE 1ST SUB AGG ASSAULT ARREST -MTH 99.6% Q23 DISPOSITION 1ST SUB AGGG ASSAULT 99.6% Q24Y DATE DISPO 1ST SUB AGG ASSAULT-YR 99.6% Q24M DATE DISPO 1ST SUB AGG ASSAULT-MTH 99.6% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. 1 ICPSR 6008 Page 39 DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT This report corresponds to the data file: DA6008.P6 Table 6: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=916) Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 78.8% (82 of 104 variables) have 0% Missing Values 2.9% (3 of 104 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 104 variables) have > 1% - 3% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 104 variables) have > 3% - 5% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 104 variables) have > 5% - 10% Missing Values 0.0% (0 of 104 variables) have > 10% - 20% Missing Values 3.8% (4 of 104 variables) have > 20% - 40% Missing Values HAND WEAPON USED BY SUSPECT - HAND 22.3% CUFF HANDCUFFING CIRCUMSTANCES OF SUBJECT 39.5% OFFTRA ARRESTING PO TRANSPORT SUBJECT FOR BOOK 39.6% BOOK LOCATION OF BOOKING 39.6% 14.4% (15 of 104 variables) have > 40% - 100% Missing Values RECONT VICTIM REFUSED CONTACT 51.9% TELCONT CONTACTED BY TELEPHONE ONLY 51.9% TELPER CONTACTED IN-PERSON AND BY TELEPHONE 51.9% INPER CONTACT MADE IN-PERSON ONLY 51.9% ACTIVE ACTIVE REFERRAL 51.9% PASSVE PASSIVE REFERRAL 51.9% CANT UNABLE TO CONTACT 51.9% VCOP VICTIM COOPERATION LEVEL W/DETECTIVE 53.6% FIST WEAPON USED BY SUSPECT - FIST 56.6% FEET WEAPON USED BY SUSPECT - FEET 94.7% OTH WEAPON USED BY SUSPECT - OTHER 95.9% SSRESP SAFE STREETS UNIT RESPOND 97.3% KNIFE WEAPON USED BY SUSPECT - KNIFE 99.9% ======================================================================= 1 Page 40 ICPSR 6008 Table 6 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GUN WEAPON USED BY SUSPECT - GUN 100.0% ADDRESS ADDRESS OF THE OFFENSE 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded.